There was no consensus on the assessment results for 1 target country (PAN). In addition, 2 baseline country (BRA, URY) and 2 target countries (CUW, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 5 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
The hospitalization rate for ambulatory care-sensitive conditions serves as a valuable indicator for evaluating progress in strengthening the first level of care, including its economic implications for the overall healthcare system. During this reporting period, only two countries have made notable advances in this indicator: Mexico has integrated it into their National Sectoral Health Program 2022-2024 monitoring system, and El Salvador is currently in the process of collecting data for this indicator.
Measurement of this indicator has posed challenges for many countries in the region. While PASB has provided technical cooperation, tools, and support for this purpose, there is a need to enhance the commitment of countries further and improve countries’ capacities to utilize these resources effectively.
Three target countries (BRA, CUW, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 3 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Many countries in the region are continuing their efforts to enhance the response capacity of primary care services. Countries such as Belize, Bolivia, Canada, Chile, and Honduras, among others, have formulated policies and strategies to improve access to primary care, support healthcare professionals, build capacities to address chronic diseases, enhance preventive and palliative care, and promote the integration of health networks, including the use of telehealth. Similarly, other countries such as Argentina, Costa Rica, Ecuador, and Guyana, have focused on strengthening governance, improving infrastructure, fostering intersectoral collaboration, and reinforcing maternal and child healthcare services. Despite these endeavors, much work remains to be done, particularly concerning the advancement of health service integration with a focus on equity. The sustained continuation of these efforts is crucial to achieving long-term impact on health outcomes.
Two baseline countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Overall, although there was a regression from the baseline, countries achieved or are on track to achieve this outcome indicator to improve children's health and development. Some countries have a national strategy on maternal and newborn health under implementation, but improved monitoring and alignment of these strategies with the WHO/UNICEF Framework are needed. Strategies for moving forward include adoption and implementation of the WHO frameworks Parenting for Lifelong Health and Global Scale for Early Childhood Development in the region.
One baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Overall, the countries are mostly on track with their development of actions to prevent care dependence. The Decade of Healthy Aging movement was seen as an important opportunity to advance this agenda, encouraging countries to implement actions that are conducive to integrated care and intersectoral actions, especially concerning enabling environments and the protection of older adults' rights.
Four target countries (BRA, GUF, GLP, MTQ) did not complete the assessment. These 4 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Work is ongoing to strengthen countries’ arboviral disease surveillance capacities, facilitating the monitoring of the largest dengue epidemic ever recorded in the Americas. Significant progress has been made via operationalization of collaborative surveillance through the implementation of Virtual Collaboration Spaces. In addition, a new Integrated Surveillance Manual for Arboviral Diseases has been completed following two consultation meetings with country experts.
PASB will continue supporting at-risk countries in conducting follow-up campaigns to update the vaccination status of unvaccinated children under 5 years of age. This should improve MMR-1 and MMR-2 vaccination coverage by the end of 2023. Countries report 2023 data in the first quarter of 2024 via the PAHO-WHO/UNICEF electronic Joint Immunization Data Reporting Form (eJRF).
One baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Since 2020, a decrease in vaccination coverage with the third dose of PCV vaccine has been noted. In 2023, a very slight improvement was noted compared to 2022 (81% vs. 80%). This, together with improvement in coverage of other vaccines (e.g., pentavalent), could indicate that PCV3 vaccination coverage has started to recover. It is important to closely monitor the progress of member states.
Three baseline countries (BRA, DOM, GLP) did not complete the assessment. These 3 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
The countries of the Region have made great efforts to incorporate the vaccine into their national vaccination schedules; as of December 31, 2023, only 4 countries had not introduced the HPV vaccine. 26 countries in the Region are vaccinating children and 12 countries have switched to a single-dose schedule.
One baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
The year 2022 was primarily dedicated to recovering from the negative impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, with a particular emphasis on reinstating interrupted screening procedures. The Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) has been working toward facilitating the implementation of HPV testing as the primary screening procedure, and concurrently developing comprehensive national strategies aimed at eradicating cervical cancer through HPV vaccination.
In the period spanning 2022-2023, PAHO, in collaboration with the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), worked on the CanScreen5 project, designed to comprehend the obstacles impeding the achievement of screening targets. Furthermore, they sought to devise methods to monitor progress through the utilization of standardized indicators. Subsequently, PAHO compiled and published a regional report that provides an overview of the current status of cervical cancer control within the region, utilizing all available data.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 1 target country (JAM). In addition, 2 baseline countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 3 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
One baseline country (BRA) and 1 target country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Rehabilitation services are a key component of a health system and PAHO has been working with Member States to conduct needs assessments (STARS analysis) and develop strategic plans to strengthen availability and access to rehabilitation services in the region. ASHA, an NGO in official relations with PAHO, has trained health providers in speech and language therapy to build capacity in this area. However, numerous challenges persist within overall health system strengthening that pertain to rehabilitation, such as limited capacity, sufficient human resources, and insufficient funding.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 1 target country (CYM). In addition, 1 baseline country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
As part of the deinstitutionalization process, a mental health crisis management course was delivered to first responders in Saint Kitts and Nevis and the Bahamas. Deinstitutionalization processes were accelerated across several countries to shift toward community-based services. For instance, Paraguay made progress transitioning patients from a national psychiatric hospital into integrated community-based mental healthcare, supporting 156 patients through new municipal-level centers last year. Mobile crisis response gained more prominence as an alternative to hospitalizations. Another example is the Bahamas emergency response service, which has prevented avoidable hospital admissions. Similar assistance programs now run across 3 Argentine provinces.
One target country (CUW) did not complete the assessment. This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
In the area of substance use, PAHO implemented workshops to improve the quality of healthcare services for people with substance use problems. A total of 22 participants from the six Caribbean Dutch Islands (Aruba, Curaçao, Sint Maarten, BON, STA, and SAB) attended the workshop in Curaçao.
Two target countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Sexual violence is a particularly severe challenge in the Americas, requiring timely intervention by the health system to mitigate the consequences for survivors’ health and well-being. The need for comprehensive post-sexual assault (post-rape) care services in emergency health services is reiterated in the Strategy and Plan of Action on Strengthening the Health System to Address Violence against Women, which defines post-rape care to include:
a) First-line support and psychological first aid;
b) Emergency contraception to women who seek care within 5 days;
c) Referral to safe abortion if a woman is pregnant as a result of rape, where such services are permitted by national law;
d) Sexually transmitted infection and/or HIV post-exposure prophylaxis, per applicable protocols; and
e) Hepatitis B vaccination.
PASB has supported Member States in strengthening the health system response to sexual violence, including through improved health system protocols and health workforce training. A recent analysis of health system protocols found that text references to these essential post-rape care services remain limited. For example, 54% of Member States refer to first-line support in their protocols, while hepatitis B vaccination is mentioned by 43%, demonstrating significant gaps. While a text reference to these criteria does not necessarily mean corresponding services are readily available and accessible, it is an important starting point for them to be specifically mentioned in protocols that outline the health system’s response to violence. Importantly, one barrier in this area is the lack of health service evaluation tools to assess specific progress on post-rape care in line with established indicators. In response, PASB has collaborated with selected Member States in the development and piloting of a rapid service evaluation tool for post-sexual assault care. This tool has the potential to improve monitoring of this indicator beyond the pilot countries (Argentina, Colombia, Honduras, Peru), thereby helping to strengthen quality improvement of post-sexual assault care.
One baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
This indicator is on track to be achieved by the target date. However, countries with historical issues of shortages and migration of health workers will probably face challenges in achieving the indicator, and therefore will require additional support from PASB.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 1 target country (JAM). In addition, 1 baseline country (BRA) and 1 target country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 3 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Despite a regression from baseline, some countries are progressing toward the target. One country is classified as “at risk” as it has reported progress in increasing the capacity of interprofessional teams at the first level of care, but has not yet reached the level its model of care requires. Examples of progress in countries that are on track include PASB support in preparing technical proposals aligned with the national health reform, joint work between PASB and academia to define the composition and organization of interprofessional teams, and passing resolutions on primary health care that enable the development of interprofessional teams within countries.
The Plan of Action on Human Resources for Universal Access to Health and Universal Health Coverage 2018-2023 included the formation of interprofessional teams at the first level of care as one of its objectives, guiding countries toward achieving this goal. Additionally, the Policy on the Health Workforce 2030: Strengthening Human Resources for Health to Achieve Resilient Health Systems outlines measures to strengthen the formation of interprofessional teams and incorporate them into integrated health services networks based on primary health care as a strategic line, which will support the efforts of countries on track to meet this goal.
One baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Important progress was made at country level, with 6 out of 8 target countries having already achieved the indicator. Chile and Colombia are on track to achieve it, with technical support from PASB on strategies to increase access to medicines. At the regional level, data was collected from 20 MS, including Chile and Colombia, through a survey on access to medicines and other health technologies, which allowed PASB to identify access gaps and needs for technical cooperation and prepare the final report for Resolution CD55.R12 on Access and Rational Use of Strategic and High-cost Medicines and other Health Technologies.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 1 baseline country (CHL). In addition, 1 baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Although the current rating of this indicator is “No progress” due to a regression from the baseline, regulatory systems in most countries are advancing toward maturity level 3. Examples of progress in countries that are on track to achieve the indicator include:
1) increased capacity to implement the Global Benchmarking Tool for assessing regulatory capacities,
2) increased participation in a roster of experts to assess regulatory capacities,
3) better identification of gaps, and
4) definition of institutional development plans with a view to increasing their maturity level, as per defined criteria.
Additional efforts are in place to guide and support the National Regulatory Authorities of Regional Reference from Latin America (Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Cuba, and Mexico) in their transition to become WHO-listed Authorities through a streamlined procedure that may not require full assessment of regulatory capacities, but only demonstration of their performance.
