Three target countries (BRA, CUW, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 3 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Many countries in the region are continuing their efforts to enhance the response capacity of primary care services. Countries such as Belize, Bolivia, Canada, Chile, and Honduras, among others, have formulated policies and strategies to improve access to primary care, support healthcare professionals, build capacities to address chronic diseases, enhance preventive and palliative care, and promote the integration of health networks, including the use of telehealth. Similarly, other countries such as Argentina, Costa Rica, Ecuador, and Guyana, have focused on strengthening governance, improving infrastructure, fostering intersectoral collaboration, and reinforcing maternal and child healthcare services. Despite these endeavors, much work remains to be done, particularly concerning the advancement of health service integration with a focus on equity. The sustained continuation of these efforts is crucial to achieving long-term impact on health outcomes.
Two baseline countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Overall, although there was a regression from the baseline, countries achieved or are on track to achieve this outcome indicator to improve children's health and development. Some countries have a national strategy on maternal and newborn health under implementation, but improved monitoring and alignment of these strategies with the WHO/UNICEF Framework are needed. Strategies for moving forward include adoption and implementation of the WHO frameworks Parenting for Lifelong Health and Global Scale for Early Childhood Development in the region.
Four target countries (BRA, GUF, GLP, MTQ) did not complete the assessment. These 4 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Work is ongoing to strengthen countries’ arboviral disease surveillance capacities, facilitating the monitoring of the largest dengue epidemic ever recorded in the Americas. Significant progress has been made via operationalization of collaborative surveillance through the implementation of Virtual Collaboration Spaces. In addition, a new Integrated Surveillance Manual for Arboviral Diseases has been completed following two consultation meetings with country experts.
Three baseline countries (BRA, DOM, GLP) did not complete the assessment. These 3 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
The countries of the Region have made great efforts to incorporate the vaccine into their national vaccination schedules; as of December 31, 2023, only 4 countries had not introduced the HPV vaccine. 26 countries in the Region are vaccinating children and 12 countries have switched to a single-dose schedule.
One baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Countries in the region are moving toward implementing standardized, evidence-based protocols to improve the quality of diabetes care. However, in parallel with these efforts, the prevalence of obesity, one of the main risk factors for diabetes, continues to increase. This challenge makes it difficult to stop the sustained increase in diabetes, reflecting the need to redouble efforts and move toward a joint, integrated, and comprehensive response to diabetes and other non-communicable diseases and risk factors. Additionally, the need for updated, standardized, and internationally comparable population data makes it difficult to evaluate the progress achieved with this indicator. Strengthening population surveillance systems for non-communicable diseases, including diabetes, would have a positive effect on the monitoring of this indicator.
One baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
The year 2022 was primarily dedicated to recovering from the negative impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, with a particular emphasis on reinstating interrupted screening procedures. The Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) has been working toward facilitating the implementation of HPV testing as the primary screening procedure, and concurrently developing comprehensive national strategies aimed at eradicating cervical cancer through HPV vaccination.
In the period spanning 2022-2023, PAHO, in collaboration with the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), worked on the CanScreen5 project, designed to comprehend the obstacles impeding the achievement of screening targets. Furthermore, they sought to devise methods to monitor progress through the utilization of standardized indicators. Subsequently, PAHO compiled and published a regional report that provides an overview of the current status of cervical cancer control within the region, utilizing all available data.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 1 target country (JAM). In addition, 2 baseline countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 3 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
One target country (CUW) did not complete the assessment. This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
The mental health Gap Action Programme (mhGAP) continues to be broadly adopted across the Region to integrate evidence-based care in primary settings through non-specialist health workers.
107 MhGAP trainings were conducted in countries. 25 countries received training on the integration of MH into primary health care; 144,790 health personnel were trained. Among those countries that received training were Aruba, Saint Lucia, and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines. Increased integration of MH into primary health care can improve the continuum of care for mental health conditions. During the biennium, Belize showed an increase in mental health diagnosis at the outpatient level.
mhGAP implementation in Latin American countries showcases significant progress in key metrics, with 4,131 new trainers. For instance, Chile and Mexico have trained 5144 and 136,131 individuals respectively. Both countries have successfully integrated mhGAP into their national mental health policies. Paraguay, demonstrating notable advancement, has trained 103 individuals with 67 trainers, and successfully incorporated mhGAP into its national policy.
One target country (CUW) did not complete the assessment. This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
In the area of substance use, PAHO implemented workshops to improve the quality of healthcare services for people with substance use problems. A total of 22 participants from the six Caribbean Dutch Islands (Aruba, Curaçao, Sint Maarten, BON, STA, and SAB) attended the workshop in Curaçao.
Two target countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Sexual violence is a particularly severe challenge in the Americas, requiring timely intervention by the health system to mitigate the consequences for survivors’ health and well-being. The need for comprehensive post-sexual assault (post-rape) care services in emergency health services is reiterated in the Strategy and Plan of Action on Strengthening the Health System to Address Violence against Women, which defines post-rape care to include:
a) First-line support and psychological first aid;
b) Emergency contraception to women who seek care within 5 days;
c) Referral to safe abortion if a woman is pregnant as a result of rape, where such services are permitted by national law;
d) Sexually transmitted infection and/or HIV post-exposure prophylaxis, per applicable protocols; and
e) Hepatitis B vaccination.
PASB has supported Member States in strengthening the health system response to sexual violence, including through improved health system protocols and health workforce training. A recent analysis of health system protocols found that text references to these essential post-rape care services remain limited. For example, 54% of Member States refer to first-line support in their protocols, while hepatitis B vaccination is mentioned by 43%, demonstrating significant gaps. While a text reference to these criteria does not necessarily mean corresponding services are readily available and accessible, it is an important starting point for them to be specifically mentioned in protocols that outline the health system’s response to violence. Importantly, one barrier in this area is the lack of health service evaluation tools to assess specific progress on post-rape care in line with established indicators. In response, PASB has collaborated with selected Member States in the development and piloting of a rapid service evaluation tool for post-sexual assault care. This tool has the potential to improve monitoring of this indicator beyond the pilot countries (Argentina, Colombia, Honduras, Peru), thereby helping to strengthen quality improvement of post-sexual assault care.
One baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
This indicator is on track to be achieved by the target date. However, countries with historical issues of shortages and migration of health workers will probably face challenges in achieving the indicator, and therefore will require additional support from PASB.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 1 target country (JAM). In addition, 1 baseline country (BRA) and 1 target country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 3 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Despite a regression from baseline, some countries are progressing toward the target. One country is classified as “at risk” as it has reported progress in increasing the capacity of interprofessional teams at the first level of care, but has not yet reached the level its model of care requires. Examples of progress in countries that are on track include PASB support in preparing technical proposals aligned with the national health reform, joint work between PASB and academia to define the composition and organization of interprofessional teams, and passing resolutions on primary health care that enable the development of interprofessional teams within countries.
The Plan of Action on Human Resources for Universal Access to Health and Universal Health Coverage 2018-2023 included the formation of interprofessional teams at the first level of care as one of its objectives, guiding countries toward achieving this goal. Additionally, the Policy on the Health Workforce 2030: Strengthening Human Resources for Health to Achieve Resilient Health Systems outlines measures to strengthen the formation of interprofessional teams and incorporate them into integrated health services networks based on primary health care as a strategic line, which will support the efforts of countries on track to meet this goal.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 1 baseline country (CHL). In addition, 1 baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Although the current rating of this indicator is “No progress” due to a regression from the baseline, regulatory systems in most countries are advancing toward maturity level 3. Examples of progress in countries that are on track to achieve the indicator include:
1) increased capacity to implement the Global Benchmarking Tool for assessing regulatory capacities,
2) increased participation in a roster of experts to assess regulatory capacities,
3) better identification of gaps, and
4) definition of institutional development plans with a view to increasing their maturity level, as per defined criteria.
Additional efforts are in place to guide and support the National Regulatory Authorities of Regional Reference from Latin America (Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Cuba, and Mexico) in their transition to become WHO-listed Authorities through a streamlined procedure that may not require full assessment of regulatory capacities, but only demonstration of their performance.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 2 target countries (CHL, CRI). In addition, 1 baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. These 3 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
PASB continues to provide technical cooperation to countries (including some not included as targets for 2025) in developing mechanisms and official systems to monitor the quality of pharmaceutical services, as part of Integrated Health Services Delivery Networks. Brazil and El Salvador are both making progress in developing mechanisms to monitor the quality of pharmacies. While there was no agreement for two target countries on the specific rating of the indicator, advances were recognized in both cases.
One baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Important advances have been made in the Region toward the institutionalization of health technology assessments (HTA) as a tool to inform decision-making related to the incorporation of health technologies into health systems. Five countries have already achieved the indicator, and 3 are on track to achieve it (Chile, Costa Rica, and El Salvador). PASB has been supporting Member States through technical cooperation to develop institutional frameworks, public policies, methodological documents, and capacity building. As the Secretariat of the Regional HTA Network (RedETSA), PASB has been promoting collaboration and information exchange among the 21 participating countries. Only one country is at risk, but PASB is working with the national health authorities to help them achieve the indicator by 2025.
One target country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Access barriers were exacerbated during the COVID-19 pandemic, affecting both the supply and demand sides of health services. Achievement of this indicator is at risk in five countries due to lack of updated data to measure the indicator and little progress in the reduction of reported access barriers. There are, however, five other countries that have achieved or are on track to achieve this indicator, having made significant progress in overcoming service disruptions and reducing access barriers to health services overall. Understanding barriers to healthcare access and the resulting magnitude of unmet needs is key to monitoring progress toward universal access to health and universal health coverage, but measuring and implementing policy options to reduce and eliminate access barriers remains a challenge.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 1 target country (GUY). In addition, 1 target country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Substantial progress has been made on the evaluation of capacities and the development of action plans to strengthen the Essential Public Health Functions (EPHF). One country has already achieved this indicator, and 12 out of the 17 countries are on track to achieve it. Two countries are at risk, and two have not shown progress as a recent evaluation of the EPHF has not been completed. The countries that are on track have completed the baseline evaluation, with results showing that less than 60% of capacity is currently being met; however, they are moving forward with the implementation of action plans to improve capacity and could reach that threshold. Efforts toward strengthening leadership, governance, and institutional capacities, alongside intersectoral collaboration and technical cooperation, are contributing to the positive trajectory of this indicator.
Three target countries (BRA, DOM, ECU) did not complete the assessment. These 3 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Only 1 country has achieved this indicator, although 3 more are reported to be on track to do so by 2025.
The financial protection indicators within the SDG framework (catastrophic and household-impoverishing expenditures) are constructed based on household surveys that record relevant data. These surveys are carried out by countries at various points in time, but almost always at 5- or 10-year intervals. Many countries have great difficulties in implementing these surveys, and this causes years of delay.
Only 4 countries in the region (Bolivia, Mexico, Peru, and United States of America) would be in a position to calculate such indicators, with 2 or more years (data points) in the period 2019-2025 (or relevant adjacent years) available to calculate variation. Four other countries (Colombia, Dominican Republic, El Salvador, and Panama) currently have one data point for the relevant or adjacent years and could eventually complete the measurement toward the end of the period in 2025. It is therefore recommended to eliminate their measurement or simply limit the indicator baselines and targets to countries for which sufficient data are available.
These indicators are monitored by PAHO in collaboration with WHO. Countries are encouraged and trained to use them so that they can carry out surveys and then analyze the results. More recently, PASB has begun to analyze the determinants that contribute to a lack of financial protection. This will allow countries to have more evidence to improve their policies.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 1 baseline country (MEX). In addition, 1 baseline country (BRA) and 1 target country (GUF) did not complete the assessment. These 3 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Existing post-pandemic conditions continue to negatively impact the ability of countries to effectively implement field interventions to address this problem. Better achievements are expected in the next biennium (2024-2025).
Two baseline countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Although the current rating of this indicator is “No progress”, countries have been able to address risk factors for communicable diseases through intersectoral action with the technical support provided by PASB. From the integrated public health perspective embedded in the One Health approach, countries are experiencing tangible improvements in public health outcomes. Notable advances include the implementation of national action plans for antimicrobial resistance, the development and strengthening of national food safety systems based on Codex Alimentarius, and improved access to lifesaving antivenoms through production by public health laboratories and their inclusion in the PAHO revolving funds.
Two target countries (CUW, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
During the biennium, countries in the Region made progress toward improving their food control systems to prevent and mitigate risks to food safety. PASB has provided technical guidance to countries (Brazil, Chile, Costa Rica, Cuba, Guatemala, Ecuador, Honduras, Panama, Peru, Paraguay, URU) to improve their food control systems based on the principles of risk analysis (risk management, risk assessment and risk communication).
Country achievements include the development of national food safety policies and Codex Alimentarius programs for standard-setting and implementation from farm to fork – One Health (Guatemala, Guyana, Honduras, El Salvador). Additionally, Paraguay, Dominican Republic, Colombia and Haiti are improving the capacity of their traditional food markets to prevent emerging food safety risks under the One Health approach. In the Caribbean, a survey was conducted to assess the readiness of food control systems to mitigate risks related to climate change (Saint Lucia, Trinidad and Tobago, Barbados, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Guyana, Jamaica). Based on the findings of this survey, Trinidad and Tobago and Barbados developed climate-resilient national food safety plans. One of the main challenges in achieving the indicator at country level is the high turnover of government officials. As a lesson learned, it is important to facilitate collaboration across sectors and regularly monitor the implementation of developed policies, programs, and plans. PASB has mobilized resources to improve and harmonize the food safety risk analysis capacity of countries in Latin America.
Two target countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Most target Member States have demonstrated political commitment to the elimination of industrially produced trans fatty acids from their food supply. Continued PASB efforts to support them in securing the adoption of PAHO/WHO best practices to achieve such elimination suggest the indicator is on track, provided that Member States' commitments translate into policy action in 2024.
Two baseline countries did not complete the assessment (BRA, DOM). These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
An advisory committee or lead agency in road safety is crucial for coordinating efforts across various sectors such as transportation, health, education, and law enforcement, ensuring a unified and strategic approach. Additionally, it is responsible for developing and implementing evidence-based policies and regulations, such as seatbelt laws, speed limits, and measures to prevent drunk driving. A lead agency also plays a vital role in the collection and analysis of data on road traffic injuries, allowing for the identification of trends and the evaluation of intervention effectiveness. Proper resource allocation and international cooperation are other areas where such an agency can have a significant impact, adopting global best practices to enhance road safety and reduce road traffic deaths and injuries.
PAHO has provided technical support to various road safety advisory committees or lead agencies in the Region, as requested, to support their efforts in road safety management. One key area of focus is the strengthening of road safety data systems. In line with this, WHO/PAHO produced the Fifth Global Road Safety Status Report to help countries identify gaps and priorities to accelerate implementation of the recommendations of the Global Plan for the Second Decade of Action for Road Safety 2021-2030. These initiatives aim to achieve the ambitious but reachable target of reducing global road mortality and serious injuries by 50%.
Two target countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Given the high prevalence of violence in the Americas, it is crucial that Member States place a strong emphasis on prevention. Preventing violence relies on the collaboration of many government sectors and non-government stakeholders. While no single institution or actor can prevent violence, it is essential that the health sector collaborate with other partners in the prevention of violence. National or multisectoral policies and plans play an essential role in defining a country’s vision, goals, policy directions, and strategies, as well as coordination mechanisms for preventing and responding to violence. The importance of a national or multisectoral plan addressing violence that includes the health system is reiterated by the Strategy and Plan of Action on Strengthening the Health System to Address Violence against Women, as well as by the multi-agency frameworks INSPIRE and RESPECT. PASB has been supporting countries in building capacity on evidence-based strategies and interventions in the Region of the Americas so as to inform the policy-making process. While many Member States report the existence of such a national or multisectoral plan, it is important to note that several of these plans are soon to expire, stressing the urgency of advancing action in this area and sustaining the progress achieved in the last decade. Partnerships with UN Women, UNICEF, and the World Bank to strengthen implementation tools and policy dialogue on INSPIRE and RESPECT in countries, as well as preparations for the forthcoming Global Ministerial Conference on Violence against Children, set the tone for this important work, which has the potential to be scaled up in the future.
One baseline country (DOM) and one target country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
The Report of the PAHO High-Level Commission on Mental Health and COVID-19 and the new Strategy for Improving Mental Health and Suicide Prevention provide the vision and the recommended actions for increased technical cooperation in MH in the Region. Several countries have started to take important actions to improve and reform their mental health systems. The recommendations of the Commission emphasize the importance of intersectoral work and integration of mental health into all areas of government to better face the long-term crisis of mental health in the Americas. In the area of suicide prevention, comprehensive strategies aligned with global best practices were developed with the support of PAHO, including the promotion of intersectoral collaboration and policy developments. For instance, PAHO helped Uruguay establish a multi-stakeholder network for suicide prevention across healthcare, education, social services, and civil society. Prioritized policy recommendations have also been formulated. Bolivia targeted action across societal, community, relationship, and individual levels based on the WHO LIVE LIFE framework.
