Three target countries (BRA, CUW, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 3 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Many countries in the region are continuing their efforts to enhance the response capacity of primary care services. Countries such as Belize, Bolivia, Canada, Chile, and Honduras, among others, have formulated policies and strategies to improve access to primary care, support healthcare professionals, build capacities to address chronic diseases, enhance preventive and palliative care, and promote the integration of health networks, including the use of telehealth. Similarly, other countries such as Argentina, Costa Rica, Ecuador, and Guyana, have focused on strengthening governance, improving infrastructure, fostering intersectoral collaboration, and reinforcing maternal and child healthcare services. Despite these endeavors, much work remains to be done, particularly concerning the advancement of health service integration with a focus on equity. The sustained continuation of these efforts is crucial to achieving long-term impact on health outcomes.
One baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Overall, the countries are mostly on track with their development of actions to prevent care dependence. The Decade of Healthy Aging movement was seen as an important opportunity to advance this agenda, encouraging countries to implement actions that are conducive to integrated care and intersectoral actions, especially concerning enabling environments and the protection of older adults' rights.
Three baseline countries (BRA, DOM, GLP) did not complete the assessment. These 3 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
The countries of the Region have made great efforts to incorporate the vaccine into their national vaccination schedules; as of December 31, 2023, only 4 countries had not introduced the HPV vaccine. 26 countries in the Region are vaccinating children and 12 countries have switched to a single-dose schedule.
One baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Countries in the region are moving toward implementing standardized, evidence-based protocols to improve the quality of diabetes care. However, in parallel with these efforts, the prevalence of obesity, one of the main risk factors for diabetes, continues to increase. This challenge makes it difficult to stop the sustained increase in diabetes, reflecting the need to redouble efforts and move toward a joint, integrated, and comprehensive response to diabetes and other non-communicable diseases and risk factors. Additionally, the need for updated, standardized, and internationally comparable population data makes it difficult to evaluate the progress achieved with this indicator. Strengthening population surveillance systems for non-communicable diseases, including diabetes, would have a positive effect on the monitoring of this indicator.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 1 target country (MEX). In addition, 1 target country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Countries in the region, including those at risk, are making structural changes regarding the procurement of medicines and validated blood pressure devices, as well as adopting standardized treatment protocols to help expand access to quality care from the primary health care setting and improve hypertension control rates. However, the adoption of systematic quality improvement methodologies to improve hypertension management is still incipient in the region and must be accompanied by monitoring and evaluation systems designed to enable primary health care teams to monitor and correct deviations in their own performance. Additionally, a lack of updated population-level data limits the ability to accurately gauge progress.
One baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
The year 2022 was primarily dedicated to recovering from the negative impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, with a particular emphasis on reinstating interrupted screening procedures. The Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) has been working toward facilitating the implementation of HPV testing as the primary screening procedure, and concurrently developing comprehensive national strategies aimed at eradicating cervical cancer through HPV vaccination.
In the period spanning 2022-2023, PAHO, in collaboration with the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), worked on the CanScreen5 project, designed to comprehend the obstacles impeding the achievement of screening targets. Furthermore, they sought to devise methods to monitor progress through the utilization of standardized indicators. Subsequently, PAHO compiled and published a regional report that provides an overview of the current status of cervical cancer control within the region, utilizing all available data.
One target country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Palliative care services are an essential service as part of universal health coverage, and this indicator is a measure of access to palliative care. In 2022-2023, the PASB provided technical assistance in palliative care to all countries in the Region, through mentorship and discussion of cases through the ECHO program, as well as trained 31 young leaders from 13 countries to build HRH capacity for palliative care services in the region. Lastly, through the PAHO Strategic Fund, morphine and other pain relief medications are made available to all countries, though uptake continues to be a challenge.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 1 target country (JAM). In addition, 2 baseline countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 3 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 1 baseline country (CHL). In addition, 1 baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Although the current rating of this indicator is “No progress” due to a regression from the baseline, regulatory systems in most countries are advancing toward maturity level 3. Examples of progress in countries that are on track to achieve the indicator include:
1) increased capacity to implement the Global Benchmarking Tool for assessing regulatory capacities,
2) increased participation in a roster of experts to assess regulatory capacities,
3) better identification of gaps, and
4) definition of institutional development plans with a view to increasing their maturity level, as per defined criteria.
Additional efforts are in place to guide and support the National Regulatory Authorities of Regional Reference from Latin America (Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Cuba, and Mexico) in their transition to become WHO-listed Authorities through a streamlined procedure that may not require full assessment of regulatory capacities, but only demonstration of their performance.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 1 target country (CHL). In addition, 1 target country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
PASB continues to cooperate with Member States in the development, adoption, and implementation of national radiation safety plans in accordance with the International Basic Safety Standards (BSS). While most Member States are using the BSS when establishing or updating national rules or regulations and have employed operational criteria in the field of radiation safety, it will take time for them to make the necessary changes to existing national radiation protection systems in order to fully comply with BSS requirements. The target is expected to be achieved by the end of 2025.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 2 target countries (CHL, CRI). In addition, 1 baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. These 3 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
PASB continues to provide technical cooperation to countries (including some not included as targets for 2025) in developing mechanisms and official systems to monitor the quality of pharmaceutical services, as part of Integrated Health Services Delivery Networks. Brazil and El Salvador are both making progress in developing mechanisms to monitor the quality of pharmacies. While there was no agreement for two target countries on the specific rating of the indicator, advances were recognized in both cases.
One baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Important advances have been made in the Region toward the institutionalization of health technology assessments (HTA) as a tool to inform decision-making related to the incorporation of health technologies into health systems. Five countries have already achieved the indicator, and 3 are on track to achieve it (Chile, Costa Rica, and El Salvador). PASB has been supporting Member States through technical cooperation to develop institutional frameworks, public policies, methodological documents, and capacity building. As the Secretariat of the Regional HTA Network (RedETSA), PASB has been promoting collaboration and information exchange among the 21 participating countries. Only one country is at risk, but PASB is working with the national health authorities to help them achieve the indicator by 2025.
One baseline country (CUW) and 1 target country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
At the regional level, the indicator showed progress for the target countries, for which the average public expenditure on health as a share of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) rose from 4.3% to 5.3% between 2019 and 2021. Nine countries (Argentina, Aruba, Bermudas, Canada, Colombia, Cuba, El Salvador, Montserrat, and Uruguay) have achieved this indicator, investing more than 6% of GDP in the health sector using public sources of funding. Of the 7 target countries, two (Chile and Honduras) are working to achieve the indicator, but progress is at risk. In Chile, public expenditure on health rose from 4.8% in 2019 to 5.5% in 2020 but subsequently decreased to 5.2%. On other hand, Honduras increased public expenditure on health from 2.9% to 3.4% in 2020, remaining stagnant. In terms of data collection, new data from the WHO Health Expenditure Database in 2024 will allow assessment of the progress of countries that have not fully achieved this indicator.
Two baseline countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Although the current rating of this indicator is “No progress”, countries have been able to address risk factors for communicable diseases through intersectoral action with the technical support provided by PASB. From the integrated public health perspective embedded in the One Health approach, countries are experiencing tangible improvements in public health outcomes. Notable advances include the implementation of national action plans for antimicrobial resistance, the development and strengthening of national food safety systems based on Codex Alimentarius, and improved access to lifesaving antivenoms through production by public health laboratories and their inclusion in the PAHO revolving funds.
Two target countries (CUW, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
During the biennium, countries in the Region made progress toward improving their food control systems to prevent and mitigate risks to food safety. PASB has provided technical guidance to countries (Brazil, Chile, Costa Rica, Cuba, Guatemala, Ecuador, Honduras, Panama, Peru, Paraguay, URU) to improve their food control systems based on the principles of risk analysis (risk management, risk assessment and risk communication).