One baseline country (CUW) and 1 target country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Although the current rating of this indicator is “No progress” due to a regression from the baseline, it should be noted that, of the total number of countries (14), 5 achieved the target and 7 are on track to achieve it; only 2 countries are at risk. Countries that are on track to achieve the indicator have progressed in expanding blood collection capacity and reducing blood loss or expiration as they improve their quality processes. Additional efforts are being made to support Caribbean countries through quality training so that better performance also improves the availability of blood for transfusion. Likewise, the promotion of voluntary blood donation was strengthened with the World Blood Donor Day campaign and through regional seminars. Greater support will be provided to the countries that are at risk to help them reach the target by 2025.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 1 target country (CHL). In addition, 1 target country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
PASB continues to cooperate with Member States in the development, adoption, and implementation of national radiation safety plans in accordance with the International Basic Safety Standards (BSS). While most Member States are using the BSS when establishing or updating national rules or regulations and have employed operational criteria in the field of radiation safety, it will take time for them to make the necessary changes to existing national radiation protection systems in order to fully comply with BSS requirements. The target is expected to be achieved by the end of 2025.
One baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Important advances have been made in the Region toward the institutionalization of health technology assessments (HTA) as a tool to inform decision-making related to the incorporation of health technologies into health systems. Five countries have already achieved the indicator, and 3 are on track to achieve it (Chile, Costa Rica, and El Salvador). PASB has been supporting Member States through technical cooperation to develop institutional frameworks, public policies, methodological documents, and capacity building. As the Secretariat of the Regional HTA Network (RedETSA), PASB has been promoting collaboration and information exchange among the 21 participating countries. Only one country is at risk, but PASB is working with the national health authorities to help them achieve the indicator by 2025.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 1 target country (GUY). In addition, 1 target country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Substantial progress has been made on the evaluation of capacities and the development of action plans to strengthen the Essential Public Health Functions (EPHF). One country has already achieved this indicator, and 12 out of the 17 countries are on track to achieve it. Two countries are at risk, and two have not shown progress as a recent evaluation of the EPHF has not been completed. The countries that are on track have completed the baseline evaluation, with results showing that less than 60% of capacity is currently being met; however, they are moving forward with the implementation of action plans to improve capacity and could reach that threshold. Efforts toward strengthening leadership, governance, and institutional capacities, alongside intersectoral collaboration and technical cooperation, are contributing to the positive trajectory of this indicator.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 1 target country (JAM). In addition, 1 target country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Significant efforts have been made in tracking prioritization of the first level of care, with two countries having achieved the indicator and two more on track to do so. Chile and Mexico have shown a positive trend toward reaching the goal of 30% of public expenditure on health allocated to the first level of care. Differences in methods and in the availability of studies measuring the prioritization of the first level of care represent major, ongoing challenges to assessment of progress on this indicator.
Two target countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
No country has yet achieved this indicator, although 4 countries are reported to be on track to do so by 2025.
The financial protection indicators within the SDG framework (catastrophic and household-impoverishing expenditures) are constructed based on household surveys that record relevant data. These surveys are carried out by countries at various points in time, but almost always at 5- or 10-year intervals. Many countries have great difficulties in implementing these surveys, and this causes years of delay.
Only 4 countries in the region (Bolivia, Mexico, Peru, and United States of America) would be in a position to calculate such indicators, with 2 or more years (data points) in the period 2019-2025 (or relevant adjacent years) available to calculate variation. Four other countries (Colombia, Dominican Republic, El Salvador, and Panama) currently have one data point for the relevant or adjacent years and could eventually complete the measurement toward the end of the period in 2025. It is therefore recommended to eliminate their measurement or simply limit the indicator baselines and targets to countries for which sufficient data are available.
These indicators are monitored by PAHO in collaboration with WHO. Countries are encouraged and trained to use them so that they can carry out surveys and then analyze the results. More recently, PASB has begun to analyze the determinants that contribute to a lack of financial protection. This will allow countries to have more evidence to improve their policies.
Two baseline countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Although the current rating of this indicator is “No progress”, countries have been able to address risk factors for communicable diseases through intersectoral action with the technical support provided by PASB. From the integrated public health perspective embedded in the One Health approach, countries are experiencing tangible improvements in public health outcomes. Notable advances include the implementation of national action plans for antimicrobial resistance, the development and strengthening of national food safety systems based on Codex Alimentarius, and improved access to lifesaving antivenoms through production by public health laboratories and their inclusion in the PAHO revolving funds.
Two target countries (CUW, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
During the biennium, countries in the Region made progress toward improving their food control systems to prevent and mitigate risks to food safety. PASB has provided technical guidance to countries (Brazil, Chile, Costa Rica, Cuba, Guatemala, Ecuador, Honduras, Panama, Peru, Paraguay, URU) to improve their food control systems based on the principles of risk analysis (risk management, risk assessment and risk communication).
Country achievements include the development of national food safety policies and Codex Alimentarius programs for standard-setting and implementation from farm to fork – One Health (Guatemala, Guyana, Honduras, El Salvador). Additionally, Paraguay, Dominican Republic, Colombia and Haiti are improving the capacity of their traditional food markets to prevent emerging food safety risks under the One Health approach. In the Caribbean, a survey was conducted to assess the readiness of food control systems to mitigate risks related to climate change (Saint Lucia, Trinidad and Tobago, Barbados, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Guyana, Jamaica). Based on the findings of this survey, Trinidad and Tobago and Barbados developed climate-resilient national food safety plans. One of the main challenges in achieving the indicator at country level is the high turnover of government officials. As a lesson learned, it is important to facilitate collaboration across sectors and regularly monitor the implementation of developed policies, programs, and plans. PASB has mobilized resources to improve and harmonize the food safety risk analysis capacity of countries in Latin America.
Two target countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Most target Member States have demonstrated political commitment to the elimination of industrially produced trans fatty acids from their food supply. Continued PASB efforts to support them in securing the adoption of PAHO/WHO best practices to achieve such elimination suggest the indicator is on track, provided that Member States' commitments translate into policy action in 2024.
Two baseline countries did not complete the assessment (BRA, DOM). These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
An advisory committee or lead agency in road safety is crucial for coordinating efforts across various sectors such as transportation, health, education, and law enforcement, ensuring a unified and strategic approach. Additionally, it is responsible for developing and implementing evidence-based policies and regulations, such as seatbelt laws, speed limits, and measures to prevent drunk driving. A lead agency also plays a vital role in the collection and analysis of data on road traffic injuries, allowing for the identification of trends and the evaluation of intervention effectiveness. Proper resource allocation and international cooperation are other areas where such an agency can have a significant impact, adopting global best practices to enhance road safety and reduce road traffic deaths and injuries.
PAHO has provided technical support to various road safety advisory committees or lead agencies in the Region, as requested, to support their efforts in road safety management. One key area of focus is the strengthening of road safety data systems. In line with this, WHO/PAHO produced the Fifth Global Road Safety Status Report to help countries identify gaps and priorities to accelerate implementation of the recommendations of the Global Plan for the Second Decade of Action for Road Safety 2021-2030. These initiatives aim to achieve the ambitious but reachable target of reducing global road mortality and serious injuries by 50%.
Two target countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Given the high prevalence of violence in the Americas, it is crucial that Member States place a strong emphasis on prevention. Preventing violence relies on the collaboration of many government sectors and non-government stakeholders. While no single institution or actor can prevent violence, it is essential that the health sector collaborate with other partners in the prevention of violence. National or multisectoral policies and plans play an essential role in defining a country’s vision, goals, policy directions, and strategies, as well as coordination mechanisms for preventing and responding to violence. The importance of a national or multisectoral plan addressing violence that includes the health system is reiterated by the Strategy and Plan of Action on Strengthening the Health System to Address Violence against Women, as well as by the multi-agency frameworks INSPIRE and RESPECT. PASB has been supporting countries in building capacity on evidence-based strategies and interventions in the Region of the Americas so as to inform the policy-making process. While many Member States report the existence of such a national or multisectoral plan, it is important to note that several of these plans are soon to expire, stressing the urgency of advancing action in this area and sustaining the progress achieved in the last decade. Partnerships with UN Women, UNICEF, and the World Bank to strengthen implementation tools and policy dialogue on INSPIRE and RESPECT in countries, as well as preparations for the forthcoming Global Ministerial Conference on Violence against Children, set the tone for this important work, which has the potential to be scaled up in the future.
One baseline country (DOM) and one target country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
The Report of the PAHO High-Level Commission on Mental Health and COVID-19 and the new Strategy for Improving Mental Health and Suicide Prevention provide the vision and the recommended actions for increased technical cooperation in MH in the Region. Several countries have started to take important actions to improve and reform their mental health systems. The recommendations of the Commission emphasize the importance of intersectoral work and integration of mental health into all areas of government to better face the long-term crisis of mental health in the Americas. In the area of suicide prevention, comprehensive strategies aligned with global best practices were developed with the support of PAHO, including the promotion of intersectoral collaboration and policy developments. For instance, PAHO helped Uruguay establish a multi-stakeholder network for suicide prevention across healthcare, education, social services, and civil society. Prioritized policy recommendations have also been formulated. Bolivia targeted action across societal, community, relationship, and individual levels based on the WHO LIVE LIFE framework.
Furthermore, 70 media professionals were trained on responsible reporting on suicide in Guyana (25), Barbados (22), and Grenada (23).
