Three target countries (BRA, CUW, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 3 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Many countries in the region are continuing their efforts to enhance the response capacity of primary care services. Countries such as Belize, Bolivia, Canada, Chile, and Honduras, among others, have formulated policies and strategies to improve access to primary care, support healthcare professionals, build capacities to address chronic diseases, enhance preventive and palliative care, and promote the integration of health networks, including the use of telehealth. Similarly, other countries such as Argentina, Costa Rica, Ecuador, and Guyana, have focused on strengthening governance, improving infrastructure, fostering intersectoral collaboration, and reinforcing maternal and child healthcare services. Despite these endeavors, much work remains to be done, particularly concerning the advancement of health service integration with a focus on equity. The sustained continuation of these efforts is crucial to achieving long-term impact on health outcomes.
One baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Overall, the countries are mostly on track with their development of actions to prevent care dependence. The Decade of Healthy Aging movement was seen as an important opportunity to advance this agenda, encouraging countries to implement actions that are conducive to integrated care and intersectoral actions, especially concerning enabling environments and the protection of older adults' rights.
PASB will continue supporting at-risk countries in conducting follow-up campaigns to update the vaccination status of unvaccinated children under 5 years of age. This should improve MMR-1 and MMR-2 vaccination coverage by the end of 2023. Countries report 2023 data in the first quarter of 2024 via the PAHO-WHO/UNICEF electronic Joint Immunization Data Reporting Form (eJRF).
One baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Since 2020, a decrease in vaccination coverage with the third dose of PCV vaccine has been noted. In 2023, a very slight improvement was noted compared to 2022 (81% vs. 80%). This, together with improvement in coverage of other vaccines (e.g., pentavalent), could indicate that PCV3 vaccination coverage has started to recover. It is important to closely monitor the progress of member states.
Three baseline countries (BRA, DOM, GLP) did not complete the assessment. These 3 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
The countries of the Region have made great efforts to incorporate the vaccine into their national vaccination schedules; as of December 31, 2023, only 4 countries had not introduced the HPV vaccine. 26 countries in the Region are vaccinating children and 12 countries have switched to a single-dose schedule.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 1 target country (JAM). In addition, 2 baseline countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 3 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
One baseline country (BRA) and 1 target country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Rehabilitation services are a key component of a health system and PAHO has been working with Member States to conduct needs assessments (STARS analysis) and develop strategic plans to strengthen availability and access to rehabilitation services in the region. ASHA, an NGO in official relations with PAHO, has trained health providers in speech and language therapy to build capacity in this area. However, numerous challenges persist within overall health system strengthening that pertain to rehabilitation, such as limited capacity, sufficient human resources, and insufficient funding.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 1 target country (CYM). In addition, 1 baseline country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
As part of the deinstitutionalization process, a mental health crisis management course was delivered to first responders in Saint Kitts and Nevis and the Bahamas. Deinstitutionalization processes were accelerated across several countries to shift toward community-based services. For instance, Paraguay made progress transitioning patients from a national psychiatric hospital into integrated community-based mental healthcare, supporting 156 patients through new municipal-level centers last year. Mobile crisis response gained more prominence as an alternative to hospitalizations. Another example is the Bahamas emergency response service, which has prevented avoidable hospital admissions. Similar assistance programs now run across 3 Argentine provinces.
Two target countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
This indicator is part of the 12 Global Road Safety Performance targets that resulted from the mandate of World Health Assembly Resolution 69.7, adopted in May 2016, in which Member States requested WHO to facilitate a transparent, sustainable, and participatory process with all stakeholders to assist interested countries in developing global performance targets for key risk factors and service delivery mechanisms to reduce road traffic fatalities and injuries. This indicator was adopted by Member States after a long process of technical consultations and will help guide action and ensure measurement of progress at the national and global levels.
Response time, which can be measured as the time in minutes elapsed from system activation to the arrival of specialized care at the scene, allows us to analyze the performance of the health system, especially in terms of the emergency care provision. This indicator facilitates analysis of the timeliness of emergency care and allows the identification of inefficiencies and gaps in the system in order to work on the necessary mechanisms to strengthen, expand, and rationalize emergency care. Although there is no consensus on a specific response time for traumatic injuries, countries were encouraged to set a response time target in their national road safety strategies and try to achieve it. This implies having a single telephone number for all emergency care services with whole-country coverage (all areas use this number, and no other numbers exist), integrated call-taking and dispatch services, and availability of ambulance services capable of providing high-standard care on scene, transfer and transport, handover and triage, etc. Data systems that measure key time intervals (such as by systematically recording and analyzing response time at the national or subnational level) are essential for improving performance and service quality. While these functions could be implemented in different ways depending on available resources, affordable and sustainable improvements can be made according to each situation, building on the WHO framework.
To achieve this outcome, the three levels of the Organization, along with Ministry of Health counterparts and other relevant stakeholders, are working to conduct emergency and critical care systems assessments using WHO’s ECCSA tool. This strategic planning tool was designed to help Ministries of Health assess their emergency care system, identify gaps, and set priorities for system development. This includes establishing laws and regulations, creating protocols to guide personnel on critical processes, ensuring compliance with standards through certifications, and implementing processes for the accreditation of service quality and safety. From 2022 to 2023, four ECCSAs were conducted in the Region.
Additionally, we promoted the implementation of a Train the Trainer strategy to implement the WHO/ICRC Basic Emergency Care training course in a cascading manner, strengthening the capabilities of first responders. Funding was secured to implement these and other WHO-developed tools to strengthen emergency care in priority countries.
Two target countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Sexual violence is a particularly severe challenge in the Americas, requiring timely intervention by the health system to mitigate the consequences for survivors’ health and well-being. The need for comprehensive post-sexual assault (post-rape) care services in emergency health services is reiterated in the Strategy and Plan of Action on Strengthening the Health System to Address Violence against Women, which defines post-rape care to include:
a) First-line support and psychological first aid;
b) Emergency contraception to women who seek care within 5 days;
c) Referral to safe abortion if a woman is pregnant as a result of rape, where such services are permitted by national law;
d) Sexually transmitted infection and/or HIV post-exposure prophylaxis, per applicable protocols; and
e) Hepatitis B vaccination.
PASB has supported Member States in strengthening the health system response to sexual violence, including through improved health system protocols and health workforce training. A recent analysis of health system protocols found that text references to these essential post-rape care services remain limited. For example, 54% of Member States refer to first-line support in their protocols, while hepatitis B vaccination is mentioned by 43%, demonstrating significant gaps. While a text reference to these criteria does not necessarily mean corresponding services are readily available and accessible, it is an important starting point for them to be specifically mentioned in protocols that outline the health system’s response to violence. Importantly, one barrier in this area is the lack of health service evaluation tools to assess specific progress on post-rape care in line with established indicators. In response, PASB has collaborated with selected Member States in the development and piloting of a rapid service evaluation tool for post-sexual assault care. This tool has the potential to improve monitoring of this indicator beyond the pilot countries (Argentina, Colombia, Honduras, Peru), thereby helping to strengthen quality improvement of post-sexual assault care.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 1 baseline country (CHL). In addition, 1 baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Although the current rating of this indicator is “No progress” due to a regression from the baseline, regulatory systems in most countries are advancing toward maturity level 3. Examples of progress in countries that are on track to achieve the indicator include:
1) increased capacity to implement the Global Benchmarking Tool for assessing regulatory capacities,
2) increased participation in a roster of experts to assess regulatory capacities,
3) better identification of gaps, and
4) definition of institutional development plans with a view to increasing their maturity level, as per defined criteria.