Country achievements include the development of national food safety policies and Codex Alimentarius programs for standard-setting and implementation from farm to fork – One Health (Guatemala, Guyana, Honduras, El Salvador). Additionally, Paraguay, Dominican Republic, Colombia and Haiti are improving the capacity of their traditional food markets to prevent emerging food safety risks under the One Health approach. In the Caribbean, a survey was conducted to assess the readiness of food control systems to mitigate risks related to climate change (Saint Lucia, Trinidad and Tobago, Barbados, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Guyana, Jamaica). Based on the findings of this survey, Trinidad and Tobago and Barbados developed climate-resilient national food safety plans. One of the main challenges in achieving the indicator at country level is the high turnover of government officials. As a lesson learned, it is important to facilitate collaboration across sectors and regularly monitor the implementation of developed policies, programs, and plans. PASB has mobilized resources to improve and harmonize the food safety risk analysis capacity of countries in Latin America.
Two target countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Most target Member States have demonstrated political commitment to the elimination of industrially produced trans fatty acids from their food supply. Continued PASB efforts to support them in securing the adoption of PAHO/WHO best practices to achieve such elimination suggest the indicator is on track, provided that Member States' commitments translate into policy action in 2024.
Two baseline countries did not complete the assessment (BRA, DOM). These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
An advisory committee or lead agency in road safety is crucial for coordinating efforts across various sectors such as transportation, health, education, and law enforcement, ensuring a unified and strategic approach. Additionally, it is responsible for developing and implementing evidence-based policies and regulations, such as seatbelt laws, speed limits, and measures to prevent drunk driving. A lead agency also plays a vital role in the collection and analysis of data on road traffic injuries, allowing for the identification of trends and the evaluation of intervention effectiveness. Proper resource allocation and international cooperation are other areas where such an agency can have a significant impact, adopting global best practices to enhance road safety and reduce road traffic deaths and injuries.
PAHO has provided technical support to various road safety advisory committees or lead agencies in the Region, as requested, to support their efforts in road safety management. One key area of focus is the strengthening of road safety data systems. In line with this, WHO/PAHO produced the Fifth Global Road Safety Status Report to help countries identify gaps and priorities to accelerate implementation of the recommendations of the Global Plan for the Second Decade of Action for Road Safety 2021-2030. These initiatives aim to achieve the ambitious but reachable target of reducing global road mortality and serious injuries by 50%.
Two target countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Given the high prevalence of violence in the Americas, it is crucial that Member States place a strong emphasis on prevention. Preventing violence relies on the collaboration of many government sectors and non-government stakeholders. While no single institution or actor can prevent violence, it is essential that the health sector collaborate with other partners in the prevention of violence. National or multisectoral policies and plans play an essential role in defining a country’s vision, goals, policy directions, and strategies, as well as coordination mechanisms for preventing and responding to violence. The importance of a national or multisectoral plan addressing violence that includes the health system is reiterated by the Strategy and Plan of Action on Strengthening the Health System to Address Violence against Women, as well as by the multi-agency frameworks INSPIRE and RESPECT. PASB has been supporting countries in building capacity on evidence-based strategies and interventions in the Region of the Americas so as to inform the policy-making process. While many Member States report the existence of such a national or multisectoral plan, it is important to note that several of these plans are soon to expire, stressing the urgency of advancing action in this area and sustaining the progress achieved in the last decade. Partnerships with UN Women, UNICEF, and the World Bank to strengthen implementation tools and policy dialogue on INSPIRE and RESPECT in countries, as well as preparations for the forthcoming Global Ministerial Conference on Violence against Children, set the tone for this important work, which has the potential to be scaled up in the future.
One baseline country (DOM) and one target country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
The Report of the PAHO High-Level Commission on Mental Health and COVID-19 and the new Strategy for Improving Mental Health and Suicide Prevention provide the vision and the recommended actions for increased technical cooperation in MH in the Region. Several countries have started to take important actions to improve and reform their mental health systems. The recommendations of the Commission emphasize the importance of intersectoral work and integration of mental health into all areas of government to better face the long-term crisis of mental health in the Americas. In the area of suicide prevention, comprehensive strategies aligned with global best practices were developed with the support of PAHO, including the promotion of intersectoral collaboration and policy developments. For instance, PAHO helped Uruguay establish a multi-stakeholder network for suicide prevention across healthcare, education, social services, and civil society. Prioritized policy recommendations have also been formulated. Bolivia targeted action across societal, community, relationship, and individual levels based on the WHO LIVE LIFE framework.
Furthermore, 70 media professionals were trained on responsible reporting on suicide in Guyana (25), Barbados (22), and Grenada (23).
One baseline country (BRA) and 1 target country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
As of 2022, 85% of people with HIV in Latin America are diagnosed; of those, 85% are on antiretroviral therapy (ART); and of those, 92% have suppressed viral loads. In the Caribbean, 83% of people with HIV are diagnosed; of those, 81% are on ART; and of those, 84% have suppressed viral loads. ART coverage for people living with HIV in Latin America and the Caribbean increased 2.2-fold from 2010 (32%) to 2022 (71%). As part of efforts to optimize HIV treatment, PASB has been actively supporting countries in updating their national strategic plans and HIV treatment guidelines. This includes targeted assistance in several countries across the Region, including support for the optimal selection and forecasting of antiretroviral (ARV) drugs. Additionally, PASB has been supporting countries on HIV and aging, pediatric treatment, resistance, elimination, and cure. Furthermore, a newly designed WHO Collaborating Center on HIV resistance, CIENI/INER, is expected to reinforce technical cooperation.
Regarding advanced HIV disease, PASB provides technical assistance for the introduction of new tests and treatments for opportunistic infections and supports implementation research, including mortality analysis, in selected countries.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 2 baseline countries (KNA, URY). In addition, 1 baseline country (BRA) and 1 target country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 4 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
During the REDIPRA meeting held in Colombia in late 2023, significant progress was noted toward the interruption of dog-mediated human rabies transmission, following the elimination validation criteria. PAHO support – through provision of standards, generation of data, and technical cooperation – has been pivotal. Achievements include successful mass dog vaccination campaigns, enhanced public awareness, and improved surveillance systems. Many countries have reported zero human cases for multiple years; however, four countries have reported cases in the past years. Challenges remain in some countries, such as maintaining high vaccination coverage, addressing surveillance gaps, and ensuring access to post-exposure prophylaxis. Continued commitment is essential to overcome these hurdles and sustain the progress made toward eliminating canine rabies.
One baseline country (BRA) and 1 target country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Following the technical specification of the indicator, PASB recognizes that 28 countries have established capacity and effective processes to eliminate dog-mediated human rabies, showcasing significant progress in the region. PAHO contributions, including provision of standards, generation of data, and technical cooperation, have been instrumental in these achievements. Successful strategies include comprehensive dog vaccination campaigns, public awareness initiatives, and robust surveillance systems. However, several countries continue to report canine rabies, with some also reporting human cases. Lessons learned highlight the importance of sustained vaccination efforts, enhanced surveillance, and accessible post-exposure prophylaxis. Continued support and commitment are essential to address these challenges and achieve the complete elimination of dog-mediated human rabies across the region.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 1 baseline country (COL). In addition, 1 baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Progress has been made toward the achievement of this indicator through implementation of the Special Initiative for Action on Social Determinants of Health Equity in Chile, Colombia, Peru, and Costa Rica. Work is being carried out with the ministries of health of Chile and Colombia within this framework to integrate the social determinants of health and equity approach into their health reforms. In addition, work is being carried out with 16 local governments in the four countries of the Initiative to implement the social determinants approach in their policies and programs. Finally, progress has been made in the design and implementation of social determinants of health monitoring systems (by 2023, the mapping of all available sources of information measuring social determinants in Chile, Colombia, Peru, and Costa Rica was completed, which will feed into the PAHO's monitoring prototype).
