Four target countries (BRA, GUF, GLP, MTQ) did not complete the assessment. These 4 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Work is ongoing to strengthen countries’ arboviral disease surveillance capacities, facilitating the monitoring of the largest dengue epidemic ever recorded in the Americas. Significant progress has been made via operationalization of collaborative surveillance through the implementation of Virtual Collaboration Spaces. In addition, a new Integrated Surveillance Manual for Arboviral Diseases has been completed following two consultation meetings with country experts.
Three baseline countries (BRA, DOM, GLP) did not complete the assessment. These 3 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
The countries of the Region have made great efforts to incorporate the vaccine into their national vaccination schedules; as of December 31, 2023, only 4 countries had not introduced the HPV vaccine. 26 countries in the Region are vaccinating children and 12 countries have switched to a single-dose schedule.
Three baseline countries (DOM, GLP, MTQ) did not complete the assessment. These 3 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
During the biennium, countries in the Region made progress in eliminating malaria or interrupting its transmission both at the national and subnational levels, as well as preventing re-establishment in malaria-free countries and receptive territories. Case investigation is being incorporated by endemic and non-endemic countries, including improvements in guidelines, instruments, and surveillance processes. These actions should integrate the efforts made so far by vertical programs with more cross-cutting epidemiologic surveillance processes and actors. Important challenges remain in this aspect of integration and in the quality of investigations. Pending improvements include the adoption of investigation in endemic territories where the small number of cases already justifies this action to accelerate elimination, as well as improvements in response. The technical cooperation that PAHO has developed in this area has been replicated with partner implementation actions, such as the RMEI initiative in Central America.
One target country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Saint Lucia is on track to achieve this indicator. The status of schistosomiasis transmission in Puerto Rico remains active, posing continued risks. Suriname has not made progress in assessing the status of schistosomiasis transmission. Antigua and Barbuda did not show progress on this indicator due to suspected interruption of transmission, pending confirmation through necessary studies.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 3 target countries (BMU, BON, KNA). In addition, 1 baseline country (BRA) and 5 target country (DOM, GUF, MTQ, GLP, CUW) did not complete the assessment. These 9 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
The number of countries that have generated and produced analytical health reports which include disaggregated data on a regular basis has increased from 5 to 17. Additionally, countries are increasingly making these reports and other health data and information more accessible both internally and externally. Improved national health information systems and advances in digital transformation have led to increased data demand and utilization. Such data increasingly include the social determinants of health and allow countries to monitor progress and gaps. PASB provided technical cooperation through ongoing capacity-building efforts in health analysis, particularly for monitoring SDG3 indicators among interdisciplinary country teams at national and subnational levels. This has been crucial to the progress achieved for OCM 21.b. An additional 13 countries are on track to achieve this indicator.
No agreement was reached for three countries and territories. PASB assessed that the criteria as detailed on the technical note for the indicator were not met, and no documentation was submitted or otherwise available at the time of the assessment.
One baseline country (BRA) and one target country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Progress has been observed in the Americas regarding the generation, circulation, and utilization of scientific and technical information, as well as the promulgation of knowledge-sharing initiatives among Members States, PASB, and stakeholders.
Overall, the impact factor of the scientific output and the number of journals increased across all Member States during the period 2022-2023, with special emphasis on medicine, public health, and related topics. The increase in implementation of open-access platforms and policies helped ensure more equitable and accessible access to scientific production in public health-related fields.
The contribution from documentation centers to regional databases such as LILACS, MedCarib, and other open-access platforms worldwide has also increased. A total of 22 countries and territories are eligible to access the Research4Life (R4L) program, and there has been an increase in the number of registered institutions, which have helped to meet the need for more equitable access to scientific and technical information and to reduce the digital divide across the Region. El Salvador became the first Member State to participate in the R4L Country Connector initiative.
Despite a slight decrease in the number of new designations and re-designations, PAHO/WHO Collaborating Centers (CC) have proven to be an important mechanism of technical cooperation. PAHO/WHO CCs support the Organization in fulfilling the mandates and priorities of the Region and globally, by developing research models and evidence-based literature and providing health analysis and methodologies. By December 2023, there were 179 CCs in the Region, distributed across 15 Member States.
Despite these advancements, persistent efforts to strengthen research systems, enhance knowledge sharing, and promote evidence-informed policies are needed. Institutionalizing knowledge, evidence, and science at the national level is essential, as is fostering integrated policies for information use and knowledge dissemination. Furthermore, capacity building and a continued focus on digital literacy are necessary to ensure that public health workers, decision-makers, researchers, and communities have access to the best scientific and technical information.