Additional efforts are in place to guide and support the National Regulatory Authorities of Regional Reference from Latin America (Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Cuba, and Mexico) in their transition to become WHO-listed Authorities through a streamlined procedure that may not require full assessment of regulatory capacities, but only demonstration of their performance.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 1 target country (CHL). In addition, 1 target country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
PASB continues to cooperate with Member States in the development, adoption, and implementation of national radiation safety plans in accordance with the International Basic Safety Standards (BSS). While most Member States are using the BSS when establishing or updating national rules or regulations and have employed operational criteria in the field of radiation safety, it will take time for them to make the necessary changes to existing national radiation protection systems in order to fully comply with BSS requirements. The target is expected to be achieved by the end of 2025.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 2 target countries (CHL, CRI). In addition, 1 baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. These 3 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
PASB continues to provide technical cooperation to countries (including some not included as targets for 2025) in developing mechanisms and official systems to monitor the quality of pharmaceutical services, as part of Integrated Health Services Delivery Networks. Brazil and El Salvador are both making progress in developing mechanisms to monitor the quality of pharmacies. While there was no agreement for two target countries on the specific rating of the indicator, advances were recognized in both cases.
Three target countries (BRA, DOM, ECU) did not complete the assessment. These 3 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Only 1 country has achieved this indicator, although 3 more are reported to be on track to do so by 2025.
The financial protection indicators within the SDG framework (catastrophic and household-impoverishing expenditures) are constructed based on household surveys that record relevant data. These surveys are carried out by countries at various points in time, but almost always at 5- or 10-year intervals. Many countries have great difficulties in implementing these surveys, and this causes years of delay.
Only 4 countries in the region (Bolivia, Mexico, Peru, and United States of America) would be in a position to calculate such indicators, with 2 or more years (data points) in the period 2019-2025 (or relevant adjacent years) available to calculate variation. Four other countries (Colombia, Dominican Republic, El Salvador, and Panama) currently have one data point for the relevant or adjacent years and could eventually complete the measurement toward the end of the period in 2025. It is therefore recommended to eliminate their measurement or simply limit the indicator baselines and targets to countries for which sufficient data are available.
These indicators are monitored by PAHO in collaboration with WHO. Countries are encouraged and trained to use them so that they can carry out surveys and then analyze the results. More recently, PASB has begun to analyze the determinants that contribute to a lack of financial protection. This will allow countries to have more evidence to improve their policies.
Two target countries (CUW, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
During the biennium, countries in the Region made progress toward improving their food control systems to prevent and mitigate risks to food safety. PASB has provided technical guidance to countries (Brazil, Chile, Costa Rica, Cuba, Guatemala, Ecuador, Honduras, Panama, Peru, Paraguay, URU) to improve their food control systems based on the principles of risk analysis (risk management, risk assessment and risk communication).
Country achievements include the development of national food safety policies and Codex Alimentarius programs for standard-setting and implementation from farm to fork – One Health (Guatemala, Guyana, Honduras, El Salvador). Additionally, Paraguay, Dominican Republic, Colombia and Haiti are improving the capacity of their traditional food markets to prevent emerging food safety risks under the One Health approach. In the Caribbean, a survey was conducted to assess the readiness of food control systems to mitigate risks related to climate change (Saint Lucia, Trinidad and Tobago, Barbados, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Guyana, Jamaica). Based on the findings of this survey, Trinidad and Tobago and Barbados developed climate-resilient national food safety plans. One of the main challenges in achieving the indicator at country level is the high turnover of government officials. As a lesson learned, it is important to facilitate collaboration across sectors and regularly monitor the implementation of developed policies, programs, and plans. PASB has mobilized resources to improve and harmonize the food safety risk analysis capacity of countries in Latin America.
Two target countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Most target Member States have demonstrated political commitment to the elimination of industrially produced trans fatty acids from their food supply. Continued PASB efforts to support them in securing the adoption of PAHO/WHO best practices to achieve such elimination suggest the indicator is on track, provided that Member States' commitments translate into policy action in 2024.
One baseline country (DOM) and one target country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
The Report of the PAHO High-Level Commission on Mental Health and COVID-19 and the new Strategy for Improving Mental Health and Suicide Prevention provide the vision and the recommended actions for increased technical cooperation in MH in the Region. Several countries have started to take important actions to improve and reform their mental health systems. The recommendations of the Commission emphasize the importance of intersectoral work and integration of mental health into all areas of government to better face the long-term crisis of mental health in the Americas. In the area of suicide prevention, comprehensive strategies aligned with global best practices were developed with the support of PAHO, including the promotion of intersectoral collaboration and policy developments. For instance, PAHO helped Uruguay establish a multi-stakeholder network for suicide prevention across healthcare, education, social services, and civil society. Prioritized policy recommendations have also been formulated. Bolivia targeted action across societal, community, relationship, and individual levels based on the WHO LIVE LIFE framework.
Furthermore, 70 media professionals were trained on responsible reporting on suicide in Guyana (25), Barbados (22), and Grenada (23).
Three baseline countries (DOM, GLP, MTQ) did not complete the assessment. These 3 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
During the biennium, countries in the Region made progress in eliminating malaria or interrupting its transmission both at the national and subnational levels, as well as preventing re-establishment in malaria-free countries and receptive territories. Case investigation is being incorporated by endemic and non-endemic countries, including improvements in guidelines, instruments, and surveillance processes. These actions should integrate the efforts made so far by vertical programs with more cross-cutting epidemiologic surveillance processes and actors. Important challenges remain in this aspect of integration and in the quality of investigations. Pending improvements include the adoption of investigation in endemic territories where the small number of cases already justifies this action to accelerate elimination, as well as improvements in response. The technical cooperation that PAHO has developed in this area has been replicated with partner implementation actions, such as the RMEI initiative in Central America.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 2 baseline countries (KNA, URY). In addition, 1 baseline country (BRA) and 1 target country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 4 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
During the REDIPRA meeting held in Colombia in late 2023, significant progress was noted toward the interruption of dog-mediated human rabies transmission, following the elimination validation criteria. PAHO support – through provision of standards, generation of data, and technical cooperation – has been pivotal. Achievements include successful mass dog vaccination campaigns, enhanced public awareness, and improved surveillance systems. Many countries have reported zero human cases for multiple years; however, four countries have reported cases in the past years. Challenges remain in some countries, such as maintaining high vaccination coverage, addressing surveillance gaps, and ensuring access to post-exposure prophylaxis. Continued commitment is essential to overcome these hurdles and sustain the progress made toward eliminating canine rabies.
One baseline country (BRA) and 1 target country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Following the technical specification of the indicator, PASB recognizes that 28 countries have established capacity and effective processes to eliminate dog-mediated human rabies, showcasing significant progress in the region. PAHO contributions, including provision of standards, generation of data, and technical cooperation, have been instrumental in these achievements. Successful strategies include comprehensive dog vaccination campaigns, public awareness initiatives, and robust surveillance systems. However, several countries continue to report canine rabies, with some also reporting human cases. Lessons learned highlight the importance of sustained vaccination efforts, enhanced surveillance, and accessible post-exposure prophylaxis. Continued support and commitment are essential to address these challenges and achieve the complete elimination of dog-mediated human rabies across the region.