Two baseline countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
The health sectors of several countries have strengthened capacities to engage with other sectors, ensuring that health is included in climate change discussions at the local, regional, and international levels. This achievement is facilitated by the appointment of designated climate change and health focal points who advocate for health inclusion in climate change inter-ministerial committees.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 1 baseline country (COL). In addition, 1 baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Progress has been made in promoting health and wellbeing and reducing health inequities by implementing the Health in All Policies (HiAP) framework. In 2022, Member States adopted Resolution CE170.R12 on the Policy for Recovering Progress toward the Sustainable Development Goals with Equity through Action on the Social Determinants of Health and Intersectoral Work, which has among its strategic lines of action “promote intersectoral action to address the indivisible goals of the 2030 Agenda, integrating equity as a cross-cutting value”. The first regional meeting on intersectoral action and HiAP for health equity was held in 2023, with the participation of over 20 countries of the Americas, resulting in the creation of the Network on Intersectoral Work and Social Participation for Health Equity in the Americas (TIPSESA). Additionally, the PASB will launch 3 virtual courses to strengthen capacities for development of intersectoral action and HiAP, aimed at both the health sector and other sectors, and for different levels of government. A proposal of indicators to monitor Intersectoral Action will also be developed.
One baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
From 2019 to 2023, substantial progress has been made in Information Systems for Health (IS4H) through the adoption of initiatives that have enabled countries to advance toward the targets. A key achievement has been the significant progress in implementing interoperable information systems for health that include subnational disaggregation at all levels, which is crucial for effective data-driven decision-making. Other notable accomplishments include the adoption of governance mechanisms, the use of the PASB model for maturity assessments supported by the Inter-American Development Bank and the World Bank, and the establishment of regulatory frameworks. Importantly, 17 countries and territories have adopted the Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR) and ICD-11 standards, indicating progress in electronic health records and data management. A comprehensive maturity assessment of IS4H was conducted by PASB of progress made between 2016 to 2023, using over 240 standardized indicators to evaluate national health information systems in areas such as governance, strategy, laws, financial sustainability, human resources, data quality, and IT infrastructure. Findings revealed that 42.8% of countries are at the initial maturity level, 34.7% are implementing best practices, 18.4% are standardizing and continuously improving, and only 4.1% have highly integrated systems. No country has reached the maximum maturity level, indicating ongoing challenges and areas for improvement.
Significant advances have been made toward the digital transformation of the health sector, aligned with the Global Strategy on Digital Health. A network of countries has been established to promote digital health solutions and information systems, facilitating the adoption of emerging technologies and innovative digital health solutions such as the PASB telehealth platform and digital COVID-19 vaccine certificates. The health sector's active participation in e-government initiatives reflects a broader commitment to optimizing technology infrastructure and converging current initiatives for a more efficient approach to health information management. In alignment with United Nations recommendations, notable progress has been achieved in several areas, particularly in implementing interoperable information systems for health that include subnational disaggregation. This effort has been essential in enhancing data-driven health strategies regionally. Twelve countries have improved connectivity and bandwidth, particularly in rural areas, to expand telehealth services and enhance IT infrastructure. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, 17 countries have digitalized vaccination certification processes, and seven countries are implementing the PASB All-in-ONE Telehealth Platform. Thirty-three countries and territories have demonstrated commitment to data governance and achieving high levels of data disaggregation to reduce biases in artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms. Ten countries have established national committees on health information systems, 18 countries are transitioning to ICD-11, and 12 countries are adopting the Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine (SNOMED) for semantic interoperability. Additionally, 17 countries are actively developing technological infrastructure for cross-border data exchange and interoperability. Thirteen countries are engaging in discussions on the role of AI in public health, focusing on governance, ethical aspects, and the application of AI technologies.
These initiatives reflect a broad commitment to improving health outcomes and operational efficiencies, demonstrating the importance of robust, data-informed public health strategies and policies across the Region. This indicator is a key metric for building more resilient health systems and enabling health systems to ensure that no one is left behind. Countries’ commitment to having more detailed and inclusive data supports stronger, more responsive primary health care systems that can adapt to diverse needs and challenges, ultimately promoting equitable health for all.
One baseline country (BRA) and one target country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Moving toward robust institutional capacity of the science, evidence, and applied knowledge ecosystems, evidence-informed policy and practice programs are being implemented in 15 countries, in alignment with regional initiatives and other key priorities: Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, El Salvador, Jamaica, Mexico, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Trinidad and Tobago, and Venezuela. There has also been progress as evidenced by 20 countries participating in the PAHO/WHO regional joint meeting of the Evidence-Informed Policy Network (EVIPNET) and Health Technology Assessment Network of the Americas (REDETSA), which took place in Jamaica in October 2023. The BIGG-REC database efficiently organizes over 3,500 current WHO and PAHO recommendations for easy access in four languages. Through 3 courses on the Virtual Campus, decision-makers and healthcare professionals in 28 countries received training in development of systematic reviews, evidence-based guidelines, and evidence-informed policies, engaging more than 20 000 participants. A PAHO Handbook for Adapting and Implementing Evidence-Informed Guidelines Second Edition was developed with the participation of 15 Member States and has been disseminated and used for guideline adaptation by national guideline programs.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 3 target countries (BMU, BON, KNA). In addition, 1 baseline country (BRA) and 5 target country (DOM, GUF, MTQ, GLP, CUW) did not complete the assessment. These 9 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
The number of countries that have generated and produced analytical health reports which include disaggregated data on a regular basis has increased from 5 to 17. Additionally, countries are increasingly making these reports and other health data and information more accessible both internally and externally. Improved national health information systems and advances in digital transformation have led to increased data demand and utilization. Such data increasingly include the social determinants of health and allow countries to monitor progress and gaps. PASB provided technical cooperation through ongoing capacity-building efforts in health analysis, particularly for monitoring SDG3 indicators among interdisciplinary country teams at national and subnational levels. This has been crucial to the progress achieved for OCM 21.b. An additional 13 countries are on track to achieve this indicator.
No agreement was reached for three countries and territories. PASB assessed that the criteria as detailed on the technical note for the indicator were not met, and no documentation was submitted or otherwise available at the time of the assessment.
One baseline country (BRA) and one target country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Progress has been observed in the Americas regarding the generation, circulation, and utilization of scientific and technical information, as well as the promulgation of knowledge-sharing initiatives among Members States, PASB, and stakeholders.
Overall, the impact factor of the scientific output and the number of journals increased across all Member States during the period 2022-2023, with special emphasis on medicine, public health, and related topics. The increase in implementation of open-access platforms and policies helped ensure more equitable and accessible access to scientific production in public health-related fields.
The contribution from documentation centers to regional databases such as LILACS, MedCarib, and other open-access platforms worldwide has also increased. A total of 22 countries and territories are eligible to access the Research4Life (R4L) program, and there has been an increase in the number of registered institutions, which have helped to meet the need for more equitable access to scientific and technical information and to reduce the digital divide across the Region. El Salvador became the first Member State to participate in the R4L Country Connector initiative.
Despite a slight decrease in the number of new designations and re-designations, PAHO/WHO Collaborating Centers (CC) have proven to be an important mechanism of technical cooperation. PAHO/WHO CCs support the Organization in fulfilling the mandates and priorities of the Region and globally, by developing research models and evidence-based literature and providing health analysis and methodologies. By December 2023, there were 179 CCs in the Region, distributed across 15 Member States.
Despite these advancements, persistent efforts to strengthen research systems, enhance knowledge sharing, and promote evidence-informed policies are needed. Institutionalizing knowledge, evidence, and science at the national level is essential, as is fostering integrated policies for information use and knowledge dissemination. Furthermore, capacity building and a continued focus on digital literacy are necessary to ensure that public health workers, decision-makers, researchers, and communities have access to the best scientific and technical information.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for one baseline country (GUY) and 4 target countries (CUB, ECU, JAM, MEX). In addition, one baseline country (DOM) and one target country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. These 7 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Achieving this outcome indicator involves continuously monitoring and supporting national policies and agendas for health research and promoting their alignment with the Policy on Research for Health (CD49/10) and WHO’s Strategy on Research for Health (WHA 58.34). PASB also supports countries to assess and report on financial flows for health research. This process often requires intersectoral action, because while priorities are usually set by the health sector, funding is frequently allocated by other sectors, such as science and technology.