Seven baseline countries (BON, BRA, CUW, DOM, GLP, GUF, MTQ) did not complete the assessment. These 7 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
In the 2022-23 biennium, progress was made toward strengthening country capacity for all-hazards health emergency and disaster risk management. As of the latest assessment, 22 countries fully meet or exceed minimum capacities to manage public health risk associated with emergencies, with another 15 on track to do so. PASB's technical support, including the development of assessment tools and coordinator meetings, remains essential for achieving the 2025 target of 37 countries. Continuous monitoring and emphasis on gender-sensitive disaster preparedness, supported by tools such as the Preparedness Index for Health Emergencies and Disasters and the monitoring survey for the Plan of Action on Disaster Risk Reduction, are critical for maintaining and building on the progress made.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 1 baseline country (BHS). In addition, 1 baseline country (DOM) and 5 target countries (BRA, CUW, GLP, GUF, MTQ) did not complete the assessment. These 7 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
Two baseline countries (BRA, DOM) and 1 target country (GUF) did not complete the assessment. These 3 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Despite significant progress in implementing changes toward malaria elimination in the E2025 countries, major implementation challenges persist in these areas, especially in the countries with the highest disease burden and dispersion. In addition to the structural weaknesses of the health systems in endemic areas, financial challenges, and the aftermath of COVID-19, social factors such as gold mining, migration, and social conflicts have limited the implementation of changes by the countries; nevertheless, significant progress was made. PASB support included developing guidelines and technical tools, as well as promoting changes that were replicated by strategic partners such as the RMEI initiative. Focal pockets of transmission in a limited number of territories continue to be a factor in favor of elimination, insufficiently leveraged by decision-makers to implement high-impact interventions with the necessary structural improvements in specific locations, which would have a major impact on the national situation. Preventing the re-establishment of transmission at the subnational level is another strategy facing significant implementation challenges in the coming years.
Two baseline countries (BRA, DOM) and four target countries (CUW, GLP, GUF, MTQ) did not complete the assessment. These 6 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
A comprehensive maturity assessment of IS4H was conducted by PASB of progress made between 2016 and 2023. Using over 240 standardized indicators, the evaluation assessed national health information systems with respect to governance, strategy, laws, financial sustainability, human resources, data management, and quality, including vital statistics, analysis capabilities, information flows, project management, and information technology (IT) infrastructure. Information for the assessment was gathered through country visits, expert consultations, database and gap analyses, and reviews of policies, procedures, and technical documentation. Site visits allowed for direct observation of information platform use and interoperability, especially in primary care, and for data collection and interviews with frontline administrative and clinical staff.
A comprehensive report on the regional IS4H maturity assessment will be published in late 2024; however, the assessment found that 42.8% of the countries are still at level 1, “building awareness.” These countries are characterized by early adoption of health information systems, with mostly analogue data and a growing recognition of the need for digitalization. With very limited capacity to generate data and assure its quality, including on health indicators whose data source relies on civil registration and vital statistics, they depend largely on international organizations in this regard. Investments in digital health have often not expanded infrastructure as expected due to gaps in access to electricity and connectivity, as well as a lack of long-term planning and sustainable financing.
A third of the countries, 34.7%, have reached level 2, “implementing best practices.” They are developing their health information systems with data from various sources and managing health information effectively. However, they face challenges such as incomplete development of indicators, insufficient data exchange, and limited implementation of data standards and public health communication strategies. Another 18.4% have reached level 3, “standardization and continuous improvement,” reflecting advances in IS4H policies and strategies and the use of high-quality data for decision-making. Only 4.1% of countries are at level 4, “integration and alignment,” marked by highly integrated information systems that are aligned with national and international standards.
No country in the Region has reached level 5, the maximum maturity level in IS4H, which entails complete deployment of all components of the model and a constant search for innovation.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 1 target country (GTM). This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Reporting financial flows for research is a cumbersome task that requires intersectoral collaboration and coordination, especially in countries where funding and priorities are set by different sectors and entities. PAHO has worked closely with WHO’s Global Observatory on Research for Health and Development and its Governing Bodies to reduce the burden of reporting financial flows for research, a meaningful SDG indicator that is measured with support from UNESCO, OECD, RICyT, and other partners.
PASB has coordinated with these counterparts and countries to incentivize reporting and updating of these indicators at least every 10 years, sending reminders to countries. PAHO and WHO are exploring dynamics and capacity building to improve intersectoral collaboration, aiming to implement training in the next biennium to facilitate reporting and intersectoral dialogue.
Thirteen countries have updated reports in WHO’s Global Observatory, according to PAHO and the Global Observatory’s SDG Indicator 9.5.1.
Two baseline countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
In the 2022-2023 biennium, significant strides were made in health sector risk management, with 23 countries conducting national and/or subnational risk assessments to update their response plans. PASB supported this by implementing the "Emergency Risk Management in Health and Disasters" virtual course. This course trained 1,466 healthcare professionals, including 17 facilitators, on risk assessments, preparedness evaluation, and multi-threat response planning using methodologies like STAR, EDHPI, and the Multi-Threat Response Framework.
Two baseline countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Significant progress was made in the 2022-2023 biennium; 37 countries have full-time personnel dedicated to health emergencies. Training played a crucial role, with 5,682 health professionals certified in Health Facility Assessment, totaling 14 767 certified individuals. Additionally, the “Emergency Risk Management in Health and Disasters” virtual course trained 1,466 health professionals, including 17 facilitator trainers.
One baseline country (DOM) and one target country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
In the 2022-2023 biennium, progress was made in enhancing the resilience and safety of healthcare facilities across the Caribbean and South America through the Resilient Hospitals Initiative. This initiative focused on the strengthening of SMART Hospitals to fortify health facilities against health emergencies and disasters, which 24 countries have launched, promoting safety, sustainability, inclusivity, and adaptability within health facilities. Technical support was instrumental in helping Caribbean countries integrate SMART standards, with notable achievements such as the evaluation of 10 facilities for A70 standards in Barbados and the modernization of eight health centers in Belize. Continuous efforts in monitoring, resource allocation, and addressing data gaps remain essential if the 2025 targets for safe and resilient healthcare infrastructure are to be met.