Three target countries (BRA, CUW, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 3 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Many countries in the region are continuing their efforts to enhance the response capacity of primary care services. Countries such as Belize, Bolivia, Canada, Chile, and Honduras, among others, have formulated policies and strategies to improve access to primary care, support healthcare professionals, build capacities to address chronic diseases, enhance preventive and palliative care, and promote the integration of health networks, including the use of telehealth. Similarly, other countries such as Argentina, Costa Rica, Ecuador, and Guyana, have focused on strengthening governance, improving infrastructure, fostering intersectoral collaboration, and reinforcing maternal and child healthcare services. Despite these endeavors, much work remains to be done, particularly concerning the advancement of health service integration with a focus on equity. The sustained continuation of these efforts is crucial to achieving long-term impact on health outcomes.
Two baseline countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Overall, although there was a regression from the baseline, countries achieved or are on track to achieve this outcome indicator to improve children's health and development. Some countries have a national strategy on maternal and newborn health under implementation, but improved monitoring and alignment of these strategies with the WHO/UNICEF Framework are needed. Strategies for moving forward include adoption and implementation of the WHO frameworks Parenting for Lifelong Health and Global Scale for Early Childhood Development in the region.
PASB will continue supporting at-risk countries in conducting follow-up campaigns to update the vaccination status of unvaccinated children under 5 years of age. This should improve MMR-1 and MMR-2 vaccination coverage by the end of 2023. Countries report 2023 data in the first quarter of 2024 via the PAHO-WHO/UNICEF electronic Joint Immunization Data Reporting Form (eJRF).
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 3 baseline countries (BMU, NIC, KNA) and 1 target country (CRI). In addition, 1 baseline country (CUW) and 1 target country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 6 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
DPT vaccination coverage has been affected by the pandemic. Although efforts are being made to improve coverage and reduce dropout rates, the goal is to ensure that the under-vaccinated are reached.
One baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Since 2020, a decrease in vaccination coverage with the third dose of PCV vaccine has been noted. In 2023, a very slight improvement was noted compared to 2022 (81% vs. 80%). This, together with improvement in coverage of other vaccines (e.g., pentavalent), could indicate that PCV3 vaccination coverage has started to recover. It is important to closely monitor the progress of member states.
Three baseline countries (BRA, DOM, GLP) did not complete the assessment. These 3 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
The countries of the Region have made great efforts to incorporate the vaccine into their national vaccination schedules; as of December 31, 2023, only 4 countries had not introduced the HPV vaccine. 26 countries in the Region are vaccinating children and 12 countries have switched to a single-dose schedule.
One baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
The year 2022 was primarily dedicated to recovering from the negative impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, with a particular emphasis on reinstating interrupted screening procedures. The Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) has been working toward facilitating the implementation of HPV testing as the primary screening procedure, and concurrently developing comprehensive national strategies aimed at eradicating cervical cancer through HPV vaccination.
In the period spanning 2022-2023, PAHO, in collaboration with the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), worked on the CanScreen5 project, designed to comprehend the obstacles impeding the achievement of screening targets. Furthermore, they sought to devise methods to monitor progress through the utilization of standardized indicators. Subsequently, PAHO compiled and published a regional report that provides an overview of the current status of cervical cancer control within the region, utilizing all available data.
One target country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Palliative care services are an essential service as part of universal health coverage, and this indicator is a measure of access to palliative care. In 2022-2023, the PASB provided technical assistance in palliative care to all countries in the Region, through mentorship and discussion of cases through the ECHO program, as well as trained 31 young leaders from 13 countries to build HRH capacity for palliative care services in the region. Lastly, through the PAHO Strategic Fund, morphine and other pain relief medications are made available to all countries, though uptake continues to be a challenge.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 1 target country (JAM). In addition, 2 baseline countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 3 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
One target country (CUW) did not complete the assessment. This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
The mental health Gap Action Programme (mhGAP) continues to be broadly adopted across the Region to integrate evidence-based care in primary settings through non-specialist health workers.
107 MhGAP trainings were conducted in countries. 25 countries received training on the integration of MH into primary health care; 144,790 health personnel were trained. Among those countries that received training were Aruba, Saint Lucia, and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines. Increased integration of MH into primary health care can improve the continuum of care for mental health conditions. During the biennium, Belize showed an increase in mental health diagnosis at the outpatient level.
mhGAP implementation in Latin American countries showcases significant progress in key metrics, with 4,131 new trainers. For instance, Chile and Mexico have trained 5144 and 136,131 individuals respectively. Both countries have successfully integrated mhGAP into their national mental health policies. Paraguay, demonstrating notable advancement, has trained 103 individuals with 67 trainers, and successfully incorporated mhGAP into its national policy.
Two target countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Sexual violence is a particularly severe challenge in the Americas, requiring timely intervention by the health system to mitigate the consequences for survivors’ health and well-being. The need for comprehensive post-sexual assault (post-rape) care services in emergency health services is reiterated in the Strategy and Plan of Action on Strengthening the Health System to Address Violence against Women, which defines post-rape care to include:
a) First-line support and psychological first aid;
b) Emergency contraception to women who seek care within 5 days;
c) Referral to safe abortion if a woman is pregnant as a result of rape, where such services are permitted by national law;
d) Sexually transmitted infection and/or HIV post-exposure prophylaxis, per applicable protocols; and
e) Hepatitis B vaccination.
PASB has supported Member States in strengthening the health system response to sexual violence, including through improved health system protocols and health workforce training. A recent analysis of health system protocols found that text references to these essential post-rape care services remain limited. For example, 54% of Member States refer to first-line support in their protocols, while hepatitis B vaccination is mentioned by 43%, demonstrating significant gaps. While a text reference to these criteria does not necessarily mean corresponding services are readily available and accessible, it is an important starting point for them to be specifically mentioned in protocols that outline the health system’s response to violence. Importantly, one barrier in this area is the lack of health service evaluation tools to assess specific progress on post-rape care in line with established indicators. In response, PASB has collaborated with selected Member States in the development and piloting of a rapid service evaluation tool for post-sexual assault care. This tool has the potential to improve monitoring of this indicator beyond the pilot countries (Argentina, Colombia, Honduras, Peru), thereby helping to strengthen quality improvement of post-sexual assault care.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 1 target country (JAM). In addition, 1 baseline country (BRA) and 1 target country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 3 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Despite a regression from baseline, some countries are progressing toward the target. One country is classified as “at risk” as it has reported progress in increasing the capacity of interprofessional teams at the first level of care, but has not yet reached the level its model of care requires. Examples of progress in countries that are on track include PASB support in preparing technical proposals aligned with the national health reform, joint work between PASB and academia to define the composition and organization of interprofessional teams, and passing resolutions on primary health care that enable the development of interprofessional teams within countries.
The Plan of Action on Human Resources for Universal Access to Health and Universal Health Coverage 2018-2023 included the formation of interprofessional teams at the first level of care as one of its objectives, guiding countries toward achieving this goal. Additionally, the Policy on the Health Workforce 2030: Strengthening Human Resources for Health to Achieve Resilient Health Systems outlines measures to strengthen the formation of interprofessional teams and incorporate them into integrated health services networks based on primary health care as a strategic line, which will support the efforts of countries on track to meet this goal.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 1 baseline country (CHL). In addition, 1 baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Although the current rating of this indicator is “No progress” due to a regression from the baseline, regulatory systems in most countries are advancing toward maturity level 3. Examples of progress in countries that are on track to achieve the indicator include:
1) increased capacity to implement the Global Benchmarking Tool for assessing regulatory capacities,
2) increased participation in a roster of experts to assess regulatory capacities,
3) better identification of gaps, and
4) definition of institutional development plans with a view to increasing their maturity level, as per defined criteria.