In addition to providing direct technical cooperation, PASB has issued technical documents and a checklist to assist countries in developing a national policy or agenda on health research. PAHO also collaborates with WHO’s Global Observatory on Research for Health and Development, harmonizing indicators with those monitored by WHO, UN, UNESCO, and OECD to improve consistency and reduce the reporting burden on countries. PAHO collates this information on a public website and works with WHO, Member States, and data providers to keep the data updated.
One baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
PASB supported Member States in the development and revision of national standards governing the ethics of research, such as laws, regulations, and national policies, with the goal of ensuring that they adhere to international ethical standards for research with human participants. The COVID-19 pandemic brought increased attention to the importance of adhering to international standards to expedite the conduct of high-impact clinical trials. Furthermore, international standards for research now include specific provisions for research in emergencies (as described in PAHO’s Catalyzing Ethical Research in Emergencies: Ethics guidance, lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic and pending agenda), and PASB supported countries in including these provisions in national standards, thus improving ethics preparedness to conduct research in future emergencies. Measuring progress in this indicator has often entailed distinguishing the ethical from the strictly regulatory oversight of research with human participants.
Seven baseline countries (BON, BRA, CUW, DOM, GLP, GUF, MTQ) did not complete the assessment. These 7 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
In the 2022-23 biennium, progress was made toward strengthening country capacity for all-hazards health emergency and disaster risk management. As of the latest assessment, 22 countries fully meet or exceed minimum capacities to manage public health risk associated with emergencies, with another 15 on track to do so. PASB's technical support, including the development of assessment tools and coordinator meetings, remains essential for achieving the 2025 target of 37 countries. Continuous monitoring and emphasis on gender-sensitive disaster preparedness, supported by tools such as the Preparedness Index for Health Emergencies and Disasters and the monitoring survey for the Plan of Action on Disaster Risk Reduction, are critical for maintaining and building on the progress made.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 3 target countries (BRB, CRI, MEX). In addition, 2 target countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 5 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
To achieve this indicator, a State Party must have improved its scores or maintained them (where the score is higher than 0%), for at least 12 of the 15 core capacities, as compared to the previous year. Three countries did not comply with the State Party Self-Assessment Reporting Tool in 2021, precluding comparison with results for the past biennium. PASB is working closely with the countries to strengthen and maintain their core capacities under the IHR, which contribute directly to global health security.
Two target countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Twelve countries achieved the indicator by the end of 2023, and another 21 were on track to do so by 2025. This indicator aims to measure and track the capacity of countries and territories to respond to major epidemics and pandemics and to ensure a rapid exchange of information about impending public health threats and, as a result, to increase confidence and trust among all parties.
PASB provided technical cooperation to improve disease surveillance systems and train health workers to strengthen preparedness for epidemics and pandemics, notably by strengthening national and regional surveillance networks and implementing the Strategy on Regional Genomic Surveillance for Epidemic and Pandemic Preparedness and Response.
One target country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Progress has been observed in advancing health equity, gender and ethnic equality in health, and human rights in the region. The continued commitment of Member States to issues of ethnicity and human rights was demonstrated by the approval of two progress reports presented at the 60th Directing Council, held 25-29 September 2023: Health and Human Rights (Resolution CD50.R8) [1] and the Strategy and Plan of Action on Ethnicity and Health 2019-2025 (CD57/13) [2]. In addition, DHE/EG collaborated with the WHO Department of Gender Equity and Rights on the resolution on Indigenous Health tabled by the Government of Brazil and approved by the 67th World Health Assembly in May 2023. Furthermore, Member States requested an update to PAHO Resolution CD52.R6, Addressing the Causes of Disparities in Health Services Access and Utilization for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Trans (LGBT) persons.
[1] https://www.paho.org/en/documents/cd50r8-health-and-human-rights
[2] https://www.paho.org/en/documents/cd5713-strategy-and-plan-action-ethnicity-and-health-2019-2025
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 1 baseline country (BHS). In addition, 1 baseline country (DOM) and 5 target countries (BRA, CUW, GLP, GUF, MTQ) did not complete the assessment. These 7 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
In addition, 2 baseline countries (BRA, DOM) and 1 target country (CUW) did not complete the assessment. These 3 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Although countries continuously work to implement the IHSDN framework, some have approved policies or regulations that reinforce IHSDNs, but require time to be implemented to achieve their objectives. Technical cooperation during the next period needs to support countries in these implementation processes.
One baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Although there has been important progress in the region, with several countries already having a national quality policy or strategy in place, there has been a regression from the baseline. Therefore, efforts must continue in other countries if the indicator is to be achieved.
Additionally, all countries face challenges in the implementation, monitoring, and assessment of these policies or strategies.
PASB aims to focus its technical cooperation on supporting countries with technical guidance and facilitating exchanges so they can learn from the experiences of other countries, particularly from successful experiences achieved during complex processes.
One baseline country (BRA) and one target country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
This is a composite indicator based on the inclusion of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) policies, the incorporation of short oral treatment for tuberculosis (bedaquiline) into national guidelines, and the use of direct-acting antivirals (DAA) for treatment of hepatitis C. While countries have made great strides in incorporating these commodities in their national policies and guidelines, it is vital to scale up access and increase the number of people receiving PrEP, bedaquiline, and DAAs, all of which can be procured through the Strategic Fund. The technical team has been promoting the scale-up of these interventions.
Two target countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
DPT vaccination coverage has been affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. PASB is working to improve coverage and reduce dropout rates to ensure that under-vaccinated individuals receive the necessary immunizations.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 1 baseline country (BOL). In addition, 2 baseline countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 3 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 1 target country (GUY). In addition, 2 baseline countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 3 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
One target country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Several countries are initiating or expanding information and monitoring systems. For instance, Chile developed a database which tracks diagnosed cases and service referrals to analyze gaps. Similar surveillance efforts are underway in countries like Argentina.
Two baseline countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment
PASB Comments
A milestone for a strong health-system response to violence is the existence of at least one health sector protocol which provides information on services and care to be provided to survivors of violence. These protocols are critical tools to guide high-quality health service delivery. They provide standardized guidance that ensures consistency across people and settings and over time. Protocols can also be useful to guide training and professional development of health workers, as these documents often set the expectation for the health-system response to survivors of violence. Countries may have one national sector-wide violence protocol or several ones focusing on specific forms of violence, specific settings, or specific groups of survivors. PASB has developed substantial guidance for Member States with evidence-based recommendations of what should be included in such protocols. The Organization has continued to provide support to Member States in the development, review, and updating of national guidelines on violence. While a large majority of Member States now have at least one health-sector protocol on violence, which is a considerable achievement for the Region, a recent analysis by PASB stressed that more work was needed to improve the quality of these documents. The more detailed the guidance included, the easier it is for health managers to implement and for health workers to understand exactly what is required of them, improving the quality of care for survivors in all their diversity. Moreover, while the existence of a protocol and its alignment with the evidence base and related indicators is a critical milestone, it is important that these documents be implemented and supplemented by clinical handbooks, job aids, and similar reference tools, as well as by training for health workers to support them in their day-to-day interactions with survivors.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 1 target country (VEN). In addition, 1 baseline country (BRA) and 1 target country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 3 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Countries have shown significant progress in the development and implementation of national human resources for health (HRH) policies. The first objective of the Plan of Action on Human Resources for Universal Access to Health and Universal Health Coverage 2018-2023 calls for promoting the formulation and implementation of a national policy on human resources for health at the highest level and agreed through intersectoral engagement. Some countries have already developed a national HRH policy, while others have been doing so with technical support from PAHO. Additionally, the Policy on the Health Workforce 2030: Strengthening Human Resources for Health to Achieve Resilient Health Systems recommends among its priority actions the strengthening of governance and promotion of national policies and plans for HRH, which should reinforce the work of countries that are on the path to achieving this objective.