Three baseline countries (DOM, GLP, MTQ) did not complete the assessment. These 3 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
During the biennium, countries in the Region made progress in eliminating malaria or interrupting its transmission both at the national and subnational levels, as well as preventing re-establishment in malaria-free countries and receptive territories. Case investigation is being incorporated by endemic and non-endemic countries, including improvements in guidelines, instruments, and surveillance processes. These actions should integrate the efforts made so far by vertical programs with more cross-cutting epidemiologic surveillance processes and actors. Important challenges remain in this aspect of integration and in the quality of investigations. Pending improvements include the adoption of investigation in endemic territories where the small number of cases already justifies this action to accelerate elimination, as well as improvements in response. The technical cooperation that PAHO has developed in this area has been replicated with partner implementation actions, such as the RMEI initiative in Central America.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 2 baseline countries (GUY, MEX). In addition, 1 baseline country (BRA) and 1 target country (GUF) did not complete the assessment. These 4 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Despite the complexity of the Chagas disease scenario, a marked reduction in the incidence and prevalence of this parasitosis has been observed in recent decades. This decline has been sustained above all by improvements in the quality of life of affected populations, the progress achieved by national control programs, the intensification of screening and infection detection actions in blood banks, and the actions of healthcare services aimed at managing morbidity and mortality in some countries. However, the unexpected emergence of the SARS-CoV-2 virus at the end of 2019, and the subsequent measures aimed at containing it, represented a turning point for the normal functioning both of plans and programs for the prevention and control of Chagas disease and of its evaluation mechanisms, with severe knock-on effects on this set of approaches, which relies on territorial deployments of diverse configuration and purpose. The most noticeable consequences of this contingency have been:
The efforts of governments to mitigate the spread of COVID-19 meant that medical care was strictly limited for several months to urgent conditions and emergencies. This conspired against programs to diagnose, monitor, and treat Chagas disease, as evinced by the reduction of care actions for affected people, screening of pregnant women or women of reproductive age, and diagnostic confirmation, treatment, and follow-up of children born to infected mothers; all of these circumstances have partially invisible implications for health systems. The modification of health-seeking behavior by the vulnerable population (driven by fear of contagion and recommendations to stay home) was another determining factor in this regard.
Programmatic vector surveillance and control schemes were postponed due to the reassignment of health personnel to pandemic response activities and the impossibility of traveling from operating bases to the rural areas of intervention.
The financial crisis caused by the unexpected expenses required to implement COVID-19 prevention and control measures affected the regular funding of routine Chagas prevention and control programs, which are already highly expensive in relative terms.
The continuity of many international cooperation activities was compromised due to the impossibility of (or limitations on) conducting face-to-face activities.
At the end of the biennium, the activities of national Chagas programs have not managed to recover to pre-pandemic levels. All of the above means there has not been any substantial gain from baseline.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 2 baseline countries (KNA, URY). In addition, 1 baseline country (BRA) and 1 target country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 4 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
During the REDIPRA meeting held in Colombia in late 2023, significant progress was noted toward the interruption of dog-mediated human rabies transmission, following the elimination validation criteria. PAHO support – through provision of standards, generation of data, and technical cooperation – has been pivotal. Achievements include successful mass dog vaccination campaigns, enhanced public awareness, and improved surveillance systems. Many countries have reported zero human cases for multiple years; however, four countries have reported cases in the past years. Challenges remain in some countries, such as maintaining high vaccination coverage, addressing surveillance gaps, and ensuring access to post-exposure prophylaxis. Continued commitment is essential to overcome these hurdles and sustain the progress made toward eliminating canine rabies.
Two target countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Costa Rica, Suriname, and Trinidad and Tobago were removed from the list of LF endemic countries by WHO (upon PAHO's request) in 2011. In Guyana, the Transmission Assessment Survey (TAS) has been completed, with results suggesting a potential need for another round of Mass Drug Administration (MDA) in certain areas.
One baseline country (BRA) and 1 target country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Following the technical specification of the indicator, PASB recognizes that 28 countries have established capacity and effective processes to eliminate dog-mediated human rabies, showcasing significant progress in the region. PAHO contributions, including provision of standards, generation of data, and technical cooperation, have been instrumental in these achievements. Successful strategies include comprehensive dog vaccination campaigns, public awareness initiatives, and robust surveillance systems. However, several countries continue to report canine rabies, with some also reporting human cases. Lessons learned highlight the importance of sustained vaccination efforts, enhanced surveillance, and accessible post-exposure prophylaxis. Continued support and commitment are essential to address these challenges and achieve the complete elimination of dog-mediated human rabies across the region.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 1 baseline country (COL). In addition, 1 baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Progress has been made toward the achievement of this indicator through implementation of the Special Initiative for Action on Social Determinants of Health Equity in Chile, Colombia, Peru, and Costa Rica. Work is being carried out with the ministries of health of Chile and Colombia within this framework to integrate the social determinants of health and equity approach into their health reforms. In addition, work is being carried out with 16 local governments in the four countries of the Initiative to implement the social determinants approach in their policies and programs. Finally, progress has been made in the design and implementation of social determinants of health monitoring systems (by 2023, the mapping of all available sources of information measuring social determinants in Chile, Colombia, Peru, and Costa Rica was completed, which will feed into the PAHO's monitoring prototype).
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 1 target country (COL). In addition, 1 target country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Progress has been made toward the achievement of this indicator. The PASB has provided technical support and promoted exchange of experiences on the prevention of chronic kidney disease of non-traditional origin (CKDnt) among the countries of the Central American Integration System. Moreover, in collaboration with the Chilean Institute of Public Health, a PAHO/WHO Collaborating Center, the PASB has supported the development of the Carcinogen Exposure Matrix, which is instrumental in preventing occupational cancer and the implementation of the National Plan on Silicosis Elimination.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 1 target country (JAM). In addition, 1 baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Progress has been observed in the implementation of different WHA resolutions through legislation, national action plans, capacity-building activities, and programs addressing prioritized chemicals. However, the challenges observed in some countries highlight the need for further attention in a multisectoral environment.
Two baseline countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
The health sectors of several countries have strengthened capacities to engage with other sectors, ensuring that health is included in climate change discussions at the local, regional, and international levels. This achievement is facilitated by the appointment of designated climate change and health focal points who advocate for health inclusion in climate change inter-ministerial committees.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 1 baseline country (COL). In addition, 1 baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Progress has been made in promoting health and wellbeing and reducing health inequities by implementing the Health in All Policies (HiAP) framework. In 2022, Member States adopted Resolution CE170.R12 on the Policy for Recovering Progress toward the Sustainable Development Goals with Equity through Action on the Social Determinants of Health and Intersectoral Work, which has among its strategic lines of action “promote intersectoral action to address the indivisible goals of the 2030 Agenda, integrating equity as a cross-cutting value”. The first regional meeting on intersectoral action and HiAP for health equity was held in 2023, with the participation of over 20 countries of the Americas, resulting in the creation of the Network on Intersectoral Work and Social Participation for Health Equity in the Americas (TIPSESA). Additionally, the PASB will launch 3 virtual courses to strengthen capacities for development of intersectoral action and HiAP, aimed at both the health sector and other sectors, and for different levels of government. A proposal of indicators to monitor Intersectoral Action will also be developed.
One baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Progress has been observed in the context of the special initiative on SDH and health reform in some countries; e.g., in Chile, intersectoral action, social participation, and social prescription were integrated as part of the universalization of PHC. Reviews of the evidence regarding social prescription and experiences of health promotion in PHC have also been undertaken. Future technical cooperation will focus on implementing health promotion and the social determinants in primary health care.
One baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
From 2019 to 2023, substantial progress has been made in Information Systems for Health (IS4H) through the adoption of initiatives that have enabled countries to advance toward the targets. A key achievement has been the significant progress in implementing interoperable information systems for health that include subnational disaggregation at all levels, which is crucial for effective data-driven decision-making. Other notable accomplishments include the adoption of governance mechanisms, the use of the PASB model for maturity assessments supported by the Inter-American Development Bank and the World Bank, and the establishment of regulatory frameworks. Importantly, 17 countries and territories have adopted the Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR) and ICD-11 standards, indicating progress in electronic health records and data management. A comprehensive maturity assessment of IS4H was conducted by PASB of progress made between 2016 to 2023, using over 240 standardized indicators to evaluate national health information systems in areas such as governance, strategy, laws, financial sustainability, human resources, data quality, and IT infrastructure. Findings revealed that 42.8% of countries are at the initial maturity level, 34.7% are implementing best practices, 18.4% are standardizing and continuously improving, and only 4.1% have highly integrated systems. No country has reached the maximum maturity level, indicating ongoing challenges and areas for improvement.
Significant advances have been made toward the digital transformation of the health sector, aligned with the Global Strategy on Digital Health. A network of countries has been established to promote digital health solutions and information systems, facilitating the adoption of emerging technologies and innovative digital health solutions such as the PASB telehealth platform and digital COVID-19 vaccine certificates. The health sector's active participation in e-government initiatives reflects a broader commitment to optimizing technology infrastructure and converging current initiatives for a more efficient approach to health information management. In alignment with United Nations recommendations, notable progress has been achieved in several areas, particularly in implementing interoperable information systems for health that include subnational disaggregation. This effort has been essential in enhancing data-driven health strategies regionally. Twelve countries have improved connectivity and bandwidth, particularly in rural areas, to expand telehealth services and enhance IT infrastructure. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, 17 countries have digitalized vaccination certification processes, and seven countries are implementing the PASB All-in-ONE Telehealth Platform. Thirty-three countries and territories have demonstrated commitment to data governance and achieving high levels of data disaggregation to reduce biases in artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms. Ten countries have established national committees on health information systems, 18 countries are transitioning to ICD-11, and 12 countries are adopting the Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine (SNOMED) for semantic interoperability. Additionally, 17 countries are actively developing technological infrastructure for cross-border data exchange and interoperability. Thirteen countries are engaging in discussions on the role of AI in public health, focusing on governance, ethical aspects, and the application of AI technologies.
These initiatives reflect a broad commitment to improving health outcomes and operational efficiencies, demonstrating the importance of robust, data-informed public health strategies and policies across the Region. This indicator is a key metric for building more resilient health systems and enabling health systems to ensure that no one is left behind. Countries’ commitment to having more detailed and inclusive data supports stronger, more responsive primary health care systems that can adapt to diverse needs and challenges, ultimately promoting equitable health for all.