Additional efforts are in place to guide and support the National Regulatory Authorities of Regional Reference from Latin America (Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Cuba, and Mexico) in their transition to become WHO-listed Authorities through a streamlined procedure that may not require full assessment of regulatory capacities, but only demonstration of their performance.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 1 target country (GUY). In addition, 1 target country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Substantial progress has been made on the evaluation of capacities and the development of action plans to strengthen the Essential Public Health Functions (EPHF). One country has already achieved this indicator, and 12 out of the 17 countries are on track to achieve it. Two countries are at risk, and two have not shown progress as a recent evaluation of the EPHF has not been completed. The countries that are on track have completed the baseline evaluation, with results showing that less than 60% of capacity is currently being met; however, they are moving forward with the implementation of action plans to improve capacity and could reach that threshold. Efforts toward strengthening leadership, governance, and institutional capacities, alongside intersectoral collaboration and technical cooperation, are contributing to the positive trajectory of this indicator.
One baseline country (CUW) and 1 target country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
At the regional level, the indicator showed progress for the target countries, for which the average public expenditure on health as a share of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) rose from 4.3% to 5.3% between 2019 and 2021. Nine countries (Argentina, Aruba, Bermudas, Canada, Colombia, Cuba, El Salvador, Montserrat, and Uruguay) have achieved this indicator, investing more than 6% of GDP in the health sector using public sources of funding. Of the 7 target countries, two (Chile and Honduras) are working to achieve the indicator, but progress is at risk. In Chile, public expenditure on health rose from 4.8% in 2019 to 5.5% in 2020 but subsequently decreased to 5.2%. On other hand, Honduras increased public expenditure on health from 2.9% to 3.4% in 2020, remaining stagnant. In terms of data collection, new data from the WHO Health Expenditure Database in 2024 will allow assessment of the progress of countries that have not fully achieved this indicator.
Two baseline countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
The number of countries that are reporting stigma data in health services has increased, but this has yet to become a systematic action to support stigma reduction and improve MSM access to health services.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 1 baseline country (MEX). In addition, 1 baseline country (BRA) and 1 target country (GUF) did not complete the assessment. These 3 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Existing post-pandemic conditions continue to negatively impact the ability of countries to effectively implement field interventions to address this problem. Better achievements are expected in the next biennium (2024-2025).
Two baseline countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Although the current rating of this indicator is “No progress”, countries have been able to address risk factors for communicable diseases through intersectoral action with the technical support provided by PASB. From the integrated public health perspective embedded in the One Health approach, countries are experiencing tangible improvements in public health outcomes. Notable advances include the implementation of national action plans for antimicrobial resistance, the development and strengthening of national food safety systems based on Codex Alimentarius, and improved access to lifesaving antivenoms through production by public health laboratories and their inclusion in the PAHO revolving funds.
Two target countries (CUW, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
During the biennium, countries in the Region made progress toward improving their food control systems to prevent and mitigate risks to food safety. PASB has provided technical guidance to countries (Brazil, Chile, Costa Rica, Cuba, Guatemala, Ecuador, Honduras, Panama, Peru, Paraguay, URU) to improve their food control systems based on the principles of risk analysis (risk management, risk assessment and risk communication).
Country achievements include the development of national food safety policies and Codex Alimentarius programs for standard-setting and implementation from farm to fork – One Health (Guatemala, Guyana, Honduras, El Salvador). Additionally, Paraguay, Dominican Republic, Colombia and Haiti are improving the capacity of their traditional food markets to prevent emerging food safety risks under the One Health approach. In the Caribbean, a survey was conducted to assess the readiness of food control systems to mitigate risks related to climate change (Saint Lucia, Trinidad and Tobago, Barbados, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Guyana, Jamaica). Based on the findings of this survey, Trinidad and Tobago and Barbados developed climate-resilient national food safety plans. One of the main challenges in achieving the indicator at country level is the high turnover of government officials. As a lesson learned, it is important to facilitate collaboration across sectors and regularly monitor the implementation of developed policies, programs, and plans. PASB has mobilized resources to improve and harmonize the food safety risk analysis capacity of countries in Latin America.
Two baseline countries did not complete the assessment (BRA, DOM). These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
An advisory committee or lead agency in road safety is crucial for coordinating efforts across various sectors such as transportation, health, education, and law enforcement, ensuring a unified and strategic approach. Additionally, it is responsible for developing and implementing evidence-based policies and regulations, such as seatbelt laws, speed limits, and measures to prevent drunk driving. A lead agency also plays a vital role in the collection and analysis of data on road traffic injuries, allowing for the identification of trends and the evaluation of intervention effectiveness. Proper resource allocation and international cooperation are other areas where such an agency can have a significant impact, adopting global best practices to enhance road safety and reduce road traffic deaths and injuries.
PAHO has provided technical support to various road safety advisory committees or lead agencies in the Region, as requested, to support their efforts in road safety management. One key area of focus is the strengthening of road safety data systems. In line with this, WHO/PAHO produced the Fifth Global Road Safety Status Report to help countries identify gaps and priorities to accelerate implementation of the recommendations of the Global Plan for the Second Decade of Action for Road Safety 2021-2030. These initiatives aim to achieve the ambitious but reachable target of reducing global road mortality and serious injuries by 50%.
Two target countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Given the high prevalence of violence in the Americas, it is crucial that Member States place a strong emphasis on prevention. Preventing violence relies on the collaboration of many government sectors and non-government stakeholders. While no single institution or actor can prevent violence, it is essential that the health sector collaborate with other partners in the prevention of violence. National or multisectoral policies and plans play an essential role in defining a country’s vision, goals, policy directions, and strategies, as well as coordination mechanisms for preventing and responding to violence. The importance of a national or multisectoral plan addressing violence that includes the health system is reiterated by the Strategy and Plan of Action on Strengthening the Health System to Address Violence against Women, as well as by the multi-agency frameworks INSPIRE and RESPECT. PASB has been supporting countries in building capacity on evidence-based strategies and interventions in the Region of the Americas so as to inform the policy-making process. While many Member States report the existence of such a national or multisectoral plan, it is important to note that several of these plans are soon to expire, stressing the urgency of advancing action in this area and sustaining the progress achieved in the last decade. Partnerships with UN Women, UNICEF, and the World Bank to strengthen implementation tools and policy dialogue on INSPIRE and RESPECT in countries, as well as preparations for the forthcoming Global Ministerial Conference on Violence against Children, set the tone for this important work, which has the potential to be scaled up in the future.
One baseline country (BRA) and 1 target country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
As of 2022, 85% of people with HIV in Latin America are diagnosed; of those, 85% are on antiretroviral therapy (ART); and of those, 92% have suppressed viral loads. In the Caribbean, 83% of people with HIV are diagnosed; of those, 81% are on ART; and of those, 84% have suppressed viral loads. ART coverage for people living with HIV in Latin America and the Caribbean increased 2.2-fold from 2010 (32%) to 2022 (71%). As part of efforts to optimize HIV treatment, PASB has been actively supporting countries in updating their national strategic plans and HIV treatment guidelines. This includes targeted assistance in several countries across the Region, including support for the optimal selection and forecasting of antiretroviral (ARV) drugs. Additionally, PASB has been supporting countries on HIV and aging, pediatric treatment, resistance, elimination, and cure. Furthermore, a newly designed WHO Collaborating Center on HIV resistance, CIENI/INER, is expected to reinforce technical cooperation.
Regarding advanced HIV disease, PASB provides technical assistance for the introduction of new tests and treatments for opportunistic infections and supports implementation research, including mortality analysis, in selected countries.