Furthermore, 70 media professionals were trained on responsible reporting on suicide in Guyana (25), Barbados (22), and Grenada (23).
Three baseline countries (DOM, GLP, MTQ) did not complete the assessment. These 3 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
During the biennium, countries in the Region made progress in eliminating malaria or interrupting its transmission both at the national and subnational levels, as well as preventing re-establishment in malaria-free countries and receptive territories. Case investigation is being incorporated by endemic and non-endemic countries, including improvements in guidelines, instruments, and surveillance processes. These actions should integrate the efforts made so far by vertical programs with more cross-cutting epidemiologic surveillance processes and actors. Important challenges remain in this aspect of integration and in the quality of investigations. Pending improvements include the adoption of investigation in endemic territories where the small number of cases already justifies this action to accelerate elimination, as well as improvements in response. The technical cooperation that PAHO has developed in this area has been replicated with partner implementation actions, such as the RMEI initiative in Central America.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 2 baseline countries (GUY, MEX). In addition, 1 baseline country (BRA) and 1 target country (GUF) did not complete the assessment. These 4 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Despite the complexity of the Chagas disease scenario, a marked reduction in the incidence and prevalence of this parasitosis has been observed in recent decades. This decline has been sustained above all by improvements in the quality of life of affected populations, the progress achieved by national control programs, the intensification of screening and infection detection actions in blood banks, and the actions of healthcare services aimed at managing morbidity and mortality in some countries. However, the unexpected emergence of the SARS-CoV-2 virus at the end of 2019, and the subsequent measures aimed at containing it, represented a turning point for the normal functioning both of plans and programs for the prevention and control of Chagas disease and of its evaluation mechanisms, with severe knock-on effects on this set of approaches, which relies on territorial deployments of diverse configuration and purpose. The most noticeable consequences of this contingency have been:
The efforts of governments to mitigate the spread of COVID-19 meant that medical care was strictly limited for several months to urgent conditions and emergencies. This conspired against programs to diagnose, monitor, and treat Chagas disease, as evinced by the reduction of care actions for affected people, screening of pregnant women or women of reproductive age, and diagnostic confirmation, treatment, and follow-up of children born to infected mothers; all of these circumstances have partially invisible implications for health systems. The modification of health-seeking behavior by the vulnerable population (driven by fear of contagion and recommendations to stay home) was another determining factor in this regard.
Programmatic vector surveillance and control schemes were postponed due to the reassignment of health personnel to pandemic response activities and the impossibility of traveling from operating bases to the rural areas of intervention.
The financial crisis caused by the unexpected expenses required to implement COVID-19 prevention and control measures affected the regular funding of routine Chagas prevention and control programs, which are already highly expensive in relative terms.
The continuity of many international cooperation activities was compromised due to the impossibility of (or limitations on) conducting face-to-face activities.
At the end of the biennium, the activities of national Chagas programs have not managed to recover to pre-pandemic levels. All of the above means there has not been any substantial gain from baseline.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 2 baseline countries (KNA, URY). In addition, 1 baseline country (BRA) and 1 target country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 4 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
During the REDIPRA meeting held in Colombia in late 2023, significant progress was noted toward the interruption of dog-mediated human rabies transmission, following the elimination validation criteria. PAHO support – through provision of standards, generation of data, and technical cooperation – has been pivotal. Achievements include successful mass dog vaccination campaigns, enhanced public awareness, and improved surveillance systems. Many countries have reported zero human cases for multiple years; however, four countries have reported cases in the past years. Challenges remain in some countries, such as maintaining high vaccination coverage, addressing surveillance gaps, and ensuring access to post-exposure prophylaxis. Continued commitment is essential to overcome these hurdles and sustain the progress made toward eliminating canine rabies.
Honduras has made significant progress toward achieving the indicator through intersectoral coordination between health and SENASA. However, there is a need to implement mass drug administration for the control of taeniasis. In the case of Mexico, the objective is to eliminate deaths in children, morbidity in at-risk communities, and disability in children by 2030. The country has implemented important actions but needs to increase efforts in establishing baselines and evaluating surveillance activities and health promotion interventions. Colombia has incorporated PAHO/WHO recommendations for addressing and intervening in territories which meet endemicity criteria for taeniasis/cysticercosis through surveillance and mass drug administration. Paraguay and Guatemala are also on track to achieve the indicator. In 2020, Guatemala identified areas of risk for human taeniasis/cysticercosis at the departmental level. The next step is to confirm active transmission in these areas through targeted investigations and monitoring. Paraguay has made significant progress by identifying areas of risk at both national and subnational levels. The current priority is to confirm active transmission of the parasite in the identified hotspots through comprehensive field studies and diagnostics.
One baseline country (BRA) and 1 target country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Following the technical specification of the indicator, PASB recognizes that 28 countries have established capacity and effective processes to eliminate dog-mediated human rabies, showcasing significant progress in the region. PAHO contributions, including provision of standards, generation of data, and technical cooperation, have been instrumental in these achievements. Successful strategies include comprehensive dog vaccination campaigns, public awareness initiatives, and robust surveillance systems. However, several countries continue to report canine rabies, with some also reporting human cases. Lessons learned highlight the importance of sustained vaccination efforts, enhanced surveillance, and accessible post-exposure prophylaxis. Continued support and commitment are essential to address these challenges and achieve the complete elimination of dog-mediated human rabies across the region.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 1 target country (JAM). In addition, 1 baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Progress has been observed in the implementation of different WHA resolutions through legislation, national action plans, capacity-building activities, and programs addressing prioritized chemicals. However, the challenges observed in some countries highlight the need for further attention in a multisectoral environment.
One baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Progress has been observed in the context of the special initiative on SDH and health reform in some countries; e.g., in Chile, intersectoral action, social participation, and social prescription were integrated as part of the universalization of PHC. Reviews of the evidence regarding social prescription and experiences of health promotion in PHC have also been undertaken. Future technical cooperation will focus on implementing health promotion and the social determinants in primary health care.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 1 target country (BHS). In addition, 1 baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Progress has been observed regarding implementation of the Health Promoting Schools (HPS) approach. PASB has developed Regional Guidance for the Development of Health Promoting Schools that will contribute to strengthening the actions of schools in the region, incorporating the HPS approach; and has developed a course on Health Promoting Schools to strengthen the capacities of school personnel. Furthermore, lessons learned from the piloting of WHO Global Standards for Health Promoting Schools in Paraguay will be systematized and disseminated throughout the region.
One baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
From 2019 to 2023, substantial progress has been made in Information Systems for Health (IS4H) through the adoption of initiatives that have enabled countries to advance toward the targets. A key achievement has been the significant progress in implementing interoperable information systems for health that include subnational disaggregation at all levels, which is crucial for effective data-driven decision-making. Other notable accomplishments include the adoption of governance mechanisms, the use of the PASB model for maturity assessments supported by the Inter-American Development Bank and the World Bank, and the establishment of regulatory frameworks. Importantly, 17 countries and territories have adopted the Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR) and ICD-11 standards, indicating progress in electronic health records and data management. A comprehensive maturity assessment of IS4H was conducted by PASB of progress made between 2016 to 2023, using over 240 standardized indicators to evaluate national health information systems in areas such as governance, strategy, laws, financial sustainability, human resources, data quality, and IT infrastructure. Findings revealed that 42.8% of countries are at the initial maturity level, 34.7% are implementing best practices, 18.4% are standardizing and continuously improving, and only 4.1% have highly integrated systems. No country has reached the maximum maturity level, indicating ongoing challenges and areas for improvement.
Significant advances have been made toward the digital transformation of the health sector, aligned with the Global Strategy on Digital Health. A network of countries has been established to promote digital health solutions and information systems, facilitating the adoption of emerging technologies and innovative digital health solutions such as the PASB telehealth platform and digital COVID-19 vaccine certificates. The health sector's active participation in e-government initiatives reflects a broader commitment to optimizing technology infrastructure and converging current initiatives for a more efficient approach to health information management. In alignment with United Nations recommendations, notable progress has been achieved in several areas, particularly in implementing interoperable information systems for health that include subnational disaggregation. This effort has been essential in enhancing data-driven health strategies regionally. Twelve countries have improved connectivity and bandwidth, particularly in rural areas, to expand telehealth services and enhance IT infrastructure. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, 17 countries have digitalized vaccination certification processes, and seven countries are implementing the PASB All-in-ONE Telehealth Platform. Thirty-three countries and territories have demonstrated commitment to data governance and achieving high levels of data disaggregation to reduce biases in artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms. Ten countries have established national committees on health information systems, 18 countries are transitioning to ICD-11, and 12 countries are adopting the Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine (SNOMED) for semantic interoperability. Additionally, 17 countries are actively developing technological infrastructure for cross-border data exchange and interoperability. Thirteen countries are engaging in discussions on the role of AI in public health, focusing on governance, ethical aspects, and the application of AI technologies.