One baseline country (BRA) and one target country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Moving toward robust institutional capacity of the science, evidence, and applied knowledge ecosystems, evidence-informed policy and practice programs are being implemented in 15 countries, in alignment with regional initiatives and other key priorities: Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, El Salvador, Jamaica, Mexico, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Trinidad and Tobago, and Venezuela. There has also been progress as evidenced by 20 countries participating in the PAHO/WHO regional joint meeting of the Evidence-Informed Policy Network (EVIPNET) and Health Technology Assessment Network of the Americas (REDETSA), which took place in Jamaica in October 2023. The BIGG-REC database efficiently organizes over 3,500 current WHO and PAHO recommendations for easy access in four languages. Through 3 courses on the Virtual Campus, decision-makers and healthcare professionals in 28 countries received training in development of systematic reviews, evidence-based guidelines, and evidence-informed policies, engaging more than 20 000 participants. A PAHO Handbook for Adapting and Implementing Evidence-Informed Guidelines Second Edition was developed with the participation of 15 Member States and has been disseminated and used for guideline adaptation by national guideline programs.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 3 target countries (BMU, BON, KNA). In addition, 1 baseline country (BRA) and 5 target country (DOM, GUF, MTQ, GLP, CUW) did not complete the assessment. These 9 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
The number of countries that have generated and produced analytical health reports which include disaggregated data on a regular basis has increased from 5 to 17. Additionally, countries are increasingly making these reports and other health data and information more accessible both internally and externally. Improved national health information systems and advances in digital transformation have led to increased data demand and utilization. Such data increasingly include the social determinants of health and allow countries to monitor progress and gaps. PASB provided technical cooperation through ongoing capacity-building efforts in health analysis, particularly for monitoring SDG3 indicators among interdisciplinary country teams at national and subnational levels. This has been crucial to the progress achieved for OCM 21.b. An additional 13 countries are on track to achieve this indicator.
No agreement was reached for three countries and territories. PASB assessed that the criteria as detailed on the technical note for the indicator were not met, and no documentation was submitted or otherwise available at the time of the assessment.
One baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
PASB supported Member States in the development and revision of national standards governing the ethics of research, such as laws, regulations, and national policies, with the goal of ensuring that they adhere to international ethical standards for research with human participants. The COVID-19 pandemic brought increased attention to the importance of adhering to international standards to expedite the conduct of high-impact clinical trials. Furthermore, international standards for research now include specific provisions for research in emergencies (as described in PAHO’s Catalyzing Ethical Research in Emergencies: Ethics guidance, lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic and pending agenda), and PASB supported countries in including these provisions in national standards, thus improving ethics preparedness to conduct research in future emergencies. Measuring progress in this indicator has often entailed distinguishing the ethical from the strictly regulatory oversight of research with human participants.
Seven baseline countries (BON, BRA, CUW, DOM, GLP, GUF, MTQ) did not complete the assessment. These 7 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
In the 2022-23 biennium, progress was made toward strengthening country capacity for all-hazards health emergency and disaster risk management. As of the latest assessment, 22 countries fully meet or exceed minimum capacities to manage public health risk associated with emergencies, with another 15 on track to do so. PASB's technical support, including the development of assessment tools and coordinator meetings, remains essential for achieving the 2025 target of 37 countries. Continuous monitoring and emphasis on gender-sensitive disaster preparedness, supported by tools such as the Preparedness Index for Health Emergencies and Disasters and the monitoring survey for the Plan of Action on Disaster Risk Reduction, are critical for maintaining and building on the progress made.
Two target countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Twelve countries achieved the indicator by the end of 2023, and another 21 were on track to do so by 2025. This indicator aims to measure and track the capacity of countries and territories to respond to major epidemics and pandemics and to ensure a rapid exchange of information about impending public health threats and, as a result, to increase confidence and trust among all parties.
PASB provided technical cooperation to improve disease surveillance systems and train health workers to strengthen preparedness for epidemics and pandemics, notably by strengthening national and regional surveillance networks and implementing the Strategy on Regional Genomic Surveillance for Epidemic and Pandemic Preparedness and Response.
One target country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Progress has been observed in advancing health equity, gender and ethnic equality in health, and human rights in the region. The continued commitment of Member States to issues of ethnicity and human rights was demonstrated by the approval of two progress reports presented at the 60th Directing Council, held 25-29 September 2023: Health and Human Rights (Resolution CD50.R8) [1] and the Strategy and Plan of Action on Ethnicity and Health 2019-2025 (CD57/13) [2]. In addition, DHE/EG collaborated with the WHO Department of Gender Equity and Rights on the resolution on Indigenous Health tabled by the Government of Brazil and approved by the 67th World Health Assembly in May 2023. Furthermore, Member States requested an update to PAHO Resolution CD52.R6, Addressing the Causes of Disparities in Health Services Access and Utilization for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Trans (LGBT) persons.
[1] https://www.paho.org/en/documents/cd50r8-health-and-human-rights
[2] https://www.paho.org/en/documents/cd5713-strategy-and-plan-action-ethnicity-and-health-2019-2025
Eight target countries (BRA, CAN, CUW, DOM, GLP, GUF, MTQ, PRI) did not complete the assessment. These 8 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
The majority of countries and territories express satisfaction with PAHO/WHO's leading role on global and regional health issues, indicating that the Organization’s efforts and initiatives are generally perceived positively across the region. This widespread satisfaction underscores PAHO/WHO's role as a leading public health authority, engaging countries and territories in the regional and global public health agenda at the highest level – politically, strategically, and technically. Efforts will continue to ensure alignment between biennial work plans and the priorities indicated by national health authorities. This commitment involves ongoing coordination and collaboration with national health authorities to tailor PAHO/WHO's biennial work plans to address the specific health challenges and priorities identified by each country.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 1 baseline country (BHS). In addition, 1 baseline country (DOM) and 5 target countries (BRA, CUW, GLP, GUF, MTQ) did not complete the assessment. These 7 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
In addition, 2 baseline countries (BRA, DOM) and 1 target country (CUW) did not complete the assessment. These 3 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Although countries continuously work to implement the IHSDN framework, some have approved policies or regulations that reinforce IHSDNs, but require time to be implemented to achieve their objectives. Technical cooperation during the next period needs to support countries in these implementation processes.
One target country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
All countries are implementing initiatives to improve the resolution capacity of the first level of care within the IHSDN. However, not all of them have an overall or specific action plan to support this, and the implementation of plans where these exist is still an ongoing process.
One baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Although there has been important progress in the region, with several countries already having a national quality policy or strategy in place, there has been a regression from the baseline. Therefore, efforts must continue in other countries if the indicator is to be achieved.
Additionally, all countries face challenges in the implementation, monitoring, and assessment of these policies or strategies.
PASB aims to focus its technical cooperation on supporting countries with technical guidance and facilitating exchanges so they can learn from the experiences of other countries, particularly from successful experiences achieved during complex processes.
Two baseline countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Despite a regression from baseline, all sixteen countries (achieved and partially achieved) have made progress in implementing strategies to increase access to quality health services for adolescents, even though this will remain an ongoing area of work. PASB’s technical cooperation includes capacity building for a standard-driven approach to adolescent health services and training of health workers through virtual and face-to-face modalities.
One target country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Countries continue to make progress in this area and are committed to advancing in this topic, some having already established equity-based targets for access and coverage of vulnerable groups. Costa Rica achieved this indicator most recently during the current evaluation period. To ensure that no one is left behind, universal health access and coverage efforts must identify and target vulnerable groups. Setting specific targets can help focus attention on and support strategic actions to reach these groups.
All baseline and target countries have met the technical criteria for this indicator. Mexico achieved this indicator most recently during the current evaluation period. Comprehensive assessment is an important part of the ICOPE integrated person-centered approach, which is a strategy implemented through PASB’s technical cooperation to strengthen the responsiveness of primary care to older adults.
One baseline country (BRA) and one target country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
This is a composite indicator based on the inclusion of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) policies, the incorporation of short oral treatment for tuberculosis (bedaquiline) into national guidelines, and the use of direct-acting antivirals (DAA) for treatment of hepatitis C. While countries have made great strides in incorporating these commodities in their national policies and guidelines, it is vital to scale up access and increase the number of people receiving PrEP, bedaquiline, and DAAs, all of which can be procured through the Strategic Fund. The technical team has been promoting the scale-up of these interventions.
Two baseline countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Major gains have been made in clinical management of arboviral diseases, especially dengue. Despite the most severe epidemic in recorded history, the case fatality rate remained under the target threshold of 0.05%. This improvement in clinical management notwithstanding, some countries have measured the achievement of this indicator as partially completed because they have not concluded a national adaptation of the Regional Guidance. As can be assessed by the low case fatality rate, the updated clinical guidance is being implemented throughout the Region. Four countries indicate that activities to update guidelines were halted during the epidemic but will resume in these countries during the 2024-2025 biennium.
Two baseline countries (BRA, DOM) and one target country (GUF) did not complete the assessment. These 3 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
By the end of the biennium, endemic countries had adopted policies promoted by PAHO/WHO to reduce malaria transmission and achieve elimination. Significant progress was noted in several countries, especially in Central America, through the introduction of the DTI-R strategy and the adoption of reactive and responsive interventions to accelerate elimination. Strategic partnerships with organizations such as the IDB and the Global Fund have supported the implementation of these policies, while collaboration with USAID continues to contribute to PAHO's technical cooperation.
However, significant challenges in improving coverage and implementing policies remain in all 17 endemic countries, with emphasis on addressing the barriers that persist for the affected population to access diagnosis and treatment. Challenges also persist in updating national strategic plans, improving regulations and guidelines on aspects related to the role of community health workers, and political decisions to maximize the use of RDTs. Despite these challenges, the implementation of key interventions recommended by PAHO/WHO has significantly reduced malaria cases in Venezuela, helping reverse the trend of increasing cases in the Region up to 2019.