Two baseline countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
The health sectors of several countries have strengthened capacities to engage with other sectors, ensuring that health is included in climate change discussions at the local, regional, and international levels. This achievement is facilitated by the appointment of designated climate change and health focal points who advocate for health inclusion in climate change inter-ministerial committees.
One baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
From 2019 to 2023, substantial progress has been made in Information Systems for Health (IS4H) through the adoption of initiatives that have enabled countries to advance toward the targets. A key achievement has been the significant progress in implementing interoperable information systems for health that include subnational disaggregation at all levels, which is crucial for effective data-driven decision-making. Other notable accomplishments include the adoption of governance mechanisms, the use of the PASB model for maturity assessments supported by the Inter-American Development Bank and the World Bank, and the establishment of regulatory frameworks. Importantly, 17 countries and territories have adopted the Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR) and ICD-11 standards, indicating progress in electronic health records and data management. A comprehensive maturity assessment of IS4H was conducted by PASB of progress made between 2016 to 2023, using over 240 standardized indicators to evaluate national health information systems in areas such as governance, strategy, laws, financial sustainability, human resources, data quality, and IT infrastructure. Findings revealed that 42.8% of countries are at the initial maturity level, 34.7% are implementing best practices, 18.4% are standardizing and continuously improving, and only 4.1% have highly integrated systems. No country has reached the maximum maturity level, indicating ongoing challenges and areas for improvement.
Significant advances have been made toward the digital transformation of the health sector, aligned with the Global Strategy on Digital Health. A network of countries has been established to promote digital health solutions and information systems, facilitating the adoption of emerging technologies and innovative digital health solutions such as the PASB telehealth platform and digital COVID-19 vaccine certificates. The health sector's active participation in e-government initiatives reflects a broader commitment to optimizing technology infrastructure and converging current initiatives for a more efficient approach to health information management. In alignment with United Nations recommendations, notable progress has been achieved in several areas, particularly in implementing interoperable information systems for health that include subnational disaggregation. This effort has been essential in enhancing data-driven health strategies regionally. Twelve countries have improved connectivity and bandwidth, particularly in rural areas, to expand telehealth services and enhance IT infrastructure. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, 17 countries have digitalized vaccination certification processes, and seven countries are implementing the PASB All-in-ONE Telehealth Platform. Thirty-three countries and territories have demonstrated commitment to data governance and achieving high levels of data disaggregation to reduce biases in artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms. Ten countries have established national committees on health information systems, 18 countries are transitioning to ICD-11, and 12 countries are adopting the Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine (SNOMED) for semantic interoperability. Additionally, 17 countries are actively developing technological infrastructure for cross-border data exchange and interoperability. Thirteen countries are engaging in discussions on the role of AI in public health, focusing on governance, ethical aspects, and the application of AI technologies.
These initiatives reflect a broad commitment to improving health outcomes and operational efficiencies, demonstrating the importance of robust, data-informed public health strategies and policies across the Region. This indicator is a key metric for building more resilient health systems and enabling health systems to ensure that no one is left behind. Countries’ commitment to having more detailed and inclusive data supports stronger, more responsive primary health care systems that can adapt to diverse needs and challenges, ultimately promoting equitable health for all.
One baseline country (BRA) and one target country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Moving toward robust institutional capacity of the science, evidence, and applied knowledge ecosystems, evidence-informed policy and practice programs are being implemented in 15 countries, in alignment with regional initiatives and other key priorities: Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, El Salvador, Jamaica, Mexico, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Trinidad and Tobago, and Venezuela. There has also been progress as evidenced by 20 countries participating in the PAHO/WHO regional joint meeting of the Evidence-Informed Policy Network (EVIPNET) and Health Technology Assessment Network of the Americas (REDETSA), which took place in Jamaica in October 2023. The BIGG-REC database efficiently organizes over 3,500 current WHO and PAHO recommendations for easy access in four languages. Through 3 courses on the Virtual Campus, decision-makers and healthcare professionals in 28 countries received training in development of systematic reviews, evidence-based guidelines, and evidence-informed policies, engaging more than 20 000 participants. A PAHO Handbook for Adapting and Implementing Evidence-Informed Guidelines Second Edition was developed with the participation of 15 Member States and has been disseminated and used for guideline adaptation by national guideline programs.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 3 target countries (BMU, BON, KNA). In addition, 1 baseline country (BRA) and 5 target country (DOM, GUF, MTQ, GLP, CUW) did not complete the assessment. These 9 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
The number of countries that have generated and produced analytical health reports which include disaggregated data on a regular basis has increased from 5 to 17. Additionally, countries are increasingly making these reports and other health data and information more accessible both internally and externally. Improved national health information systems and advances in digital transformation have led to increased data demand and utilization. Such data increasingly include the social determinants of health and allow countries to monitor progress and gaps. PASB provided technical cooperation through ongoing capacity-building efforts in health analysis, particularly for monitoring SDG3 indicators among interdisciplinary country teams at national and subnational levels. This has been crucial to the progress achieved for OCM 21.b. An additional 13 countries are on track to achieve this indicator.
No agreement was reached for three countries and territories. PASB assessed that the criteria as detailed on the technical note for the indicator were not met, and no documentation was submitted or otherwise available at the time of the assessment.
One baseline country (BRA) and one target country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Progress has been observed in the Americas regarding the generation, circulation, and utilization of scientific and technical information, as well as the promulgation of knowledge-sharing initiatives among Members States, PASB, and stakeholders.
Overall, the impact factor of the scientific output and the number of journals increased across all Member States during the period 2022-2023, with special emphasis on medicine, public health, and related topics. The increase in implementation of open-access platforms and policies helped ensure more equitable and accessible access to scientific production in public health-related fields.
The contribution from documentation centers to regional databases such as LILACS, MedCarib, and other open-access platforms worldwide has also increased. A total of 22 countries and territories are eligible to access the Research4Life (R4L) program, and there has been an increase in the number of registered institutions, which have helped to meet the need for more equitable access to scientific and technical information and to reduce the digital divide across the Region. El Salvador became the first Member State to participate in the R4L Country Connector initiative.
Despite a slight decrease in the number of new designations and re-designations, PAHO/WHO Collaborating Centers (CC) have proven to be an important mechanism of technical cooperation. PAHO/WHO CCs support the Organization in fulfilling the mandates and priorities of the Region and globally, by developing research models and evidence-based literature and providing health analysis and methodologies. By December 2023, there were 179 CCs in the Region, distributed across 15 Member States.
Despite these advancements, persistent efforts to strengthen research systems, enhance knowledge sharing, and promote evidence-informed policies are needed. Institutionalizing knowledge, evidence, and science at the national level is essential, as is fostering integrated policies for information use and knowledge dissemination. Furthermore, capacity building and a continued focus on digital literacy are necessary to ensure that public health workers, decision-makers, researchers, and communities have access to the best scientific and technical information.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for one baseline country (GUY) and 4 target countries (CUB, ECU, JAM, MEX). In addition, one baseline country (DOM) and one target country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. These 7 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Achieving this outcome indicator involves continuously monitoring and supporting national policies and agendas for health research and promoting their alignment with the Policy on Research for Health (CD49/10) and WHO’s Strategy on Research for Health (WHA 58.34). PASB also supports countries to assess and report on financial flows for health research. This process often requires intersectoral action, because while priorities are usually set by the health sector, funding is frequently allocated by other sectors, such as science and technology.
