Three target countries (BRA, CUW, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 3 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Many countries in the region are continuing their efforts to enhance the response capacity of primary care services. Countries such as Belize, Bolivia, Canada, Chile, and Honduras, among others, have formulated policies and strategies to improve access to primary care, support healthcare professionals, build capacities to address chronic diseases, enhance preventive and palliative care, and promote the integration of health networks, including the use of telehealth. Similarly, other countries such as Argentina, Costa Rica, Ecuador, and Guyana, have focused on strengthening governance, improving infrastructure, fostering intersectoral collaboration, and reinforcing maternal and child healthcare services. Despite these endeavors, much work remains to be done, particularly concerning the advancement of health service integration with a focus on equity. The sustained continuation of these efforts is crucial to achieving long-term impact on health outcomes.
One baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
The reduction in time to diagnose and treat malaria cases is an essential indicator for actions against malaria and is one of the main focuses of PAHO's technical framework for cooperation. Early access to treatment has been the cornerstone of the regional strategy, with actions ranging from maintaining diagnostic capacity and promoting the use of rapid tests to managing antimalarials, promoting microplanning, and implementing the DTI-R strategy.
Thanks to nominal information systems, all endemic countries monitor the timing of diagnosis and treatment. While a significant number of countries reported compliance with the indicator, partial compliance by two baseline countries may affect the overall performance of the indicator. All endemic countries continue to face challenges in shortening the time between the onset of symptoms and treatment and should prioritize actions to address the barriers the population faces in accessing treatment.
However, as noted in the technical specifications, this indicator is variable and difficult to achieve in settings of low transmission, penalizing those countries that achieve significant reductions in the number of cases. As transmission is reduced, cases take longer to be detected. Therefore, it is expected that baseline countries that are reducing malaria transmission, as well as other countries achieving significant reductions in case volume, will experience difficulties in achieving the indicator by 2025, despite making progress toward elimination.
Four target countries (BRA, GUF, GLP, MTQ) did not complete the assessment. These 4 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Work is ongoing to strengthen countries’ arboviral disease surveillance capacities, facilitating the monitoring of the largest dengue epidemic ever recorded in the Americas. Significant progress has been made via operationalization of collaborative surveillance through the implementation of Virtual Collaboration Spaces. In addition, a new Integrated Surveillance Manual for Arboviral Diseases has been completed following two consultation meetings with country experts.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 1 target country (JAM). In addition, 2 baseline countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 3 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
One baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
This indicator is on track to be achieved by the target date. However, countries with historical issues of shortages and migration of health workers will probably face challenges in achieving the indicator, and therefore will require additional support from PASB.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 1 target country (JAM). In addition, 1 baseline country (BRA) and 1 target country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 3 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Despite a regression from baseline, some countries are progressing toward the target. One country is classified as “at risk” as it has reported progress in increasing the capacity of interprofessional teams at the first level of care, but has not yet reached the level its model of care requires. Examples of progress in countries that are on track include PASB support in preparing technical proposals aligned with the national health reform, joint work between PASB and academia to define the composition and organization of interprofessional teams, and passing resolutions on primary health care that enable the development of interprofessional teams within countries.
The Plan of Action on Human Resources for Universal Access to Health and Universal Health Coverage 2018-2023 included the formation of interprofessional teams at the first level of care as one of its objectives, guiding countries toward achieving this goal. Additionally, the Policy on the Health Workforce 2030: Strengthening Human Resources for Health to Achieve Resilient Health Systems outlines measures to strengthen the formation of interprofessional teams and incorporate them into integrated health services networks based on primary health care as a strategic line, which will support the efforts of countries on track to meet this goal.
Two baseline countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
The number of countries that are reporting stigma data in health services has increased, but this has yet to become a systematic action to support stigma reduction and improve MSM access to health services.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 1 baseline country (MEX). In addition, 1 baseline country (BRA) and 1 target country (GUF) did not complete the assessment. These 3 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Existing post-pandemic conditions continue to negatively impact the ability of countries to effectively implement field interventions to address this problem. Better achievements are expected in the next biennium (2024-2025).