Three baseline countries (DOM, GLP, MTQ) did not complete the assessment. These 3 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
During the biennium, countries in the Region made progress in eliminating malaria or interrupting its transmission both at the national and subnational levels, as well as preventing re-establishment in malaria-free countries and receptive territories. Case investigation is being incorporated by endemic and non-endemic countries, including improvements in guidelines, instruments, and surveillance processes. These actions should integrate the efforts made so far by vertical programs with more cross-cutting epidemiologic surveillance processes and actors. Important challenges remain in this aspect of integration and in the quality of investigations. Pending improvements include the adoption of investigation in endemic territories where the small number of cases already justifies this action to accelerate elimination, as well as improvements in response. The technical cooperation that PAHO has developed in this area has been replicated with partner implementation actions, such as the RMEI initiative in Central America.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 2 baseline countries (GUY, MEX). In addition, 1 baseline country (BRA) and 1 target country (GUF) did not complete the assessment. These 4 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Despite the complexity of the Chagas disease scenario, a marked reduction in the incidence and prevalence of this parasitosis has been observed in recent decades. This decline has been sustained above all by improvements in the quality of life of affected populations, the progress achieved by national control programs, the intensification of screening and infection detection actions in blood banks, and the actions of healthcare services aimed at managing morbidity and mortality in some countries. However, the unexpected emergence of the SARS-CoV-2 virus at the end of 2019, and the subsequent measures aimed at containing it, represented a turning point for the normal functioning both of plans and programs for the prevention and control of Chagas disease and of its evaluation mechanisms, with severe knock-on effects on this set of approaches, which relies on territorial deployments of diverse configuration and purpose. The most noticeable consequences of this contingency have been:
The efforts of governments to mitigate the spread of COVID-19 meant that medical care was strictly limited for several months to urgent conditions and emergencies. This conspired against programs to diagnose, monitor, and treat Chagas disease, as evinced by the reduction of care actions for affected people, screening of pregnant women or women of reproductive age, and diagnostic confirmation, treatment, and follow-up of children born to infected mothers; all of these circumstances have partially invisible implications for health systems. The modification of health-seeking behavior by the vulnerable population (driven by fear of contagion and recommendations to stay home) was another determining factor in this regard.
Programmatic vector surveillance and control schemes were postponed due to the reassignment of health personnel to pandemic response activities and the impossibility of traveling from operating bases to the rural areas of intervention.
The financial crisis caused by the unexpected expenses required to implement COVID-19 prevention and control measures affected the regular funding of routine Chagas prevention and control programs, which are already highly expensive in relative terms.
The continuity of many international cooperation activities was compromised due to the impossibility of (or limitations on) conducting face-to-face activities.
At the end of the biennium, the activities of national Chagas programs have not managed to recover to pre-pandemic levels. All of the above means there has not been any substantial gain from baseline.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 2 baseline countries (KNA, URY). In addition, 1 baseline country (BRA) and 1 target country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 4 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
During the REDIPRA meeting held in Colombia in late 2023, significant progress was noted toward the interruption of dog-mediated human rabies transmission, following the elimination validation criteria. PAHO support – through provision of standards, generation of data, and technical cooperation – has been pivotal. Achievements include successful mass dog vaccination campaigns, enhanced public awareness, and improved surveillance systems. Many countries have reported zero human cases for multiple years; however, four countries have reported cases in the past years. Challenges remain in some countries, such as maintaining high vaccination coverage, addressing surveillance gaps, and ensuring access to post-exposure prophylaxis. Continued commitment is essential to overcome these hurdles and sustain the progress made toward eliminating canine rabies.
Honduras has made significant progress toward achieving the indicator through intersectoral coordination between health and SENASA. However, there is a need to implement mass drug administration for the control of taeniasis. In the case of Mexico, the objective is to eliminate deaths in children, morbidity in at-risk communities, and disability in children by 2030. The country has implemented important actions but needs to increase efforts in establishing baselines and evaluating surveillance activities and health promotion interventions. Colombia has incorporated PAHO/WHO recommendations for addressing and intervening in territories which meet endemicity criteria for taeniasis/cysticercosis through surveillance and mass drug administration. Paraguay and Guatemala are also on track to achieve the indicator. In 2020, Guatemala identified areas of risk for human taeniasis/cysticercosis at the departmental level. The next step is to confirm active transmission in these areas through targeted investigations and monitoring. Paraguay has made significant progress by identifying areas of risk at both national and subnational levels. The current priority is to confirm active transmission of the parasite in the identified hotspots through comprehensive field studies and diagnostics.
One baseline country (BRA) and 1 target country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Following the technical specification of the indicator, PASB recognizes that 28 countries have established capacity and effective processes to eliminate dog-mediated human rabies, showcasing significant progress in the region. PAHO contributions, including provision of standards, generation of data, and technical cooperation, have been instrumental in these achievements. Successful strategies include comprehensive dog vaccination campaigns, public awareness initiatives, and robust surveillance systems. However, several countries continue to report canine rabies, with some also reporting human cases. Lessons learned highlight the importance of sustained vaccination efforts, enhanced surveillance, and accessible post-exposure prophylaxis. Continued support and commitment are essential to address these challenges and achieve the complete elimination of dog-mediated human rabies across the region.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 1 target country (JAM). In addition, 1 baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Progress has been observed in the implementation of different WHA resolutions through legislation, national action plans, capacity-building activities, and programs addressing prioritized chemicals. However, the challenges observed in some countries highlight the need for further attention in a multisectoral environment.
Two baseline countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
The health sectors of several countries have strengthened capacities to engage with other sectors, ensuring that health is included in climate change discussions at the local, regional, and international levels. This achievement is facilitated by the appointment of designated climate change and health focal points who advocate for health inclusion in climate change inter-ministerial committees.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 3 target countries (BMU, BON, KNA). In addition, 1 baseline country (BRA) and 5 target country (DOM, GUF, MTQ, GLP, CUW) did not complete the assessment. These 9 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
The number of countries that have generated and produced analytical health reports which include disaggregated data on a regular basis has increased from 5 to 17. Additionally, countries are increasingly making these reports and other health data and information more accessible both internally and externally. Improved national health information systems and advances in digital transformation have led to increased data demand and utilization. Such data increasingly include the social determinants of health and allow countries to monitor progress and gaps. PASB provided technical cooperation through ongoing capacity-building efforts in health analysis, particularly for monitoring SDG3 indicators among interdisciplinary country teams at national and subnational levels. This has been crucial to the progress achieved for OCM 21.b. An additional 13 countries are on track to achieve this indicator.
No agreement was reached for three countries and territories. PASB assessed that the criteria as detailed on the technical note for the indicator were not met, and no documentation was submitted or otherwise available at the time of the assessment.
One baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
PASB supported Member States in the development and revision of national standards governing the ethics of research, such as laws, regulations, and national policies, with the goal of ensuring that they adhere to international ethical standards for research with human participants. The COVID-19 pandemic brought increased attention to the importance of adhering to international standards to expedite the conduct of high-impact clinical trials. Furthermore, international standards for research now include specific provisions for research in emergencies (as described in PAHO’s Catalyzing Ethical Research in Emergencies: Ethics guidance, lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic and pending agenda), and PASB supported countries in including these provisions in national standards, thus improving ethics preparedness to conduct research in future emergencies. Measuring progress in this indicator has often entailed distinguishing the ethical from the strictly regulatory oversight of research with human participants.
Seven baseline countries (BON, BRA, CUW, DOM, GLP, GUF, MTQ) did not complete the assessment. These 7 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
In the 2022-23 biennium, progress was made toward strengthening country capacity for all-hazards health emergency and disaster risk management. As of the latest assessment, 22 countries fully meet or exceed minimum capacities to manage public health risk associated with emergencies, with another 15 on track to do so. PASB's technical support, including the development of assessment tools and coordinator meetings, remains essential for achieving the 2025 target of 37 countries. Continuous monitoring and emphasis on gender-sensitive disaster preparedness, supported by tools such as the Preparedness Index for Health Emergencies and Disasters and the monitoring survey for the Plan of Action on Disaster Risk Reduction, are critical for maintaining and building on the progress made.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 3 target countries (BRB, CRI, MEX). In addition, 2 target countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 5 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
To achieve this indicator, a State Party must have improved its scores or maintained them (where the score is higher than 0%), for at least 12 of the 15 core capacities, as compared to the previous year. Three countries did not comply with the State Party Self-Assessment Reporting Tool in 2021, precluding comparison with results for the past biennium. PASB is working closely with the countries to strengthen and maintain their core capacities under the IHR, which contribute directly to global health security.
