There was no consensus on the assessment results for 1 target country (PAN). In addition, 2 baseline country (BRA, URY) and 2 target countries (CUW, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 5 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
The hospitalization rate for ambulatory care-sensitive conditions serves as a valuable indicator for evaluating progress in strengthening the first level of care, including its economic implications for the overall healthcare system. During this reporting period, only two countries have made notable advances in this indicator: Mexico has integrated it into their National Sectoral Health Program 2022-2024 monitoring system, and El Salvador is currently in the process of collecting data for this indicator.
Measurement of this indicator has posed challenges for many countries in the region. While PASB has provided technical cooperation, tools, and support for this purpose, there is a need to enhance the commitment of countries further and improve countries’ capacities to utilize these resources effectively.
Three target countries (BRA, CUW, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 3 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Many countries in the region are continuing their efforts to enhance the response capacity of primary care services. Countries such as Belize, Bolivia, Canada, Chile, and Honduras, among others, have formulated policies and strategies to improve access to primary care, support healthcare professionals, build capacities to address chronic diseases, enhance preventive and palliative care, and promote the integration of health networks, including the use of telehealth. Similarly, other countries such as Argentina, Costa Rica, Ecuador, and Guyana, have focused on strengthening governance, improving infrastructure, fostering intersectoral collaboration, and reinforcing maternal and child healthcare services. Despite these endeavors, much work remains to be done, particularly concerning the advancement of health service integration with a focus on equity. The sustained continuation of these efforts is crucial to achieving long-term impact on health outcomes.
Two baseline countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Overall, although there was a regression from the baseline, countries achieved or are on track to achieve this outcome indicator to improve children's health and development. Some countries have a national strategy on maternal and newborn health under implementation, but improved monitoring and alignment of these strategies with the WHO/UNICEF Framework are needed. Strategies for moving forward include adoption and implementation of the WHO frameworks Parenting for Lifelong Health and Global Scale for Early Childhood Development in the region.
One baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
The reduction in time to diagnose and treat malaria cases is an essential indicator for actions against malaria and is one of the main focuses of PAHO's technical framework for cooperation. Early access to treatment has been the cornerstone of the regional strategy, with actions ranging from maintaining diagnostic capacity and promoting the use of rapid tests to managing antimalarials, promoting microplanning, and implementing the DTI-R strategy.
Thanks to nominal information systems, all endemic countries monitor the timing of diagnosis and treatment. While a significant number of countries reported compliance with the indicator, partial compliance by two baseline countries may affect the overall performance of the indicator. All endemic countries continue to face challenges in shortening the time between the onset of symptoms and treatment and should prioritize actions to address the barriers the population faces in accessing treatment.
However, as noted in the technical specifications, this indicator is variable and difficult to achieve in settings of low transmission, penalizing those countries that achieve significant reductions in the number of cases. As transmission is reduced, cases take longer to be detected. Therefore, it is expected that baseline countries that are reducing malaria transmission, as well as other countries achieving significant reductions in case volume, will experience difficulties in achieving the indicator by 2025, despite making progress toward elimination.
Four target countries (BRA, GUF, GLP, MTQ) did not complete the assessment. These 4 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Work is ongoing to strengthen countries’ arboviral disease surveillance capacities, facilitating the monitoring of the largest dengue epidemic ever recorded in the Americas. Significant progress has been made via operationalization of collaborative surveillance through the implementation of Virtual Collaboration Spaces. In addition, a new Integrated Surveillance Manual for Arboviral Diseases has been completed following two consultation meetings with country experts.
Three baseline countries (BRA, DOM, GLP) did not complete the assessment. These 3 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
The countries of the Region have made great efforts to incorporate the vaccine into their national vaccination schedules; as of December 31, 2023, only 4 countries had not introduced the HPV vaccine. 26 countries in the Region are vaccinating children and 12 countries have switched to a single-dose schedule.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 1 target country (JAM). In addition, 2 baseline countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 3 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
One target country (CUW) did not complete the assessment. This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
The mental health Gap Action Programme (mhGAP) continues to be broadly adopted across the Region to integrate evidence-based care in primary settings through non-specialist health workers.
107 MhGAP trainings were conducted in countries. 25 countries received training on the integration of MH into primary health care; 144,790 health personnel were trained. Among those countries that received training were Aruba, Saint Lucia, and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines. Increased integration of MH into primary health care can improve the continuum of care for mental health conditions. During the biennium, Belize showed an increase in mental health diagnosis at the outpatient level.
mhGAP implementation in Latin American countries showcases significant progress in key metrics, with 4,131 new trainers. For instance, Chile and Mexico have trained 5144 and 136,131 individuals respectively. Both countries have successfully integrated mhGAP into their national mental health policies. Paraguay, demonstrating notable advancement, has trained 103 individuals with 67 trainers, and successfully incorporated mhGAP into its national policy.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 1 target country (CYM). In addition, 1 baseline country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
As part of the deinstitutionalization process, a mental health crisis management course was delivered to first responders in Saint Kitts and Nevis and the Bahamas. Deinstitutionalization processes were accelerated across several countries to shift toward community-based services. For instance, Paraguay made progress transitioning patients from a national psychiatric hospital into integrated community-based mental healthcare, supporting 156 patients through new municipal-level centers last year. Mobile crisis response gained more prominence as an alternative to hospitalizations. Another example is the Bahamas emergency response service, which has prevented avoidable hospital admissions. Similar assistance programs now run across 3 Argentine provinces.
Two target countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Sexual violence is a particularly severe challenge in the Americas, requiring timely intervention by the health system to mitigate the consequences for survivors’ health and well-being. The need for comprehensive post-sexual assault (post-rape) care services in emergency health services is reiterated in the Strategy and Plan of Action on Strengthening the Health System to Address Violence against Women, which defines post-rape care to include:
a) First-line support and psychological first aid;
b) Emergency contraception to women who seek care within 5 days;
c) Referral to safe abortion if a woman is pregnant as a result of rape, where such services are permitted by national law;
d) Sexually transmitted infection and/or HIV post-exposure prophylaxis, per applicable protocols; and
e) Hepatitis B vaccination.