In addition to providing direct technical cooperation, PASB has issued technical documents and a checklist to assist countries in developing a national policy or agenda on health research. PAHO also collaborates with WHO’s Global Observatory on Research for Health and Development, harmonizing indicators with those monitored by WHO, UN, UNESCO, and OECD to improve consistency and reduce the reporting burden on countries. PAHO collates this information on a public website and works with WHO, Member States, and data providers to keep the data updated.
One baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
PASB supported Member States in the development and revision of national standards governing the ethics of research, such as laws, regulations, and national policies, with the goal of ensuring that they adhere to international ethical standards for research with human participants. The COVID-19 pandemic brought increased attention to the importance of adhering to international standards to expedite the conduct of high-impact clinical trials. Furthermore, international standards for research now include specific provisions for research in emergencies (as described in PAHO’s Catalyzing Ethical Research in Emergencies: Ethics guidance, lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic and pending agenda), and PASB supported countries in including these provisions in national standards, thus improving ethics preparedness to conduct research in future emergencies. Measuring progress in this indicator has often entailed distinguishing the ethical from the strictly regulatory oversight of research with human participants.
Seven baseline countries (BON, BRA, CUW, DOM, GLP, GUF, MTQ) did not complete the assessment. These 7 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
In the 2022-23 biennium, progress was made toward strengthening country capacity for all-hazards health emergency and disaster risk management. As of the latest assessment, 22 countries fully meet or exceed minimum capacities to manage public health risk associated with emergencies, with another 15 on track to do so. PASB's technical support, including the development of assessment tools and coordinator meetings, remains essential for achieving the 2025 target of 37 countries. Continuous monitoring and emphasis on gender-sensitive disaster preparedness, supported by tools such as the Preparedness Index for Health Emergencies and Disasters and the monitoring survey for the Plan of Action on Disaster Risk Reduction, are critical for maintaining and building on the progress made.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 3 target countries (BRB, CRI, MEX). In addition, 2 target countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 5 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
To achieve this indicator, a State Party must have improved its scores or maintained them (where the score is higher than 0%), for at least 12 of the 15 core capacities, as compared to the previous year. Three countries did not comply with the State Party Self-Assessment Reporting Tool in 2021, precluding comparison with results for the past biennium. PASB is working closely with the countries to strengthen and maintain their core capacities under the IHR, which contribute directly to global health security.
Two target countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Twelve countries achieved the indicator by the end of 2023, and another 21 were on track to do so by 2025. This indicator aims to measure and track the capacity of countries and territories to respond to major epidemics and pandemics and to ensure a rapid exchange of information about impending public health threats and, as a result, to increase confidence and trust among all parties.
PASB provided technical cooperation to improve disease surveillance systems and train health workers to strengthen preparedness for epidemics and pandemics, notably by strengthening national and regional surveillance networks and implementing the Strategy on Regional Genomic Surveillance for Epidemic and Pandemic Preparedness and Response.
One target country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Progress has been observed in advancing health equity, gender and ethnic equality in health, and human rights in the region. The continued commitment of Member States to issues of ethnicity and human rights was demonstrated by the approval of two progress reports presented at the 60th Directing Council, held 25-29 September 2023: Health and Human Rights (Resolution CD50.R8) [1] and the Strategy and Plan of Action on Ethnicity and Health 2019-2025 (CD57/13) [2]. In addition, DHE/EG collaborated with the WHO Department of Gender Equity and Rights on the resolution on Indigenous Health tabled by the Government of Brazil and approved by the 67th World Health Assembly in May 2023. Furthermore, Member States requested an update to PAHO Resolution CD52.R6, Addressing the Causes of Disparities in Health Services Access and Utilization for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Trans (LGBT) persons.
[1] https://www.paho.org/en/documents/cd50r8-health-and-human-rights
[2] https://www.paho.org/en/documents/cd5713-strategy-and-plan-action-ethnicity-and-health-2019-2025
Eight target countries (BRA, CAN, CUW, DOM, GLP, GUF, MTQ, PRI) did not complete the assessment. These 8 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
The majority of countries and territories express satisfaction with PAHO/WHO's leading role on global and regional health issues, indicating that the Organization’s efforts and initiatives are generally perceived positively across the region. This widespread satisfaction underscores PAHO/WHO's role as a leading public health authority, engaging countries and territories in the regional and global public health agenda at the highest level – politically, strategically, and technically. Efforts will continue to ensure alignment between biennial work plans and the priorities indicated by national health authorities. This commitment involves ongoing coordination and collaboration with national health authorities to tailor PAHO/WHO's biennial work plans to address the specific health challenges and priorities identified by each country.
One baseline country (BRA) and one target country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
This is a composite indicator based on the inclusion of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) policies, the incorporation of short oral treatment for tuberculosis (bedaquiline) into national guidelines, and the use of direct-acting antivirals (DAA) for treatment of hepatitis C. While countries have made great strides in incorporating these commodities in their national policies and guidelines, it is vital to scale up access and increase the number of people receiving PrEP, bedaquiline, and DAAs, all of which can be procured through the Strategic Fund. The technical team has been promoting the scale-up of these interventions.
Two target countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
DPT vaccination coverage has been affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. PASB is working to improve coverage and reduce dropout rates to ensure that under-vaccinated individuals receive the necessary immunizations.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 1 baseline country (BOL). In addition, 2 baseline countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 3 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 1 target country (GUY). In addition, 2 baseline countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 3 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
One baseline country (BRA) and one target country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
The mental health Gap Action Programme (mhGAP) continues to be broadly adopted across the Region to integrate evidence-based care in primary settings through non-specialist health workers.
107 MhGAP trainings were conducted in countries. 25 countries received training on the integration of MH into primary health care; 144,790 health personnel were trained. Among those countries that received training were Aruba, Saint Lucia, and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines. Increased integration of MH into primary health care can improve the continuum of care for mental health conditions. During the biennium, Belize showed an increase in mental health diagnosis at the outpatient level.
mhGAP implementation in Latin American countries showcases significant progress in key metrics, with 4,131 new trainers. For instance, Chile and Mexico have trained 5144 and 136,131 individuals respectively. Both countries have successfully integrated mhGAP into their national mental health policies. Paraguay, demonstrating notable advancement, has trained 103 individuals with 67 trainers, and successfully incorporated mhGAP into its national policy.
One target country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Several countries are initiating or expanding information and monitoring systems. For instance, Chile developed a database which tracks diagnosed cases and service referrals to analyze gaps. Similar surveillance efforts are underway in countries like Argentina.
One baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment
PASB Comments
The establishment of a single emergency care access number is crucial to streamline communication, improve response times, and enhance coordination among emergency responders. This supports Target 12 of the voluntary Global Road Safety Performance targets, which aims at ensuring that road traffic victims receive timely and effective pre-hospital care, thus improving survival rates and recovery outcomes.
The importance of having a free-to-call, single, easily recognizable, and universal (i.e., with countrywide coverage) emergency care access number cannot be overstated. This significantly enhances the effectiveness and efficiency of emergency medical services. It simplifies the process for victims and bystanders, ensuring they can quickly and easily reach the necessary emergency services without confusion or delay. This streamlined communication is essential in crisis situations, where every second counts. Furthermore, it facilitates better coordination among emergency responders, enabling them to provide timely and effective care.