Two target countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Twelve countries achieved the indicator by the end of 2023, and another 21 were on track to do so by 2025. This indicator aims to measure and track the capacity of countries and territories to respond to major epidemics and pandemics and to ensure a rapid exchange of information about impending public health threats and, as a result, to increase confidence and trust among all parties.
PASB provided technical cooperation to improve disease surveillance systems and train health workers to strengthen preparedness for epidemics and pandemics, notably by strengthening national and regional surveillance networks and implementing the Strategy on Regional Genomic Surveillance for Epidemic and Pandemic Preparedness and Response.
One target country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Progress has been observed in advancing health equity, gender and ethnic equality in health, and human rights in the region. The continued commitment of Member States to issues of ethnicity and human rights was demonstrated by the approval of two progress reports presented at the 60th Directing Council, held 25-29 September 2023: Health and Human Rights (Resolution CD50.R8) [1] and the Strategy and Plan of Action on Ethnicity and Health 2019-2025 (CD57/13) [2]. In addition, DHE/EG collaborated with the WHO Department of Gender Equity and Rights on the resolution on Indigenous Health tabled by the Government of Brazil and approved by the 67th World Health Assembly in May 2023. Furthermore, Member States requested an update to PAHO Resolution CD52.R6, Addressing the Causes of Disparities in Health Services Access and Utilization for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Trans (LGBT) persons.
[1] https://www.paho.org/en/documents/cd50r8-health-and-human-rights
[2] https://www.paho.org/en/documents/cd5713-strategy-and-plan-action-ethnicity-and-health-2019-2025
Eight target countries (BRA, CAN, CUW, DOM, GLP, GUF, MTQ, PRI) did not complete the assessment. These 8 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
The majority of countries and territories express satisfaction with PAHO/WHO's leading role on global and regional health issues, indicating that the Organization’s efforts and initiatives are generally perceived positively across the region. This widespread satisfaction underscores PAHO/WHO's role as a leading public health authority, engaging countries and territories in the regional and global public health agenda at the highest level – politically, strategically, and technically. Efforts will continue to ensure alignment between biennial work plans and the priorities indicated by national health authorities. This commitment involves ongoing coordination and collaboration with national health authorities to tailor PAHO/WHO's biennial work plans to address the specific health challenges and priorities identified by each country.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 1 baseline country (BHS). In addition, 1 baseline country (DOM) and 5 target countries (BRA, CUW, GLP, GUF, MTQ) did not complete the assessment. These 7 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
In addition, 2 baseline countries (BRA, DOM) and 1 target country (CUW) did not complete the assessment. These 3 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Although countries continuously work to implement the IHSDN framework, some have approved policies or regulations that reinforce IHSDNs, but require time to be implemented to achieve their objectives. Technical cooperation during the next period needs to support countries in these implementation processes.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 2 target countries (CHL, PER). These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Of the target countries for 2023, only 2 achieved the indicator, as shown in a report of need for family planning satisfied by modern methods with this indicator stratified by age, ethnicity, place of residence and income (Argentina and Suriname). Four countries (Colombia, Guatemala, Honduras, and Uruguay) showed progress in achieving the indicator but do not yet disaggregate for all variables required and were thus assessed as “partially achieved”. Significant advances were made in clinical guidelines, regulations, and training of health teams. Improvements have been observed in the supply chain and in increasing the reported demand in users, among other actions, showing the political importance of this issue in the countries’ health agenda. However, there is still a lack of recent stratified data.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 1 target country (ECU). In addition, 1 target country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
This is a mixed indicator encompassing both maternal and perinatal audits. Although progress was made overall, in several countries the emphasis has been solely on maternal audits, with less attention given to perinatal audits.
The pandemic caused setbacks – including in countries that had achieved progress on this indicator – which required further attention and support from PASB. PASB remains committed to supporting countries in enhancing their perinatal audit capabilities.
Two baseline countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Despite a regression from baseline, all sixteen countries (achieved and partially achieved) have made progress in implementing strategies to increase access to quality health services for adolescents, even though this will remain an ongoing area of work. PASB’s technical cooperation includes capacity building for a standard-driven approach to adolescent health services and training of health workers through virtual and face-to-face modalities.
One target country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Countries continue to make progress in this area and are committed to advancing in this topic, some having already established equity-based targets for access and coverage of vulnerable groups. Costa Rica achieved this indicator most recently during the current evaluation period. To ensure that no one is left behind, universal health access and coverage efforts must identify and target vulnerable groups. Setting specific targets can help focus attention on and support strategic actions to reach these groups.
One baseline country (BRA) and one target country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
This is a composite indicator based on the inclusion of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) policies, the incorporation of short oral treatment for tuberculosis (bedaquiline) into national guidelines, and the use of direct-acting antivirals (DAA) for treatment of hepatitis C. While countries have made great strides in incorporating these commodities in their national policies and guidelines, it is vital to scale up access and increase the number of people receiving PrEP, bedaquiline, and DAAs, all of which can be procured through the Strategic Fund. The technical team has been promoting the scale-up of these interventions.
One baseline country (DOM) and one target country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Six countries have fully achieved the indicator, while 2 have partially met the criteria outlined in the technical specifications. For instance, in Haiti, challenges such as political instability, civil unrest, and natural disasters have hindered the implementation of interventions like mass drug administration for lymphatic filariasis and soil-transmitted helminthiasis. Guatemala conducted a serosurvey of multiple diseases using multiplex methodology and is currently analyzing its results to inform integrated actions. The delay in analysis was due to a change in government, which impacted the project's continuity.
Two baseline countries (BRA, DOM) and one target country (GUF) did not complete the assessment. These 3 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
By the end of the biennium, endemic countries had adopted policies promoted by PAHO/WHO to reduce malaria transmission and achieve elimination. Significant progress was noted in several countries, especially in Central America, through the introduction of the DTI-R strategy and the adoption of reactive and responsive interventions to accelerate elimination. Strategic partnerships with organizations such as the IDB and the Global Fund have supported the implementation of these policies, while collaboration with USAID continues to contribute to PAHO's technical cooperation.
However, significant challenges in improving coverage and implementing policies remain in all 17 endemic countries, with emphasis on addressing the barriers that persist for the affected population to access diagnosis and treatment. Challenges also persist in updating national strategic plans, improving regulations and guidelines on aspects related to the role of community health workers, and political decisions to maximize the use of RDTs. Despite these challenges, the implementation of key interventions recommended by PAHO/WHO has significantly reduced malaria cases in Venezuela, helping reverse the trend of increasing cases in the Region up to 2019.
Two target countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
DPT vaccination coverage has been affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. PASB is working to improve coverage and reduce dropout rates to ensure that under-vaccinated individuals receive the necessary immunizations.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 2 baseline countries (GUY, NIC) and 2 target countries (BOL, CRI). In addition, 2 baseline countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 6 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
While 6 out of 8 baseline countries have met the indicator, it is important to note that efforts to assess effectiveness have shifted toward SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. Studies and analyses in this regard are ongoing.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 1 baseline country (BOL). In addition, 2 baseline countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 3 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
One baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment
PASB Comments
The establishment of a single emergency care access number is crucial to streamline communication, improve response times, and enhance coordination among emergency responders. This supports Target 12 of the voluntary Global Road Safety Performance targets, which aims at ensuring that road traffic victims receive timely and effective pre-hospital care, thus improving survival rates and recovery outcomes.