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 2 baseline countries (GUY, MEX). In addition, 1 baseline country (BRA) and 1 target country (GUF) did not complete the assessment. These 4 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Despite the complexity of the Chagas disease scenario, a marked reduction in the incidence and prevalence of this parasitosis has been observed in recent decades. This decline has been sustained above all by improvements in the quality of life of affected populations, the progress achieved by national control programs, the intensification of screening and infection detection actions in blood banks, and the actions of healthcare services aimed at managing morbidity and mortality in some countries. However, the unexpected emergence of the SARS-CoV-2 virus at the end of 2019, and the subsequent measures aimed at containing it, represented a turning point for the normal functioning both of plans and programs for the prevention and control of Chagas disease and of its evaluation mechanisms, with severe knock-on effects on this set of approaches, which relies on territorial deployments of diverse configuration and purpose. The most noticeable consequences of this contingency have been:
The efforts of governments to mitigate the spread of COVID-19 meant that medical care was strictly limited for several months to urgent conditions and emergencies. This conspired against programs to diagnose, monitor, and treat Chagas disease, as evinced by the reduction of care actions for affected people, screening of pregnant women or women of reproductive age, and diagnostic confirmation, treatment, and follow-up of children born to infected mothers; all of these circumstances have partially invisible implications for health systems. The modification of health-seeking behavior by the vulnerable population (driven by fear of contagion and recommendations to stay home) was another determining factor in this regard.
Programmatic vector surveillance and control schemes were postponed due to the reassignment of health personnel to pandemic response activities and the impossibility of traveling from operating bases to the rural areas of intervention.
The financial crisis caused by the unexpected expenses required to implement COVID-19 prevention and control measures affected the regular funding of routine Chagas prevention and control programs, which are already highly expensive in relative terms.
The continuity of many international cooperation activities was compromised due to the impossibility of (or limitations on) conducting face-to-face activities.
At the end of the biennium, the activities of national Chagas programs have not managed to recover to pre-pandemic levels. All of the above means there has not been any substantial gain from baseline.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 2 baseline countries (KNA, URY). In addition, 1 baseline country (BRA) and 1 target country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 4 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
During the REDIPRA meeting held in Colombia in late 2023, significant progress was noted toward the interruption of dog-mediated human rabies transmission, following the elimination validation criteria. PAHO support – through provision of standards, generation of data, and technical cooperation – has been pivotal. Achievements include successful mass dog vaccination campaigns, enhanced public awareness, and improved surveillance systems. Many countries have reported zero human cases for multiple years; however, four countries have reported cases in the past years. Challenges remain in some countries, such as maintaining high vaccination coverage, addressing surveillance gaps, and ensuring access to post-exposure prophylaxis. Continued commitment is essential to overcome these hurdles and sustain the progress made toward eliminating canine rabies.
One target country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Colombia, Ecuador, Guatemala, and Mexico were verified by WHO as having eliminated onchocerciasis transmission in 2013, 2014, 2016, and 2015, respectively. Venezuela faces significant challenges in reaching mass treatment coverage in the Yanomami Area, including geographical and cultural access difficulties. Achieving the indicator by 2025 is considered unlikely.
One baseline country (BRA) and 1 target country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Following the technical specification of the indicator, PASB recognizes that 28 countries have established capacity and effective processes to eliminate dog-mediated human rabies, showcasing significant progress in the region. PAHO contributions, including provision of standards, generation of data, and technical cooperation, have been instrumental in these achievements. Successful strategies include comprehensive dog vaccination campaigns, public awareness initiatives, and robust surveillance systems. However, several countries continue to report canine rabies, with some also reporting human cases. Lessons learned highlight the importance of sustained vaccination efforts, enhanced surveillance, and accessible post-exposure prophylaxis. Continued support and commitment are essential to address these challenges and achieve the complete elimination of dog-mediated human rabies across the region.
One baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Of the countries that reported endemic measles transmission in 2019, 1 was reverified as free of endemic transmission in 2023. The other country has gone for more than 2 years without endemic measles transmission. Rubella remains an eliminated disease in the region.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 3 target countries (BMU, BON, KNA). In addition, 1 baseline country (BRA) and 5 target country (DOM, GUF, MTQ, GLP, CUW) did not complete the assessment. These 9 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
The number of countries that have generated and produced analytical health reports which include disaggregated data on a regular basis has increased from 5 to 17. Additionally, countries are increasingly making these reports and other health data and information more accessible both internally and externally. Improved national health information systems and advances in digital transformation have led to increased data demand and utilization. Such data increasingly include the social determinants of health and allow countries to monitor progress and gaps. PASB provided technical cooperation through ongoing capacity-building efforts in health analysis, particularly for monitoring SDG3 indicators among interdisciplinary country teams at national and subnational levels. This has been crucial to the progress achieved for OCM 21.b. An additional 13 countries are on track to achieve this indicator.
No agreement was reached for three countries and territories. PASB assessed that the criteria as detailed on the technical note for the indicator were not met, and no documentation was submitted or otherwise available at the time of the assessment.
Seven baseline countries (BON, BRA, CUW, DOM, GLP, GUF, MTQ) did not complete the assessment. These 7 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
In the 2022-23 biennium, progress was made toward strengthening country capacity for all-hazards health emergency and disaster risk management. As of the latest assessment, 22 countries fully meet or exceed minimum capacities to manage public health risk associated with emergencies, with another 15 on track to do so. PASB's technical support, including the development of assessment tools and coordinator meetings, remains essential for achieving the 2025 target of 37 countries. Continuous monitoring and emphasis on gender-sensitive disaster preparedness, supported by tools such as the Preparedness Index for Health Emergencies and Disasters and the monitoring survey for the Plan of Action on Disaster Risk Reduction, are critical for maintaining and building on the progress made.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 3 target countries (BRB, CRI, MEX). In addition, 2 target countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 5 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
To achieve this indicator, a State Party must have improved its scores or maintained them (where the score is higher than 0%), for at least 12 of the 15 core capacities, as compared to the previous year. Three countries did not comply with the State Party Self-Assessment Reporting Tool in 2021, precluding comparison with results for the past biennium. PASB is working closely with the countries to strengthen and maintain their core capacities under the IHR, which contribute directly to global health security.
Two target countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Twelve countries achieved the indicator by the end of 2023, and another 21 were on track to do so by 2025. This indicator aims to measure and track the capacity of countries and territories to respond to major epidemics and pandemics and to ensure a rapid exchange of information about impending public health threats and, as a result, to increase confidence and trust among all parties.
PASB provided technical cooperation to improve disease surveillance systems and train health workers to strengthen preparedness for epidemics and pandemics, notably by strengthening national and regional surveillance networks and implementing the Strategy on Regional Genomic Surveillance for Epidemic and Pandemic Preparedness and Response.
Two countries achieved the indicator by the end of 2023, and another 3 were on track to do so by 2025. This indicator tracks progress toward reducing the risk of urban yellow fever. With ≥80% vaccine coverage, the risk of urban yellow fever (large outbreaks with transmission of yellow fever virus from person to person via Aedes vector species) in endemic areas is minimized.