Rapid access to emergency medical services is a critical component of reducing road traffic fatalities and injuries, as outlined in the Global Road Safety Performance Targets. The Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) has supported this initiative by promoting the standardization of emergency numbers across the Americas in different technical publications and by providing/incentivizing interprogrammatic technical cooperation to different countries. One example of this technical cooperation is the Emergency and Critical Care Systems Assessment (ECCSA) conducted in different countries of the Region, which has translated into the development of roadmaps to implement action priorities. ECCSA is also underway in other countries. These efforts are integral to achieving the global targets and, ultimately, saving lives.
Two baseline countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment
PASB Comments
A milestone for a strong health-system response to violence is the existence of at least one health sector protocol which provides information on services and care to be provided to survivors of violence. These protocols are critical tools to guide high-quality health service delivery. They provide standardized guidance that ensures consistency across people and settings and over time. Protocols can also be useful to guide training and professional development of health workers, as these documents often set the expectation for the health-system response to survivors of violence. Countries may have one national sector-wide violence protocol or several ones focusing on specific forms of violence, specific settings, or specific groups of survivors. PASB has developed substantial guidance for Member States with evidence-based recommendations of what should be included in such protocols. The Organization has continued to provide support to Member States in the development, review, and updating of national guidelines on violence. While a large majority of Member States now have at least one health-sector protocol on violence, which is a considerable achievement for the Region, a recent analysis by PASB stressed that more work was needed to improve the quality of these documents. The more detailed the guidance included, the easier it is for health managers to implement and for health workers to understand exactly what is required of them, improving the quality of care for survivors in all their diversity. Moreover, while the existence of a protocol and its alignment with the evidence base and related indicators is a critical milestone, it is important that these documents be implemented and supplemented by clinical handbooks, job aids, and similar reference tools, as well as by training for health workers to support them in their day-to-day interactions with survivors.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 1 target country (VEN). In addition, 1 baseline country (BRA) and 1 target country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 3 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Countries have shown significant progress in the development and implementation of national human resources for health (HRH) policies. The first objective of the Plan of Action on Human Resources for Universal Access to Health and Universal Health Coverage 2018-2023 calls for promoting the formulation and implementation of a national policy on human resources for health at the highest level and agreed through intersectoral engagement. Some countries have already developed a national HRH policy, while others have been doing so with technical support from PAHO. Additionally, the Policy on the Health Workforce 2030: Strengthening Human Resources for Health to Achieve Resilient Health Systems recommends among its priority actions the strengthening of governance and promotion of national policies and plans for HRH, which should reinforce the work of countries that are on the path to achieving this objective.
One baseline country (BRA) and one target country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Although countries are making progress in the development of interprofessional teams at the first level of care, the indicator suffered a regression from the baseline. Greater effort is required to develop standards that define their capabilities and scope. Some of the countries that are on the path to achieving the indicator have prepared technical proposals aligned with their national health reforms and are working on ways to define the capabilities and scope of practice of interprofessional teams at the first level of care. The formation of interprofessional teams at the first level of care was one of the objectives defined in the Plan of Action on Human Resources for Universal Access to Health and Universal Health Coverage 2018-2023, which helped guide countries to achieve this challenge. Additionally, the Policy on the Health Workforce 2030: Strengthening Human Resources for Health to Achieve Resilient Health Systems recommends among its priority actions strengthening the formation and integration of interprofessional teams in integrated health services networks based on primary health care, which should reinforce the work of countries that are on the path to achieving this objective.
One baseline country (BRA) and one target country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Despite a regression from baseline, there have been major advances in defining institutional development plans (IDPs) with the aid of the Global Benchmarking Tool in many countries and territories. A comprehensive approach to promote government engagement to revisit gaps in the regulatory system is needed to help countries define their IDPs. In this regard, PASB has facilitated access to assessment tools and supported self-assessments in 15 Member States (Belize, Bolivia, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, El Salvador, Guatemala, Guyana, Honduras, Nicaragua, Panama, Paraguay, and Peru) – some of which are not currently linked to the indicator – in which political commitment to advancement of regulatory system strengthening has been prioritized. PASB provided technical cooperation to Barbados, Belize, Grenada, Guyana, Ecuador, Guatemala, and Panama to support self-assessments against the Global Benchmarking Tool (GBT) and for development and/or implementation of IDPs. Support for the monitoring of IDPs was provided to Bolivia, Ecuador, and Paraguay (which already had defined IDPs in place). Finally, training in use of the electronic tool for recording GBT results and comments (cGBT) was provided to Bolivia (15 participants) and Colombia (74 participants).
One baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Five baseline countries were able to maintain achievement of the indicator. Costa Rica, a target country, has partially achieved it. Work with local authorities to implement policies and strategies that promote competition through the use of generics, thus increasing access to medicines, must continue. To better understand the needs of the Member States, a consultation was held to prepare the final report of Resolution CD55.R12 on Access and rational use of strategic and high-cost medicines and other health technologies, which covers several topics, including policies and strategies for generic medicines. The results of this final report will provide a better understanding of needs and thus inform the technical cooperation that PASB provides to Member States in the future in a more targeted and timely manner.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 1 target country (COL). In addition, 1 baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
PASB continues to collaborate with Member States in the development, adoption, and implementation of national radiation safety plans in accordance with the International Basic Safety Standards (BSS). While most Member States are using the BSS when establishing or updating national rules or regulations and have employed operational criteria in the field of radiation safety, it will take time for them to make the necessary changes to existing national radiation protection systems in order to fully comply with BSS requirements. The indicator is expected to be achieved in the next biennium.
One baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
PASB continues to support Member States in developing mechanisms and establishing quality standards for pharmaceutical services as part of health systems. In collaboration with multiple stakeholders from different countries, PASB finished the regional tool to assess indicators of quality in such services. PASB continues to encourage countries to adopt the proposed methodology in whole or in part, particularly for Costa Rica, El Salvador, and Uruguay, where technical cooperation will continue to be provided in the next biennium.
Two baseline countries (BRA, CUW) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Countries made progress toward achieving the indicator. Guidelines on quality, a course on good manufacturing practices, and several seminars on improving blood services have been developed.
One baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Countries are moving toward compliance with the indicator. The implementation of the regional strategy and action plan for donation and equitable access to organ, tissue, and cell transplantation is advancing in most Latin American and in some Caribbean countries. PASB has provided data through progress reporting on the strategy, regional seminars, and annual follow-up meetings.
One baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Chile, Cuba, El Salvador, Paraguay, and the United States of America maintained baseline status and have successfully implemented national antimicrobial consumption monitoring systems based on data from sales volumes. They have additionally designed different strategies that allow them to enforce the regulation of antibiotic sales only under prescription. PASB continues to support countries in these two areas.
PASB supported Member States addressing ethical issues in public health through the publication of training material, the development of courses, the development of ethics guidance for emergency situations (such as the emergency use of unproven interventions outside of research, known as the MEURI framework, and the ethical conduct of mpox surveillance), and direct support for their implementation. Support was also provided to address issues that became prominent as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, e.g., the ethical acceptability of vaccination mandates. Because of the pervasive nature of ethical challenges in public health, ethics support to Member States was embedded in the technical cooperation provided in other areas, e.g. immunization, surveillance, and emergency response.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 1 target country (ECU). In addition, 1 target country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Most baseline and target countries have achieved or partially achieved this indicator, so the target is expected to be achieved in the next biennium, especially if joint efforts are intensified in the countries that have not yet achieved it. PASB collaborates with countries by carrying out multiple advocacy activities with health sector authorities and contributing to gathering evidence and making it available to countries.