PASB has supported Member States in strengthening the health system response to sexual violence, including through improved health system protocols and health workforce training. A recent analysis of health system protocols found that text references to these essential post-rape care services remain limited. For example, 54% of Member States refer to first-line support in their protocols, while hepatitis B vaccination is mentioned by 43%, demonstrating significant gaps. While a text reference to these criteria does not necessarily mean corresponding services are readily available and accessible, it is an important starting point for them to be specifically mentioned in protocols that outline the health system’s response to violence. Importantly, one barrier in this area is the lack of health service evaluation tools to assess specific progress on post-rape care in line with established indicators. In response, PASB has collaborated with selected Member States in the development and piloting of a rapid service evaluation tool for post-sexual assault care. This tool has the potential to improve monitoring of this indicator beyond the pilot countries (Argentina, Colombia, Honduras, Peru), thereby helping to strengthen quality improvement of post-sexual assault care.
Two baseline countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
The number of countries that are reporting stigma data in health services has increased, but this has yet to become a systematic action to support stigma reduction and improve MSM access to health services.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 1 baseline country (MEX). In addition, 1 baseline country (BRA) and 1 target country (GUF) did not complete the assessment. These 3 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Existing post-pandemic conditions continue to negatively impact the ability of countries to effectively implement field interventions to address this problem. Better achievements are expected in the next biennium (2024-2025).
Two baseline countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Although the current rating of this indicator is “No progress”, countries have been able to address risk factors for communicable diseases through intersectoral action with the technical support provided by PASB. From the integrated public health perspective embedded in the One Health approach, countries are experiencing tangible improvements in public health outcomes. Notable advances include the implementation of national action plans for antimicrobial resistance, the development and strengthening of national food safety systems based on Codex Alimentarius, and improved access to lifesaving antivenoms through production by public health laboratories and their inclusion in the PAHO revolving funds.
Two target countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Most target Member States have demonstrated political commitment to the elimination of industrially produced trans fatty acids from their food supply. Continued PASB efforts to support them in securing the adoption of PAHO/WHO best practices to achieve such elimination suggest the indicator is on track, provided that Member States' commitments translate into policy action in 2024.
Two baseline countries did not complete the assessment (BRA, DOM). These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
An advisory committee or lead agency in road safety is crucial for coordinating efforts across various sectors such as transportation, health, education, and law enforcement, ensuring a unified and strategic approach. Additionally, it is responsible for developing and implementing evidence-based policies and regulations, such as seatbelt laws, speed limits, and measures to prevent drunk driving. A lead agency also plays a vital role in the collection and analysis of data on road traffic injuries, allowing for the identification of trends and the evaluation of intervention effectiveness. Proper resource allocation and international cooperation are other areas where such an agency can have a significant impact, adopting global best practices to enhance road safety and reduce road traffic deaths and injuries.
PAHO has provided technical support to various road safety advisory committees or lead agencies in the Region, as requested, to support their efforts in road safety management. One key area of focus is the strengthening of road safety data systems. In line with this, WHO/PAHO produced the Fifth Global Road Safety Status Report to help countries identify gaps and priorities to accelerate implementation of the recommendations of the Global Plan for the Second Decade of Action for Road Safety 2021-2030. These initiatives aim to achieve the ambitious but reachable target of reducing global road mortality and serious injuries by 50%.
One baseline country (BRA) and 1 target country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
As of 2022, 85% of people with HIV in Latin America are diagnosed; of those, 85% are on antiretroviral therapy (ART); and of those, 92% have suppressed viral loads. In the Caribbean, 83% of people with HIV are diagnosed; of those, 81% are on ART; and of those, 84% have suppressed viral loads. ART coverage for people living with HIV in Latin America and the Caribbean increased 2.2-fold from 2010 (32%) to 2022 (71%). As part of efforts to optimize HIV treatment, PASB has been actively supporting countries in updating their national strategic plans and HIV treatment guidelines. This includes targeted assistance in several countries across the Region, including support for the optimal selection and forecasting of antiretroviral (ARV) drugs. Additionally, PASB has been supporting countries on HIV and aging, pediatric treatment, resistance, elimination, and cure. Furthermore, a newly designed WHO Collaborating Center on HIV resistance, CIENI/INER, is expected to reinforce technical cooperation.
Regarding advanced HIV disease, PASB provides technical assistance for the introduction of new tests and treatments for opportunistic infections and supports implementation research, including mortality analysis, in selected countries.
Three baseline countries (DOM, GLP, MTQ) did not complete the assessment. These 3 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
During the biennium, countries in the Region made progress in eliminating malaria or interrupting its transmission both at the national and subnational levels, as well as preventing re-establishment in malaria-free countries and receptive territories. Case investigation is being incorporated by endemic and non-endemic countries, including improvements in guidelines, instruments, and surveillance processes. These actions should integrate the efforts made so far by vertical programs with more cross-cutting epidemiologic surveillance processes and actors. Important challenges remain in this aspect of integration and in the quality of investigations. Pending improvements include the adoption of investigation in endemic territories where the small number of cases already justifies this action to accelerate elimination, as well as improvements in response. The technical cooperation that PAHO has developed in this area has been replicated with partner implementation actions, such as the RMEI initiative in Central America.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 2 baseline countries (GUY, MEX). In addition, 1 baseline country (BRA) and 1 target country (GUF) did not complete the assessment. These 4 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Despite the complexity of the Chagas disease scenario, a marked reduction in the incidence and prevalence of this parasitosis has been observed in recent decades. This decline has been sustained above all by improvements in the quality of life of affected populations, the progress achieved by national control programs, the intensification of screening and infection detection actions in blood banks, and the actions of healthcare services aimed at managing morbidity and mortality in some countries. However, the unexpected emergence of the SARS-CoV-2 virus at the end of 2019, and the subsequent measures aimed at containing it, represented a turning point for the normal functioning both of plans and programs for the prevention and control of Chagas disease and of its evaluation mechanisms, with severe knock-on effects on this set of approaches, which relies on territorial deployments of diverse configuration and purpose. The most noticeable consequences of this contingency have been:
The efforts of governments to mitigate the spread of COVID-19 meant that medical care was strictly limited for several months to urgent conditions and emergencies. This conspired against programs to diagnose, monitor, and treat Chagas disease, as evinced by the reduction of care actions for affected people, screening of pregnant women or women of reproductive age, and diagnostic confirmation, treatment, and follow-up of children born to infected mothers; all of these circumstances have partially invisible implications for health systems. The modification of health-seeking behavior by the vulnerable population (driven by fear of contagion and recommendations to stay home) was another determining factor in this regard.