One target country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. This 1 country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
This indicator has been only partially achieved due to the record-breaking dengue epidemic in 2023. Evaluation visits were suspended during the epidemic period and will resume in the next biennium.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 1 baseline country (BOL). In addition, 2 baseline countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 3 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
One baseline country (BRA) and one target country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
The mental health Gap Action Programme (mhGAP) continues to be broadly adopted across the Region to integrate evidence-based care in primary settings through non-specialist health workers.
107 MhGAP trainings were conducted in countries. 25 countries received training on the integration of MH into primary health care; 144,790 health personnel were trained. Among those countries that received training were Aruba, Saint Lucia, and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines. Increased integration of MH into primary health care can improve the continuum of care for mental health conditions. During the biennium, Belize showed an increase in mental health diagnosis at the outpatient level.
mhGAP implementation in Latin American countries showcases significant progress in key metrics, with 4,131 new trainers. For instance, Chile and Mexico have trained 5144 and 136,131 individuals respectively. Both countries have successfully integrated mhGAP into their national mental health policies. Paraguay, demonstrating notable advancement, has trained 103 individuals with 67 trainers, and successfully incorporated mhGAP into its national policy.
One target country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Several countries are initiating or expanding information and monitoring systems. For instance, Chile developed a database which tracks diagnosed cases and service referrals to analyze gaps. Similar surveillance efforts are underway in countries like Argentina.
One baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment
PASB Comments
The establishment of a single emergency care access number is crucial to streamline communication, improve response times, and enhance coordination among emergency responders. This supports Target 12 of the voluntary Global Road Safety Performance targets, which aims at ensuring that road traffic victims receive timely and effective pre-hospital care, thus improving survival rates and recovery outcomes.
The importance of having a free-to-call, single, easily recognizable, and universal (i.e., with countrywide coverage) emergency care access number cannot be overstated. This significantly enhances the effectiveness and efficiency of emergency medical services. It simplifies the process for victims and bystanders, ensuring they can quickly and easily reach the necessary emergency services without confusion or delay. This streamlined communication is essential in crisis situations, where every second counts. Furthermore, it facilitates better coordination among emergency responders, enabling them to provide timely and effective care.
Rapid access to emergency medical services is a critical component of reducing road traffic fatalities and injuries, as outlined in the Global Road Safety Performance Targets. The Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) has supported this initiative by promoting the standardization of emergency numbers across the Americas in different technical publications and by providing/incentivizing interprogrammatic technical cooperation to different countries. One example of this technical cooperation is the Emergency and Critical Care Systems Assessment (ECCSA) conducted in different countries of the Region, which has translated into the development of roadmaps to implement action priorities. ECCSA is also underway in other countries. These efforts are integral to achieving the global targets and, ultimately, saving lives.
Two baseline countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment
PASB Comments
A milestone for a strong health-system response to violence is the existence of at least one health sector protocol which provides information on services and care to be provided to survivors of violence. These protocols are critical tools to guide high-quality health service delivery. They provide standardized guidance that ensures consistency across people and settings and over time. Protocols can also be useful to guide training and professional development of health workers, as these documents often set the expectation for the health-system response to survivors of violence. Countries may have one national sector-wide violence protocol or several ones focusing on specific forms of violence, specific settings, or specific groups of survivors. PASB has developed substantial guidance for Member States with evidence-based recommendations of what should be included in such protocols. The Organization has continued to provide support to Member States in the development, review, and updating of national guidelines on violence. While a large majority of Member States now have at least one health-sector protocol on violence, which is a considerable achievement for the Region, a recent analysis by PASB stressed that more work was needed to improve the quality of these documents. The more detailed the guidance included, the easier it is for health managers to implement and for health workers to understand exactly what is required of them, improving the quality of care for survivors in all their diversity. Moreover, while the existence of a protocol and its alignment with the evidence base and related indicators is a critical milestone, it is important that these documents be implemented and supplemented by clinical handbooks, job aids, and similar reference tools, as well as by training for health workers to support them in their day-to-day interactions with survivors.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 1 target country (VEN). In addition, 1 baseline country (BRA) and 1 target country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 3 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Countries have shown significant progress in the development and implementation of national human resources for health (HRH) policies. The first objective of the Plan of Action on Human Resources for Universal Access to Health and Universal Health Coverage 2018-2023 calls for promoting the formulation and implementation of a national policy on human resources for health at the highest level and agreed through intersectoral engagement. Some countries have already developed a national HRH policy, while others have been doing so with technical support from PAHO. Additionally, the Policy on the Health Workforce 2030: Strengthening Human Resources for Health to Achieve Resilient Health Systems recommends among its priority actions the strengthening of governance and promotion of national policies and plans for HRH, which should reinforce the work of countries that are on the path to achieving this objective.
One baseline country (BRA) and one target country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Although countries are making progress in the development of interprofessional teams at the first level of care, the indicator suffered a regression from the baseline. Greater effort is required to develop standards that define their capabilities and scope. Some of the countries that are on the path to achieving the indicator have prepared technical proposals aligned with their national health reforms and are working on ways to define the capabilities and scope of practice of interprofessional teams at the first level of care. The formation of interprofessional teams at the first level of care was one of the objectives defined in the Plan of Action on Human Resources for Universal Access to Health and Universal Health Coverage 2018-2023, which helped guide countries to achieve this challenge. Additionally, the Policy on the Health Workforce 2030: Strengthening Human Resources for Health to Achieve Resilient Health Systems recommends among its priority actions strengthening the formation and integration of interprofessional teams in integrated health services networks based on primary health care, which should reinforce the work of countries that are on the path to achieving this objective.
Two baseline countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.Dos países de línea de base (BRA, DOM) no completaron la evaluación. Estos 2 países no se tuvieron en cuenta en la evaluación general del indicador.
PASB Comments
Out of 13 countries, 12 achieved this indicator and Mexico reported having partially achieved it. PASB is currently supporting Mexico in the development of a national pharmaceutical policy. At the regional level, data was collected from 20 Member States through a survey on access to medicines and other health technologies, which allowed PASB to identify access gaps and needs for technical cooperation, as well as to prepare the final report for Resolution CD55.R12 on Access and Rational Use of Strategic and High-cost Medicines and other Health Technologies.
One baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Progress was made during the biennium toward achieving this target.
In 2021, the 59th Directing Council of PAHO established a commitment to increasing production capacity for essential medicines and health technologies and establishing a common framework for action (Resolution CD59.R3 and the corresponding policy document). In 2023, following those directives, the PASB established the Special Program on Innovation and Regional Production Platform of Medicines and Health Technologies to promote the generation of ecosystems to strengthen capacities for innovation, development, and production of health technologies. The program supports policy development, capacity building, knowledge sharing, and key stakeholder collaboration.
Challenges that remain to strengthen innovation and production capacities for health technologies include securing sustained political commitment and substantial financial investments, as well as establishing comprehensive medium- and long-term work agendas.
One baseline country (BRA) and one target country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Despite a regression from baseline, there have been major advances in defining institutional development plans (IDPs) with the aid of the Global Benchmarking Tool in many countries and territories. A comprehensive approach to promote government engagement to revisit gaps in the regulatory system is needed to help countries define their IDPs. In this regard, PASB has facilitated access to assessment tools and supported self-assessments in 15 Member States (Belize, Bolivia, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, El Salvador, Guatemala, Guyana, Honduras, Nicaragua, Panama, Paraguay, and Peru) – some of which are not currently linked to the indicator – in which political commitment to advancement of regulatory system strengthening has been prioritized. PASB provided technical cooperation to Barbados, Belize, Grenada, Guyana, Ecuador, Guatemala, and Panama to support self-assessments against the Global Benchmarking Tool (GBT) and for development and/or implementation of IDPs. Support for the monitoring of IDPs was provided to Bolivia, Ecuador, and Paraguay (which already had defined IDPs in place). Finally, training in use of the electronic tool for recording GBT results and comments (cGBT) was provided to Bolivia (15 participants) and Colombia (74 participants).
One baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Five baseline countries were able to maintain achievement of the indicator. Costa Rica, a target country, has partially achieved it. Work with local authorities to implement policies and strategies that promote competition through the use of generics, thus increasing access to medicines, must continue. To better understand the needs of the Member States, a consultation was held to prepare the final report of Resolution CD55.R12 on Access and rational use of strategic and high-cost medicines and other health technologies, which covers several topics, including policies and strategies for generic medicines. The results of this final report will provide a better understanding of needs and thus inform the technical cooperation that PASB provides to Member States in the future in a more targeted and timely manner.
One baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. This one country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
PASB has been providing the necessary technical cooperation to Member States on policies and pricing strategies for medicines and health technologies by supporting and strengthening the technical teams of local authorities. Of the seven countries reported, six were able to achieve or maintain the indicator and one has achieved it partially. Work will continue on defining the actors involved and competencies required for future achievement. Price-related policies and strategies are very dynamic issues that should respond to the different market configurations of each Member States, and should thus be subject to continuous evaluation. Therefore, a consultation has been conducted since the end of 2023 to prepare the final report of Resolution CD55.R12 on Access and rational use of strategic and high-cost medicines and other health technologies, which covers several topics, including pricing policies and strategies. The results of this final report will provide greater clarity on needs to inform the technical cooperation that PASB provides to Member States in the future in a more targeted and timely manner.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 1 target country (COL). In addition, 1 baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
PASB continues to collaborate with Member States in the development, adoption, and implementation of national radiation safety plans in accordance with the International Basic Safety Standards (BSS). While most Member States are using the BSS when establishing or updating national rules or regulations and have employed operational criteria in the field of radiation safety, it will take time for them to make the necessary changes to existing national radiation protection systems in order to fully comply with BSS requirements. The indicator is expected to be achieved in the next biennium.
One baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
PASB continues to support Member States in developing mechanisms and establishing quality standards for pharmaceutical services as part of health systems. In collaboration with multiple stakeholders from different countries, PASB finished the regional tool to assess indicators of quality in such services. PASB continues to encourage countries to adopt the proposed methodology in whole or in part, particularly for Costa Rica, El Salvador, and Uruguay, where technical cooperation will continue to be provided in the next biennium.
Two baseline countries (BRA, CUW) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Countries made progress toward achieving the indicator. Guidelines on quality, a course on good manufacturing practices, and several seminars on improving blood services have been developed.
One baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Countries are moving toward compliance with the indicator. The implementation of the regional strategy and action plan for donation and equitable access to organ, tissue, and cell transplantation is advancing in most Latin American and in some Caribbean countries. PASB has provided data through progress reporting on the strategy, regional seminars, and annual follow-up meetings.
One baseline country (BRA) and one target country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
All baseline and target countries achieved the indicator, which is consistent with national and regional progress on health technology assessment (HTA) and evidence-based incorporation of health technologies in the last years. These advances were evident in the Final Report of Resolution CSP28.R9 (2022) and the data collected in 2023 through a survey on high-cost medicines and other health technologies, which included indicators on HTA. PASB provided technical cooperation to develop institutional frameworks, public policies, methodological documents, and capacity building. Among several achievements, we can highlight the establishment of HTA entities in Peru, and Uruguay.
One target country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Seven countries achieved or partially achieved this indicator. These countries have developed roadmaps based on the results of assessments of the essential public health functions (EPHF), which have informed strategic planning instruments such as national health plans, national development plans, and investment programs. The three countries that achieved the indicator developed a specific action plan to improve the EPHF at a national level. PASB continues to support countries in the implementation of the EPHF evaluation to make progress toward achievement of this indicator.
Two target countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Substantial progress has been observed in several countries of the region, with five achieving the indicator. This indicator is expected to be achieved during the next biennium. Countries such as Chile and Colombia have stood out for their implementation of significant changes in regulation. PASB has supported the development of policies and capacities and is contributing with the development of evidence (an article is soon to appear in the Pan American Journal of Public Health) and an official document in which a framework for analysis of regulation has been adjusted to the realities of the region.
One baseline country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
PASB provided direct technical cooperation for the formulation, implementation, and review of legal and regulatory frameworks to ensure universal access to health and universal health coverage within a health promotion, health determinants, and risk reduction perspective and a comprehensive primary health approach, and considering equity, gender, human rights, and cultural diversity. This also includes enhanced engagement with legislative bodies in the region.
The challenge has been the absence of an integrative, overarching review of the legal and regulatory frameworks at national level, as most of the countries have segmented legislation that is not reviewed for consistency, applicability, and impact or periodically reviewed on a systematic basis. This kind of analysis could lead countries to a better balance on the ratio between legislation and regulations, thus allowing room for improvement and consistency in regulatory measures by allowing these two branches of government to interact better.
Best practices in legislative and regulatory techniques worldwide require that legislation, regulations, rules, and standards be reviewed and updated at least every 5 years. Therefore, some target countries will need more time to achieve this indicator. Several tools to support member states on these matters are being developed, including model legislation to be adapted according to needs and requirements.
One target country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Important progress has been made toward the achievement of this indicator, with all 11 countries achieving or partially achieving it. Argentina and Peru have most recently achieved the indicator through the establishment of national health policies, plans, and programs that protect the health of migrant population. Also, considerable efforts have been made to develop a comprehensive Information Platform on Health and Migration. Addressing the complex needs of migrant populations and ensuring their inclusion in healthcare systems do, however, remain ongoing challenges for many countries. Data collection for intervention planning is difficult, as it requires coordinated actions between affected countries.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 1 target country (CHL). This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Efforts have been made toward health financing for universal health in the region. Seven countries made partial progress in this indicator, for example, Mexico and Bahamas, in which some reforms and strategies toward the expansion of coverage using health insurance schemes have shown progress.
One target country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Efforts have been made to implement systems to improve resource allocation for universal health coverage. Two target countries, Mexico and Peru, have achieved this indicator, while the other target countries partially achieved it. PASB remains committed to supporting countries in strategies to improve resource allocation in the health sector.
One baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
There has been progress in developing and increasing countries’ capacity to produce health accounts (HA). Countries like Bolivia, Guatemala, and Peru have been making efforts to institutionalize this by producing new HA studies and new classifications. Peru had stopped producing official estimates in 2020 but has resumed the process and is now reporting to the WHO Global Health Expenditure Database (GHED). In terms of data collection, the WHO survey on the institutionalization of HA 2024 will provide new attributes to assess the capacity of countries to produce HA.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 1 target country (ECU). In addition, 1 target country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Most baseline and target countries have achieved or partially achieved this indicator, so the target is expected to be achieved in the next biennium, especially if joint efforts are intensified in the countries that have not yet achieved it. PASB collaborates with countries by carrying out multiple advocacy activities with health sector authorities and contributing to gathering evidence and making it available to countries.
One baseline country (DOM) and one target country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
PASB supported the implementation of the ENGAGE-TB approach by mapping civil society organizations that can be involved, facilitating meetings between Ministries, CSs, and other stakeholders, and providing technical assistance to the Global Fund's multi-country regional grant focused on strengthening CSs and their participation in the response. However, legal and structural barriers to meaningful civil society participation in the response have been identified, including that the primary care model has not been fully implemented and community participation is not well established.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 5 target countries (BHS, BRB, DMA, GUY, VEN). In addition, 1 baseline country (BRA) and 1 target country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 7 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Significant progress has been made in enabling countries to implement interventions against zoonotic diseases using a One Health approach. Many countries have achieved this indicator through enhanced intersectoral coordination, effective surveillance, prevention, and control measures. PAHO has been crucial in providing standards, producing data, and offering technical cooperation. Achievements include the establishment of national policies and integrated strategies. However, several countries still need to improve intersectoral coordination and fully implement One Health policies. Continued efforts are necessary to strengthen these areas, ensuring comprehensive and effective responses to zoonotic disease threats and preventing transmission from animals to humans.
Implementation of the SAFER package in the Region of the Americas faces many challenges. The affordability and accessibility of alcoholic beverages, as well as the attractiveness of their packaging, all limit progress toward reducing the burden of alcohol in the Americas.
One baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
In collaboration with the OAS, PASB has facilitated the adoption of an Inter-American program of work involving Ministries of Health and Ministries of Education to work collaboratively to improve physical activity in schools throughout the Americas. Brazil organized an International Conference on Physical Activity in Public Health, Chile is piloting the WHO toolkit to promote physical activity in schools, Colombia organized a meeting of the Colombian Physical Activity Network and the Network of Recreative Cycling Pathways in the Americas, Costa Rica organized a forum on physical activity and health, and the Dominican Republic is developing a national physical activity plan.
One baseline country (BRA) and one target country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Through a series of policy dialogues held in 2020 and 2021, PASB is collaborating with the OAS on school-based interventions under the framework of the Inter-American Education Agenda.
In October 2022, PASB and OAS launched the Inter-American Plan on healthy food and physical activity policies in school environments, with the participation of high-level officials appointed by the Ministries of Education and Health of approximately 26 countries. The objectives of the Inter-American Plan include sharing experiences to advance the framework of action and public policies in the countries; promote South-South cooperation, technical assistance, and capacity building; and develop lessons learned and regional guidance on school environments for healthy eating, nutrition, and physical activity.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 2 baseline countries (COL, MEX). In addition, 2 baseline countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 4 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
PASB supports countries in the development of policies and implementation of measures supportive of maternal, infant, and young child nutrition, including breastfeeding policies and infant and young child policies. These are guided by the Global Strategy for Infant and Young Child Feeding, the Comprehensive Implementation Plan on Maternal, Infant, and Young Child Nutrition, and other relevant guidance documents. PASB also supports initiatives such as the Baby-friendly Hospital Initiative (BFHI) and the implementation of food-based dietary guidelines.
Two baseline countries (BRA, DOM) and 1 target country (GUF) did not complete the assessment. These 3 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
PASB supports Member States in the development and implementation of national policies and plans to achieve the global nutrition targets, including the reduction of stunting. PASB has developed a roadmap to guide member states in responding to all forms of malnutrition using a food and nutrition systems approach. PAHO is also part of the UN High-Level Regional Task Force to follow up on the UN Food Systems Summit of September 2021, and PAHO supports the transformation of food systems, putting health at the center.
Two baseline countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
In the Americas, violence intersects with complex trends – such as social, economic and gender inequality, migration, social and intergenerational change, organized crime, and others – which cannot be addressed in isolation. Integrated responses that actively engage different sectors and stakeholders are fundamental to ensuring the sustainability of investments. However, the involvement of diverse actors and perspectives can increase the risk of duplication and misalignment of activities. As a result, multisectoral coordination mechanisms play a key role in setting joint priorities and aligning agendas, coordinating actors, mobilizing human and financial resources, and uniting all stakeholders around the common goal of ending violence. PASB has worked with partners to strengthen the capacity for multisectoral dialogue and collaboration in countries in line with INSPIRE and RESPECT, including through multisectoral training workshops. While a substantial number of countries report having a national multisectoral coalition/task force in place to prevent and respond to violence, these mechanisms are not always set up to cover all forms of violence, thus potentially reducing their impact. Moreover, countries report challenges to keeping these mechanisms operational, which underscores the importance of strengthening access to technical support, capacity building, and other resources in future.