These initiatives reflect a broad commitment to improving health outcomes and operational efficiencies, demonstrating the importance of robust, data-informed public health strategies and policies across the Region. This indicator is a key metric for building more resilient health systems and enabling health systems to ensure that no one is left behind. Countries’ commitment to having more detailed and inclusive data supports stronger, more responsive primary health care systems that can adapt to diverse needs and challenges, ultimately promoting equitable health for all.
One baseline country (BRA) and one target country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Moving toward robust institutional capacity of the science, evidence, and applied knowledge ecosystems, evidence-informed policy and practice programs are being implemented in 15 countries, in alignment with regional initiatives and other key priorities: Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, El Salvador, Jamaica, Mexico, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Trinidad and Tobago, and Venezuela. There has also been progress as evidenced by 20 countries participating in the PAHO/WHO regional joint meeting of the Evidence-Informed Policy Network (EVIPNET) and Health Technology Assessment Network of the Americas (REDETSA), which took place in Jamaica in October 2023. The BIGG-REC database efficiently organizes over 3,500 current WHO and PAHO recommendations for easy access in four languages. Through 3 courses on the Virtual Campus, decision-makers and healthcare professionals in 28 countries received training in development of systematic reviews, evidence-based guidelines, and evidence-informed policies, engaging more than 20 000 participants. A PAHO Handbook for Adapting and Implementing Evidence-Informed Guidelines Second Edition was developed with the participation of 15 Member States and has been disseminated and used for guideline adaptation by national guideline programs.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 3 target countries (BMU, BON, KNA). In addition, 1 baseline country (BRA) and 5 target country (DOM, GUF, MTQ, GLP, CUW) did not complete the assessment. These 9 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
The number of countries that have generated and produced analytical health reports which include disaggregated data on a regular basis has increased from 5 to 17. Additionally, countries are increasingly making these reports and other health data and information more accessible both internally and externally. Improved national health information systems and advances in digital transformation have led to increased data demand and utilization. Such data increasingly include the social determinants of health and allow countries to monitor progress and gaps. PASB provided technical cooperation through ongoing capacity-building efforts in health analysis, particularly for monitoring SDG3 indicators among interdisciplinary country teams at national and subnational levels. This has been crucial to the progress achieved for OCM 21.b. An additional 13 countries are on track to achieve this indicator.
No agreement was reached for three countries and territories. PASB assessed that the criteria as detailed on the technical note for the indicator were not met, and no documentation was submitted or otherwise available at the time of the assessment.
One baseline country (BRA) and one target country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Progress has been observed in the Americas regarding the generation, circulation, and utilization of scientific and technical information, as well as the promulgation of knowledge-sharing initiatives among Members States, PASB, and stakeholders.
Overall, the impact factor of the scientific output and the number of journals increased across all Member States during the period 2022-2023, with special emphasis on medicine, public health, and related topics. The increase in implementation of open-access platforms and policies helped ensure more equitable and accessible access to scientific production in public health-related fields.
The contribution from documentation centers to regional databases such as LILACS, MedCarib, and other open-access platforms worldwide has also increased. A total of 22 countries and territories are eligible to access the Research4Life (R4L) program, and there has been an increase in the number of registered institutions, which have helped to meet the need for more equitable access to scientific and technical information and to reduce the digital divide across the Region. El Salvador became the first Member State to participate in the R4L Country Connector initiative.
Despite a slight decrease in the number of new designations and re-designations, PAHO/WHO Collaborating Centers (CC) have proven to be an important mechanism of technical cooperation. PAHO/WHO CCs support the Organization in fulfilling the mandates and priorities of the Region and globally, by developing research models and evidence-based literature and providing health analysis and methodologies. By December 2023, there were 179 CCs in the Region, distributed across 15 Member States.
Despite these advancements, persistent efforts to strengthen research systems, enhance knowledge sharing, and promote evidence-informed policies are needed. Institutionalizing knowledge, evidence, and science at the national level is essential, as is fostering integrated policies for information use and knowledge dissemination. Furthermore, capacity building and a continued focus on digital literacy are necessary to ensure that public health workers, decision-makers, researchers, and communities have access to the best scientific and technical information.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for one baseline country (GUY) and 4 target countries (CUB, ECU, JAM, MEX). In addition, one baseline country (DOM) and one target country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. These 7 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Achieving this outcome indicator involves continuously monitoring and supporting national policies and agendas for health research and promoting their alignment with the Policy on Research for Health (CD49/10) and WHO’s Strategy on Research for Health (WHA 58.34). PASB also supports countries to assess and report on financial flows for health research. This process often requires intersectoral action, because while priorities are usually set by the health sector, funding is frequently allocated by other sectors, such as science and technology.
In addition to providing direct technical cooperation, PASB has issued technical documents and a checklist to assist countries in developing a national policy or agenda on health research. PAHO also collaborates with WHO’s Global Observatory on Research for Health and Development, harmonizing indicators with those monitored by WHO, UN, UNESCO, and OECD to improve consistency and reduce the reporting burden on countries. PAHO collates this information on a public website and works with WHO, Member States, and data providers to keep the data updated.
One baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
PASB supported Member States in the development and revision of national standards governing the ethics of research, such as laws, regulations, and national policies, with the goal of ensuring that they adhere to international ethical standards for research with human participants. The COVID-19 pandemic brought increased attention to the importance of adhering to international standards to expedite the conduct of high-impact clinical trials. Furthermore, international standards for research now include specific provisions for research in emergencies (as described in PAHO’s Catalyzing Ethical Research in Emergencies: Ethics guidance, lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic and pending agenda), and PASB supported countries in including these provisions in national standards, thus improving ethics preparedness to conduct research in future emergencies. Measuring progress in this indicator has often entailed distinguishing the ethical from the strictly regulatory oversight of research with human participants.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 3 target countries (BRB, CRI, MEX). In addition, 2 target countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 5 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
To achieve this indicator, a State Party must have improved its scores or maintained them (where the score is higher than 0%), for at least 12 of the 15 core capacities, as compared to the previous year. Three countries did not comply with the State Party Self-Assessment Reporting Tool in 2021, precluding comparison with results for the past biennium. PASB is working closely with the countries to strengthen and maintain their core capacities under the IHR, which contribute directly to global health security.
Two target countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Twelve countries achieved the indicator by the end of 2023, and another 21 were on track to do so by 2025. This indicator aims to measure and track the capacity of countries and territories to respond to major epidemics and pandemics and to ensure a rapid exchange of information about impending public health threats and, as a result, to increase confidence and trust among all parties.
PASB provided technical cooperation to improve disease surveillance systems and train health workers to strengthen preparedness for epidemics and pandemics, notably by strengthening national and regional surveillance networks and implementing the Strategy on Regional Genomic Surveillance for Epidemic and Pandemic Preparedness and Response.
Eight target countries (BRA, CAN, CUW, DOM, GLP, GUF, MTQ, PRI) did not complete the assessment. These 8 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
The majority of countries and territories express satisfaction with PAHO/WHO's leading role on global and regional health issues, indicating that the Organization’s efforts and initiatives are generally perceived positively across the region. This widespread satisfaction underscores PAHO/WHO's role as a leading public health authority, engaging countries and territories in the regional and global public health agenda at the highest level – politically, strategically, and technically. Efforts will continue to ensure alignment between biennial work plans and the priorities indicated by national health authorities. This commitment involves ongoing coordination and collaboration with national health authorities to tailor PAHO/WHO's biennial work plans to address the specific health challenges and priorities identified by each country.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 1 baseline country (BHS). In addition, 1 baseline country (DOM) and 5 target countries (BRA, CUW, GLP, GUF, MTQ) did not complete the assessment. These 7 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
In addition, 2 baseline countries (BRA, DOM) and 1 target country (CUW) did not complete the assessment. These 3 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Although countries continuously work to implement the IHSDN framework, some have approved policies or regulations that reinforce IHSDNs, but require time to be implemented to achieve their objectives. Technical cooperation during the next period needs to support countries in these implementation processes.
One baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Although there has been important progress in the region, with several countries already having a national quality policy or strategy in place, there has been a regression from the baseline. Therefore, efforts must continue in other countries if the indicator is to be achieved.
Additionally, all countries face challenges in the implementation, monitoring, and assessment of these policies or strategies.
PASB aims to focus its technical cooperation on supporting countries with technical guidance and facilitating exchanges so they can learn from the experiences of other countries, particularly from successful experiences achieved during complex processes.