Programmatic vector surveillance and control schemes were postponed due to the reassignment of health personnel to pandemic response activities and the impossibility of traveling from operating bases to the rural areas of intervention.
The financial crisis caused by the unexpected expenses required to implement COVID-19 prevention and control measures affected the regular funding of routine Chagas prevention and control programs, which are already highly expensive in relative terms.
The continuity of many international cooperation activities was compromised due to the impossibility of (or limitations on) conducting face-to-face activities.
At the end of the biennium, the activities of national Chagas programs have not managed to recover to pre-pandemic levels. All of the above means there has not been any substantial gain from baseline.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 2 baseline countries (KNA, URY). In addition, 1 baseline country (BRA) and 1 target country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 4 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
During the REDIPRA meeting held in Colombia in late 2023, significant progress was noted toward the interruption of dog-mediated human rabies transmission, following the elimination validation criteria. PAHO support – through provision of standards, generation of data, and technical cooperation – has been pivotal. Achievements include successful mass dog vaccination campaigns, enhanced public awareness, and improved surveillance systems. Many countries have reported zero human cases for multiple years; however, four countries have reported cases in the past years. Challenges remain in some countries, such as maintaining high vaccination coverage, addressing surveillance gaps, and ensuring access to post-exposure prophylaxis. Continued commitment is essential to overcome these hurdles and sustain the progress made toward eliminating canine rabies.
Two target countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Costa Rica, Suriname, and Trinidad and Tobago were removed from the list of LF endemic countries by WHO (upon PAHO's request) in 2011. In Guyana, the Transmission Assessment Survey (TAS) has been completed, with results suggesting a potential need for another round of Mass Drug Administration (MDA) in certain areas.
One target country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Saint Lucia is on track to achieve this indicator. The status of schistosomiasis transmission in Puerto Rico remains active, posing continued risks. Suriname has not made progress in assessing the status of schistosomiasis transmission. Antigua and Barbuda did not show progress on this indicator due to suspected interruption of transmission, pending confirmation through necessary studies.
One baseline country (BRA) and 1 target country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Following the technical specification of the indicator, PASB recognizes that 28 countries have established capacity and effective processes to eliminate dog-mediated human rabies, showcasing significant progress in the region. PAHO contributions, including provision of standards, generation of data, and technical cooperation, have been instrumental in these achievements. Successful strategies include comprehensive dog vaccination campaigns, public awareness initiatives, and robust surveillance systems. However, several countries continue to report canine rabies, with some also reporting human cases. Lessons learned highlight the importance of sustained vaccination efforts, enhanced surveillance, and accessible post-exposure prophylaxis. Continued support and commitment are essential to address these challenges and achieve the complete elimination of dog-mediated human rabies across the region.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 1 baseline country (COL). In addition, 1 baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Progress has been made toward the achievement of this indicator through implementation of the Special Initiative for Action on Social Determinants of Health Equity in Chile, Colombia, Peru, and Costa Rica. Work is being carried out with the ministries of health of Chile and Colombia within this framework to integrate the social determinants of health and equity approach into their health reforms. In addition, work is being carried out with 16 local governments in the four countries of the Initiative to implement the social determinants approach in their policies and programs. Finally, progress has been made in the design and implementation of social determinants of health monitoring systems (by 2023, the mapping of all available sources of information measuring social determinants in Chile, Colombia, Peru, and Costa Rica was completed, which will feed into the PAHO's monitoring prototype).
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 1 target country (JAM). In addition, 1 baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Progress has been observed in the implementation of different WHA resolutions through legislation, national action plans, capacity-building activities, and programs addressing prioritized chemicals. However, the challenges observed in some countries highlight the need for further attention in a multisectoral environment.
Two baseline countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
The health sectors of several countries have strengthened capacities to engage with other sectors, ensuring that health is included in climate change discussions at the local, regional, and international levels. This achievement is facilitated by the appointment of designated climate change and health focal points who advocate for health inclusion in climate change inter-ministerial committees.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 1 baseline country (COL). In addition, 1 baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Progress has been made in promoting health and wellbeing and reducing health inequities by implementing the Health in All Policies (HiAP) framework. In 2022, Member States adopted Resolution CE170.R12 on the Policy for Recovering Progress toward the Sustainable Development Goals with Equity through Action on the Social Determinants of Health and Intersectoral Work, which has among its strategic lines of action “promote intersectoral action to address the indivisible goals of the 2030 Agenda, integrating equity as a cross-cutting value”. The first regional meeting on intersectoral action and HiAP for health equity was held in 2023, with the participation of over 20 countries of the Americas, resulting in the creation of the Network on Intersectoral Work and Social Participation for Health Equity in the Americas (TIPSESA). Additionally, the PASB will launch 3 virtual courses to strengthen capacities for development of intersectoral action and HiAP, aimed at both the health sector and other sectors, and for different levels of government. A proposal of indicators to monitor Intersectoral Action will also be developed.
One baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Progress has been observed in the context of the special initiative on SDH and health reform in some countries; e.g., in Chile, intersectoral action, social participation, and social prescription were integrated as part of the universalization of PHC. Reviews of the evidence regarding social prescription and experiences of health promotion in PHC have also been undertaken. Future technical cooperation will focus on implementing health promotion and the social determinants in primary health care.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 1 target country (BHS). In addition, 1 baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Progress has been observed regarding implementation of the Health Promoting Schools (HPS) approach. PASB has developed Regional Guidance for the Development of Health Promoting Schools that will contribute to strengthening the actions of schools in the region, incorporating the HPS approach; and has developed a course on Health Promoting Schools to strengthen the capacities of school personnel. Furthermore, lessons learned from the piloting of WHO Global Standards for Health Promoting Schools in Paraguay will be systematized and disseminated throughout the region.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 3 target countries (BMU, BON, KNA). In addition, 1 baseline country (BRA) and 5 target country (DOM, GUF, MTQ, GLP, CUW) did not complete the assessment. These 9 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
The number of countries that have generated and produced analytical health reports which include disaggregated data on a regular basis has increased from 5 to 17. Additionally, countries are increasingly making these reports and other health data and information more accessible both internally and externally. Improved national health information systems and advances in digital transformation have led to increased data demand and utilization. Such data increasingly include the social determinants of health and allow countries to monitor progress and gaps. PASB provided technical cooperation through ongoing capacity-building efforts in health analysis, particularly for monitoring SDG3 indicators among interdisciplinary country teams at national and subnational levels. This has been crucial to the progress achieved for OCM 21.b. An additional 13 countries are on track to achieve this indicator.
No agreement was reached for three countries and territories. PASB assessed that the criteria as detailed on the technical note for the indicator were not met, and no documentation was submitted or otherwise available at the time of the assessment.
Seven baseline countries (BON, BRA, CUW, DOM, GLP, GUF, MTQ) did not complete the assessment. These 7 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
In the 2022-23 biennium, progress was made toward strengthening country capacity for all-hazards health emergency and disaster risk management. As of the latest assessment, 22 countries fully meet or exceed minimum capacities to manage public health risk associated with emergencies, with another 15 on track to do so. PASB's technical support, including the development of assessment tools and coordinator meetings, remains essential for achieving the 2025 target of 37 countries. Continuous monitoring and emphasis on gender-sensitive disaster preparedness, supported by tools such as the Preparedness Index for Health Emergencies and Disasters and the monitoring survey for the Plan of Action on Disaster Risk Reduction, are critical for maintaining and building on the progress made.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 3 target countries (BRB, CRI, MEX). In addition, 2 target countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 5 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
To achieve this indicator, a State Party must have improved its scores or maintained them (where the score is higher than 0%), for at least 12 of the 15 core capacities, as compared to the previous year. Three countries did not comply with the State Party Self-Assessment Reporting Tool in 2021, precluding comparison with results for the past biennium. PASB is working closely with the countries to strengthen and maintain their core capacities under the IHR, which contribute directly to global health security.
Two target countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Twelve countries achieved the indicator by the end of 2023, and another 21 were on track to do so by 2025. This indicator aims to measure and track the capacity of countries and territories to respond to major epidemics and pandemics and to ensure a rapid exchange of information about impending public health threats and, as a result, to increase confidence and trust among all parties.
PASB provided technical cooperation to improve disease surveillance systems and train health workers to strengthen preparedness for epidemics and pandemics, notably by strengthening national and regional surveillance networks and implementing the Strategy on Regional Genomic Surveillance for Epidemic and Pandemic Preparedness and Response.
One target country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Progress has been observed in advancing health equity, gender and ethnic equality in health, and human rights in the region. The continued commitment of Member States to issues of ethnicity and human rights was demonstrated by the approval of two progress reports presented at the 60th Directing Council, held 25-29 September 2023: Health and Human Rights (Resolution CD50.R8) [1] and the Strategy and Plan of Action on Ethnicity and Health 2019-2025 (CD57/13) [2]. In addition, DHE/EG collaborated with the WHO Department of Gender Equity and Rights on the resolution on Indigenous Health tabled by the Government of Brazil and approved by the 67th World Health Assembly in May 2023. Furthermore, Member States requested an update to PAHO Resolution CD52.R6, Addressing the Causes of Disparities in Health Services Access and Utilization for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Trans (LGBT) persons.
[1] https://www.paho.org/en/documents/cd50r8-health-and-human-rights
[2] https://www.paho.org/en/documents/cd5713-strategy-and-plan-action-ethnicity-and-health-2019-2025
Eight target countries (BRA, CAN, CUW, DOM, GLP, GUF, MTQ, PRI) did not complete the assessment. These 8 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
The majority of countries and territories express satisfaction with PAHO/WHO's leading role on global and regional health issues, indicating that the Organization’s efforts and initiatives are generally perceived positively across the region. This widespread satisfaction underscores PAHO/WHO's role as a leading public health authority, engaging countries and territories in the regional and global public health agenda at the highest level – politically, strategically, and technically. Efforts will continue to ensure alignment between biennial work plans and the priorities indicated by national health authorities. This commitment involves ongoing coordination and collaboration with national health authorities to tailor PAHO/WHO's biennial work plans to address the specific health challenges and priorities identified by each country.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 1 baseline country (BHS). In addition, 1 baseline country (DOM) and 5 target countries (BRA, CUW, GLP, GUF, MTQ) did not complete the assessment. These 7 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
In addition, 2 baseline countries (BRA, DOM) and 1 target country (CUW) did not complete the assessment. These 3 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Although countries continuously work to implement the IHSDN framework, some have approved policies or regulations that reinforce IHSDNs, but require time to be implemented to achieve their objectives. Technical cooperation during the next period needs to support countries in these implementation processes.
One target country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
All countries are implementing initiatives to improve the resolution capacity of the first level of care within the IHSDN. However, not all of them have an overall or specific action plan to support this, and the implementation of plans where these exist is still an ongoing process.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 2 target countries (CHL, PER). These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Of the target countries for 2023, only 2 achieved the indicator, as shown in a report of need for family planning satisfied by modern methods with this indicator stratified by age, ethnicity, place of residence and income (Argentina and Suriname). Four countries (Colombia, Guatemala, Honduras, and Uruguay) showed progress in achieving the indicator but do not yet disaggregate for all variables required and were thus assessed as “partially achieved”. Significant advances were made in clinical guidelines, regulations, and training of health teams. Improvements have been observed in the supply chain and in increasing the reported demand in users, among other actions, showing the political importance of this issue in the countries’ health agenda. However, there is still a lack of recent stratified data.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 1 target country (ECU). In addition, 1 target country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
This is a mixed indicator encompassing both maternal and perinatal audits. Although progress was made overall, in several countries the emphasis has been solely on maternal audits, with less attention given to perinatal audits.