Eight target countries (BRA, CAN, CUW, DOM, GLP, GUF, MTQ, PRI) did not complete the assessment. These 8 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
The majority of countries and territories express satisfaction with PAHO/WHO's leading role on global and regional health issues, indicating that the Organization’s efforts and initiatives are generally perceived positively across the region. This widespread satisfaction underscores PAHO/WHO's role as a leading public health authority, engaging countries and territories in the regional and global public health agenda at the highest level – politically, strategically, and technically. Efforts will continue to ensure alignment between biennial work plans and the priorities indicated by national health authorities. This commitment involves ongoing coordination and collaboration with national health authorities to tailor PAHO/WHO's biennial work plans to address the specific health challenges and priorities identified by each country.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 1 baseline country (BHS). In addition, 1 baseline country (DOM) and 5 target countries (BRA, CUW, GLP, GUF, MTQ) did not complete the assessment. These 7 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
Two baseline countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Despite a regression from baseline, all sixteen countries (achieved and partially achieved) have made progress in implementing strategies to increase access to quality health services for adolescents, even though this will remain an ongoing area of work. PASB’s technical cooperation includes capacity building for a standard-driven approach to adolescent health services and training of health workers through virtual and face-to-face modalities.
One baseline country (BRA) and one target country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
This is a composite indicator based on the inclusion of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) policies, the incorporation of short oral treatment for tuberculosis (bedaquiline) into national guidelines, and the use of direct-acting antivirals (DAA) for treatment of hepatitis C. While countries have made great strides in incorporating these commodities in their national policies and guidelines, it is vital to scale up access and increase the number of people receiving PrEP, bedaquiline, and DAAs, all of which can be procured through the Strategic Fund. The technical team has been promoting the scale-up of these interventions.
Two baseline countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Major gains have been made in clinical management of arboviral diseases, especially dengue. Despite the most severe epidemic in recorded history, the case fatality rate remained under the target threshold of 0.05%. This improvement in clinical management notwithstanding, some countries have measured the achievement of this indicator as partially completed because they have not concluded a national adaptation of the Regional Guidance. As can be assessed by the low case fatality rate, the updated clinical guidance is being implemented throughout the Region. Four countries indicate that activities to update guidelines were halted during the epidemic but will resume in these countries during the 2024-2025 biennium.
Two baseline countries (BRA, DOM) and one target country (GUF) did not complete the assessment. These 3 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
By the end of the biennium, endemic countries had adopted policies promoted by PAHO/WHO to reduce malaria transmission and achieve elimination. Significant progress was noted in several countries, especially in Central America, through the introduction of the DTI-R strategy and the adoption of reactive and responsive interventions to accelerate elimination. Strategic partnerships with organizations such as the IDB and the Global Fund have supported the implementation of these policies, while collaboration with USAID continues to contribute to PAHO's technical cooperation.
However, significant challenges in improving coverage and implementing policies remain in all 17 endemic countries, with emphasis on addressing the barriers that persist for the affected population to access diagnosis and treatment. Challenges also persist in updating national strategic plans, improving regulations and guidelines on aspects related to the role of community health workers, and political decisions to maximize the use of RDTs. Despite these challenges, the implementation of key interventions recommended by PAHO/WHO has significantly reduced malaria cases in Venezuela, helping reverse the trend of increasing cases in the Region up to 2019.
Two target countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
DPT vaccination coverage has been affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. PASB is working to improve coverage and reduce dropout rates to ensure that under-vaccinated individuals receive the necessary immunizations.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 1 baseline country (BOL). In addition, 2 baseline countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 3 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
One baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment
PASB Comments
The establishment of a single emergency care access number is crucial to streamline communication, improve response times, and enhance coordination among emergency responders. This supports Target 12 of the voluntary Global Road Safety Performance targets, which aims at ensuring that road traffic victims receive timely and effective pre-hospital care, thus improving survival rates and recovery outcomes.
The importance of having a free-to-call, single, easily recognizable, and universal (i.e., with countrywide coverage) emergency care access number cannot be overstated. This significantly enhances the effectiveness and efficiency of emergency medical services. It simplifies the process for victims and bystanders, ensuring they can quickly and easily reach the necessary emergency services without confusion or delay. This streamlined communication is essential in crisis situations, where every second counts. Furthermore, it facilitates better coordination among emergency responders, enabling them to provide timely and effective care.