One baseline country (BRA) and one target country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Although countries are making progress in the development of interprofessional teams at the first level of care, the indicator suffered a regression from the baseline. Greater effort is required to develop standards that define their capabilities and scope. Some of the countries that are on the path to achieving the indicator have prepared technical proposals aligned with their national health reforms and are working on ways to define the capabilities and scope of practice of interprofessional teams at the first level of care. The formation of interprofessional teams at the first level of care was one of the objectives defined in the Plan of Action on Human Resources for Universal Access to Health and Universal Health Coverage 2018-2023, which helped guide countries to achieve this challenge. Additionally, the Policy on the Health Workforce 2030: Strengthening Human Resources for Health to Achieve Resilient Health Systems recommends among its priority actions strengthening the formation and integration of interprofessional teams in integrated health services networks based on primary health care, which should reinforce the work of countries that are on the path to achieving this objective.
Two baseline countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.Dos países de línea de base (BRA, DOM) no completaron la evaluación. Estos 2 países no se tuvieron en cuenta en la evaluación general del indicador.
PASB Comments
Out of 13 countries, 12 achieved this indicator and Mexico reported having partially achieved it. PASB is currently supporting Mexico in the development of a national pharmaceutical policy. At the regional level, data was collected from 20 Member States through a survey on access to medicines and other health technologies, which allowed PASB to identify access gaps and needs for technical cooperation, as well as to prepare the final report for Resolution CD55.R12 on Access and Rational Use of Strategic and High-cost Medicines and other Health Technologies.
One baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Progress was made during the biennium toward achieving this target.
In 2021, the 59th Directing Council of PAHO established a commitment to increasing production capacity for essential medicines and health technologies and establishing a common framework for action (Resolution CD59.R3 and the corresponding policy document). In 2023, following those directives, the PASB established the Special Program on Innovation and Regional Production Platform of Medicines and Health Technologies to promote the generation of ecosystems to strengthen capacities for innovation, development, and production of health technologies. The program supports policy development, capacity building, knowledge sharing, and key stakeholder collaboration.
Challenges that remain to strengthen innovation and production capacities for health technologies include securing sustained political commitment and substantial financial investments, as well as establishing comprehensive medium- and long-term work agendas.
One baseline country (BRA) and one target country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Despite a regression from baseline, there have been major advances in defining institutional development plans (IDPs) with the aid of the Global Benchmarking Tool in many countries and territories. A comprehensive approach to promote government engagement to revisit gaps in the regulatory system is needed to help countries define their IDPs. In this regard, PASB has facilitated access to assessment tools and supported self-assessments in 15 Member States (Belize, Bolivia, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, El Salvador, Guatemala, Guyana, Honduras, Nicaragua, Panama, Paraguay, and Peru) – some of which are not currently linked to the indicator – in which political commitment to advancement of regulatory system strengthening has been prioritized. PASB provided technical cooperation to Barbados, Belize, Grenada, Guyana, Ecuador, Guatemala, and Panama to support self-assessments against the Global Benchmarking Tool (GBT) and for development and/or implementation of IDPs. Support for the monitoring of IDPs was provided to Bolivia, Ecuador, and Paraguay (which already had defined IDPs in place). Finally, training in use of the electronic tool for recording GBT results and comments (cGBT) was provided to Bolivia (15 participants) and Colombia (74 participants).
One baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Five baseline countries were able to maintain achievement of the indicator. Costa Rica, a target country, has partially achieved it. Work with local authorities to implement policies and strategies that promote competition through the use of generics, thus increasing access to medicines, must continue. To better understand the needs of the Member States, a consultation was held to prepare the final report of Resolution CD55.R12 on Access and rational use of strategic and high-cost medicines and other health technologies, which covers several topics, including policies and strategies for generic medicines. The results of this final report will provide a better understanding of needs and thus inform the technical cooperation that PASB provides to Member States in the future in a more targeted and timely manner.
One baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. This one country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
PASB has been providing the necessary technical cooperation to Member States on policies and pricing strategies for medicines and health technologies by supporting and strengthening the technical teams of local authorities. Of the seven countries reported, six were able to achieve or maintain the indicator and one has achieved it partially. Work will continue on defining the actors involved and competencies required for future achievement. Price-related policies and strategies are very dynamic issues that should respond to the different market configurations of each Member States, and should thus be subject to continuous evaluation. Therefore, a consultation has been conducted since the end of 2023 to prepare the final report of Resolution CD55.R12 on Access and rational use of strategic and high-cost medicines and other health technologies, which covers several topics, including pricing policies and strategies. The results of this final report will provide greater clarity on needs to inform the technical cooperation that PASB provides to Member States in the future in a more targeted and timely manner.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 1 target country (COL). In addition, 1 baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
PASB continues to collaborate with Member States in the development, adoption, and implementation of national radiation safety plans in accordance with the International Basic Safety Standards (BSS). While most Member States are using the BSS when establishing or updating national rules or regulations and have employed operational criteria in the field of radiation safety, it will take time for them to make the necessary changes to existing national radiation protection systems in order to fully comply with BSS requirements. The indicator is expected to be achieved in the next biennium.
One baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
PASB continues to support Member States in developing mechanisms and establishing quality standards for pharmaceutical services as part of health systems. In collaboration with multiple stakeholders from different countries, PASB finished the regional tool to assess indicators of quality in such services. PASB continues to encourage countries to adopt the proposed methodology in whole or in part, particularly for Costa Rica, El Salvador, and Uruguay, where technical cooperation will continue to be provided in the next biennium.
Two baseline countries (BRA, CUW) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Countries made progress toward achieving the indicator. Guidelines on quality, a course on good manufacturing practices, and several seminars on improving blood services have been developed.
One baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Countries are moving toward compliance with the indicator. The implementation of the regional strategy and action plan for donation and equitable access to organ, tissue, and cell transplantation is advancing in most Latin American and in some Caribbean countries. PASB has provided data through progress reporting on the strategy, regional seminars, and annual follow-up meetings.
One baseline country (BRA) and one target country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
All baseline and target countries achieved the indicator, which is consistent with national and regional progress on health technology assessment (HTA) and evidence-based incorporation of health technologies in the last years. These advances were evident in the Final Report of Resolution CSP28.R9 (2022) and the data collected in 2023 through a survey on high-cost medicines and other health technologies, which included indicators on HTA. PASB provided technical cooperation to develop institutional frameworks, public policies, methodological documents, and capacity building. Among several achievements, we can highlight the establishment of HTA entities in Peru, and Uruguay.
PASB supported Member States addressing ethical issues in public health through the publication of training material, the development of courses, the development of ethics guidance for emergency situations (such as the emergency use of unproven interventions outside of research, known as the MEURI framework, and the ethical conduct of mpox surveillance), and direct support for their implementation. Support was also provided to address issues that became prominent as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, e.g., the ethical acceptability of vaccination mandates. Because of the pervasive nature of ethical challenges in public health, ethics support to Member States was embedded in the technical cooperation provided in other areas, e.g. immunization, surveillance, and emergency response.
Two baseline countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
During the biennium, countries conducted comprehensive communications campaigns to support AMR awareness efforts. These campaigns utilized various channels including webinars, social media, radio spots, and infographics with targeted messages. Events such as World Hand Hygiene Day and World Antimicrobial Awareness Week (WAAW) served as platforms to amplify these campaigns, with WAAW messages garnering 34,538 views. Moreover, the “Communities Empowered to Tackle AMR” platform was launched, fostering open and diverse dialogue, sharing best practices, and promoting community engagement under National Action Plans (NAPs) for AMR. This initiative was nominated and selected as a UN best practice in South-South cooperation for development.
Two baseline countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
During the biennium, countries strengthened their Infection Prevention and Control (IPC) programs, including their capacity to respond to multidrug-resistant organism outbreaks in healthcare facilities. PASB directed efforts toward supporting countries to consolidate their IPC and antimicrobial stewardship programs to enhance the effectiveness of local interventions. Countries also strengthened the coordination between National Reference Labs and national IPC programs for rapid detection and response to emerging resistant mechanisms.
One baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Throughout the biennium, countries continued the formalization of multisectoral AMR committees to ensure that AMR National Action Plans receive proper funding for sustainability of key AMR activities. As per TrACCS 2023, 90% of countries in the region have formalized AMR multisectoral committees for the implementation of their AMR National Action Plans.