The pandemic caused setbacks – including in countries that had achieved progress on this indicator – which required further attention and support from PASB. PASB remains committed to supporting countries in enhancing their perinatal audit capabilities.
One baseline country (BRA) and one target country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
This is a composite indicator based on the inclusion of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) policies, the incorporation of short oral treatment for tuberculosis (bedaquiline) into national guidelines, and the use of direct-acting antivirals (DAA) for treatment of hepatitis C. While countries have made great strides in incorporating these commodities in their national policies and guidelines, it is vital to scale up access and increase the number of people receiving PrEP, bedaquiline, and DAAs, all of which can be procured through the Strategic Fund. The technical team has been promoting the scale-up of these interventions.
Two baseline countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Major gains have been made in clinical management of arboviral diseases, especially dengue. Despite the most severe epidemic in recorded history, the case fatality rate remained under the target threshold of 0.05%. This improvement in clinical management notwithstanding, some countries have measured the achievement of this indicator as partially completed because they have not concluded a national adaptation of the Regional Guidance. As can be assessed by the low case fatality rate, the updated clinical guidance is being implemented throughout the Region. Four countries indicate that activities to update guidelines were halted during the epidemic but will resume in these countries during the 2024-2025 biennium.
Two baseline countries (BRA, DOM) and one target country (GUF) did not complete the assessment. These 3 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
By the end of the biennium, endemic countries had adopted policies promoted by PAHO/WHO to reduce malaria transmission and achieve elimination. Significant progress was noted in several countries, especially in Central America, through the introduction of the DTI-R strategy and the adoption of reactive and responsive interventions to accelerate elimination. Strategic partnerships with organizations such as the IDB and the Global Fund have supported the implementation of these policies, while collaboration with USAID continues to contribute to PAHO's technical cooperation.
However, significant challenges in improving coverage and implementing policies remain in all 17 endemic countries, with emphasis on addressing the barriers that persist for the affected population to access diagnosis and treatment. Challenges also persist in updating national strategic plans, improving regulations and guidelines on aspects related to the role of community health workers, and political decisions to maximize the use of RDTs. Despite these challenges, the implementation of key interventions recommended by PAHO/WHO has significantly reduced malaria cases in Venezuela, helping reverse the trend of increasing cases in the Region up to 2019.
Two target countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
DPT vaccination coverage has been affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. PASB is working to improve coverage and reduce dropout rates to ensure that under-vaccinated individuals receive the necessary immunizations.
One target country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Several countries are initiating or expanding information and monitoring systems. For instance, Chile developed a database which tracks diagnosed cases and service referrals to analyze gaps. Similar surveillance efforts are underway in countries like Argentina.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 1 target country (COL). In addition, 1 baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
PASB continues to collaborate with Member States in the development, adoption, and implementation of national radiation safety plans in accordance with the International Basic Safety Standards (BSS). While most Member States are using the BSS when establishing or updating national rules or regulations and have employed operational criteria in the field of radiation safety, it will take time for them to make the necessary changes to existing national radiation protection systems in order to fully comply with BSS requirements. The indicator is expected to be achieved in the next biennium.
One baseline country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
PASB provided direct technical cooperation for the formulation, implementation, and review of legal and regulatory frameworks to ensure universal access to health and universal health coverage within a health promotion, health determinants, and risk reduction perspective and a comprehensive primary health approach, and considering equity, gender, human rights, and cultural diversity. This also includes enhanced engagement with legislative bodies in the region.
The challenge has been the absence of an integrative, overarching review of the legal and regulatory frameworks at national level, as most of the countries have segmented legislation that is not reviewed for consistency, applicability, and impact or periodically reviewed on a systematic basis. This kind of analysis could lead countries to a better balance on the ratio between legislation and regulations, thus allowing room for improvement and consistency in regulatory measures by allowing these two branches of government to interact better.
Best practices in legislative and regulatory techniques worldwide require that legislation, regulations, rules, and standards be reviewed and updated at least every 5 years. Therefore, some target countries will need more time to achieve this indicator. Several tools to support member states on these matters are being developed, including model legislation to be adapted according to needs and requirements.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 1 target country (CHL). This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Efforts have been made toward health financing for universal health in the region. Seven countries made partial progress in this indicator, for example, Mexico and Bahamas, in which some reforms and strategies toward the expansion of coverage using health insurance schemes have shown progress.
One baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
There has been progress in developing and increasing countries’ capacity to produce health accounts (HA). Countries like Bolivia, Guatemala, and Peru have been making efforts to institutionalize this by producing new HA studies and new classifications. Peru had stopped producing official estimates in 2020 but has resumed the process and is now reporting to the WHO Global Health Expenditure Database (GHED). In terms of data collection, the WHO survey on the institutionalization of HA 2024 will provide new attributes to assess the capacity of countries to produce HA.
Two baseline countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
During the biennium, countries strengthened their Infection Prevention and Control (IPC) programs, including their capacity to respond to multidrug-resistant organism outbreaks in healthcare facilities. PASB directed efforts toward supporting countries to consolidate their IPC and antimicrobial stewardship programs to enhance the effectiveness of local interventions. Countries also strengthened the coordination between National Reference Labs and national IPC programs for rapid detection and response to emerging resistant mechanisms.