One baseline country (BRA) and one target country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
National data from almost all countries of the Americas exceed the threshold of four antenatal care (ANC) visits. However, few countries regularly collect and publish such data disaggregated by different aspects (age, educational level, ethnicity, rural-urban residence, among others), as required by this indicator. For this reason, the indicator is showing a lack of progress, with a regression from the baseline. It is well known that national averages mask the problems experienced by women living in the most vulnerable conditions. Therefore, to reduce maternal mortality, Member States must carry out epidemiological analyses to identify these groups and implement actions focused on them.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 1 target country (ECU). In addition, 1 target country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
This is a mixed indicator encompassing both maternal and perinatal audits. Although progress was made overall, in several countries the emphasis has been solely on maternal audits, with less attention given to perinatal audits.
The pandemic caused setbacks – including in countries that had achieved progress on this indicator – which required further attention and support from PASB. PASB remains committed to supporting countries in enhancing their perinatal audit capabilities.
All target countries have met the technical criteria for the indicator. The purpose of this indicator is to monitor the implementation of the strategic line of action of the WHO Nurturing Care Framework (NCF) related to health services for young children.
Two baseline countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Despite a regression from baseline, all sixteen countries (achieved and partially achieved) have made progress in implementing strategies to increase access to quality health services for adolescents, even though this will remain an ongoing area of work. PASB’s technical cooperation includes capacity building for a standard-driven approach to adolescent health services and training of health workers through virtual and face-to-face modalities.
One baseline country (BRA) and one target country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
This is a composite indicator based on the inclusion of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) policies, the incorporation of short oral treatment for tuberculosis (bedaquiline) into national guidelines, and the use of direct-acting antivirals (DAA) for treatment of hepatitis C. While countries have made great strides in incorporating these commodities in their national policies and guidelines, it is vital to scale up access and increase the number of people receiving PrEP, bedaquiline, and DAAs, all of which can be procured through the Strategic Fund. The technical team has been promoting the scale-up of these interventions.
Two baseline countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Major gains have been made in clinical management of arboviral diseases, especially dengue. Despite the most severe epidemic in recorded history, the case fatality rate remained under the target threshold of 0.05%. This improvement in clinical management notwithstanding, some countries have measured the achievement of this indicator as partially completed because they have not concluded a national adaptation of the Regional Guidance. As can be assessed by the low case fatality rate, the updated clinical guidance is being implemented throughout the Region. Four countries indicate that activities to update guidelines were halted during the epidemic but will resume in these countries during the 2024-2025 biennium.
One baseline country (DOM) and one target country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Six countries have fully achieved the indicator, while 2 have partially met the criteria outlined in the technical specifications. For instance, in Haiti, challenges such as political instability, civil unrest, and natural disasters have hindered the implementation of interventions like mass drug administration for lymphatic filariasis and soil-transmitted helminthiasis. Guatemala conducted a serosurvey of multiple diseases using multiplex methodology and is currently analyzing its results to inform integrated actions. The delay in analysis was due to a change in government, which impacted the project's continuity.
Two target countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
DPT vaccination coverage has been affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. PASB is working to improve coverage and reduce dropout rates to ensure that under-vaccinated individuals receive the necessary immunizations.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 2 baseline countries (GUY, NIC) and 2 target countries (BOL, CRI). In addition, 2 baseline countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 6 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
While 6 out of 8 baseline countries have met the indicator, it is important to note that efforts to assess effectiveness have shifted toward SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. Studies and analyses in this regard are ongoing.
One target country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. This 1 country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
This indicator has been only partially achieved due to the record-breaking dengue epidemic in 2023. Evaluation visits were suspended during the epidemic period and will resume in the next biennium.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 1 target country (GUY). In addition, 2 baseline countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 3 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
One baseline country (BRA) and one target country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
The mental health Gap Action Programme (mhGAP) continues to be broadly adopted across the Region to integrate evidence-based care in primary settings through non-specialist health workers.
107 MhGAP trainings were conducted in countries. 25 countries received training on the integration of MH into primary health care; 144,790 health personnel were trained. Among those countries that received training were Aruba, Saint Lucia, and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines. Increased integration of MH into primary health care can improve the continuum of care for mental health conditions. During the biennium, Belize showed an increase in mental health diagnosis at the outpatient level.
mhGAP implementation in Latin American countries showcases significant progress in key metrics, with 4,131 new trainers. For instance, Chile and Mexico have trained 5144 and 136,131 individuals respectively. Both countries have successfully integrated mhGAP into their national mental health policies. Paraguay, demonstrating notable advancement, has trained 103 individuals with 67 trainers, and successfully incorporated mhGAP into its national policy.
One target country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Several countries are initiating or expanding information and monitoring systems. For instance, Chile developed a database which tracks diagnosed cases and service referrals to analyze gaps. Similar surveillance efforts are underway in countries like Argentina.
One baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment
PASB Comments
The establishment of a single emergency care access number is crucial to streamline communication, improve response times, and enhance coordination among emergency responders. This supports Target 12 of the voluntary Global Road Safety Performance targets, which aims at ensuring that road traffic victims receive timely and effective pre-hospital care, thus improving survival rates and recovery outcomes.
The importance of having a free-to-call, single, easily recognizable, and universal (i.e., with countrywide coverage) emergency care access number cannot be overstated. This significantly enhances the effectiveness and efficiency of emergency medical services. It simplifies the process for victims and bystanders, ensuring they can quickly and easily reach the necessary emergency services without confusion or delay. This streamlined communication is essential in crisis situations, where every second counts. Furthermore, it facilitates better coordination among emergency responders, enabling them to provide timely and effective care.
Rapid access to emergency medical services is a critical component of reducing road traffic fatalities and injuries, as outlined in the Global Road Safety Performance Targets. The Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) has supported this initiative by promoting the standardization of emergency numbers across the Americas in different technical publications and by providing/incentivizing interprogrammatic technical cooperation to different countries. One example of this technical cooperation is the Emergency and Critical Care Systems Assessment (ECCSA) conducted in different countries of the Region, which has translated into the development of roadmaps to implement action priorities. ECCSA is also underway in other countries. These efforts are integral to achieving the global targets and, ultimately, saving lives.
Two baseline countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment
PASB Comments
A milestone for a strong health-system response to violence is the existence of at least one health sector protocol which provides information on services and care to be provided to survivors of violence. These protocols are critical tools to guide high-quality health service delivery. They provide standardized guidance that ensures consistency across people and settings and over time. Protocols can also be useful to guide training and professional development of health workers, as these documents often set the expectation for the health-system response to survivors of violence. Countries may have one national sector-wide violence protocol or several ones focusing on specific forms of violence, specific settings, or specific groups of survivors. PASB has developed substantial guidance for Member States with evidence-based recommendations of what should be included in such protocols. The Organization has continued to provide support to Member States in the development, review, and updating of national guidelines on violence. While a large majority of Member States now have at least one health-sector protocol on violence, which is a considerable achievement for the Region, a recent analysis by PASB stressed that more work was needed to improve the quality of these documents. The more detailed the guidance included, the easier it is for health managers to implement and for health workers to understand exactly what is required of them, improving the quality of care for survivors in all their diversity. Moreover, while the existence of a protocol and its alignment with the evidence base and related indicators is a critical milestone, it is important that these documents be implemented and supplemented by clinical handbooks, job aids, and similar reference tools, as well as by training for health workers to support them in their day-to-day interactions with survivors.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 1 target country (VEN). In addition, 1 baseline country (BRA) and 1 target country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 3 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Countries have shown significant progress in the development and implementation of national human resources for health (HRH) policies. The first objective of the Plan of Action on Human Resources for Universal Access to Health and Universal Health Coverage 2018-2023 calls for promoting the formulation and implementation of a national policy on human resources for health at the highest level and agreed through intersectoral engagement. Some countries have already developed a national HRH policy, while others have been doing so with technical support from PAHO. Additionally, the Policy on the Health Workforce 2030: Strengthening Human Resources for Health to Achieve Resilient Health Systems recommends among its priority actions the strengthening of governance and promotion of national policies and plans for HRH, which should reinforce the work of countries that are on the path to achieving this objective.
One baseline country (BRA) and one target country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Although countries are making progress in the development of interprofessional teams at the first level of care, the indicator suffered a regression from the baseline. Greater effort is required to develop standards that define their capabilities and scope. Some of the countries that are on the path to achieving the indicator have prepared technical proposals aligned with their national health reforms and are working on ways to define the capabilities and scope of practice of interprofessional teams at the first level of care. The formation of interprofessional teams at the first level of care was one of the objectives defined in the Plan of Action on Human Resources for Universal Access to Health and Universal Health Coverage 2018-2023, which helped guide countries to achieve this challenge. Additionally, the Policy on the Health Workforce 2030: Strengthening Human Resources for Health to Achieve Resilient Health Systems recommends among its priority actions strengthening the formation and integration of interprofessional teams in integrated health services networks based on primary health care, which should reinforce the work of countries that are on the path to achieving this objective.