Substantial progress has been made to improve the capacities for food control in countries in the Region. Honduras, Guatemala, El Salvador, and Guyana have developed their Codex Alimentarius programs to set and implement food safety standards from farm to fork within the One Health approach, and Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Colombia, Cuba, Chile, Guyana, Paraguay, Peru, and URU have improved their integrated AMR surveillance plans to include the food value chain. Suriname’s IHR Capacity 13 for Food Safety was assessed, and some areas of improvement have been detected. Countries’ food monitoring capacities have been improved through the technical support provided by the Inter-American Network of Food Analysis Laboratories (INFAL). PASB has provided technical guidance in risk analysis and foodborne disease surveillance regularly and on an ad-hoc basis to countries in Latin America.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 5 target countries (BHS, BRB, DMA, GUY, VEN). In addition, 1 baseline country (BRA) and 1 target country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 7 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Significant progress has been made in enabling countries to implement interventions against zoonotic diseases using a One Health approach. Many countries have achieved this indicator through enhanced intersectoral coordination, effective surveillance, prevention, and control measures. PAHO has been crucial in providing standards, producing data, and offering technical cooperation. Achievements include the establishment of national policies and integrated strategies. However, several countries still need to improve intersectoral coordination and fully implement One Health policies. Continued efforts are necessary to strengthen these areas, ensuring comprehensive and effective responses to zoonotic disease threats and preventing transmission from animals to humans.
One baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
In collaboration with the OAS, PASB has facilitated the adoption of an Inter-American program of work involving Ministries of Health and Ministries of Education to work collaboratively to improve physical activity in schools throughout the Americas. Brazil organized an International Conference on Physical Activity in Public Health, Chile is piloting the WHO toolkit to promote physical activity in schools, Colombia organized a meeting of the Colombian Physical Activity Network and the Network of Recreative Cycling Pathways in the Americas, Costa Rica organized a forum on physical activity and health, and the Dominican Republic is developing a national physical activity plan.
One baseline country (BRA) and one target country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Through a series of policy dialogues held in 2020 and 2021, PASB is collaborating with the OAS on school-based interventions under the framework of the Inter-American Education Agenda.
In October 2022, PASB and OAS launched the Inter-American Plan on healthy food and physical activity policies in school environments, with the participation of high-level officials appointed by the Ministries of Education and Health of approximately 26 countries. The objectives of the Inter-American Plan include sharing experiences to advance the framework of action and public policies in the countries; promote South-South cooperation, technical assistance, and capacity building; and develop lessons learned and regional guidance on school environments for healthy eating, nutrition, and physical activity.
One baseline country (BRA) and one target country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
PASB continuous efforts to support Member States has been successful in advancing labeling provisions to reduce the demand for and offer of products excessive in saturated fats and trans fats. However, the support for adoption of PAHO/WHO best practices to eliminate industrially produced trans fats needs to be intensified particularly in the Caribbean and in Central America.
Two baseline countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
In the Americas, violence intersects with complex trends – such as social, economic and gender inequality, migration, social and intergenerational change, organized crime, and others – which cannot be addressed in isolation. Integrated responses that actively engage different sectors and stakeholders are fundamental to ensuring the sustainability of investments. However, the involvement of diverse actors and perspectives can increase the risk of duplication and misalignment of activities. As a result, multisectoral coordination mechanisms play a key role in setting joint priorities and aligning agendas, coordinating actors, mobilizing human and financial resources, and uniting all stakeholders around the common goal of ending violence. PASB has worked with partners to strengthen the capacity for multisectoral dialogue and collaboration in countries in line with INSPIRE and RESPECT, including through multisectoral training workshops. While a substantial number of countries report having a national multisectoral coalition/task force in place to prevent and respond to violence, these mechanisms are not always set up to cover all forms of violence, thus potentially reducing their impact. Moreover, countries report challenges to keeping these mechanisms operational, which underscores the importance of strengthening access to technical support, capacity building, and other resources in future.
Two baseline countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Comprehensive suicide prevention strategies aligned with global best practices were developed with the support of PAHO, including the promotion of intersectoral collaboration and policy developments. For instance, PAHO supported Uruguay in establishing a multi-stakeholder network for suicide prevention across healthcare, education, social services, and civil society. Prioritized policy recommendations were also formulated. Bolivia targeted action across societal, community, relationship, and individual levels based on the WHO LIVE LIFE framework.
70 media professionals were trained on responsible reporting on suicide in Guyana (25), Barbados (22), and Grenada (23).
Strategies to improve surveillance and response systems for suicide prevention were created with the support of PAHO. PAHO supported the development of suicide surveillance centers in Argentina as part of the national registry and monitoring system for suicidality, while Paraguay expanded telehealth to enable urgent access to support.
Capacity building for frontline providers was another pillar, with training in identification, counseling, and treatment implemented with the support of PAHO. Paraguay implemented suicide risk monitoring, counseling, and crisis management for healthcare workers. Gatekeeper networks were also expanded from the community to clinical levels, as Paraguay increased community gatekeepers to direct at-risk individuals into care.
Two baseline countries (BRA, DOM) and 1 target country (GUF) did not complete the assessment. These 3 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Despite significant progress in implementing changes toward malaria elimination in the E2025 countries, major implementation challenges persist in these areas, especially in the countries with the highest disease burden and dispersion. In addition to the structural weaknesses of the health systems in endemic areas, financial challenges, and the aftermath of COVID-19, social factors such as gold mining, migration, and social conflicts have limited the implementation of changes by the countries; nevertheless, significant progress was made. PASB support included developing guidelines and technical tools, as well as promoting changes that were replicated by strategic partners such as the RMEI initiative. Focal pockets of transmission in a limited number of territories continue to be a factor in favor of elimination, insufficiently leveraged by decision-makers to implement high-impact interventions with the necessary structural improvements in specific locations, which would have a major impact on the national situation. Preventing the re-establishment of transmission at the subnational level is another strategy facing significant implementation challenges in the coming years.
Two baseline countries (BRA, DOM) and 1 target country (CUW) did not complete the assessment. These 3 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
As of 31 December 2023, 27 baseline countries achieved this output indicator and two partially achieved it. This assessment was conducted based on the information entered by the countries through eJRF.
One baseline country (BRA) and 1 target country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Twenty-five countries have successfully implemented plans of action for the prevention, prophylaxis, surveillance, control, and elimination of dog-mediated human rabies. PAHO has made significant contributions by providing standards, data, and technical cooperation. Achievements include comprehensive vaccination campaigns, improved surveillance systems, and effective public awareness programs. However, several countries still need to enhance their national capacities, as canine rabies cases persist, posing a continued risk for human rabies transmission. Lessons learned highlight the importance of sustained efforts in vaccination, surveillance, and access to post-exposure prophylaxis. Ongoing support is essential to strengthen these capacities and achieve the complete elimination of dog-mediated rabies.
Two baseline countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Countries have been working toward strengthening healthy settings. Annual reporting on progress in schools, housing, markets, workplaces, or universities has been limited. Nevertheless, advances shown in policy documents, progress reports on health promotion, and publications have been taken into account for this indicator. PASB supports the achievement of this indicator by developing documents such as the Health Promoting Schools guidance, conducting webinars on housing, and participating in and disseminating the Health Promoting Universities Network.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 1 baseline country (GTM). In addition, 2 baseline countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 3 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
The Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) developed the Criteria for Healthy Municipalities, Cities and Communities in the Region of the Americas to serve as a guide to local governments to strengthen action at local level on health promotion, based on the three pillars of equity, intersectoral action, and participation. The Criteria were adopted by mayors of the region during the VI Regional Meeting of Mayors for Healthy Municipalities, Cities and Communities, held in Huechuraba (Chile) in November 2023. Networks of Healthy Municipalities, Cities and Communities in the Americas continue to work toward strengthening capacities at local level for the development and implementation of policies that promote health and wellbeing.