The importance of having a free-to-call, single, easily recognizable, and universal (i.e., with countrywide coverage) emergency care access number cannot be overstated. This significantly enhances the effectiveness and efficiency of emergency medical services. It simplifies the process for victims and bystanders, ensuring they can quickly and easily reach the necessary emergency services without confusion or delay. This streamlined communication is essential in crisis situations, where every second counts. Furthermore, it facilitates better coordination among emergency responders, enabling them to provide timely and effective care.
Rapid access to emergency medical services is a critical component of reducing road traffic fatalities and injuries, as outlined in the Global Road Safety Performance Targets. The Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) has supported this initiative by promoting the standardization of emergency numbers across the Americas in different technical publications and by providing/incentivizing interprogrammatic technical cooperation to different countries. One example of this technical cooperation is the Emergency and Critical Care Systems Assessment (ECCSA) conducted in different countries of the Region, which has translated into the development of roadmaps to implement action priorities. ECCSA is also underway in other countries. These efforts are integral to achieving the global targets and, ultimately, saving lives.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 1 target country (VEN). In addition, 1 baseline country (BRA) and 1 target country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 3 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Countries have shown significant progress in the development and implementation of national human resources for health (HRH) policies. The first objective of the Plan of Action on Human Resources for Universal Access to Health and Universal Health Coverage 2018-2023 calls for promoting the formulation and implementation of a national policy on human resources for health at the highest level and agreed through intersectoral engagement. Some countries have already developed a national HRH policy, while others have been doing so with technical support from PAHO. Additionally, the Policy on the Health Workforce 2030: Strengthening Human Resources for Health to Achieve Resilient Health Systems recommends among its priority actions the strengthening of governance and promotion of national policies and plans for HRH, which should reinforce the work of countries that are on the path to achieving this objective.
One baseline country (BRA) and one target country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Although countries are making progress in the development of interprofessional teams at the first level of care, the indicator suffered a regression from the baseline. Greater effort is required to develop standards that define their capabilities and scope. Some of the countries that are on the path to achieving the indicator have prepared technical proposals aligned with their national health reforms and are working on ways to define the capabilities and scope of practice of interprofessional teams at the first level of care. The formation of interprofessional teams at the first level of care was one of the objectives defined in the Plan of Action on Human Resources for Universal Access to Health and Universal Health Coverage 2018-2023, which helped guide countries to achieve this challenge. Additionally, the Policy on the Health Workforce 2030: Strengthening Human Resources for Health to Achieve Resilient Health Systems recommends among its priority actions strengthening the formation and integration of interprofessional teams in integrated health services networks based on primary health care, which should reinforce the work of countries that are on the path to achieving this objective.
One baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Progress was made during the biennium toward achieving this target.
In 2021, the 59th Directing Council of PAHO established a commitment to increasing production capacity for essential medicines and health technologies and establishing a common framework for action (Resolution CD59.R3 and the corresponding policy document). In 2023, following those directives, the PASB established the Special Program on Innovation and Regional Production Platform of Medicines and Health Technologies to promote the generation of ecosystems to strengthen capacities for innovation, development, and production of health technologies. The program supports policy development, capacity building, knowledge sharing, and key stakeholder collaboration.
Challenges that remain to strengthen innovation and production capacities for health technologies include securing sustained political commitment and substantial financial investments, as well as establishing comprehensive medium- and long-term work agendas.
One baseline country (BRA) and one target country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Despite a regression from baseline, there have been major advances in defining institutional development plans (IDPs) with the aid of the Global Benchmarking Tool in many countries and territories. A comprehensive approach to promote government engagement to revisit gaps in the regulatory system is needed to help countries define their IDPs. In this regard, PASB has facilitated access to assessment tools and supported self-assessments in 15 Member States (Belize, Bolivia, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, El Salvador, Guatemala, Guyana, Honduras, Nicaragua, Panama, Paraguay, and Peru) – some of which are not currently linked to the indicator – in which political commitment to advancement of regulatory system strengthening has been prioritized. PASB provided technical cooperation to Barbados, Belize, Grenada, Guyana, Ecuador, Guatemala, and Panama to support self-assessments against the Global Benchmarking Tool (GBT) and for development and/or implementation of IDPs. Support for the monitoring of IDPs was provided to Bolivia, Ecuador, and Paraguay (which already had defined IDPs in place). Finally, training in use of the electronic tool for recording GBT results and comments (cGBT) was provided to Bolivia (15 participants) and Colombia (74 participants).
The COVID-19 pandemic seriously impacted not only the global supply chain, but also national capacities to properly plan, purchase, and distribute essential health commodities, which in many cases led to stock-out situations. However, during the 2022-2023 biennium, progress toward integrated supply chain management of medicines and other health technologies has been achieved in all countries to some extent.
Highlights include the progress in planning and the independent use of PASB tools like QUANTMET achieved in Belize and Nicaragua, the implementation of the new model for integrated supply chain management (SCM) in Paraguay, and improved governance in Cuba. All countries implemented SCM system characterization and developed systems strengthening plans (as per the two first capacities set in this indicator), Additionally, Belize and Nicaragua are implementing an integrated LMIS/ERP profile that is working and producing quality information.
Still, most countries continued to face challenges in the governance of integrated SCM systems, with segmentation and unclear roles of the different stakeholders, as well as lack of standardized documentation for management of the supply chain down to health facilities and services.
One baseline country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
PASB provided direct technical cooperation for the formulation, implementation, and review of legal and regulatory frameworks to ensure universal access to health and universal health coverage within a health promotion, health determinants, and risk reduction perspective and a comprehensive primary health approach, and considering equity, gender, human rights, and cultural diversity. This also includes enhanced engagement with legislative bodies in the region.
The challenge has been the absence of an integrative, overarching review of the legal and regulatory frameworks at national level, as most of the countries have segmented legislation that is not reviewed for consistency, applicability, and impact or periodically reviewed on a systematic basis. This kind of analysis could lead countries to a better balance on the ratio between legislation and regulations, thus allowing room for improvement and consistency in regulatory measures by allowing these two branches of government to interact better.
Best practices in legislative and regulatory techniques worldwide require that legislation, regulations, rules, and standards be reviewed and updated at least every 5 years. Therefore, some target countries will need more time to achieve this indicator. Several tools to support member states on these matters are being developed, including model legislation to be adapted according to needs and requirements.
One target country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Important progress has been made toward the achievement of this indicator, with all 11 countries achieving or partially achieving it. Argentina and Peru have most recently achieved the indicator through the establishment of national health policies, plans, and programs that protect the health of migrant population. Also, considerable efforts have been made to develop a comprehensive Information Platform on Health and Migration. Addressing the complex needs of migrant populations and ensuring their inclusion in healthcare systems do, however, remain ongoing challenges for many countries. Data collection for intervention planning is difficult, as it requires coordinated actions between affected countries.
One baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
There has been progress in developing and increasing countries’ capacity to produce health accounts (HA). Countries like Bolivia, Guatemala, and Peru have been making efforts to institutionalize this by producing new HA studies and new classifications. Peru had stopped producing official estimates in 2020 but has resumed the process and is now reporting to the WHO Global Health Expenditure Database (GHED). In terms of data collection, the WHO survey on the institutionalization of HA 2024 will provide new attributes to assess the capacity of countries to produce HA.
Two baseline countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Throughout the biennium, countries across the region started shifting from reporting AMR aggregated surveillance data to isolate-level data, which allows for a more in-depth assessment of social determinants of AMR and development of more targeted equitable interventions. ReLAVRA+ provided technical guidance and support for countries to strengthen and harmonize their capacities in phenotypic and genotypic characterization and implementation of new technologies for characterization of carbapenemases. Within the ReLAVRA+ framework, the network has implemented the protocol for Candida surveillance, to which 18 countries have adhered; of these, 8 have provided data: Argentina, Colombia, Costa Rica, Guatemala, Panama, Peru, Paraguay, and Uruguay.