Rapid access to emergency medical services is a critical component of reducing road traffic fatalities and injuries, as outlined in the Global Road Safety Performance Targets. The Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) has supported this initiative by promoting the standardization of emergency numbers across the Americas in different technical publications and by providing/incentivizing interprogrammatic technical cooperation to different countries. One example of this technical cooperation is the Emergency and Critical Care Systems Assessment (ECCSA) conducted in different countries of the Region, which has translated into the development of roadmaps to implement action priorities. ECCSA is also underway in other countries. These efforts are integral to achieving the global targets and, ultimately, saving lives.
Two baseline countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment
PASB Comments
A milestone for a strong health-system response to violence is the existence of at least one health sector protocol which provides information on services and care to be provided to survivors of violence. These protocols are critical tools to guide high-quality health service delivery. They provide standardized guidance that ensures consistency across people and settings and over time. Protocols can also be useful to guide training and professional development of health workers, as these documents often set the expectation for the health-system response to survivors of violence. Countries may have one national sector-wide violence protocol or several ones focusing on specific forms of violence, specific settings, or specific groups of survivors. PASB has developed substantial guidance for Member States with evidence-based recommendations of what should be included in such protocols. The Organization has continued to provide support to Member States in the development, review, and updating of national guidelines on violence. While a large majority of Member States now have at least one health-sector protocol on violence, which is a considerable achievement for the Region, a recent analysis by PASB stressed that more work was needed to improve the quality of these documents. The more detailed the guidance included, the easier it is for health managers to implement and for health workers to understand exactly what is required of them, improving the quality of care for survivors in all their diversity. Moreover, while the existence of a protocol and its alignment with the evidence base and related indicators is a critical milestone, it is important that these documents be implemented and supplemented by clinical handbooks, job aids, and similar reference tools, as well as by training for health workers to support them in their day-to-day interactions with survivors.
One baseline country (BRA) and one target country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Although countries are making progress in the development of interprofessional teams at the first level of care, the indicator suffered a regression from the baseline. Greater effort is required to develop standards that define their capabilities and scope. Some of the countries that are on the path to achieving the indicator have prepared technical proposals aligned with their national health reforms and are working on ways to define the capabilities and scope of practice of interprofessional teams at the first level of care. The formation of interprofessional teams at the first level of care was one of the objectives defined in the Plan of Action on Human Resources for Universal Access to Health and Universal Health Coverage 2018-2023, which helped guide countries to achieve this challenge. Additionally, the Policy on the Health Workforce 2030: Strengthening Human Resources for Health to Achieve Resilient Health Systems recommends among its priority actions strengthening the formation and integration of interprofessional teams in integrated health services networks based on primary health care, which should reinforce the work of countries that are on the path to achieving this objective.
One baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment
PASB Comments
PASB continued to provide technical assistance to Member States in the Region of the Americas toward progressing the tobacco control agenda, including the implementation at the highest level of the four major demand-reduction measures in the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC):
1) tobacco taxes representing more than 75% of the final retail price, or the country has increased taxes in the reviewed period and has moved to the next category according to the WHO Report on the Global Tobacco Epidemic (measure R),
2) all enclosed public places, workplaces and public transportation totally smoke-free (measure P),
3) large graphic health warning covering an average of at least 50% of the front and the back of the packaging of tobacco products (measure W) and pictorial warnings covering at least 50% of the principal display areas of the outside packaging and labeling of all tobacco products, plus a ban on misleading descriptors (measure W), and
4) a total ban on all tobacco advertisement, promotion, and sponsorship (measure E).
Peru dropped out of the baseline as it did not increase taxes sufficiently during the reviewed period to move to the next category according to the WHO Report on the Global Tobacco Epidemic.