Two baseline countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Mental Health plans and policies have advanced in the Region, with Saint Marteen and Guyana developing new plans. The Ministry of Health in Honduras delivered the National Mental Health Policy to the National Secretariat of Strategic Planning. Several countries strengthened legal frameworks and oversight mechanisms to uphold the rights of people with MH conditions. Paraguay now requires judicial review before involuntary hospitalization. Saint Lucia implemented care consent policies and Grenada mandated appeal processes for treatment decisions. Antigua and Barbuda, Barbados, Grenada, Jamaica, and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines continue to advance in the review of their mental health legislation as a key step toward reforming mental health services. Of note, Grenada designated 2023 as the year of mental health and, for the first time, the country has appointed a national MH Coordinator and allocated funding specifically to MH.
Two baseline countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Comprehensive suicide prevention strategies aligned with global best practices were developed with the support of PAHO, including the promotion of intersectoral collaboration and policy developments. For instance, PAHO supported Uruguay in establishing a multi-stakeholder network for suicide prevention across healthcare, education, social services, and civil society. Prioritized policy recommendations were also formulated. Bolivia targeted action across societal, community, relationship, and individual levels based on the WHO LIVE LIFE framework.
70 media professionals were trained on responsible reporting on suicide in Guyana (25), Barbados (22), and Grenada (23).
Strategies to improve surveillance and response systems for suicide prevention were created with the support of PAHO. PAHO supported the development of suicide surveillance centers in Argentina as part of the national registry and monitoring system for suicidality, while Paraguay expanded telehealth to enable urgent access to support.
Capacity building for frontline providers was another pillar, with training in identification, counseling, and treatment implemented with the support of PAHO. Paraguay implemented suicide risk monitoring, counseling, and crisis management for healthcare workers. Gatekeeper networks were also expanded from the community to clinical levels, as Paraguay increased community gatekeepers to direct at-risk individuals into care.
Two baseline countries (BRA, DOM) and 1 target country (GUF) did not complete the assessment. These 3 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Despite significant progress in implementing changes toward malaria elimination in the E2025 countries, major implementation challenges persist in these areas, especially in the countries with the highest disease burden and dispersion. In addition to the structural weaknesses of the health systems in endemic areas, financial challenges, and the aftermath of COVID-19, social factors such as gold mining, migration, and social conflicts have limited the implementation of changes by the countries; nevertheless, significant progress was made. PASB support included developing guidelines and technical tools, as well as promoting changes that were replicated by strategic partners such as the RMEI initiative. Focal pockets of transmission in a limited number of territories continue to be a factor in favor of elimination, insufficiently leveraged by decision-makers to implement high-impact interventions with the necessary structural improvements in specific locations, which would have a major impact on the national situation. Preventing the re-establishment of transmission at the subnational level is another strategy facing significant implementation challenges in the coming years.
Given that these target countries were selected before the pandemic and considering the evolving public health conditions in various countries, a detailed assessment will be necessary to determine which countries should be included as targets for future biennia.
Two baseline countries (BRA, DOM) and 1 target country (CUW) did not complete the assessment. These 3 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
As of 31 December 2023, 27 baseline countries achieved this output indicator and two partially achieved it. This assessment was conducted based on the information entered by the countries through eJRF.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 1 target country (GTM). In addition, 2 target countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 3 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
During the 30th Pan American Sanitary Conference, Member States approved Resolution CSP30.R13, through which they committed to formulating and implementing a polio risk mitigation plan considering the context, needs, vulnerabilities, and priorities of each country. PASB has provided technical guidance to countries on expanding capacities at the national and subnational surveillance system levels to support acute flaccid paralysis (AFP) case detection, reporting, and investigation; institutional active case finding of AFP; strengthening laboratory capacities for poliovirus characterization and sequencing; and the availability of related supplies and equipment for poliovirus detection and confirmation.
One baseline country (BRA) and 1 target country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Twenty-five countries have successfully implemented plans of action for the prevention, prophylaxis, surveillance, control, and elimination of dog-mediated human rabies. PAHO has made significant contributions by providing standards, data, and technical cooperation. Achievements include comprehensive vaccination campaigns, improved surveillance systems, and effective public awareness programs. However, several countries still need to enhance their national capacities, as canine rabies cases persist, posing a continued risk for human rabies transmission. Lessons learned highlight the importance of sustained efforts in vaccination, surveillance, and access to post-exposure prophylaxis. Ongoing support is essential to strengthen these capacities and achieve the complete elimination of dog-mediated rabies.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 1 baseline country (COL). In addition, 1 baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
PASB supported the achievement of this indicator by implementing the Special Initiative for Action on Social Determinants of Health Equity. Additionally, efforts have been made to incorporate a policymaking approach based on the social determinants of health and health equity at all levels of government to address noncommunicable diseases.
One baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
PASB has contributed technical support and promoted the exchange of experiences among the countries of the Central American Integration System on health promotion, early detection, treatment, and rehabilitation related to chronic kidney disease of non-traditional origin (CKDnt). Working together with SE-COMISCA, special attention has been given to defining the scope of training of teams at the first level of care and strategies to develop health surveillance. Additionally, PASB has provided technical support, especially through its collaborating center in Chile, for the elimination of silicosis initiative.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 1 baseline country (GTM). In addition, 2 baseline countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 3 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
The Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) developed the Criteria for Healthy Municipalities, Cities and Communities in the Region of the Americas to serve as a guide to local governments to strengthen action at local level on health promotion, based on the three pillars of equity, intersectoral action, and participation. The Criteria were adopted by mayors of the region during the VI Regional Meeting of Mayors for Healthy Municipalities, Cities and Communities, held in Huechuraba (Chile) in November 2023. Networks of Healthy Municipalities, Cities and Communities in the Americas continue to work toward strengthening capacities at local level for the development and implementation of policies that promote health and wellbeing.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 1 baseline country (COL). In addition, 1 baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Through the Special Initiative for Action on the Social Determinants of Health for Advancing Health Equity, PASB has supported the creation, strengthening, and work of Intersectoral Commissions on Equity and Social Determinants in several sub-national governments in Chile, Colombia, Peru, and Costa Rica. At the local level, these efforts have translated into the establishment of intersectoral models of action in 16 pathfinder municipalities, benefiting 968 000 people. Likewise, the invigoration of the Healthy Municipalities, Cities and Communities Movement, with 42 active members across 12 countries, has involved the development of guidelines to strengthen local governments’ commitment to set up intersectoral mechanisms to improve health, wellbeing, and health equity.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 1 baseline country (GTM). In addition, 1 baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Progress has been made toward the establishment of mechanisms for community participation, with all countries achieving the indicator. The PASB has been strengthening mechanisms for community participation, for example by supporting the Network on Vulnerable Populations (EPSI.V) and the Latin American and Caribbean Confederation of Women Domestic Workers (CONLACTRAHO). PASB support includes knowledge dissemination and systematization, as well as gathering information to adapt health policies or strategies based on the needs of specific populations.
One baseline country (BRA) and one target country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
From 2019 to 2023, initiatives for improving information systems for health (IS4H) have driven significant advances toward set targets. These efforts have focused on improving governance mechanisms, maturity assessments, regulatory frameworks, and health information architecture, and they have achieved substantial progress in enhancing data-driven health strategies regionally. The establishment of monitoring and evaluation frameworks, interinstitutional committees, and national policies for electronic health records with open data has been crucial. Significant advances include the adoption of governance mechanisms by several countries and territories, exceeding the target; use of the PASB model for maturity assessment with financial and technical support from the Inter-American Development Bank and the World Bank; and the establishment of regulatory frameworks and health information architecture by numerous countries and territories. Initiatives in data management and information technologies include the adoption of Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR) and ICD-11 standards by 17 countries and territories, as well as progress in electronic health records implementation, moving toward a more unified and efficient health data management model. Additionally, engagement with academic and professional communities and networks has strengthened health analysis and knowledge management, while innovations such as the PASB telehealth platform indicate a shift toward a more integrated approach for the co-creation of health-focused digital public goods. These advances reflect broad progress toward robust, data-informed public health strategies and policies, demonstrating an important commitment to improving health outcomes and operational efficiencies within all Member States.
Two baseline countries (BRA, DOM) and four target countries (CUW, GLP, GUF, MTQ) did not complete the assessment. These 6 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
A comprehensive maturity assessment of IS4H was conducted by PASB of progress made between 2016 and 2023. Using over 240 standardized indicators, the evaluation assessed national health information systems with respect to governance, strategy, laws, financial sustainability, human resources, data management, and quality, including vital statistics, analysis capabilities, information flows, project management, and information technology (IT) infrastructure. Information for the assessment was gathered through country visits, expert consultations, database and gap analyses, and reviews of policies, procedures, and technical documentation. Site visits allowed for direct observation of information platform use and interoperability, especially in primary care, and for data collection and interviews with frontline administrative and clinical staff.
A comprehensive report on the regional IS4H maturity assessment will be published in late 2024; however, the assessment found that 42.8% of the countries are still at level 1, “building awareness.” These countries are characterized by early adoption of health information systems, with mostly analogue data and a growing recognition of the need for digitalization. With very limited capacity to generate data and assure its quality, including on health indicators whose data source relies on civil registration and vital statistics, they depend largely on international organizations in this regard. Investments in digital health have often not expanded infrastructure as expected due to gaps in access to electricity and connectivity, as well as a lack of long-term planning and sustainable financing.
A third of the countries, 34.7%, have reached level 2, “implementing best practices.” They are developing their health information systems with data from various sources and managing health information effectively. However, they face challenges such as incomplete development of indicators, insufficient data exchange, and limited implementation of data standards and public health communication strategies. Another 18.4% have reached level 3, “standardization and continuous improvement,” reflecting advances in IS4H policies and strategies and the use of high-quality data for decision-making. Only 4.1% of countries are at level 4, “integration and alignment,” marked by highly integrated information systems that are aligned with national and international standards.