Substantial progress has been made to improve the capacities for food control in countries in the Region. Honduras, Guatemala, El Salvador, and Guyana have developed their Codex Alimentarius programs to set and implement food safety standards from farm to fork within the One Health approach, and Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Colombia, Cuba, Chile, Guyana, Paraguay, Peru, and URU have improved their integrated AMR surveillance plans to include the food value chain. Suriname’s IHR Capacity 13 for Food Safety was assessed, and some areas of improvement have been detected. Countries’ food monitoring capacities have been improved through the technical support provided by the Inter-American Network of Food Analysis Laboratories (INFAL). PASB has provided technical guidance in risk analysis and foodborne disease surveillance regularly and on an ad-hoc basis to countries in Latin America.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 5 target countries (BHS, BRB, DMA, GUY, VEN). In addition, 1 baseline country (BRA) and 1 target country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 7 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Significant progress has been made in enabling countries to implement interventions against zoonotic diseases using a One Health approach. Many countries have achieved this indicator through enhanced intersectoral coordination, effective surveillance, prevention, and control measures. PAHO has been crucial in providing standards, producing data, and offering technical cooperation. Achievements include the establishment of national policies and integrated strategies. However, several countries still need to improve intersectoral coordination and fully implement One Health policies. Continued efforts are necessary to strengthen these areas, ensuring comprehensive and effective responses to zoonotic disease threats and preventing transmission from animals to humans.
One baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Countries continue to make significant efforts to improve surveillance and control of Chagas disease. However, countries that partially achieved or did not achieve the indicator will need to intensify efforts to reach the target.
One baseline country (BRA) and one target country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
PASB continuous efforts to support Member States has been successful in advancing labeling provisions to reduce the demand for and offer of products excessive in saturated fats and trans fats. However, the support for adoption of PAHO/WHO best practices to eliminate industrially produced trans fats needs to be intensified particularly in the Caribbean and in Central America.
One baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment
PASB Comments
PASB continued to provide technical assistance to Member States in the Region of the Americas toward progressing the tobacco control agenda, including the implementation at the highest level of the four major demand-reduction measures in the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC):
1) tobacco taxes representing more than 75% of the final retail price, or the country has increased taxes in the reviewed period and has moved to the next category according to the WHO Report on the Global Tobacco Epidemic (measure R),
2) all enclosed public places, workplaces and public transportation totally smoke-free (measure P),
3) large graphic health warning covering an average of at least 50% of the front and the back of the packaging of tobacco products (measure W) and pictorial warnings covering at least 50% of the principal display areas of the outside packaging and labeling of all tobacco products, plus a ban on misleading descriptors (measure W), and
4) a total ban on all tobacco advertisement, promotion, and sponsorship (measure E).
Peru dropped out of the baseline as it did not increase taxes sufficiently during the reviewed period to move to the next category according to the WHO Report on the Global Tobacco Epidemic.
Colombia, Jamaica, and El Salvador partially achieved the indicator. However, there were significant efforts toward this in Colombia and Jamaica. In Colombia, Bill No. 274/2022 to increase tobacco taxes, including taxation of emerging nicotine and tobacco products, was filed in November 2022. At regional and country levels, PASB collaborated with international and national partners to provide technical assistance in support of the bill and to organize strategic meetings to present evidence supporting this bill, convening advisors to the bill authors and representatives of the Ministry of Finance. Tobacco industry interference has been active during the legislative process discussions and debates. While the bill was approved for further discussion at a second debate at the Plenary of the House of Representatives in 2022, it was killed in June 2024 when the legislature came to an end. It is expected to be filed again and continue its discussion and approval processes at the upcoming legislative session.
In Jamaica, PASB provided technical assistance to national at regional and country levels and presented before the Joint Select Committee, by request, in previous years since the Tobacco Control Bill was filed in 2020. In 2022, the Joint Select Committee conducted a clause-by-clause analysis of the bill, considering submissions from national stakeholders. In addition to technical assistance provided to the Ministry of Health, PASB supported communications activities by the health authority at regional and country levels, such as creating and pushing existing materials through joint media interviews (Smile Jamaica, Beyond the Headlines, Cliff Hughes on Nationwide), TV adverts, social media, and newspapers. The deliberations of the Joint Select Committee concluded in October 2022, and it was expected that the bill would be presented for voting by the end of 2022. However, the sittings planned for November and December 2022 were postponed and deliberations expected to resume in 2023 did not take place.
PASB recognized Brazil’s leadership in the Region of the Americas and worldwide as it has demonstrated the viability of implementing the four major WHO FCTC demand-reduction measures at the highest level of achievement, as well as other tobacco control policies.
In addition, other PAHO Member States, such as Bolivia and Costa Rica, are devoting efforts to tobacco control, with the latter having a bill on tobacco taxes and the former working toward the drafting and filing of a similar one, following national evidence generated on the topic. Also, through a CCHD, Bolivia, Cuba, and Panama are moving forward on tobacco control.
Two baseline countries (BRA, DOM) and 1 target country (GUF) did not complete the assessment. These 3 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
PASB supports Member States in the development and implementation of national policies and plans to achieve the global nutrition targets, including the reduction of stunting. PASB has developed a roadmap to guide member states in responding to all forms of malnutrition using a food and nutrition systems approach. PAHO is also part of the UN High-Level Regional Task Force to follow up on the UN Food Systems Summit of September 2021, and PAHO supports the transformation of food systems, putting health at the center.
Two baseline countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
In the Americas, violence intersects with complex trends – such as social, economic and gender inequality, migration, social and intergenerational change, organized crime, and others – which cannot be addressed in isolation. Integrated responses that actively engage different sectors and stakeholders are fundamental to ensuring the sustainability of investments. However, the involvement of diverse actors and perspectives can increase the risk of duplication and misalignment of activities. As a result, multisectoral coordination mechanisms play a key role in setting joint priorities and aligning agendas, coordinating actors, mobilizing human and financial resources, and uniting all stakeholders around the common goal of ending violence. PASB has worked with partners to strengthen the capacity for multisectoral dialogue and collaboration in countries in line with INSPIRE and RESPECT, including through multisectoral training workshops. While a substantial number of countries report having a national multisectoral coalition/task force in place to prevent and respond to violence, these mechanisms are not always set up to cover all forms of violence, thus potentially reducing their impact. Moreover, countries report challenges to keeping these mechanisms operational, which underscores the importance of strengthening access to technical support, capacity building, and other resources in future.