Colombia, Jamaica, and El Salvador partially achieved the indicator. However, there were significant efforts toward this in Colombia and Jamaica. In Colombia, Bill No. 274/2022 to increase tobacco taxes, including taxation of emerging nicotine and tobacco products, was filed in November 2022. At regional and country levels, PASB collaborated with international and national partners to provide technical assistance in support of the bill and to organize strategic meetings to present evidence supporting this bill, convening advisors to the bill authors and representatives of the Ministry of Finance. Tobacco industry interference has been active during the legislative process discussions and debates. While the bill was approved for further discussion at a second debate at the Plenary of the House of Representatives in 2022, it was killed in June 2024 when the legislature came to an end. It is expected to be filed again and continue its discussion and approval processes at the upcoming legislative session.
In Jamaica, PASB provided technical assistance to national at regional and country levels and presented before the Joint Select Committee, by request, in previous years since the Tobacco Control Bill was filed in 2020. In 2022, the Joint Select Committee conducted a clause-by-clause analysis of the bill, considering submissions from national stakeholders. In addition to technical assistance provided to the Ministry of Health, PASB supported communications activities by the health authority at regional and country levels, such as creating and pushing existing materials through joint media interviews (Smile Jamaica, Beyond the Headlines, Cliff Hughes on Nationwide), TV adverts, social media, and newspapers. The deliberations of the Joint Select Committee concluded in October 2022, and it was expected that the bill would be presented for voting by the end of 2022. However, the sittings planned for November and December 2022 were postponed and deliberations expected to resume in 2023 did not take place.
PASB recognized Brazil’s leadership in the Region of the Americas and worldwide as it has demonstrated the viability of implementing the four major WHO FCTC demand-reduction measures at the highest level of achievement, as well as other tobacco control policies.
In addition, other PAHO Member States, such as Bolivia and Costa Rica, are devoting efforts to tobacco control, with the latter having a bill on tobacco taxes and the former working toward the drafting and filing of a similar one, following national evidence generated on the topic. Also, through a CCHD, Bolivia, Cuba, and Panama are moving forward on tobacco control.
Two baseline countries (BRA, DOM) and 1 target country (GUF) did not complete the assessment. These 3 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
PASB supports Member States in the development and implementation of national policies and plans to achieve the global nutrition targets, including the reduction of stunting. PASB has developed a roadmap to guide member states in responding to all forms of malnutrition using a food and nutrition systems approach. PAHO is also part of the UN High-Level Regional Task Force to follow up on the UN Food Systems Summit of September 2021, and PAHO supports the transformation of food systems, putting health at the center.
Two baseline countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
In the Americas, violence intersects with complex trends – such as social, economic and gender inequality, migration, social and intergenerational change, organized crime, and others – which cannot be addressed in isolation. Integrated responses that actively engage different sectors and stakeholders are fundamental to ensuring the sustainability of investments. However, the involvement of diverse actors and perspectives can increase the risk of duplication and misalignment of activities. As a result, multisectoral coordination mechanisms play a key role in setting joint priorities and aligning agendas, coordinating actors, mobilizing human and financial resources, and uniting all stakeholders around the common goal of ending violence. PASB has worked with partners to strengthen the capacity for multisectoral dialogue and collaboration in countries in line with INSPIRE and RESPECT, including through multisectoral training workshops. While a substantial number of countries report having a national multisectoral coalition/task force in place to prevent and respond to violence, these mechanisms are not always set up to cover all forms of violence, thus potentially reducing their impact. Moreover, countries report challenges to keeping these mechanisms operational, which underscores the importance of strengthening access to technical support, capacity building, and other resources in future.
Two baseline countries (BRA, DOM) and 1 target country (GUF) did not complete the assessment. These 3 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Despite significant progress in implementing changes toward malaria elimination in the E2025 countries, major implementation challenges persist in these areas, especially in the countries with the highest disease burden and dispersion. In addition to the structural weaknesses of the health systems in endemic areas, financial challenges, and the aftermath of COVID-19, social factors such as gold mining, migration, and social conflicts have limited the implementation of changes by the countries; nevertheless, significant progress was made. PASB support included developing guidelines and technical tools, as well as promoting changes that were replicated by strategic partners such as the RMEI initiative. Focal pockets of transmission in a limited number of territories continue to be a factor in favor of elimination, insufficiently leveraged by decision-makers to implement high-impact interventions with the necessary structural improvements in specific locations, which would have a major impact on the national situation. Preventing the re-establishment of transmission at the subnational level is another strategy facing significant implementation challenges in the coming years.