One baseline country (DOM) and one target country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
PASB supported the implementation of the ENGAGE-TB approach by mapping civil society organizations that can be involved, facilitating meetings between Ministries, CSs, and other stakeholders, and providing technical assistance to the Global Fund's multi-country regional grant focused on strengthening CSs and their participation in the response. However, legal and structural barriers to meaningful civil society participation in the response have been identified, including that the primary care model has not been fully implemented and community participation is not well established.
Paraguay and Honduras have made partial progress in implementing the integrated approach for the elimination of neglected infectious diseases with the WASH (Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene) strategy. To fully achieve this indicator, PASB will work with these countries to finalize their work plans and conduct necessary training sessions.
Substantial progress has been made to improve the capacities for food control in countries in the Region. Honduras, Guatemala, El Salvador, and Guyana have developed their Codex Alimentarius programs to set and implement food safety standards from farm to fork within the One Health approach, and Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Colombia, Cuba, Chile, Guyana, Paraguay, Peru, and URU have improved their integrated AMR surveillance plans to include the food value chain. Suriname’s IHR Capacity 13 for Food Safety was assessed, and some areas of improvement have been detected. Countries’ food monitoring capacities have been improved through the technical support provided by the Inter-American Network of Food Analysis Laboratories (INFAL). PASB has provided technical guidance in risk analysis and foodborne disease surveillance regularly and on an ad-hoc basis to countries in Latin America.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 5 target countries (BHS, BRB, DMA, GUY, VEN). In addition, 1 baseline country (BRA) and 1 target country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 7 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Significant progress has been made in enabling countries to implement interventions against zoonotic diseases using a One Health approach. Many countries have achieved this indicator through enhanced intersectoral coordination, effective surveillance, prevention, and control measures. PAHO has been crucial in providing standards, producing data, and offering technical cooperation. Achievements include the establishment of national policies and integrated strategies. However, several countries still need to improve intersectoral coordination and fully implement One Health policies. Continued efforts are necessary to strengthen these areas, ensuring comprehensive and effective responses to zoonotic disease threats and preventing transmission from animals to humans.
One baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Countries continue to make significant efforts to improve surveillance and control of Chagas disease. However, countries that partially achieved or did not achieve the indicator will need to intensify efforts to reach the target.
Implementation of the SAFER package in the Region of the Americas faces many challenges. The affordability and accessibility of alcoholic beverages, as well as the attractiveness of their packaging, all limit progress toward reducing the burden of alcohol in the Americas.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 2 baseline countries (COL, MEX). In addition, 2 baseline countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 4 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
PASB supports countries in the development of policies and implementation of measures supportive of maternal, infant, and young child nutrition, including breastfeeding policies and infant and young child policies. These are guided by the Global Strategy for Infant and Young Child Feeding, the Comprehensive Implementation Plan on Maternal, Infant, and Young Child Nutrition, and other relevant guidance documents. PASB also supports initiatives such as the Baby-friendly Hospital Initiative (BFHI) and the implementation of food-based dietary guidelines.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 1 target country (CHL). In addition, 2 target countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 3 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
PASB supports countries in the development and revision of national breastfeeding or infant and young child feeding policies. PASB advocates for and supports countries in the development, implementation, and monitoring of national laws for implementing the International Code of Marketing of Breast-milk Substitutes and maternity protection policies which are supportive of breastfeeding. According to the 2024 Status report for the Code, 19 countries in the Americas have laws which include some provisions of the International Code, but of these, only two countries have laws that are substantially aligned with the Code; in nine countries, laws are moderately aligned. Support is also given for the conduct of NetCode surveys to monitor implementation of the Code. PASB acted as a facilitator for several countries in working sessions on the International Code at the Global Code Congress in 2023, and is now setting up Code Networks to facilitate the sharing of information, tools, and resources among member countries in strengthening Code implementation.
PASB has set up Baby-friendly Hospital Initiative (BFHI) networks for the Caribbean and Latin America and provides technical support to countries to implement the BFHI nationally in a sustainable way. These networks provide a forum for sharing experiences and materials and providing up-to-date information on breastfeeding. Support to countries also includes training (including online delivery and dissemination of new and updated information).
Two baseline countries (BRA, DOM) and 1 target country (GUF) did not complete the assessment. These 3 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
PASB supports Member States in the development and implementation of national policies and plans to achieve the global nutrition targets, including the reduction of stunting. PASB has developed a roadmap to guide member states in responding to all forms of malnutrition using a food and nutrition systems approach. PAHO is also part of the UN High-Level Regional Task Force to follow up on the UN Food Systems Summit of September 2021, and PAHO supports the transformation of food systems, putting health at the center.
Two baseline countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
In the Americas, violence intersects with complex trends – such as social, economic and gender inequality, migration, social and intergenerational change, organized crime, and others – which cannot be addressed in isolation. Integrated responses that actively engage different sectors and stakeholders are fundamental to ensuring the sustainability of investments. However, the involvement of diverse actors and perspectives can increase the risk of duplication and misalignment of activities. As a result, multisectoral coordination mechanisms play a key role in setting joint priorities and aligning agendas, coordinating actors, mobilizing human and financial resources, and uniting all stakeholders around the common goal of ending violence. PASB has worked with partners to strengthen the capacity for multisectoral dialogue and collaboration in countries in line with INSPIRE and RESPECT, including through multisectoral training workshops. While a substantial number of countries report having a national multisectoral coalition/task force in place to prevent and respond to violence, these mechanisms are not always set up to cover all forms of violence, thus potentially reducing their impact. Moreover, countries report challenges to keeping these mechanisms operational, which underscores the importance of strengthening access to technical support, capacity building, and other resources in future.
Two baseline countries (BRA, DOM) and 1 target country (GUF) did not complete the assessment. These 3 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Despite significant progress in implementing changes toward malaria elimination in the E2025 countries, major implementation challenges persist in these areas, especially in the countries with the highest disease burden and dispersion. In addition to the structural weaknesses of the health systems in endemic areas, financial challenges, and the aftermath of COVID-19, social factors such as gold mining, migration, and social conflicts have limited the implementation of changes by the countries; nevertheless, significant progress was made. PASB support included developing guidelines and technical tools, as well as promoting changes that were replicated by strategic partners such as the RMEI initiative. Focal pockets of transmission in a limited number of territories continue to be a factor in favor of elimination, insufficiently leveraged by decision-makers to implement high-impact interventions with the necessary structural improvements in specific locations, which would have a major impact on the national situation. Preventing the re-establishment of transmission at the subnational level is another strategy facing significant implementation challenges in the coming years.
Two baseline countries (BRA, DOM) and 1 target country (CUW) did not complete the assessment. These 3 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
As of 31 December 2023, 27 baseline countries achieved this output indicator and two partially achieved it. This assessment was conducted based on the information entered by the countries through eJRF.
One baseline country (BRA) and 1 target country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Twenty-five countries have successfully implemented plans of action for the prevention, prophylaxis, surveillance, control, and elimination of dog-mediated human rabies. PAHO has made significant contributions by providing standards, data, and technical cooperation. Achievements include comprehensive vaccination campaigns, improved surveillance systems, and effective public awareness programs. However, several countries still need to enhance their national capacities, as canine rabies cases persist, posing a continued risk for human rabies transmission. Lessons learned highlight the importance of sustained efforts in vaccination, surveillance, and access to post-exposure prophylaxis. Ongoing support is essential to strengthen these capacities and achieve the complete elimination of dog-mediated rabies.
One baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Climate Resilient Water Security Plans (CR-WSPs) developed for cities in 6 countries. PASB has supported capacity building through courses and direct technical support to develop the plans.
One baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Climate Resilient Sanitation Safety Plans (CR-SSP) developed for cities in 4 countries. PASB has supported capacity building through courses and direct technical support for the development of these plans and for their inclusion in country-level policies and regulations.
