Through implementation of the EMTCT Plus Initiative, PASB has been working with national health authorities to strengthen national responses to syphilis and congenital syphilis, toward the achievement of elimination targets. The coverage of syphilis treatment among infected pregnant women has been historically high in Latin America and the Caribbean, reaching 89% in 2023. Eleven countries have been validated for the dual EMTCT of HIV and syphilis, and additional countries have shown progress and may be ready to seek validation in the near future.
One baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Since 2020, a decrease in vaccination coverage with the third dose of PCV vaccine has been noted. In 2023, a very slight improvement was noted compared to 2022 (81% vs. 80%). This, together with improvement in coverage of other vaccines (e.g., pentavalent), could indicate that PCV3 vaccination coverage has started to recover. It is important to closely monitor the progress of member states.
Three baseline countries (BRA, DOM, GLP) did not complete the assessment. These 3 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
The countries of the Region have made great efforts to incorporate the vaccine into their national vaccination schedules; as of December 31, 2023, only 4 countries had not introduced the HPV vaccine. 26 countries in the Region are vaccinating children and 12 countries have switched to a single-dose schedule.
One baseline country (CUW) and 1 target country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Although the current rating of this indicator is “No progress” due to a regression from the baseline, it should be noted that, of the total number of countries (14), 5 achieved the target and 7 are on track to achieve it; only 2 countries are at risk. Countries that are on track to achieve the indicator have progressed in expanding blood collection capacity and reducing blood loss or expiration as they improve their quality processes. Additional efforts are being made to support Caribbean countries through quality training so that better performance also improves the availability of blood for transfusion. Likewise, the promotion of voluntary blood donation was strengthened with the World Blood Donor Day campaign and through regional seminars. Greater support will be provided to the countries that are at risk to help them reach the target by 2025.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 3 target countries (BMU, BON, KNA). In addition, 1 baseline country (BRA) and 5 target country (DOM, GUF, MTQ, GLP, CUW) did not complete the assessment. These 9 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
The number of countries that have generated and produced analytical health reports which include disaggregated data on a regular basis has increased from 5 to 17. Additionally, countries are increasingly making these reports and other health data and information more accessible both internally and externally. Improved national health information systems and advances in digital transformation have led to increased data demand and utilization. Such data increasingly include the social determinants of health and allow countries to monitor progress and gaps. PASB provided technical cooperation through ongoing capacity-building efforts in health analysis, particularly for monitoring SDG3 indicators among interdisciplinary country teams at national and subnational levels. This has been crucial to the progress achieved for OCM 21.b. An additional 13 countries are on track to achieve this indicator.
No agreement was reached for three countries and territories. PASB assessed that the criteria as detailed on the technical note for the indicator were not met, and no documentation was submitted or otherwise available at the time of the assessment.
Seven baseline countries (BON, BRA, CUW, DOM, GLP, GUF, MTQ) did not complete the assessment. These 7 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
In the 2022-23 biennium, progress was made toward strengthening country capacity for all-hazards health emergency and disaster risk management. As of the latest assessment, 22 countries fully meet or exceed minimum capacities to manage public health risk associated with emergencies, with another 15 on track to do so. PASB's technical support, including the development of assessment tools and coordinator meetings, remains essential for achieving the 2025 target of 37 countries. Continuous monitoring and emphasis on gender-sensitive disaster preparedness, supported by tools such as the Preparedness Index for Health Emergencies and Disasters and the monitoring survey for the Plan of Action on Disaster Risk Reduction, are critical for maintaining and building on the progress made.
Eight target countries (BRA, CAN, CUW, DOM, GLP, GUF, MTQ, PRI) did not complete the assessment. These 8 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
The majority of countries and territories express satisfaction with PAHO/WHO's leading role on global and regional health issues, indicating that the Organization’s efforts and initiatives are generally perceived positively across the region. This widespread satisfaction underscores PAHO/WHO's role as a leading public health authority, engaging countries and territories in the regional and global public health agenda at the highest level – politically, strategically, and technically. Efforts will continue to ensure alignment between biennial work plans and the priorities indicated by national health authorities. This commitment involves ongoing coordination and collaboration with national health authorities to tailor PAHO/WHO's biennial work plans to address the specific health challenges and priorities identified by each country.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 1 baseline country (BHS). In addition, 1 baseline country (DOM) and 5 target countries (BRA, CUW, GLP, GUF, MTQ) did not complete the assessment. These 7 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
Two baseline countries (BRA, DOM) and 1 target country (CUW) did not complete the assessment. These 3 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
As of 31 December 2023, 27 baseline countries achieved this output indicator and two partially achieved it. This assessment was conducted based on the information entered by the countries through eJRF.
Two baseline countries (BRA, DOM) and four target countries (CUW, GLP, GUF, MTQ) did not complete the assessment. These 6 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
A comprehensive maturity assessment of IS4H was conducted by PASB of progress made between 2016 and 2023. Using over 240 standardized indicators, the evaluation assessed national health information systems with respect to governance, strategy, laws, financial sustainability, human resources, data management, and quality, including vital statistics, analysis capabilities, information flows, project management, and information technology (IT) infrastructure. Information for the assessment was gathered through country visits, expert consultations, database and gap analyses, and reviews of policies, procedures, and technical documentation. Site visits allowed for direct observation of information platform use and interoperability, especially in primary care, and for data collection and interviews with frontline administrative and clinical staff.
A comprehensive report on the regional IS4H maturity assessment will be published in late 2024; however, the assessment found that 42.8% of the countries are still at level 1, “building awareness.” These countries are characterized by early adoption of health information systems, with mostly analogue data and a growing recognition of the need for digitalization. With very limited capacity to generate data and assure its quality, including on health indicators whose data source relies on civil registration and vital statistics, they depend largely on international organizations in this regard. Investments in digital health have often not expanded infrastructure as expected due to gaps in access to electricity and connectivity, as well as a lack of long-term planning and sustainable financing.
A third of the countries, 34.7%, have reached level 2, “implementing best practices.” They are developing their health information systems with data from various sources and managing health information effectively. However, they face challenges such as incomplete development of indicators, insufficient data exchange, and limited implementation of data standards and public health communication strategies. Another 18.4% have reached level 3, “standardization and continuous improvement,” reflecting advances in IS4H policies and strategies and the use of high-quality data for decision-making. Only 4.1% of countries are at level 4, “integration and alignment,” marked by highly integrated information systems that are aligned with national and international standards.
No country in the Region has reached level 5, the maximum maturity level in IS4H, which entails complete deployment of all components of the model and a constant search for innovation.
Two baseline countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Significant progress was made in the 2022-2023 biennium; 37 countries have full-time personnel dedicated to health emergencies. Training played a crucial role, with 5,682 health professionals certified in Health Facility Assessment, totaling 14 767 certified individuals. Additionally, the “Emergency Risk Management in Health and Disasters” virtual course trained 1,466 health professionals, including 17 facilitator trainers.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 1 baseline country (BHS). In addition, 2 baseline countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 3 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Surveillance and early detection systems continue to be strengthened in the region. Training activities, lab quality assessments, and reviews of lessons learned have allowed improvement of this indicator’s performance in countries.
Four baseline countries (BRA, DOM, GLP, MTQ) did not complete the assessment. These 4 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
The surveillance system for influenza and other respiratory viruses is highly robust. This system was strengthened during the COVID-19 pandemic and laid the foundation for the integration of COVID-19 surveillance in the region in 87% of countries. Within the countries that partially achieved the indicator, work continues to improve the frequency of epidemiological reporting.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 1 baseline country (ECU). In addition, 1 target country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.