Two baseline countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Throughout the biennium, countries across the region started shifting from reporting AMR aggregated surveillance data to isolate-level data, which allows for a more in-depth assessment of social determinants of AMR and development of more targeted equitable interventions. ReLAVRA+ provided technical guidance and support for countries to strengthen and harmonize their capacities in phenotypic and genotypic characterization and implementation of new technologies for characterization of carbapenemases. Within the ReLAVRA+ framework, the network has implemented the protocol for Candida surveillance, to which 18 countries have adhered; of these, 8 have provided data: Argentina, Colombia, Costa Rica, Guatemala, Panama, Peru, Paraguay, and Uruguay.
Substantial progress has been made to improve the capacities for food control in countries in the Region. Honduras, Guatemala, El Salvador, and Guyana have developed their Codex Alimentarius programs to set and implement food safety standards from farm to fork within the One Health approach, and Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Colombia, Cuba, Chile, Guyana, Paraguay, Peru, and URU have improved their integrated AMR surveillance plans to include the food value chain. Suriname’s IHR Capacity 13 for Food Safety was assessed, and some areas of improvement have been detected. Countries’ food monitoring capacities have been improved through the technical support provided by the Inter-American Network of Food Analysis Laboratories (INFAL). PASB has provided technical guidance in risk analysis and foodborne disease surveillance regularly and on an ad-hoc basis to countries in Latin America.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 5 target countries (BHS, BRB, DMA, GUY, VEN). In addition, 1 baseline country (BRA) and 1 target country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 7 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Significant progress has been made in enabling countries to implement interventions against zoonotic diseases using a One Health approach. Many countries have achieved this indicator through enhanced intersectoral coordination, effective surveillance, prevention, and control measures. PAHO has been crucial in providing standards, producing data, and offering technical cooperation. Achievements include the establishment of national policies and integrated strategies. However, several countries still need to improve intersectoral coordination and fully implement One Health policies. Continued efforts are necessary to strengthen these areas, ensuring comprehensive and effective responses to zoonotic disease threats and preventing transmission from animals to humans.
One baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
In collaboration with the OAS, PASB has facilitated the adoption of an Inter-American program of work involving Ministries of Health and Ministries of Education to work collaboratively to improve physical activity in schools throughout the Americas. Brazil organized an International Conference on Physical Activity in Public Health, Chile is piloting the WHO toolkit to promote physical activity in schools, Colombia organized a meeting of the Colombian Physical Activity Network and the Network of Recreative Cycling Pathways in the Americas, Costa Rica organized a forum on physical activity and health, and the Dominican Republic is developing a national physical activity plan.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 1 target country (CRI). In addition, 1 baseline country (BRA) and 1 target country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 3 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
PASB’s continued efforts to support Member States have been successful in advancing policy processes from an agenda-setting stage to policy discussion, formulation, adoption, and/or implementation. The work needs to be further intensified in the Caribbean and in Central America, while sustaining the achievements of those countries that have already adopted and/or started implementing fiscal and regulatory policies to curb the obesity and NCDs epidemics.
One baseline country (BRA) and one target country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Through a series of policy dialogues held in 2020 and 2021, PASB is collaborating with the OAS on school-based interventions under the framework of the Inter-American Education Agenda.
In October 2022, PASB and OAS launched the Inter-American Plan on healthy food and physical activity policies in school environments, with the participation of high-level officials appointed by the Ministries of Education and Health of approximately 26 countries. The objectives of the Inter-American Plan include sharing experiences to advance the framework of action and public policies in the countries; promote South-South cooperation, technical assistance, and capacity building; and develop lessons learned and regional guidance on school environments for healthy eating, nutrition, and physical activity.
One baseline country (BRA) and one target country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
PASB continuous efforts to support Member States has been successful in advancing labeling provisions to reduce the demand for and offer of products excessive in saturated fats and trans fats. However, the support for adoption of PAHO/WHO best practices to eliminate industrially produced trans fats needs to be intensified particularly in the Caribbean and in Central America.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 2 baseline countries (COL, MEX). In addition, 2 baseline countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 4 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
PASB supports countries in the development of policies and implementation of measures supportive of maternal, infant, and young child nutrition, including breastfeeding policies and infant and young child policies. These are guided by the Global Strategy for Infant and Young Child Feeding, the Comprehensive Implementation Plan on Maternal, Infant, and Young Child Nutrition, and other relevant guidance documents. PASB also supports initiatives such as the Baby-friendly Hospital Initiative (BFHI) and the implementation of food-based dietary guidelines.
Two baseline countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
In the Americas, violence intersects with complex trends – such as social, economic and gender inequality, migration, social and intergenerational change, organized crime, and others – which cannot be addressed in isolation. Integrated responses that actively engage different sectors and stakeholders are fundamental to ensuring the sustainability of investments. However, the involvement of diverse actors and perspectives can increase the risk of duplication and misalignment of activities. As a result, multisectoral coordination mechanisms play a key role in setting joint priorities and aligning agendas, coordinating actors, mobilizing human and financial resources, and uniting all stakeholders around the common goal of ending violence. PASB has worked with partners to strengthen the capacity for multisectoral dialogue and collaboration in countries in line with INSPIRE and RESPECT, including through multisectoral training workshops. While a substantial number of countries report having a national multisectoral coalition/task force in place to prevent and respond to violence, these mechanisms are not always set up to cover all forms of violence, thus potentially reducing their impact. Moreover, countries report challenges to keeping these mechanisms operational, which underscores the importance of strengthening access to technical support, capacity building, and other resources in future.
Two baseline countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Comprehensive suicide prevention strategies aligned with global best practices were developed with the support of PAHO, including the promotion of intersectoral collaboration and policy developments. For instance, PAHO supported Uruguay in establishing a multi-stakeholder network for suicide prevention across healthcare, education, social services, and civil society. Prioritized policy recommendations were also formulated. Bolivia targeted action across societal, community, relationship, and individual levels based on the WHO LIVE LIFE framework.
70 media professionals were trained on responsible reporting on suicide in Guyana (25), Barbados (22), and Grenada (23).
Strategies to improve surveillance and response systems for suicide prevention were created with the support of PAHO. PAHO supported the development of suicide surveillance centers in Argentina as part of the national registry and monitoring system for suicidality, while Paraguay expanded telehealth to enable urgent access to support.
Capacity building for frontline providers was another pillar, with training in identification, counseling, and treatment implemented with the support of PAHO. Paraguay implemented suicide risk monitoring, counseling, and crisis management for healthcare workers. Gatekeeper networks were also expanded from the community to clinical levels, as Paraguay increased community gatekeepers to direct at-risk individuals into care.
Two baseline countries (BRA, DOM) and 1 target country (CUW) did not complete the assessment. These 3 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
As of 31 December 2023, 27 baseline countries achieved this output indicator and two partially achieved it. This assessment was conducted based on the information entered by the countries through eJRF.
One baseline country (BRA) and 1 target country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Twenty-five countries have successfully implemented plans of action for the prevention, prophylaxis, surveillance, control, and elimination of dog-mediated human rabies. PAHO has made significant contributions by providing standards, data, and technical cooperation. Achievements include comprehensive vaccination campaigns, improved surveillance systems, and effective public awareness programs. However, several countries still need to enhance their national capacities, as canine rabies cases persist, posing a continued risk for human rabies transmission. Lessons learned highlight the importance of sustained efforts in vaccination, surveillance, and access to post-exposure prophylaxis. Ongoing support is essential to strengthen these capacities and achieve the complete elimination of dog-mediated rabies.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 1 baseline country (COL). In addition, 1 baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
PASB supported the achievement of this indicator by implementing the Special Initiative for Action on Social Determinants of Health Equity. Additionally, efforts have been made to incorporate a policymaking approach based on the social determinants of health and health equity at all levels of government to address noncommunicable diseases.