Two baseline countries (BRA, DOM) and 1 target country (GUF) did not complete the assessment. These 3 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Despite significant progress in implementing changes toward malaria elimination in the E2025 countries, major implementation challenges persist in these areas, especially in the countries with the highest disease burden and dispersion. In addition to the structural weaknesses of the health systems in endemic areas, financial challenges, and the aftermath of COVID-19, social factors such as gold mining, migration, and social conflicts have limited the implementation of changes by the countries; nevertheless, significant progress was made. PASB support included developing guidelines and technical tools, as well as promoting changes that were replicated by strategic partners such as the RMEI initiative. Focal pockets of transmission in a limited number of territories continue to be a factor in favor of elimination, insufficiently leveraged by decision-makers to implement high-impact interventions with the necessary structural improvements in specific locations, which would have a major impact on the national situation. Preventing the re-establishment of transmission at the subnational level is another strategy facing significant implementation challenges in the coming years.
Two baseline countries (BRA, DOM) and 1 target country (CUW) did not complete the assessment. These 3 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
As of 31 December 2023, 27 baseline countries achieved this output indicator and two partially achieved it. This assessment was conducted based on the information entered by the countries through eJRF.
One baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, Peru, Paraguay, Suriname, and Uruguay have maintained their FMD-free status, while Guyana has achieved such status. Information on countries’ FMD-free status is available on the World Organization for Animal Health website (https://www.woah.org/en/disease/foot-and-mouth-disease/#ui-id-2). It is also important to highlight that the most recent FMD outbreak recorded in the Americas was in Colombia in 2018, and the current PHEFA action plan covers the period from 2021 to 2025.
One baseline country (BRA) and 1 target country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Twenty-five countries have successfully implemented plans of action for the prevention, prophylaxis, surveillance, control, and elimination of dog-mediated human rabies. PAHO has made significant contributions by providing standards, data, and technical cooperation. Achievements include comprehensive vaccination campaigns, improved surveillance systems, and effective public awareness programs. However, several countries still need to enhance their national capacities, as canine rabies cases persist, posing a continued risk for human rabies transmission. Lessons learned highlight the importance of sustained efforts in vaccination, surveillance, and access to post-exposure prophylaxis. Ongoing support is essential to strengthen these capacities and achieve the complete elimination of dog-mediated rabies.
One baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Overall, countries have been working on different aspects of chemicals management, including participation in capacity-building activities, using appropriate guidance documents, and reflecting global chemicals policies in national planning, especially regarding regulations and programs, although competing interests within and outside the health sector remain a challenge.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 1 baseline country (COL). In addition, 1 baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Through the Special Initiative for Action on the Social Determinants of Health for Advancing Health Equity, PASB has supported the creation, strengthening, and work of Intersectoral Commissions on Equity and Social Determinants in several sub-national governments in Chile, Colombia, Peru, and Costa Rica. At the local level, these efforts have translated into the establishment of intersectoral models of action in 16 pathfinder municipalities, benefiting 968 000 people. Likewise, the invigoration of the Healthy Municipalities, Cities and Communities Movement, with 42 active members across 12 countries, has involved the development of guidelines to strengthen local governments’ commitment to set up intersectoral mechanisms to improve health, wellbeing, and health equity.
One baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Progress has been made in the Region, with most of the countries achieving the indicator. The Strategy and Plan of Action on Health Promotion within the context of the Sustainable Development Goals 2019-2030, adopted by Member States in 2019, has served as an example for developing and updating national health promotion policies and programs.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 1 baseline country (GTM). In addition, 1 baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Progress has been made toward the establishment of mechanisms for community participation, with all countries achieving the indicator. The PASB has been strengthening mechanisms for community participation, for example by supporting the Network on Vulnerable Populations (EPSI.V) and the Latin American and Caribbean Confederation of Women Domestic Workers (CONLACTRAHO). PASB support includes knowledge dissemination and systematization, as well as gathering information to adapt health policies or strategies based on the needs of specific populations.
One baseline country (BRA) and one target country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
From 2019 to 2023, initiatives for improving information systems for health (IS4H) have driven significant advances toward set targets. These efforts have focused on improving governance mechanisms, maturity assessments, regulatory frameworks, and health information architecture, and they have achieved substantial progress in enhancing data-driven health strategies regionally. The establishment of monitoring and evaluation frameworks, interinstitutional committees, and national policies for electronic health records with open data has been crucial. Significant advances include the adoption of governance mechanisms by several countries and territories, exceeding the target; use of the PASB model for maturity assessment with financial and technical support from the Inter-American Development Bank and the World Bank; and the establishment of regulatory frameworks and health information architecture by numerous countries and territories. Initiatives in data management and information technologies include the adoption of Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR) and ICD-11 standards by 17 countries and territories, as well as progress in electronic health records implementation, moving toward a more unified and efficient health data management model. Additionally, engagement with academic and professional communities and networks has strengthened health analysis and knowledge management, while innovations such as the PASB telehealth platform indicate a shift toward a more integrated approach for the co-creation of health-focused digital public goods. These advances reflect broad progress toward robust, data-informed public health strategies and policies, demonstrating an important commitment to improving health outcomes and operational efficiencies within all Member States.
Two baseline countries (BRA, DOM) and four target countries (CUW, GLP, GUF, MTQ) did not complete the assessment. These 6 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
A comprehensive maturity assessment of IS4H was conducted by PASB of progress made between 2016 and 2023. Using over 240 standardized indicators, the evaluation assessed national health information systems with respect to governance, strategy, laws, financial sustainability, human resources, data management, and quality, including vital statistics, analysis capabilities, information flows, project management, and information technology (IT) infrastructure. Information for the assessment was gathered through country visits, expert consultations, database and gap analyses, and reviews of policies, procedures, and technical documentation. Site visits allowed for direct observation of information platform use and interoperability, especially in primary care, and for data collection and interviews with frontline administrative and clinical staff.
A comprehensive report on the regional IS4H maturity assessment will be published in late 2024; however, the assessment found that 42.8% of the countries are still at level 1, “building awareness.” These countries are characterized by early adoption of health information systems, with mostly analogue data and a growing recognition of the need for digitalization. With very limited capacity to generate data and assure its quality, including on health indicators whose data source relies on civil registration and vital statistics, they depend largely on international organizations in this regard. Investments in digital health have often not expanded infrastructure as expected due to gaps in access to electricity and connectivity, as well as a lack of long-term planning and sustainable financing.