One target country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
PASB has significantly contributed to advancing actions aimed at reducing the health impacts of air pollution in the region. Following the launch of the 2021 WHO Air Quality Guidelines (AQG), PASB focused its efforts on assisting Member States in developing and maintaining air quality regulations based on these guidelines. PASB actions during the biennium included: conducting capacity-building activities on regulatory development, health impact assessments, and risk communication; preparing and implementing projects to develop integrated roadmaps on air quality, climate change, and health in Trinidad and Tobago and Central American countries; and facilitating capacity-building and use of WHO Health Impact Assessment tools related to air quality in countries such as Argentina, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, Mexico, Peru, and Central American countries. These initiatives have been carried out in collaboration with UNEP, fostering well-articulated efforts between ministries of health and the environment. Progress has been made; the indicator was achieved for Uruguay, which was not in the list of baseline or target countries during this period. Uruguay issued updated regulations on air quality and health. Chile and Brazil initiated the process in 2021-2023 and issued updated regulations during the first half of 2024 as well.
The region has made significant progress in providing access to clean household energy for cooking, thereby reducing exposure to harmful air pollutants. According to WHO, during 2019 and 2021, more than 1.9 million people in the region secured access to clean energies and technologies for cooking. PASB technical cooperation has been pivotal in achieving this progress. PASB has implemented innovative tools from WHO, such as the Household Energy Assessment Rapid Tool (HEART), in Panama, Peru, and Paraguay. Additionally, PASB has piloted the newly developed BAR-HAP tool to estimate health benefits from these energy transitions in Panama and initiated working groups in Peru, El Salvador, and Nicaragua for similar efforts. The Organization has delivered expert training sessions on air quality, household energy and health, and use of assessment tools. The Bureau has also conducted outreach and awareness activities to build capacities within the health workforce to understand the connections between health, household energy, and air pollution. This work is integrated into the PAHO Elimination Initiative.
Two baseline countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Countries have been working toward strengthening healthy settings. Annual reporting on progress in schools, housing, markets, workplaces, or universities has been limited. Nevertheless, advances shown in policy documents, progress reports on health promotion, and publications have been taken into account for this indicator. PASB supports the achievement of this indicator by developing documents such as the Health Promoting Schools guidance, conducting webinars on housing, and participating in and disseminating the Health Promoting Universities Network.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 1 baseline country (GTM). In addition, 2 baseline countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 3 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
The Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) developed the Criteria for Healthy Municipalities, Cities and Communities in the Region of the Americas to serve as a guide to local governments to strengthen action at local level on health promotion, based on the three pillars of equity, intersectoral action, and participation. The Criteria were adopted by mayors of the region during the VI Regional Meeting of Mayors for Healthy Municipalities, Cities and Communities, held in Huechuraba (Chile) in November 2023. Networks of Healthy Municipalities, Cities and Communities in the Americas continue to work toward strengthening capacities at local level for the development and implementation of policies that promote health and wellbeing.
One baseline country (BRA) and one target country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
From 2019 to 2023, initiatives for improving information systems for health (IS4H) have driven significant advances toward set targets. These efforts have focused on improving governance mechanisms, maturity assessments, regulatory frameworks, and health information architecture, and they have achieved substantial progress in enhancing data-driven health strategies regionally. The establishment of monitoring and evaluation frameworks, interinstitutional committees, and national policies for electronic health records with open data has been crucial. Significant advances include the adoption of governance mechanisms by several countries and territories, exceeding the target; use of the PASB model for maturity assessment with financial and technical support from the Inter-American Development Bank and the World Bank; and the establishment of regulatory frameworks and health information architecture by numerous countries and territories. Initiatives in data management and information technologies include the adoption of Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR) and ICD-11 standards by 17 countries and territories, as well as progress in electronic health records implementation, moving toward a more unified and efficient health data management model. Additionally, engagement with academic and professional communities and networks has strengthened health analysis and knowledge management, while innovations such as the PASB telehealth platform indicate a shift toward a more integrated approach for the co-creation of health-focused digital public goods. These advances reflect broad progress toward robust, data-informed public health strategies and policies, demonstrating an important commitment to improving health outcomes and operational efficiencies within all Member States.
Two baseline countries (BRA, DOM) and four target countries (CUW, GLP, GUF, MTQ) did not complete the assessment. These 6 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
A comprehensive maturity assessment of IS4H was conducted by PASB of progress made between 2016 and 2023. Using over 240 standardized indicators, the evaluation assessed national health information systems with respect to governance, strategy, laws, financial sustainability, human resources, data management, and quality, including vital statistics, analysis capabilities, information flows, project management, and information technology (IT) infrastructure. Information for the assessment was gathered through country visits, expert consultations, database and gap analyses, and reviews of policies, procedures, and technical documentation. Site visits allowed for direct observation of information platform use and interoperability, especially in primary care, and for data collection and interviews with frontline administrative and clinical staff.
A comprehensive report on the regional IS4H maturity assessment will be published in late 2024; however, the assessment found that 42.8% of the countries are still at level 1, “building awareness.” These countries are characterized by early adoption of health information systems, with mostly analogue data and a growing recognition of the need for digitalization. With very limited capacity to generate data and assure its quality, including on health indicators whose data source relies on civil registration and vital statistics, they depend largely on international organizations in this regard. Investments in digital health have often not expanded infrastructure as expected due to gaps in access to electricity and connectivity, as well as a lack of long-term planning and sustainable financing.
A third of the countries, 34.7%, have reached level 2, “implementing best practices.” They are developing their health information systems with data from various sources and managing health information effectively. However, they face challenges such as incomplete development of indicators, insufficient data exchange, and limited implementation of data standards and public health communication strategies. Another 18.4% have reached level 3, “standardization and continuous improvement,” reflecting advances in IS4H policies and strategies and the use of high-quality data for decision-making. Only 4.1% of countries are at level 4, “integration and alignment,” marked by highly integrated information systems that are aligned with national and international standards.
No country in the Region has reached level 5, the maximum maturity level in IS4H, which entails complete deployment of all components of the model and a constant search for innovation.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 1 baseline country (JAM). In addition, 1 baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Member States have made notable progress in implementing national strategies and plans for digital transformation, as well as the roadmap for the digital transformation of the health sector in the Region, which is fully aligned with the Global Strategy on Digital Health. A network of countries was established to promote the adoption of digital health solutions and information systems, resulting in new models and digital public goods that facilitate this transformation. Additionally, the health sector’s active participation in e-government initiatives reflects a broader commitment to optimizing technology infrastructure and converging current initiatives for a more efficient and integrated approach to health information management. Highlights of this strategic line of action include adoption of emerging technologies for personalized patient care, partnerships with financial, technical, and academic institutions for increased use of technology, and piloting of innovative digital health solutions like the PASB telehealth platform and digital COVID-19 vaccine certificates.
Progress has been made in the following areas:
a. Universal connectivity: Twelve countries have strengthened information systems and digital health strategies to enhance connectivity and bandwidth. Most of these initiatives mainly target rural areas to bridge the digital divide and expand telehealth services at the first level of care. Actions have included investing in information technology infrastructure to ensure reliable internet access and bandwidth for ensuring teleconsultations. Additionally, Member States have focused on training health care workers in these areas to efficiently use digital tools, enhancing the quality of telehealth services and patient engagement.
b. Digital public goods: In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, 17 countries have made significant progress in digitalizing vaccination certification processes. Digitalization includes creating secure, accessible digital platforms for issuing and verifying COVID-19 vaccination certificates. This not only streamlines the process but also helps combat the production of fraudulent vaccination certificates. Seven countries are implementing the PASB All-in-ONE Telehealth Platform at the first level of care.
c. Inclusive digital health: Thirty-three countries and territories engaged in discussions on the importance of data for equity and committed to reinforcing data governance mechanisms across the health sector, aiming to achieve the highest and smartest possible level of data disaggregation. Additionally, Member States reached consensus on the importance of maintaining high-quality data to reduce or eliminate biases in artificial intelligence algorithms, ensuring that these technologies serve all segments of the population fairly and effectively.
d. Interoperability: Ten countries have established national committees on health information systems for standardization; 18 countries are transitioning from ICD-10 to ICD-11. Fourteen of them are from the Caribbean and are making significant progress not only in the adoption of the ICD-11, but also its integration with electronic health record platforms. Twelve countries are adopting the Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine Clinical Terms (SNOMED) for semantic interoperability, an important factor for ensuring convergence and coordination between SNOMED and ICD-11. Seventeen countries are actively participating in the development of technological infrastructure for cross-border data exchange and interoperability.
e. Artificial intelligence: Thirteen countries have actively engaged in discussions on the role of artificial intelligence (AI) in public health. These discussions sought to assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on integrating AI into the digitalization of health care services and examining current advances in this field, share knowledge and identify needs concerning governance and ethical aspects of AI, understand the crucial elements of effectively applying AI and other subfields of AI such as machine learning and natural-language processing (including the use of generative AI solutions in public health), and present the PAHO and WHO action framework for AI application in public health. These ongoing efforts are fully integrated with current actions related to the digital transformation of the health sector in the Region.