Two baseline countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Countries have been working toward strengthening healthy settings. Annual reporting on progress in schools, housing, markets, workplaces, or universities has been limited. Nevertheless, advances shown in policy documents, progress reports on health promotion, and publications have been taken into account for this indicator. PASB supports the achievement of this indicator by developing documents such as the Health Promoting Schools guidance, conducting webinars on housing, and participating in and disseminating the Health Promoting Universities Network.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 1 baseline country (GTM). In addition, 2 baseline countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 3 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
The Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) developed the Criteria for Healthy Municipalities, Cities and Communities in the Region of the Americas to serve as a guide to local governments to strengthen action at local level on health promotion, based on the three pillars of equity, intersectoral action, and participation. The Criteria were adopted by mayors of the region during the VI Regional Meeting of Mayors for Healthy Municipalities, Cities and Communities, held in Huechuraba (Chile) in November 2023. Networks of Healthy Municipalities, Cities and Communities in the Americas continue to work toward strengthening capacities at local level for the development and implementation of policies that promote health and wellbeing.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 1 baseline country (COL). In addition, 1 baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Through the Special Initiative for Action on the Social Determinants of Health for Advancing Health Equity, PASB has supported the creation, strengthening, and work of Intersectoral Commissions on Equity and Social Determinants in several sub-national governments in Chile, Colombia, Peru, and Costa Rica. At the local level, these efforts have translated into the establishment of intersectoral models of action in 16 pathfinder municipalities, benefiting 968 000 people. Likewise, the invigoration of the Healthy Municipalities, Cities and Communities Movement, with 42 active members across 12 countries, has involved the development of guidelines to strengthen local governments’ commitment to set up intersectoral mechanisms to improve health, wellbeing, and health equity.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 1 baseline country (GTM). In addition, 1 baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Progress has been made toward the establishment of mechanisms for community participation, with all countries achieving the indicator. The PASB has been strengthening mechanisms for community participation, for example by supporting the Network on Vulnerable Populations (EPSI.V) and the Latin American and Caribbean Confederation of Women Domestic Workers (CONLACTRAHO). PASB support includes knowledge dissemination and systematization, as well as gathering information to adapt health policies or strategies based on the needs of specific populations.
Two baseline countries (BRA, DOM) and four target countries (CUW, GLP, GUF, MTQ) did not complete the assessment. These 6 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
A comprehensive maturity assessment of IS4H was conducted by PASB of progress made between 2016 and 2023. Using over 240 standardized indicators, the evaluation assessed national health information systems with respect to governance, strategy, laws, financial sustainability, human resources, data management, and quality, including vital statistics, analysis capabilities, information flows, project management, and information technology (IT) infrastructure. Information for the assessment was gathered through country visits, expert consultations, database and gap analyses, and reviews of policies, procedures, and technical documentation. Site visits allowed for direct observation of information platform use and interoperability, especially in primary care, and for data collection and interviews with frontline administrative and clinical staff.
A comprehensive report on the regional IS4H maturity assessment will be published in late 2024; however, the assessment found that 42.8% of the countries are still at level 1, “building awareness.” These countries are characterized by early adoption of health information systems, with mostly analogue data and a growing recognition of the need for digitalization. With very limited capacity to generate data and assure its quality, including on health indicators whose data source relies on civil registration and vital statistics, they depend largely on international organizations in this regard. Investments in digital health have often not expanded infrastructure as expected due to gaps in access to electricity and connectivity, as well as a lack of long-term planning and sustainable financing.
A third of the countries, 34.7%, have reached level 2, “implementing best practices.” They are developing their health information systems with data from various sources and managing health information effectively. However, they face challenges such as incomplete development of indicators, insufficient data exchange, and limited implementation of data standards and public health communication strategies. Another 18.4% have reached level 3, “standardization and continuous improvement,” reflecting advances in IS4H policies and strategies and the use of high-quality data for decision-making. Only 4.1% of countries are at level 4, “integration and alignment,” marked by highly integrated information systems that are aligned with national and international standards.
No country in the Region has reached level 5, the maximum maturity level in IS4H, which entails complete deployment of all components of the model and a constant search for innovation.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 1 baseline country (JAM). In addition, 1 baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Member States have made notable progress in implementing national strategies and plans for digital transformation, as well as the roadmap for the digital transformation of the health sector in the Region, which is fully aligned with the Global Strategy on Digital Health. A network of countries was established to promote the adoption of digital health solutions and information systems, resulting in new models and digital public goods that facilitate this transformation. Additionally, the health sector’s active participation in e-government initiatives reflects a broader commitment to optimizing technology infrastructure and converging current initiatives for a more efficient and integrated approach to health information management. Highlights of this strategic line of action include adoption of emerging technologies for personalized patient care, partnerships with financial, technical, and academic institutions for increased use of technology, and piloting of innovative digital health solutions like the PASB telehealth platform and digital COVID-19 vaccine certificates.
Progress has been made in the following areas:
a. Universal connectivity: Twelve countries have strengthened information systems and digital health strategies to enhance connectivity and bandwidth. Most of these initiatives mainly target rural areas to bridge the digital divide and expand telehealth services at the first level of care. Actions have included investing in information technology infrastructure to ensure reliable internet access and bandwidth for ensuring teleconsultations. Additionally, Member States have focused on training health care workers in these areas to efficiently use digital tools, enhancing the quality of telehealth services and patient engagement.
b. Digital public goods: In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, 17 countries have made significant progress in digitalizing vaccination certification processes. Digitalization includes creating secure, accessible digital platforms for issuing and verifying COVID-19 vaccination certificates. This not only streamlines the process but also helps combat the production of fraudulent vaccination certificates. Seven countries are implementing the PASB All-in-ONE Telehealth Platform at the first level of care.
c. Inclusive digital health: Thirty-three countries and territories engaged in discussions on the importance of data for equity and committed to reinforcing data governance mechanisms across the health sector, aiming to achieve the highest and smartest possible level of data disaggregation. Additionally, Member States reached consensus on the importance of maintaining high-quality data to reduce or eliminate biases in artificial intelligence algorithms, ensuring that these technologies serve all segments of the population fairly and effectively.
d. Interoperability: Ten countries have established national committees on health information systems for standardization; 18 countries are transitioning from ICD-10 to ICD-11. Fourteen of them are from the Caribbean and are making significant progress not only in the adoption of the ICD-11, but also its integration with electronic health record platforms. Twelve countries are adopting the Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine Clinical Terms (SNOMED) for semantic interoperability, an important factor for ensuring convergence and coordination between SNOMED and ICD-11. Seventeen countries are actively participating in the development of technological infrastructure for cross-border data exchange and interoperability.
e. Artificial intelligence: Thirteen countries have actively engaged in discussions on the role of artificial intelligence (AI) in public health. These discussions sought to assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on integrating AI into the digitalization of health care services and examining current advances in this field, share knowledge and identify needs concerning governance and ethical aspects of AI, understand the crucial elements of effectively applying AI and other subfields of AI such as machine learning and natural-language processing (including the use of generative AI solutions in public health), and present the PAHO and WHO action framework for AI application in public health. These ongoing efforts are fully integrated with current actions related to the digital transformation of the health sector in the Region.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 1 baseline country (JAM). In addition, 2 baseline countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 3 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
To enhance the capacity of science and evidence ecosystems, evidence-informed policy programs are being implemented in 15 countries in alignment with regional initiatives. This progress is highlighted by the participation of 20 countries in the PAHO/WHO joint meeting of the Evidence-Informed Policy Network (EVIPNET) and Health Technology Assessment Network of the Americas (REDETSA), which took place in Jamaica in October 2023. The BIGG-REC database organizes over 3,500 WHO and PAHO recommendations in four languages. Through the Virtual Campus, over 20 000 decision-makers and healthcare professionals from 28 countries received training in systematic reviews, evidence-based guidelines, and policies. The PAHO Handbook for Adapting and Implementing Evidence-Informed Guidelines (Second Edition) was developed with input from 15 Member States and is in use by national guideline programs.
Two baseline countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Progress has been observed in the Americas regarding the generation, circulation, and utilization of scientific and technical information, as well as the promulgation of knowledge-sharing initiatives among Members States, PASB, and stakeholders.