Two baseline countries (BRA, DOM) and 1 target country (CUW) did not complete the assessment. These 3 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
As of 31 December 2023, 27 baseline countries achieved this output indicator and two partially achieved it. This assessment was conducted based on the information entered by the countries through eJRF.
One baseline country (BRA) and 1 target country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Twenty-five countries have successfully implemented plans of action for the prevention, prophylaxis, surveillance, control, and elimination of dog-mediated human rabies. PAHO has made significant contributions by providing standards, data, and technical cooperation. Achievements include comprehensive vaccination campaigns, improved surveillance systems, and effective public awareness programs. However, several countries still need to enhance their national capacities, as canine rabies cases persist, posing a continued risk for human rabies transmission. Lessons learned highlight the importance of sustained efforts in vaccination, surveillance, and access to post-exposure prophylaxis. Ongoing support is essential to strengthen these capacities and achieve the complete elimination of dog-mediated rabies.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 1 baseline country (GTM). In addition, 1 baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Progress has been made toward the establishment of mechanisms for community participation, with all countries achieving the indicator. The PASB has been strengthening mechanisms for community participation, for example by supporting the Network on Vulnerable Populations (EPSI.V) and the Latin American and Caribbean Confederation of Women Domestic Workers (CONLACTRAHO). PASB support includes knowledge dissemination and systematization, as well as gathering information to adapt health policies or strategies based on the needs of specific populations.
Two baseline countries (BRA, DOM) and four target countries (CUW, GLP, GUF, MTQ) did not complete the assessment. These 6 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
A comprehensive maturity assessment of IS4H was conducted by PASB of progress made between 2016 and 2023. Using over 240 standardized indicators, the evaluation assessed national health information systems with respect to governance, strategy, laws, financial sustainability, human resources, data management, and quality, including vital statistics, analysis capabilities, information flows, project management, and information technology (IT) infrastructure. Information for the assessment was gathered through country visits, expert consultations, database and gap analyses, and reviews of policies, procedures, and technical documentation. Site visits allowed for direct observation of information platform use and interoperability, especially in primary care, and for data collection and interviews with frontline administrative and clinical staff.
A comprehensive report on the regional IS4H maturity assessment will be published in late 2024; however, the assessment found that 42.8% of the countries are still at level 1, “building awareness.” These countries are characterized by early adoption of health information systems, with mostly analogue data and a growing recognition of the need for digitalization. With very limited capacity to generate data and assure its quality, including on health indicators whose data source relies on civil registration and vital statistics, they depend largely on international organizations in this regard. Investments in digital health have often not expanded infrastructure as expected due to gaps in access to electricity and connectivity, as well as a lack of long-term planning and sustainable financing.
A third of the countries, 34.7%, have reached level 2, “implementing best practices.” They are developing their health information systems with data from various sources and managing health information effectively. However, they face challenges such as incomplete development of indicators, insufficient data exchange, and limited implementation of data standards and public health communication strategies. Another 18.4% have reached level 3, “standardization and continuous improvement,” reflecting advances in IS4H policies and strategies and the use of high-quality data for decision-making. Only 4.1% of countries are at level 4, “integration and alignment,” marked by highly integrated information systems that are aligned with national and international standards.
No country in the Region has reached level 5, the maximum maturity level in IS4H, which entails complete deployment of all components of the model and a constant search for innovation.
Two baseline countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Progress has been observed in the Americas regarding the generation, circulation, and utilization of scientific and technical information, as well as the promulgation of knowledge-sharing initiatives among Members States, PASB, and stakeholders.