Two baseline countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Progress has been observed in the Americas regarding the generation, circulation, and utilization of scientific and technical information, as well as the promulgation of knowledge-sharing initiatives among Members States, PASB, and stakeholders.
Overall, the impact factor of the scientific output and the number of scientific journals increased across all Member States during the period 2022-2023, with special emphasis on medicine, public health, and related topics. The publication of an average of 904 titles of scientific journals in medicine and related fields across 19 Member States demonstrates that there has been strong implementation of open-access platforms and policies, helping ensure more equitable and accessible access to scientific production in public health-related fields.
The contribution from documentation centers to LILACS reached 45 291 new documents and a total of 657 indexed scientific journals. The MedCarib database, which focuses on scientific and technical production in the Caribbean, also showed an increase in new contributions during the period. A total of 22 countries and territories are eligible to access the Research4Life (R4L) program, with 1,414 institutions registered. El Salvador became the first Member State to participate in the R4L Country Connector initiative.
By December 2023, there were 179 PAHO/WHO Collaborating Centers (CCs) distributed across 15 Member States in the Region. Two CCs (in Cuba and Brazil) are focused on knowledge management and scientific communication. PAHO/WHO CCs support the Organization in fulfilling the mandates and priorities of the Region and globally, by developing research models and evidence-based literature and providing health analysis and methodologies, among other roles.
Despite these advancements, persistent efforts to strengthen research systems, enhance knowledge sharing, and promote evidence-informed policies are needed. Institutionalizing knowledge, evidence, and science at the national level is essential, as is fostering integrated policies for information use and knowledge dissemination. Furthermore, capacity building and a continued focus on digital literacy are necessary to ensure that public health workers, decision-makers, researchers, and communities have access to the best scientific and technical information.
Two baseline countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
As per the IHR (2005), all 35 State Parties are mandated to report annually on the status of their core capacities through the State Party Self-Assessment Reporting Tool (SPAR). Compliance with this requirement demonstrates transparency and accountability among Member States and the Secretariat. PASB has supported multisectoral discussions to comply with the SPAR by developing guidance documents for the 15 core capacities, as well as country profiles using the SPAR indicators for the period 2010-2022.
Two baseline countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
In the 2022-2023 biennium, significant strides were made in health sector risk management, with 23 countries conducting national and/or subnational risk assessments to update their response plans. PASB supported this by implementing the "Emergency Risk Management in Health and Disasters" virtual course. This course trained 1,466 healthcare professionals, including 17 facilitators, on risk assessments, preparedness evaluation, and multi-threat response planning using methodologies like STAR, EDHPI, and the Multi-Threat Response Framework.
Two baseline countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Significant progress was made in the 2022-2023 biennium; 37 countries have full-time personnel dedicated to health emergencies. Training played a crucial role, with 5,682 health professionals certified in Health Facility Assessment, totaling 14 767 certified individuals. Additionally, the “Emergency Risk Management in Health and Disasters” virtual course trained 1,466 health professionals, including 17 facilitator trainers.
Two baseline countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
This indicator reports on Member States’ institutionalization to evaluate capacities during real and non-actual events once plans, mechanisms, and standard operating procedures are in place by scoring 100% in at least one of the four State Party Self-Assessment Reporting Tool indicators that reflect the country’s emergency response. PASB facilitated an IHR meeting among Small Island Developing States in Jamaica (May 2023), in which delegates concluded that most of the SPAR indicators could reach the highest level in the context of SIDS, which includes the four indicators measured under this overall output indicator.
One baseline country (DOM) and one target country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
In the 2022-2023 biennium, progress was made in enhancing the resilience and safety of healthcare facilities across the Caribbean and South America through the Resilient Hospitals Initiative. This initiative focused on the strengthening of SMART Hospitals to fortify health facilities against health emergencies and disasters, which 24 countries have launched, promoting safety, sustainability, inclusivity, and adaptability within health facilities. Technical support was instrumental in helping Caribbean countries integrate SMART standards, with notable achievements such as the evaluation of 10 facilities for A70 standards in Barbados and the modernization of eight health centers in Belize. Continuous efforts in monitoring, resource allocation, and addressing data gaps remain essential if the 2025 targets for safe and resilient healthcare infrastructure are to be met.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 1 baseline country (BHS). In addition, 2 baseline countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 3 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Surveillance and early detection systems continue to be strengthened in the region. Training activities, lab quality assessments, and reviews of lessons learned have allowed improvement of this indicator’s performance in countries.
Four baseline countries (BRA, DOM, GLP, MTQ) did not complete the assessment. These 4 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
The surveillance system for influenza and other respiratory viruses is highly robust. This system was strengthened during the COVID-19 pandemic and laid the foundation for the integration of COVID-19 surveillance in the region in 87% of countries. Within the countries that partially achieved the indicator, work continues to improve the frequency of epidemiological reporting.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 2 target countries (BHS, JAM). In addition, 2 target countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 4 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Progress has been made in most countries. However, target countries continue to show either no progress or partial achievement. PASB will redouble its efforts to examine the health equity approach in key strategic programs, policies, and plans, with particular emphasis on those countries which did not complete the assessment.
Two target countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Progress has been made in many countries; however, some continue to show either no progress or partial achievement. PASB will continue to provide support to integration of gender approaches in key strategic programs, policies, and plans, with an emphasis on countries that did not complete the assessment.
One baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Major advances have been made in the region in line with the implementation of the Strategy and Plan of Action on Ethnicity and Health 2019-2025; however, challenges remain. PASB will intensify its efforts to ensure culturally adequate approaches are taken when addressing the health needs of the diverse ethnic groups in the region.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 2 target countries (BRB, VEN). In addition, 1 baseline country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 3 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
PASB has provided technical support and promoted the right to health and other health-related rights, supporting legislative processes at national levels, including capacity building with relevant stakeholders on a variety of issues, including healthy nutrition (front-of-package nutrition labeling, trans fats and sodium, breast milk substitutes), mental health, violence (police and armed forces), LGBT+, persons with disabilities (review of a course for NGOs prepared in PAN), and elimination of diseases among persons deprived of liberty, as well as inter-programmatic work, mapping and analysis of legislation, regulations, and policies across the 33 Member States of the Region, including systematization and analysis of relevant judicial decisions, national/international human rights standards, and intellectual property discussions. Regarding lessons learned and challenges, data collection is generally a challenge, especially when it requires coordination with other authorities and branches of government (legislative and judiciary). Even if the human rights approach is sometimes politically present, inclusion of human rights norms/principles/standards in national legislation, policies, plans, programs, and mechanisms is not always reflected in operational and preventive terms. Therefore, capacities on health-related human rights perspectives and approaches should be strengthened systematically and continuously at the national level.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 1 baseline country (ECU). In addition, 1 target country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.