One baseline country (BRA) and one target country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
From 2019 to 2023, initiatives for improving information systems for health (IS4H) have driven significant advances toward set targets. These efforts have focused on improving governance mechanisms, maturity assessments, regulatory frameworks, and health information architecture, and they have achieved substantial progress in enhancing data-driven health strategies regionally. The establishment of monitoring and evaluation frameworks, interinstitutional committees, and national policies for electronic health records with open data has been crucial. Significant advances include the adoption of governance mechanisms by several countries and territories, exceeding the target; use of the PASB model for maturity assessment with financial and technical support from the Inter-American Development Bank and the World Bank; and the establishment of regulatory frameworks and health information architecture by numerous countries and territories. Initiatives in data management and information technologies include the adoption of Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR) and ICD-11 standards by 17 countries and territories, as well as progress in electronic health records implementation, moving toward a more unified and efficient health data management model. Additionally, engagement with academic and professional communities and networks has strengthened health analysis and knowledge management, while innovations such as the PASB telehealth platform indicate a shift toward a more integrated approach for the co-creation of health-focused digital public goods. These advances reflect broad progress toward robust, data-informed public health strategies and policies, demonstrating an important commitment to improving health outcomes and operational efficiencies within all Member States.
Two baseline countries (BRA, DOM) and four target countries (CUW, GLP, GUF, MTQ) did not complete the assessment. These 6 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
A comprehensive maturity assessment of IS4H was conducted by PASB of progress made between 2016 and 2023. Using over 240 standardized indicators, the evaluation assessed national health information systems with respect to governance, strategy, laws, financial sustainability, human resources, data management, and quality, including vital statistics, analysis capabilities, information flows, project management, and information technology (IT) infrastructure. Information for the assessment was gathered through country visits, expert consultations, database and gap analyses, and reviews of policies, procedures, and technical documentation. Site visits allowed for direct observation of information platform use and interoperability, especially in primary care, and for data collection and interviews with frontline administrative and clinical staff.
A comprehensive report on the regional IS4H maturity assessment will be published in late 2024; however, the assessment found that 42.8% of the countries are still at level 1, “building awareness.” These countries are characterized by early adoption of health information systems, with mostly analogue data and a growing recognition of the need for digitalization. With very limited capacity to generate data and assure its quality, including on health indicators whose data source relies on civil registration and vital statistics, they depend largely on international organizations in this regard. Investments in digital health have often not expanded infrastructure as expected due to gaps in access to electricity and connectivity, as well as a lack of long-term planning and sustainable financing.
A third of the countries, 34.7%, have reached level 2, “implementing best practices.” They are developing their health information systems with data from various sources and managing health information effectively. However, they face challenges such as incomplete development of indicators, insufficient data exchange, and limited implementation of data standards and public health communication strategies. Another 18.4% have reached level 3, “standardization and continuous improvement,” reflecting advances in IS4H policies and strategies and the use of high-quality data for decision-making. Only 4.1% of countries are at level 4, “integration and alignment,” marked by highly integrated information systems that are aligned with national and international standards.
No country in the Region has reached level 5, the maximum maturity level in IS4H, which entails complete deployment of all components of the model and a constant search for innovation.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 1 baseline country (JAM). In addition, 1 baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Member States have made notable progress in implementing national strategies and plans for digital transformation, as well as the roadmap for the digital transformation of the health sector in the Region, which is fully aligned with the Global Strategy on Digital Health. A network of countries was established to promote the adoption of digital health solutions and information systems, resulting in new models and digital public goods that facilitate this transformation. Additionally, the health sector’s active participation in e-government initiatives reflects a broader commitment to optimizing technology infrastructure and converging current initiatives for a more efficient and integrated approach to health information management. Highlights of this strategic line of action include adoption of emerging technologies for personalized patient care, partnerships with financial, technical, and academic institutions for increased use of technology, and piloting of innovative digital health solutions like the PASB telehealth platform and digital COVID-19 vaccine certificates.
Progress has been made in the following areas:
a. Universal connectivity: Twelve countries have strengthened information systems and digital health strategies to enhance connectivity and bandwidth. Most of these initiatives mainly target rural areas to bridge the digital divide and expand telehealth services at the first level of care. Actions have included investing in information technology infrastructure to ensure reliable internet access and bandwidth for ensuring teleconsultations. Additionally, Member States have focused on training health care workers in these areas to efficiently use digital tools, enhancing the quality of telehealth services and patient engagement.
b. Digital public goods: In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, 17 countries have made significant progress in digitalizing vaccination certification processes. Digitalization includes creating secure, accessible digital platforms for issuing and verifying COVID-19 vaccination certificates. This not only streamlines the process but also helps combat the production of fraudulent vaccination certificates. Seven countries are implementing the PASB All-in-ONE Telehealth Platform at the first level of care.
c. Inclusive digital health: Thirty-three countries and territories engaged in discussions on the importance of data for equity and committed to reinforcing data governance mechanisms across the health sector, aiming to achieve the highest and smartest possible level of data disaggregation. Additionally, Member States reached consensus on the importance of maintaining high-quality data to reduce or eliminate biases in artificial intelligence algorithms, ensuring that these technologies serve all segments of the population fairly and effectively.
d. Interoperability: Ten countries have established national committees on health information systems for standardization; 18 countries are transitioning from ICD-10 to ICD-11. Fourteen of them are from the Caribbean and are making significant progress not only in the adoption of the ICD-11, but also its integration with electronic health record platforms. Twelve countries are adopting the Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine Clinical Terms (SNOMED) for semantic interoperability, an important factor for ensuring convergence and coordination between SNOMED and ICD-11. Seventeen countries are actively participating in the development of technological infrastructure for cross-border data exchange and interoperability.
e. Artificial intelligence: Thirteen countries have actively engaged in discussions on the role of artificial intelligence (AI) in public health. These discussions sought to assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on integrating AI into the digitalization of health care services and examining current advances in this field, share knowledge and identify needs concerning governance and ethical aspects of AI, understand the crucial elements of effectively applying AI and other subfields of AI such as machine learning and natural-language processing (including the use of generative AI solutions in public health), and present the PAHO and WHO action framework for AI application in public health. These ongoing efforts are fully integrated with current actions related to the digital transformation of the health sector in the Region.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 1 baseline country (JAM). In addition, 2 baseline countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 3 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
To enhance the capacity of science and evidence ecosystems, evidence-informed policy programs are being implemented in 15 countries in alignment with regional initiatives. This progress is highlighted by the participation of 20 countries in the PAHO/WHO joint meeting of the Evidence-Informed Policy Network (EVIPNET) and Health Technology Assessment Network of the Americas (REDETSA), which took place in Jamaica in October 2023. The BIGG-REC database organizes over 3,500 WHO and PAHO recommendations in four languages. Through the Virtual Campus, over 20 000 decision-makers and healthcare professionals from 28 countries received training in systematic reviews, evidence-based guidelines, and policies. The PAHO Handbook for Adapting and Implementing Evidence-Informed Guidelines (Second Edition) was developed with input from 15 Member States and is in use by national guideline programs.