No country in the Region has reached level 5, the maximum maturity level in IS4H, which entails complete deployment of all components of the model and a constant search for innovation.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 1 baseline country (JAM). In addition, 2 baseline countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 3 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
To enhance the capacity of science and evidence ecosystems, evidence-informed policy programs are being implemented in 15 countries in alignment with regional initiatives. This progress is highlighted by the participation of 20 countries in the PAHO/WHO joint meeting of the Evidence-Informed Policy Network (EVIPNET) and Health Technology Assessment Network of the Americas (REDETSA), which took place in Jamaica in October 2023. The BIGG-REC database organizes over 3,500 WHO and PAHO recommendations in four languages. Through the Virtual Campus, over 20 000 decision-makers and healthcare professionals from 28 countries received training in systematic reviews, evidence-based guidelines, and policies. The PAHO Handbook for Adapting and Implementing Evidence-Informed Guidelines (Second Edition) was developed with input from 15 Member States and is in use by national guideline programs.
Two baseline countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Progress has been observed in the Americas regarding the generation, circulation, and utilization of scientific and technical information, as well as the promulgation of knowledge-sharing initiatives among Members States, PASB, and stakeholders.
Overall, the impact factor of the scientific output and the number of scientific journals increased across all Member States during the period 2022-2023, with special emphasis on medicine, public health, and related topics. The publication of an average of 904 titles of scientific journals in medicine and related fields across 19 Member States demonstrates that there has been strong implementation of open-access platforms and policies, helping ensure more equitable and accessible access to scientific production in public health-related fields.
The contribution from documentation centers to LILACS reached 45 291 new documents and a total of 657 indexed scientific journals. The MedCarib database, which focuses on scientific and technical production in the Caribbean, also showed an increase in new contributions during the period. A total of 22 countries and territories are eligible to access the Research4Life (R4L) program, with 1,414 institutions registered. El Salvador became the first Member State to participate in the R4L Country Connector initiative.
By December 2023, there were 179 PAHO/WHO Collaborating Centers (CCs) distributed across 15 Member States in the Region. Two CCs (in Cuba and Brazil) are focused on knowledge management and scientific communication. PAHO/WHO CCs support the Organization in fulfilling the mandates and priorities of the Region and globally, by developing research models and evidence-based literature and providing health analysis and methodologies, among other roles.
Despite these advancements, persistent efforts to strengthen research systems, enhance knowledge sharing, and promote evidence-informed policies are needed. Institutionalizing knowledge, evidence, and science at the national level is essential, as is fostering integrated policies for information use and knowledge dissemination. Furthermore, capacity building and a continued focus on digital literacy are necessary to ensure that public health workers, decision-makers, researchers, and communities have access to the best scientific and technical information.
One baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
All 7 baseline countries kept their baseline status for the generation and dissemination of reports on Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 3 indicators, disaggregated by relevant stratifiers. Additionally, countries are increasingly making these reports and other health data and information more accessible both internally and externally. Improved national health information systems and advances in digital transformation have led to increased data demand and utilization. Such data increasingly include the social determinants of health and allow countries to monitor progress and gaps. PASB provided technical cooperation through ongoing capacity-building efforts in health analysis, particularly for monitoring SDG3 indicators among interdisciplinary country teams at national and subnational levels.
One baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
PASB supported health authorities in addressing research ethics through the development of ethical standards for research in emergencies and improving the ethical oversight of research (e.g., Catalyzing Ethical Research in Emergencies: Ethics guidance, lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic and pending agenda); the development of normative documents establishing the ethics oversight of research in accordance with international ethical standards; capacity-building (e.g., through monthly training sessions based on a plan agreed upon with health authorities); and the development of tools to facilitate national health authority oversight of research ethics committees (e.g., Tool for the accreditation of research ethics committees). The pandemic has led the region to place renewed value on health research, and Member States have thus invested efforts in revamping their research ethics systems. Accordingly, the research ethics landscape described in 2022 using PAHO-developed indicators is rapidly changing.
One baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
The production and dissemination of relevant health research have increased significantly in several countries in the Region, partly due to investments made during the pandemic. This growth is particularly evident in the areas of clinical trials and epidemiological studies.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 1 target country (GTM). This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Reporting financial flows for research is a cumbersome task that requires intersectoral collaboration and coordination, especially in countries where funding and priorities are set by different sectors and entities. PAHO has worked closely with WHO’s Global Observatory on Research for Health and Development and its Governing Bodies to reduce the burden of reporting financial flows for research, a meaningful SDG indicator that is measured with support from UNESCO, OECD, RICyT, and other partners.
PASB has coordinated with these counterparts and countries to incentivize reporting and updating of these indicators at least every 10 years, sending reminders to countries. PAHO and WHO are exploring dynamics and capacity building to improve intersectoral collaboration, aiming to implement training in the next biennium to facilitate reporting and intersectoral dialogue.
Thirteen countries have updated reports in WHO’s Global Observatory, according to PAHO and the Global Observatory’s SDG Indicator 9.5.1.
Two baseline countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
As per the IHR (2005), all 35 State Parties are mandated to report annually on the status of their core capacities through the State Party Self-Assessment Reporting Tool (SPAR). Compliance with this requirement demonstrates transparency and accountability among Member States and the Secretariat. PASB has supported multisectoral discussions to comply with the SPAR by developing guidance documents for the 15 core capacities, as well as country profiles using the SPAR indicators for the period 2010-2022.
Two baseline countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
In the 2022-2023 biennium, significant strides were made in health sector risk management, with 23 countries conducting national and/or subnational risk assessments to update their response plans. PASB supported this by implementing the "Emergency Risk Management in Health and Disasters" virtual course. This course trained 1,466 healthcare professionals, including 17 facilitators, on risk assessments, preparedness evaluation, and multi-threat response planning using methodologies like STAR, EDHPI, and the Multi-Threat Response Framework.
One baseline country (BRA) and one target country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
This indicator measures the degree of institutionalization and sustainability of essential public health functions that are relevant for application, implementation, and compliance with the IHR. Therefore, this result reflects the challenges most countries face in sustaining the level of financial investment needed to maintain surveillance and response capacities.
Two baseline countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Significant progress was made in the 2022-2023 biennium; 37 countries have full-time personnel dedicated to health emergencies. Training played a crucial role, with 5,682 health professionals certified in Health Facility Assessment, totaling 14 767 certified individuals. Additionally, the “Emergency Risk Management in Health and Disasters” virtual course trained 1,466 health professionals, including 17 facilitator trainers.
One baseline country (DOM) and one target country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
In the 2022-2023 biennium, progress was made in enhancing the resilience and safety of healthcare facilities across the Caribbean and South America through the Resilient Hospitals Initiative. This initiative focused on the strengthening of SMART Hospitals to fortify health facilities against health emergencies and disasters, which 24 countries have launched, promoting safety, sustainability, inclusivity, and adaptability within health facilities. Technical support was instrumental in helping Caribbean countries integrate SMART standards, with notable achievements such as the evaluation of 10 facilities for A70 standards in Barbados and the modernization of eight health centers in Belize. Continuous efforts in monitoring, resource allocation, and addressing data gaps remain essential if the 2025 targets for safe and resilient healthcare infrastructure are to be met.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 1 baseline country (BHS). In addition, 2 baseline countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 3 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Surveillance and early detection systems continue to be strengthened in the region. Training activities, lab quality assessments, and reviews of lessons learned have allowed improvement of this indicator’s performance in countries.
One baseline country (BRA) and one target country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
The Public Health Emergency of International Concern associated with COVID-19 demonstrated the solidarity expressed by Member States in responding to health emergencies. All national public health laboratories received training, technology transfer, and essential supplies in a timely manner. In parallel, laboratory guidelines were shared with countries, and re-certification of the laboratory personnel on the regulations for the transport of infectious substances and associated materials was reactivated in the Region.
The cholera epidemic in Hispaniola still poses a threat to the Region. Training of laboratory personnel in early detection, case confirmation, and molecular characterization of pandemic V. cholerae O:1 strains was provided.
The new strategy for genomic surveillance of epidemic- and pandemic-prone pathogens has started to be implemented at the regional level. This instrument represents added value for decision makers during outbreak investigations. Challenges remain to harmonize knowledge, technologies, and Standard Operating Procedures within public health laboratory networks.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 1 baseline country (JAM). In addition, 2 baseline countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 3 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Infection prevention and control (IPC) continues to be strengthened across the region through preparedness activities, such as the implementation of respiratory protection programs and virtual IPC trainings as part of implementation of the World Health Organization Core Components of Infection Prevention and Control Programs (WHO-IPC CC) at the national level.
Four baseline countries (BRA, DOM, GLP, MTQ) did not complete the assessment. These 4 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
The surveillance system for influenza and other respiratory viruses is highly robust. This system was strengthened during the COVID-19 pandemic and laid the foundation for the integration of COVID-19 surveillance in the region in 87% of countries. Within the countries that partially achieved the indicator, work continues to improve the frequency of epidemiological reporting.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 2 target countries (BHS, JAM). In addition, 2 target countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 4 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Progress has been made in most countries. However, target countries continue to show either no progress or partial achievement. PASB will redouble its efforts to examine the health equity approach in key strategic programs, policies, and plans, with particular emphasis on those countries which did not complete the assessment.
Two target countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Progress has been made in many countries; however, some continue to show either no progress or partial achievement. PASB will continue to provide support to integration of gender approaches in key strategic programs, policies, and plans, with an emphasis on countries that did not complete the assessment.
One baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Major advances have been made in the region in line with the implementation of the Strategy and Plan of Action on Ethnicity and Health 2019-2025; however, challenges remain. PASB will intensify its efforts to ensure culturally adequate approaches are taken when addressing the health needs of the diverse ethnic groups in the region.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 1 baseline country (ECU). In addition, 1 target country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
Measurement of this indicator has posed challenges for many countries in the region. While PASB has provided technical cooperation, tools, and support for this purpose, there is a need to enhance the commitment of countries further and improve countries’ capacities to utilize these resources effectively.