Overall, the impact factor of the scientific output and the number of scientific journals increased across all Member States during the period 2022-2023, with special emphasis on medicine, public health, and related topics. The publication of an average of 904 titles of scientific journals in medicine and related fields across 19 Member States demonstrates that there has been strong implementation of open-access platforms and policies, helping ensure more equitable and accessible access to scientific production in public health-related fields.
The contribution from documentation centers to LILACS reached 45 291 new documents and a total of 657 indexed scientific journals. The MedCarib database, which focuses on scientific and technical production in the Caribbean, also showed an increase in new contributions during the period. A total of 22 countries and territories are eligible to access the Research4Life (R4L) program, with 1,414 institutions registered. El Salvador became the first Member State to participate in the R4L Country Connector initiative.
By December 2023, there were 179 PAHO/WHO Collaborating Centers (CCs) distributed across 15 Member States in the Region. Two CCs (in Cuba and Brazil) are focused on knowledge management and scientific communication. PAHO/WHO CCs support the Organization in fulfilling the mandates and priorities of the Region and globally, by developing research models and evidence-based literature and providing health analysis and methodologies, among other roles.
Despite these advancements, persistent efforts to strengthen research systems, enhance knowledge sharing, and promote evidence-informed policies are needed. Institutionalizing knowledge, evidence, and science at the national level is essential, as is fostering integrated policies for information use and knowledge dissemination. Furthermore, capacity building and a continued focus on digital literacy are necessary to ensure that public health workers, decision-makers, researchers, and communities have access to the best scientific and technical information.
Two baseline countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
As per the IHR (2005), all 35 State Parties are mandated to report annually on the status of their core capacities through the State Party Self-Assessment Reporting Tool (SPAR). Compliance with this requirement demonstrates transparency and accountability among Member States and the Secretariat. PASB has supported multisectoral discussions to comply with the SPAR by developing guidance documents for the 15 core capacities, as well as country profiles using the SPAR indicators for the period 2010-2022.
Two baseline countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Significant progress was made in the 2022-2023 biennium; 37 countries have full-time personnel dedicated to health emergencies. Training played a crucial role, with 5,682 health professionals certified in Health Facility Assessment, totaling 14 767 certified individuals. Additionally, the “Emergency Risk Management in Health and Disasters” virtual course trained 1,466 health professionals, including 17 facilitator trainers.
Two baseline countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
This indicator reports on Member States’ institutionalization to evaluate capacities during real and non-actual events once plans, mechanisms, and standard operating procedures are in place by scoring 100% in at least one of the four State Party Self-Assessment Reporting Tool indicators that reflect the country’s emergency response. PASB facilitated an IHR meeting among Small Island Developing States in Jamaica (May 2023), in which delegates concluded that most of the SPAR indicators could reach the highest level in the context of SIDS, which includes the four indicators measured under this overall output indicator.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 1 baseline country (BHS). In addition, 2 baseline countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 3 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Surveillance and early detection systems continue to be strengthened in the region. Training activities, lab quality assessments, and reviews of lessons learned have allowed improvement of this indicator’s performance in countries.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 2 target countries (BHS, JAM). In addition, 2 target countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 4 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Progress has been made in most countries. However, target countries continue to show either no progress or partial achievement. PASB will redouble its efforts to examine the health equity approach in key strategic programs, policies, and plans, with particular emphasis on those countries which did not complete the assessment.
Two target countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Progress has been made in many countries; however, some continue to show either no progress or partial achievement. PASB will continue to provide support to integration of gender approaches in key strategic programs, policies, and plans, with an emphasis on countries that did not complete the assessment.
One baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Major advances have been made in the region in line with the implementation of the Strategy and Plan of Action on Ethnicity and Health 2019-2025; however, challenges remain. PASB will intensify its efforts to ensure culturally adequate approaches are taken when addressing the health needs of the diverse ethnic groups in the region.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 1 baseline country (ECU). In addition, 1 target country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.