The COVID-19 pandemic seriously impacted not only the global supply chain, but also national capacities to properly plan, purchase, and distribute essential health commodities, which in many cases led to stock-out situations. However, during the 2022-2023 biennium, progress toward integrated supply chain management of medicines and other health technologies has been achieved in all countries to some extent.
Highlights include the progress in planning and the independent use of PASB tools like QUANTMET achieved in Belize and Nicaragua, the implementation of the new model for integrated supply chain management (SCM) in Paraguay, and improved governance in Cuba. All countries implemented SCM system characterization and developed systems strengthening plans (as per the two first capacities set in this indicator), Additionally, Belize and Nicaragua are implementing an integrated LMIS/ERP profile that is working and producing quality information.
Still, most countries continued to face challenges in the governance of integrated SCM systems, with segmentation and unclear roles of the different stakeholders, as well as lack of standardized documentation for management of the supply chain down to health facilities and services.
One baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Chile, Cuba, El Salvador, Paraguay, and the United States of America maintained baseline status and have successfully implemented national antimicrobial consumption monitoring systems based on data from sales volumes. They have additionally designed different strategies that allow them to enforce the regulation of antibiotic sales only under prescription. PASB continues to support countries in these two areas.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 1 baseline country (JAM). In addition, 1 baseline country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
While monitoring and evaluation remains a challenge for health systems, there has been significant progress, supported by PASB. For example, a dashboard on primary health care indicators has directly contributed to progress on this output. Five countries have achieved this indicator and five others have partially achieved it, highlighting considerable progress in the development of mechanisms for monitoring and evaluation. Countries that achieved this target applied the monitoring framework for universal health, and those that have partially achieved it continue with strategies to develop the necessary mechanisms to do so. Relevant obstacles preventing the expansion of monitoring and evaluation of progress toward universal health include issues related to data availability and technical capacity at the national level.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 1 target country (CHL). This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Efforts have been made toward health financing for universal health in the region. Seven countries made partial progress in this indicator, for example, Mexico and Bahamas, in which some reforms and strategies toward the expansion of coverage using health insurance schemes have shown progress.
One baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
There has been progress in developing and increasing countries’ capacity to produce health accounts (HA). Countries like Bolivia, Guatemala, and Peru have been making efforts to institutionalize this by producing new HA studies and new classifications. Peru had stopped producing official estimates in 2020 but has resumed the process and is now reporting to the WHO Global Health Expenditure Database (GHED). In terms of data collection, the WHO survey on the institutionalization of HA 2024 will provide new attributes to assess the capacity of countries to produce HA.
Two baseline countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
During the biennium, countries conducted comprehensive communications campaigns to support AMR awareness efforts. These campaigns utilized various channels including webinars, social media, radio spots, and infographics with targeted messages. Events such as World Hand Hygiene Day and World Antimicrobial Awareness Week (WAAW) served as platforms to amplify these campaigns, with WAAW messages garnering 34,538 views. Moreover, the “Communities Empowered to Tackle AMR” platform was launched, fostering open and diverse dialogue, sharing best practices, and promoting community engagement under National Action Plans (NAPs) for AMR. This initiative was nominated and selected as a UN best practice in South-South cooperation for development.
Two baseline countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
During the biennium, countries strengthened their Infection Prevention and Control (IPC) programs, including their capacity to respond to multidrug-resistant organism outbreaks in healthcare facilities. PASB directed efforts toward supporting countries to consolidate their IPC and antimicrobial stewardship programs to enhance the effectiveness of local interventions. Countries also strengthened the coordination between National Reference Labs and national IPC programs for rapid detection and response to emerging resistant mechanisms.
One baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Throughout the biennium, countries continued the formalization of multisectoral AMR committees to ensure that AMR National Action Plans receive proper funding for sustainability of key AMR activities. As per TrACCS 2023, 90% of countries in the region have formalized AMR multisectoral committees for the implementation of their AMR National Action Plans.
Two baseline countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Throughout the biennium, countries across the region started shifting from reporting AMR aggregated surveillance data to isolate-level data, which allows for a more in-depth assessment of social determinants of AMR and development of more targeted equitable interventions. ReLAVRA+ provided technical guidance and support for countries to strengthen and harmonize their capacities in phenotypic and genotypic characterization and implementation of new technologies for characterization of carbapenemases. Within the ReLAVRA+ framework, the network has implemented the protocol for Candida surveillance, to which 18 countries have adhered; of these, 8 have provided data: Argentina, Colombia, Costa Rica, Guatemala, Panama, Peru, Paraguay, and Uruguay.
One baseline country (DOM) and one target country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
PASB supported the implementation of the ENGAGE-TB approach by mapping civil society organizations that can be involved, facilitating meetings between Ministries, CSs, and other stakeholders, and providing technical assistance to the Global Fund's multi-country regional grant focused on strengthening CSs and their participation in the response. However, legal and structural barriers to meaningful civil society participation in the response have been identified, including that the primary care model has not been fully implemented and community participation is not well established.
Paraguay and Honduras have made partial progress in implementing the integrated approach for the elimination of neglected infectious diseases with the WASH (Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene) strategy. To fully achieve this indicator, PASB will work with these countries to finalize their work plans and conduct necessary training sessions.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 5 target countries (BHS, BRB, DMA, GUY, VEN). In addition, 1 baseline country (BRA) and 1 target country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 7 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Significant progress has been made in enabling countries to implement interventions against zoonotic diseases using a One Health approach. Many countries have achieved this indicator through enhanced intersectoral coordination, effective surveillance, prevention, and control measures. PAHO has been crucial in providing standards, producing data, and offering technical cooperation. Achievements include the establishment of national policies and integrated strategies. However, several countries still need to improve intersectoral coordination and fully implement One Health policies. Continued efforts are necessary to strengthen these areas, ensuring comprehensive and effective responses to zoonotic disease threats and preventing transmission from animals to humans.
One baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Countries continue to make significant efforts to improve surveillance and control of Chagas disease. However, countries that partially achieved or did not achieve the indicator will need to intensify efforts to reach the target.
One baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
In collaboration with the OAS, PASB has facilitated the adoption of an Inter-American program of work involving Ministries of Health and Ministries of Education to work collaboratively to improve physical activity in schools throughout the Americas. Brazil organized an International Conference on Physical Activity in Public Health, Chile is piloting the WHO toolkit to promote physical activity in schools, Colombia organized a meeting of the Colombian Physical Activity Network and the Network of Recreative Cycling Pathways in the Americas, Costa Rica organized a forum on physical activity and health, and the Dominican Republic is developing a national physical activity plan.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 1 target country (CRI). In addition, 1 baseline country (BRA) and 1 target country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 3 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
PASB’s continued efforts to support Member States have been successful in advancing policy processes from an agenda-setting stage to policy discussion, formulation, adoption, and/or implementation. The work needs to be further intensified in the Caribbean and in Central America, while sustaining the achievements of those countries that have already adopted and/or started implementing fiscal and regulatory policies to curb the obesity and NCDs epidemics.
One baseline country (BRA) and one target country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Through a series of policy dialogues held in 2020 and 2021, PASB is collaborating with the OAS on school-based interventions under the framework of the Inter-American Education Agenda.
In October 2022, PASB and OAS launched the Inter-American Plan on healthy food and physical activity policies in school environments, with the participation of high-level officials appointed by the Ministries of Education and Health of approximately 26 countries. The objectives of the Inter-American Plan include sharing experiences to advance the framework of action and public policies in the countries; promote South-South cooperation, technical assistance, and capacity building; and develop lessons learned and regional guidance on school environments for healthy eating, nutrition, and physical activity.
One baseline country (BRA) and one target country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
PASB continuous efforts to support Member States has been successful in advancing labeling provisions to reduce the demand for and offer of products excessive in saturated fats and trans fats. However, the support for adoption of PAHO/WHO best practices to eliminate industrially produced trans fats needs to be intensified particularly in the Caribbean and in Central America.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 2 baseline countries (COL, MEX). In addition, 2 baseline countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 4 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
PASB supports countries in the development of policies and implementation of measures supportive of maternal, infant, and young child nutrition, including breastfeeding policies and infant and young child policies. These are guided by the Global Strategy for Infant and Young Child Feeding, the Comprehensive Implementation Plan on Maternal, Infant, and Young Child Nutrition, and other relevant guidance documents. PASB also supports initiatives such as the Baby-friendly Hospital Initiative (BFHI) and the implementation of food-based dietary guidelines.