Two baseline countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Progress has been observed in the Americas regarding the generation, circulation, and utilization of scientific and technical information, as well as the promulgation of knowledge-sharing initiatives among Members States, PASB, and stakeholders.
Overall, the impact factor of the scientific output and the number of scientific journals increased across all Member States during the period 2022-2023, with special emphasis on medicine, public health, and related topics. The publication of an average of 904 titles of scientific journals in medicine and related fields across 19 Member States demonstrates that there has been strong implementation of open-access platforms and policies, helping ensure more equitable and accessible access to scientific production in public health-related fields.
The contribution from documentation centers to LILACS reached 45 291 new documents and a total of 657 indexed scientific journals. The MedCarib database, which focuses on scientific and technical production in the Caribbean, also showed an increase in new contributions during the period. A total of 22 countries and territories are eligible to access the Research4Life (R4L) program, with 1,414 institutions registered. El Salvador became the first Member State to participate in the R4L Country Connector initiative.
By December 2023, there were 179 PAHO/WHO Collaborating Centers (CCs) distributed across 15 Member States in the Region. Two CCs (in Cuba and Brazil) are focused on knowledge management and scientific communication. PAHO/WHO CCs support the Organization in fulfilling the mandates and priorities of the Region and globally, by developing research models and evidence-based literature and providing health analysis and methodologies, among other roles.
Despite these advancements, persistent efforts to strengthen research systems, enhance knowledge sharing, and promote evidence-informed policies are needed. Institutionalizing knowledge, evidence, and science at the national level is essential, as is fostering integrated policies for information use and knowledge dissemination. Furthermore, capacity building and a continued focus on digital literacy are necessary to ensure that public health workers, decision-makers, researchers, and communities have access to the best scientific and technical information.
One baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
PASB supported health authorities in addressing research ethics through the development of ethical standards for research in emergencies and improving the ethical oversight of research (e.g., Catalyzing Ethical Research in Emergencies: Ethics guidance, lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic and pending agenda); the development of normative documents establishing the ethics oversight of research in accordance with international ethical standards; capacity-building (e.g., through monthly training sessions based on a plan agreed upon with health authorities); and the development of tools to facilitate national health authority oversight of research ethics committees (e.g., Tool for the accreditation of research ethics committees). The pandemic has led the region to place renewed value on health research, and Member States have thus invested efforts in revamping their research ethics systems. Accordingly, the research ethics landscape described in 2022 using PAHO-developed indicators is rapidly changing.
One baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
The production and dissemination of relevant health research have increased significantly in several countries in the Region, partly due to investments made during the pandemic. This growth is particularly evident in the areas of clinical trials and epidemiological studies.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 1 target country (GTM). This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Reporting financial flows for research is a cumbersome task that requires intersectoral collaboration and coordination, especially in countries where funding and priorities are set by different sectors and entities. PAHO has worked closely with WHO’s Global Observatory on Research for Health and Development and its Governing Bodies to reduce the burden of reporting financial flows for research, a meaningful SDG indicator that is measured with support from UNESCO, OECD, RICyT, and other partners.
PASB has coordinated with these counterparts and countries to incentivize reporting and updating of these indicators at least every 10 years, sending reminders to countries. PAHO and WHO are exploring dynamics and capacity building to improve intersectoral collaboration, aiming to implement training in the next biennium to facilitate reporting and intersectoral dialogue.
Thirteen countries have updated reports in WHO’s Global Observatory, according to PAHO and the Global Observatory’s SDG Indicator 9.5.1.
Two baseline countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
As per the IHR (2005), all 35 State Parties are mandated to report annually on the status of their core capacities through the State Party Self-Assessment Reporting Tool (SPAR). Compliance with this requirement demonstrates transparency and accountability among Member States and the Secretariat. PASB has supported multisectoral discussions to comply with the SPAR by developing guidance documents for the 15 core capacities, as well as country profiles using the SPAR indicators for the period 2010-2022.
Two baseline countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
In the 2022-2023 biennium, significant strides were made in health sector risk management, with 23 countries conducting national and/or subnational risk assessments to update their response plans. PASB supported this by implementing the "Emergency Risk Management in Health and Disasters" virtual course. This course trained 1,466 healthcare professionals, including 17 facilitators, on risk assessments, preparedness evaluation, and multi-threat response planning using methodologies like STAR, EDHPI, and the Multi-Threat Response Framework.
One baseline country (BRA) and one target country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
This indicator measures the degree of institutionalization and sustainability of essential public health functions that are relevant for application, implementation, and compliance with the IHR. Therefore, this result reflects the challenges most countries face in sustaining the level of financial investment needed to maintain surveillance and response capacities.
Two baseline countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Significant progress was made in the 2022-2023 biennium; 37 countries have full-time personnel dedicated to health emergencies. Training played a crucial role, with 5,682 health professionals certified in Health Facility Assessment, totaling 14 767 certified individuals. Additionally, the “Emergency Risk Management in Health and Disasters” virtual course trained 1,466 health professionals, including 17 facilitator trainers.
Two baseline countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
This indicator reports on Member States’ institutionalization to evaluate capacities during real and non-actual events once plans, mechanisms, and standard operating procedures are in place by scoring 100% in at least one of the four State Party Self-Assessment Reporting Tool indicators that reflect the country’s emergency response. PASB facilitated an IHR meeting among Small Island Developing States in Jamaica (May 2023), in which delegates concluded that most of the SPAR indicators could reach the highest level in the context of SIDS, which includes the four indicators measured under this overall output indicator.
One baseline country (BRA) and one target country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
The Public Health Emergency of International Concern associated with COVID-19 demonstrated the solidarity expressed by Member States in responding to health emergencies. All national public health laboratories received training, technology transfer, and essential supplies in a timely manner. In parallel, laboratory guidelines were shared with countries, and re-certification of the laboratory personnel on the regulations for the transport of infectious substances and associated materials was reactivated in the Region.
The cholera epidemic in Hispaniola still poses a threat to the Region. Training of laboratory personnel in early detection, case confirmation, and molecular characterization of pandemic V. cholerae O:1 strains was provided.
The new strategy for genomic surveillance of epidemic- and pandemic-prone pathogens has started to be implemented at the regional level. This instrument represents added value for decision makers during outbreak investigations. Challenges remain to harmonize knowledge, technologies, and Standard Operating Procedures within public health laboratory networks.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 1 baseline country (JAM). In addition, 2 baseline countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 3 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Infection prevention and control (IPC) continues to be strengthened across the region through preparedness activities, such as the implementation of respiratory protection programs and virtual IPC trainings as part of implementation of the World Health Organization Core Components of Infection Prevention and Control Programs (WHO-IPC CC) at the national level.
Four baseline countries (BRA, DOM, GLP, MTQ) did not complete the assessment. These 4 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
The surveillance system for influenza and other respiratory viruses is highly robust. This system was strengthened during the COVID-19 pandemic and laid the foundation for the integration of COVID-19 surveillance in the region in 87% of countries. Within the countries that partially achieved the indicator, work continues to improve the frequency of epidemiological reporting.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 2 target countries (BHS, JAM). In addition, 2 target countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 4 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Progress has been made in most countries. However, target countries continue to show either no progress or partial achievement. PASB will redouble its efforts to examine the health equity approach in key strategic programs, policies, and plans, with particular emphasis on those countries which did not complete the assessment.