Overall, the impact factor of the scientific output and the number of scientific journals increased across all Member States during the period 2022-2023, with special emphasis on medicine, public health, and related topics. The publication of an average of 904 titles of scientific journals in medicine and related fields across 19 Member States demonstrates that there has been strong implementation of open-access platforms and policies, helping ensure more equitable and accessible access to scientific production in public health-related fields.
The contribution from documentation centers to LILACS reached 45 291 new documents and a total of 657 indexed scientific journals. The MedCarib database, which focuses on scientific and technical production in the Caribbean, also showed an increase in new contributions during the period. A total of 22 countries and territories are eligible to access the Research4Life (R4L) program, with 1,414 institutions registered. El Salvador became the first Member State to participate in the R4L Country Connector initiative.
By December 2023, there were 179 PAHO/WHO Collaborating Centers (CCs) distributed across 15 Member States in the Region. Two CCs (in Cuba and Brazil) are focused on knowledge management and scientific communication. PAHO/WHO CCs support the Organization in fulfilling the mandates and priorities of the Region and globally, by developing research models and evidence-based literature and providing health analysis and methodologies, among other roles.
Despite these advancements, persistent efforts to strengthen research systems, enhance knowledge sharing, and promote evidence-informed policies are needed. Institutionalizing knowledge, evidence, and science at the national level is essential, as is fostering integrated policies for information use and knowledge dissemination. Furthermore, capacity building and a continued focus on digital literacy are necessary to ensure that public health workers, decision-makers, researchers, and communities have access to the best scientific and technical information.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 2 target countries (GUY, JAM). In addition, 1 target country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 3 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
PASB provided direct technical cooperation with an integrated approach to the development of policies and agendas, seeking inputs from stakeholders and experts in research policy and management, ethics, legislation, and other areas. It has also issued technical documents and a checklist to assist countries in developing a national policy or agenda on health research. PASB actively monitors the development of national research priorities and policies through its technical support and reports received from countries and internal sources.
Given the continuous evolution of policies and priorities as governments and conditions change, sustained team efforts involving country and regional entities within PASB are required. Some countries experienced delays in issuing their policies (e.g., some were approved after December 31, 2023) or have policy documents approved but lacking funding for implementation.
One baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
PASB supported health authorities in addressing research ethics through the development of ethical standards for research in emergencies and improving the ethical oversight of research (e.g., Catalyzing Ethical Research in Emergencies: Ethics guidance, lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic and pending agenda); the development of normative documents establishing the ethics oversight of research in accordance with international ethical standards; capacity-building (e.g., through monthly training sessions based on a plan agreed upon with health authorities); and the development of tools to facilitate national health authority oversight of research ethics committees (e.g., Tool for the accreditation of research ethics committees). The pandemic has led the region to place renewed value on health research, and Member States have thus invested efforts in revamping their research ethics systems. Accordingly, the research ethics landscape described in 2022 using PAHO-developed indicators is rapidly changing.
One baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
The production and dissemination of relevant health research have increased significantly in several countries in the Region, partly due to investments made during the pandemic. This growth is particularly evident in the areas of clinical trials and epidemiological studies.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 1 target country (GTM). This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Reporting financial flows for research is a cumbersome task that requires intersectoral collaboration and coordination, especially in countries where funding and priorities are set by different sectors and entities. PAHO has worked closely with WHO’s Global Observatory on Research for Health and Development and its Governing Bodies to reduce the burden of reporting financial flows for research, a meaningful SDG indicator that is measured with support from UNESCO, OECD, RICyT, and other partners.
PASB has coordinated with these counterparts and countries to incentivize reporting and updating of these indicators at least every 10 years, sending reminders to countries. PAHO and WHO are exploring dynamics and capacity building to improve intersectoral collaboration, aiming to implement training in the next biennium to facilitate reporting and intersectoral dialogue.
Thirteen countries have updated reports in WHO’s Global Observatory, according to PAHO and the Global Observatory’s SDG Indicator 9.5.1.
Two baseline countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
As per the IHR (2005), all 35 State Parties are mandated to report annually on the status of their core capacities through the State Party Self-Assessment Reporting Tool (SPAR). Compliance with this requirement demonstrates transparency and accountability among Member States and the Secretariat. PASB has supported multisectoral discussions to comply with the SPAR by developing guidance documents for the 15 core capacities, as well as country profiles using the SPAR indicators for the period 2010-2022.
Two baseline countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
In the 2022-2023 biennium, significant strides were made in health sector risk management, with 23 countries conducting national and/or subnational risk assessments to update their response plans. PASB supported this by implementing the "Emergency Risk Management in Health and Disasters" virtual course. This course trained 1,466 healthcare professionals, including 17 facilitators, on risk assessments, preparedness evaluation, and multi-threat response planning using methodologies like STAR, EDHPI, and the Multi-Threat Response Framework.
One baseline country (BRA) and one target country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
This indicator measures the degree of institutionalization and sustainability of essential public health functions that are relevant for application, implementation, and compliance with the IHR. Therefore, this result reflects the challenges most countries face in sustaining the level of financial investment needed to maintain surveillance and response capacities.
Two baseline countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Significant progress was made in the 2022-2023 biennium; 37 countries have full-time personnel dedicated to health emergencies. Training played a crucial role, with 5,682 health professionals certified in Health Facility Assessment, totaling 14 767 certified individuals. Additionally, the “Emergency Risk Management in Health and Disasters” virtual course trained 1,466 health professionals, including 17 facilitator trainers.
Two baseline countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
This indicator reports on Member States’ institutionalization to evaluate capacities during real and non-actual events once plans, mechanisms, and standard operating procedures are in place by scoring 100% in at least one of the four State Party Self-Assessment Reporting Tool indicators that reflect the country’s emergency response. PASB facilitated an IHR meeting among Small Island Developing States in Jamaica (May 2023), in which delegates concluded that most of the SPAR indicators could reach the highest level in the context of SIDS, which includes the four indicators measured under this overall output indicator.
One baseline country (BRA) and one target country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
The Public Health Emergency of International Concern associated with COVID-19 demonstrated the solidarity expressed by Member States in responding to health emergencies. All national public health laboratories received training, technology transfer, and essential supplies in a timely manner. In parallel, laboratory guidelines were shared with countries, and re-certification of the laboratory personnel on the regulations for the transport of infectious substances and associated materials was reactivated in the Region.
The cholera epidemic in Hispaniola still poses a threat to the Region. Training of laboratory personnel in early detection, case confirmation, and molecular characterization of pandemic V. cholerae O:1 strains was provided.
The new strategy for genomic surveillance of epidemic- and pandemic-prone pathogens has started to be implemented at the regional level. This instrument represents added value for decision makers during outbreak investigations. Challenges remain to harmonize knowledge, technologies, and Standard Operating Procedures within public health laboratory networks.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 1 baseline country (JAM). In addition, 2 baseline countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 3 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Infection prevention and control (IPC) continues to be strengthened across the region through preparedness activities, such as the implementation of respiratory protection programs and virtual IPC trainings as part of implementation of the World Health Organization Core Components of Infection Prevention and Control Programs (WHO-IPC CC) at the national level.
Four baseline countries (BRA, DOM, GLP, MTQ) did not complete the assessment. These 4 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
The surveillance system for influenza and other respiratory viruses is highly robust. This system was strengthened during the COVID-19 pandemic and laid the foundation for the integration of COVID-19 surveillance in the region in 87% of countries. Within the countries that partially achieved the indicator, work continues to improve the frequency of epidemiological reporting.
Two target countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Progress has been made in many countries; however, some continue to show either no progress or partial achievement. PASB will continue to provide support to integration of gender approaches in key strategic programs, policies, and plans, with an emphasis on countries that did not complete the assessment.
One baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Major advances have been made in the region in line with the implementation of the Strategy and Plan of Action on Ethnicity and Health 2019-2025; however, challenges remain. PASB will intensify its efforts to ensure culturally adequate approaches are taken when addressing the health needs of the diverse ethnic groups in the region.