Two baseline countries (BRA, DOM) and 1 target country (GUF) did not complete the assessment. These 3 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
PASB supports Member States in the development and implementation of national policies and plans to achieve the global nutrition targets, including the reduction of stunting. PASB has developed a roadmap to guide member states in responding to all forms of malnutrition using a food and nutrition systems approach. PAHO is also part of the UN High-Level Regional Task Force to follow up on the UN Food Systems Summit of September 2021, and PAHO supports the transformation of food systems, putting health at the center.
Two baseline countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
In the Americas, violence intersects with complex trends – such as social, economic and gender inequality, migration, social and intergenerational change, organized crime, and others – which cannot be addressed in isolation. Integrated responses that actively engage different sectors and stakeholders are fundamental to ensuring the sustainability of investments. However, the involvement of diverse actors and perspectives can increase the risk of duplication and misalignment of activities. As a result, multisectoral coordination mechanisms play a key role in setting joint priorities and aligning agendas, coordinating actors, mobilizing human and financial resources, and uniting all stakeholders around the common goal of ending violence. PASB has worked with partners to strengthen the capacity for multisectoral dialogue and collaboration in countries in line with INSPIRE and RESPECT, including through multisectoral training workshops. While a substantial number of countries report having a national multisectoral coalition/task force in place to prevent and respond to violence, these mechanisms are not always set up to cover all forms of violence, thus potentially reducing their impact. Moreover, countries report challenges to keeping these mechanisms operational, which underscores the importance of strengthening access to technical support, capacity building, and other resources in future.
Two baseline countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Mental Health plans and policies have advanced in the Region, with Saint Marteen and Guyana developing new plans. The Ministry of Health in Honduras delivered the National Mental Health Policy to the National Secretariat of Strategic Planning. Several countries strengthened legal frameworks and oversight mechanisms to uphold the rights of people with MH conditions. Paraguay now requires judicial review before involuntary hospitalization. Saint Lucia implemented care consent policies and Grenada mandated appeal processes for treatment decisions. Antigua and Barbuda, Barbados, Grenada, Jamaica, and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines continue to advance in the review of their mental health legislation as a key step toward reforming mental health services. Of note, Grenada designated 2023 as the year of mental health and, for the first time, the country has appointed a national MH Coordinator and allocated funding specifically to MH.
Two baseline countries (BRA, DOM) and 1 target country (GUF) did not complete the assessment. These 3 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Despite significant progress in implementing changes toward malaria elimination in the E2025 countries, major implementation challenges persist in these areas, especially in the countries with the highest disease burden and dispersion. In addition to the structural weaknesses of the health systems in endemic areas, financial challenges, and the aftermath of COVID-19, social factors such as gold mining, migration, and social conflicts have limited the implementation of changes by the countries; nevertheless, significant progress was made. PASB support included developing guidelines and technical tools, as well as promoting changes that were replicated by strategic partners such as the RMEI initiative. Focal pockets of transmission in a limited number of territories continue to be a factor in favor of elimination, insufficiently leveraged by decision-makers to implement high-impact interventions with the necessary structural improvements in specific locations, which would have a major impact on the national situation. Preventing the re-establishment of transmission at the subnational level is another strategy facing significant implementation challenges in the coming years.
Two baseline countries (BRA, DOM) and 1 target country (CUW) did not complete the assessment. These 3 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
As of 31 December 2023, 27 baseline countries achieved this output indicator and two partially achieved it. This assessment was conducted based on the information entered by the countries through eJRF.
One baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, Peru, Paraguay, Suriname, and Uruguay have maintained their FMD-free status, while Guyana has achieved such status. Information on countries’ FMD-free status is available on the World Organization for Animal Health website (https://www.woah.org/en/disease/foot-and-mouth-disease/#ui-id-2). It is also important to highlight that the most recent FMD outbreak recorded in the Americas was in Colombia in 2018, and the current PHEFA action plan covers the period from 2021 to 2025.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 1 target country (GTM). In addition, 2 target countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 3 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
During the 30th Pan American Sanitary Conference, Member States approved Resolution CSP30.R13, through which they committed to formulating and implementing a polio risk mitigation plan considering the context, needs, vulnerabilities, and priorities of each country. PASB has provided technical guidance to countries on expanding capacities at the national and subnational surveillance system levels to support acute flaccid paralysis (AFP) case detection, reporting, and investigation; institutional active case finding of AFP; strengthening laboratory capacities for poliovirus characterization and sequencing; and the availability of related supplies and equipment for poliovirus detection and confirmation.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 1 target country (DMA). This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Two South American countries that are targeted for 2023 have achieved this output. Caribbean countries are all at risk due to failure in achieving the reporting rate of at least 2 suspected cases by 100,000 population and at least 3 of 5 surveillance indicators.
One baseline country (BRA) and 1 target country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Twenty-five countries have successfully implemented plans of action for the prevention, prophylaxis, surveillance, control, and elimination of dog-mediated human rabies. PAHO has made significant contributions by providing standards, data, and technical cooperation. Achievements include comprehensive vaccination campaigns, improved surveillance systems, and effective public awareness programs. However, several countries still need to enhance their national capacities, as canine rabies cases persist, posing a continued risk for human rabies transmission. Lessons learned highlight the importance of sustained efforts in vaccination, surveillance, and access to post-exposure prophylaxis. Ongoing support is essential to strengthen these capacities and achieve the complete elimination of dog-mediated rabies.
One baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Overall, countries have been working on different aspects of chemicals management, including participation in capacity-building activities, using appropriate guidance documents, and reflecting global chemicals policies in national planning, especially regarding regulations and programs, although competing interests within and outside the health sector remain a challenge.
The region has made significant progress in providing access to clean household energy for cooking, thereby reducing exposure to harmful air pollutants. According to WHO, during 2019 and 2021, more than 1.9 million people in the region secured access to clean energies and technologies for cooking. PASB technical cooperation has been pivotal in achieving this progress. PASB has implemented innovative tools from WHO, such as the Household Energy Assessment Rapid Tool (HEART), in Panama, Peru, and Paraguay. Additionally, PASB has piloted the newly developed BAR-HAP tool to estimate health benefits from these energy transitions in Panama and initiated working groups in Peru, El Salvador, and Nicaragua for similar efforts. The Organization has delivered expert training sessions on air quality, household energy and health, and use of assessment tools. The Bureau has also conducted outreach and awareness activities to build capacities within the health workforce to understand the connections between health, household energy, and air pollution. This work is integrated into the PAHO Elimination Initiative.
Two baseline countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Countries have been working toward strengthening healthy settings. Annual reporting on progress in schools, housing, markets, workplaces, or universities has been limited. Nevertheless, advances shown in policy documents, progress reports on health promotion, and publications have been taken into account for this indicator. PASB supports the achievement of this indicator by developing documents such as the Health Promoting Schools guidance, conducting webinars on housing, and participating in and disseminating the Health Promoting Universities Network.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 1 baseline country (COL). In addition, 1 baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Through the Special Initiative for Action on the Social Determinants of Health for Advancing Health Equity, PASB has supported the creation, strengthening, and work of Intersectoral Commissions on Equity and Social Determinants in several sub-national governments in Chile, Colombia, Peru, and Costa Rica. At the local level, these efforts have translated into the establishment of intersectoral models of action in 16 pathfinder municipalities, benefiting 968 000 people. Likewise, the invigoration of the Healthy Municipalities, Cities and Communities Movement, with 42 active members across 12 countries, has involved the development of guidelines to strengthen local governments’ commitment to set up intersectoral mechanisms to improve health, wellbeing, and health equity.
One baseline country (BRA) and one target country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
From 2019 to 2023, initiatives for improving information systems for health (IS4H) have driven significant advances toward set targets. These efforts have focused on improving governance mechanisms, maturity assessments, regulatory frameworks, and health information architecture, and they have achieved substantial progress in enhancing data-driven health strategies regionally. The establishment of monitoring and evaluation frameworks, interinstitutional committees, and national policies for electronic health records with open data has been crucial. Significant advances include the adoption of governance mechanisms by several countries and territories, exceeding the target; use of the PASB model for maturity assessment with financial and technical support from the Inter-American Development Bank and the World Bank; and the establishment of regulatory frameworks and health information architecture by numerous countries and territories. Initiatives in data management and information technologies include the adoption of Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR) and ICD-11 standards by 17 countries and territories, as well as progress in electronic health records implementation, moving toward a more unified and efficient health data management model. Additionally, engagement with academic and professional communities and networks has strengthened health analysis and knowledge management, while innovations such as the PASB telehealth platform indicate a shift toward a more integrated approach for the co-creation of health-focused digital public goods. These advances reflect broad progress toward robust, data-informed public health strategies and policies, demonstrating an important commitment to improving health outcomes and operational efficiencies within all Member States.