A third of the countries, 34.7%, have reached level 2, “implementing best practices.” They are developing their health information systems with data from various sources and managing health information effectively. However, they face challenges such as incomplete development of indicators, insufficient data exchange, and limited implementation of data standards and public health communication strategies. Another 18.4% have reached level 3, “standardization and continuous improvement,” reflecting advances in IS4H policies and strategies and the use of high-quality data for decision-making. Only 4.1% of countries are at level 4, “integration and alignment,” marked by highly integrated information systems that are aligned with national and international standards.
No country in the Region has reached level 5, the maximum maturity level in IS4H, which entails complete deployment of all components of the model and a constant search for innovation.
Two baseline countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
As per the IHR (2005), all 35 State Parties are mandated to report annually on the status of their core capacities through the State Party Self-Assessment Reporting Tool (SPAR). Compliance with this requirement demonstrates transparency and accountability among Member States and the Secretariat. PASB has supported multisectoral discussions to comply with the SPAR by developing guidance documents for the 15 core capacities, as well as country profiles using the SPAR indicators for the period 2010-2022.
Two baseline countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
In the 2022-2023 biennium, significant strides were made in health sector risk management, with 23 countries conducting national and/or subnational risk assessments to update their response plans. PASB supported this by implementing the "Emergency Risk Management in Health and Disasters" virtual course. This course trained 1,466 healthcare professionals, including 17 facilitators, on risk assessments, preparedness evaluation, and multi-threat response planning using methodologies like STAR, EDHPI, and the Multi-Threat Response Framework.
One baseline country (BRA) and one target country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
This indicator measures the degree of institutionalization and sustainability of essential public health functions that are relevant for application, implementation, and compliance with the IHR. Therefore, this result reflects the challenges most countries face in sustaining the level of financial investment needed to maintain surveillance and response capacities.
Two baseline countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Significant progress was made in the 2022-2023 biennium; 37 countries have full-time personnel dedicated to health emergencies. Training played a crucial role, with 5,682 health professionals certified in Health Facility Assessment, totaling 14 767 certified individuals. Additionally, the “Emergency Risk Management in Health and Disasters” virtual course trained 1,466 health professionals, including 17 facilitator trainers.
Two baseline countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
This indicator reports on Member States’ institutionalization to evaluate capacities during real and non-actual events once plans, mechanisms, and standard operating procedures are in place by scoring 100% in at least one of the four State Party Self-Assessment Reporting Tool indicators that reflect the country’s emergency response. PASB facilitated an IHR meeting among Small Island Developing States in Jamaica (May 2023), in which delegates concluded that most of the SPAR indicators could reach the highest level in the context of SIDS, which includes the four indicators measured under this overall output indicator.
One baseline country (DOM) and one target country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
In the 2022-2023 biennium, progress was made in enhancing the resilience and safety of healthcare facilities across the Caribbean and South America through the Resilient Hospitals Initiative. This initiative focused on the strengthening of SMART Hospitals to fortify health facilities against health emergencies and disasters, which 24 countries have launched, promoting safety, sustainability, inclusivity, and adaptability within health facilities. Technical support was instrumental in helping Caribbean countries integrate SMART standards, with notable achievements such as the evaluation of 10 facilities for A70 standards in Barbados and the modernization of eight health centers in Belize. Continuous efforts in monitoring, resource allocation, and addressing data gaps remain essential if the 2025 targets for safe and resilient healthcare infrastructure are to be met.
Three additional countries achieved this indicator during the biennium. The indicator measures country progress toward mainstreaming disaster risk reduction and climate change adaptation/mitigation in the health sector.
In the 2022-1023 biennium, 17 countries included the criteria for disaster mitigation and climate change adaptation under the SMART H initiative, ensuring the operation of health services during and in the aftermath of disasters. As part of this group of countries, three additional countries achieved this indicator during the biennium. Two countries have had delays in implementation of interventions after the assessment, but both are working to achieve the indicator.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 1 baseline country (BHS). In addition, 2 baseline countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 3 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Surveillance and early detection systems continue to be strengthened in the region. Training activities, lab quality assessments, and reviews of lessons learned have allowed improvement of this indicator’s performance in countries.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 1 baseline country (JAM). In addition, 2 baseline countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 3 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Infection prevention and control (IPC) continues to be strengthened across the region through preparedness activities, such as the implementation of respiratory protection programs and virtual IPC trainings as part of implementation of the World Health Organization Core Components of Infection Prevention and Control Programs (WHO-IPC CC) at the national level.
Four baseline countries (BRA, DOM, GLP, MTQ) did not complete the assessment. These 4 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
The surveillance system for influenza and other respiratory viruses is highly robust. This system was strengthened during the COVID-19 pandemic and laid the foundation for the integration of COVID-19 surveillance in the region in 87% of countries. Within the countries that partially achieved the indicator, work continues to improve the frequency of epidemiological reporting.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 2 target countries (BHS, JAM). In addition, 2 target countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 4 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Progress has been made in most countries. However, target countries continue to show either no progress or partial achievement. PASB will redouble its efforts to examine the health equity approach in key strategic programs, policies, and plans, with particular emphasis on those countries which did not complete the assessment.
Two target countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Progress has been made in many countries; however, some continue to show either no progress or partial achievement. PASB will continue to provide support to integration of gender approaches in key strategic programs, policies, and plans, with an emphasis on countries that did not complete the assessment.
One baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Major advances have been made in the region in line with the implementation of the Strategy and Plan of Action on Ethnicity and Health 2019-2025; however, challenges remain. PASB will intensify its efforts to ensure culturally adequate approaches are taken when addressing the health needs of the diverse ethnic groups in the region.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 1 baseline country (ECU). In addition, 1 target country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
Measurement of this indicator has posed challenges for many countries in the region. While PASB has provided technical cooperation, tools, and support for this purpose, there is a need to enhance the commitment of countries further and improve countries’ capacities to utilize these resources effectively.