Two baseline countries (BRA, DOM) and four target countries (CUW, GLP, GUF, MTQ) did not complete the assessment. These 6 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
A comprehensive maturity assessment of IS4H was conducted by PASB of progress made between 2016 and 2023. Using over 240 standardized indicators, the evaluation assessed national health information systems with respect to governance, strategy, laws, financial sustainability, human resources, data management, and quality, including vital statistics, analysis capabilities, information flows, project management, and information technology (IT) infrastructure. Information for the assessment was gathered through country visits, expert consultations, database and gap analyses, and reviews of policies, procedures, and technical documentation. Site visits allowed for direct observation of information platform use and interoperability, especially in primary care, and for data collection and interviews with frontline administrative and clinical staff.
A comprehensive report on the regional IS4H maturity assessment will be published in late 2024; however, the assessment found that 42.8% of the countries are still at level 1, “building awareness.” These countries are characterized by early adoption of health information systems, with mostly analogue data and a growing recognition of the need for digitalization. With very limited capacity to generate data and assure its quality, including on health indicators whose data source relies on civil registration and vital statistics, they depend largely on international organizations in this regard. Investments in digital health have often not expanded infrastructure as expected due to gaps in access to electricity and connectivity, as well as a lack of long-term planning and sustainable financing.
A third of the countries, 34.7%, have reached level 2, “implementing best practices.” They are developing their health information systems with data from various sources and managing health information effectively. However, they face challenges such as incomplete development of indicators, insufficient data exchange, and limited implementation of data standards and public health communication strategies. Another 18.4% have reached level 3, “standardization and continuous improvement,” reflecting advances in IS4H policies and strategies and the use of high-quality data for decision-making. Only 4.1% of countries are at level 4, “integration and alignment,” marked by highly integrated information systems that are aligned with national and international standards.
No country in the Region has reached level 5, the maximum maturity level in IS4H, which entails complete deployment of all components of the model and a constant search for innovation.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 1 baseline country (JAM). In addition, 1 baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Member States have made notable progress in implementing national strategies and plans for digital transformation, as well as the roadmap for the digital transformation of the health sector in the Region, which is fully aligned with the Global Strategy on Digital Health. A network of countries was established to promote the adoption of digital health solutions and information systems, resulting in new models and digital public goods that facilitate this transformation. Additionally, the health sector’s active participation in e-government initiatives reflects a broader commitment to optimizing technology infrastructure and converging current initiatives for a more efficient and integrated approach to health information management. Highlights of this strategic line of action include adoption of emerging technologies for personalized patient care, partnerships with financial, technical, and academic institutions for increased use of technology, and piloting of innovative digital health solutions like the PASB telehealth platform and digital COVID-19 vaccine certificates.
Progress has been made in the following areas:
a. Universal connectivity: Twelve countries have strengthened information systems and digital health strategies to enhance connectivity and bandwidth. Most of these initiatives mainly target rural areas to bridge the digital divide and expand telehealth services at the first level of care. Actions have included investing in information technology infrastructure to ensure reliable internet access and bandwidth for ensuring teleconsultations. Additionally, Member States have focused on training health care workers in these areas to efficiently use digital tools, enhancing the quality of telehealth services and patient engagement.
b. Digital public goods: In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, 17 countries have made significant progress in digitalizing vaccination certification processes. Digitalization includes creating secure, accessible digital platforms for issuing and verifying COVID-19 vaccination certificates. This not only streamlines the process but also helps combat the production of fraudulent vaccination certificates. Seven countries are implementing the PASB All-in-ONE Telehealth Platform at the first level of care.
c. Inclusive digital health: Thirty-three countries and territories engaged in discussions on the importance of data for equity and committed to reinforcing data governance mechanisms across the health sector, aiming to achieve the highest and smartest possible level of data disaggregation. Additionally, Member States reached consensus on the importance of maintaining high-quality data to reduce or eliminate biases in artificial intelligence algorithms, ensuring that these technologies serve all segments of the population fairly and effectively.
d. Interoperability: Ten countries have established national committees on health information systems for standardization; 18 countries are transitioning from ICD-10 to ICD-11. Fourteen of them are from the Caribbean and are making significant progress not only in the adoption of the ICD-11, but also its integration with electronic health record platforms. Twelve countries are adopting the Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine Clinical Terms (SNOMED) for semantic interoperability, an important factor for ensuring convergence and coordination between SNOMED and ICD-11. Seventeen countries are actively participating in the development of technological infrastructure for cross-border data exchange and interoperability.
e. Artificial intelligence: Thirteen countries have actively engaged in discussions on the role of artificial intelligence (AI) in public health. These discussions sought to assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on integrating AI into the digitalization of health care services and examining current advances in this field, share knowledge and identify needs concerning governance and ethical aspects of AI, understand the crucial elements of effectively applying AI and other subfields of AI such as machine learning and natural-language processing (including the use of generative AI solutions in public health), and present the PAHO and WHO action framework for AI application in public health. These ongoing efforts are fully integrated with current actions related to the digital transformation of the health sector in the Region.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 1 baseline country (JAM). In addition, 2 baseline countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 3 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
To enhance the capacity of science and evidence ecosystems, evidence-informed policy programs are being implemented in 15 countries in alignment with regional initiatives. This progress is highlighted by the participation of 20 countries in the PAHO/WHO joint meeting of the Evidence-Informed Policy Network (EVIPNET) and Health Technology Assessment Network of the Americas (REDETSA), which took place in Jamaica in October 2023. The BIGG-REC database organizes over 3,500 WHO and PAHO recommendations in four languages. Through the Virtual Campus, over 20 000 decision-makers and healthcare professionals from 28 countries received training in systematic reviews, evidence-based guidelines, and policies. The PAHO Handbook for Adapting and Implementing Evidence-Informed Guidelines (Second Edition) was developed with input from 15 Member States and is in use by national guideline programs.
Two baseline countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Progress has been observed in the Americas regarding the generation, circulation, and utilization of scientific and technical information, as well as the promulgation of knowledge-sharing initiatives among Members States, PASB, and stakeholders.
Overall, the impact factor of the scientific output and the number of scientific journals increased across all Member States during the period 2022-2023, with special emphasis on medicine, public health, and related topics. The publication of an average of 904 titles of scientific journals in medicine and related fields across 19 Member States demonstrates that there has been strong implementation of open-access platforms and policies, helping ensure more equitable and accessible access to scientific production in public health-related fields.
The contribution from documentation centers to LILACS reached 45 291 new documents and a total of 657 indexed scientific journals. The MedCarib database, which focuses on scientific and technical production in the Caribbean, also showed an increase in new contributions during the period. A total of 22 countries and territories are eligible to access the Research4Life (R4L) program, with 1,414 institutions registered. El Salvador became the first Member State to participate in the R4L Country Connector initiative.
By December 2023, there were 179 PAHO/WHO Collaborating Centers (CCs) distributed across 15 Member States in the Region. Two CCs (in Cuba and Brazil) are focused on knowledge management and scientific communication. PAHO/WHO CCs support the Organization in fulfilling the mandates and priorities of the Region and globally, by developing research models and evidence-based literature and providing health analysis and methodologies, among other roles.
Despite these advancements, persistent efforts to strengthen research systems, enhance knowledge sharing, and promote evidence-informed policies are needed. Institutionalizing knowledge, evidence, and science at the national level is essential, as is fostering integrated policies for information use and knowledge dissemination. Furthermore, capacity building and a continued focus on digital literacy are necessary to ensure that public health workers, decision-makers, researchers, and communities have access to the best scientific and technical information.
One baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
All 7 baseline countries kept their baseline status for the generation and dissemination of reports on Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 3 indicators, disaggregated by relevant stratifiers. Additionally, countries are increasingly making these reports and other health data and information more accessible both internally and externally. Improved national health information systems and advances in digital transformation have led to increased data demand and utilization. Such data increasingly include the social determinants of health and allow countries to monitor progress and gaps. PASB provided technical cooperation through ongoing capacity-building efforts in health analysis, particularly for monitoring SDG3 indicators among interdisciplinary country teams at national and subnational levels.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 2 target countries (GUY, JAM). In addition, 1 target country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 3 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
PASB provided direct technical cooperation with an integrated approach to the development of policies and agendas, seeking inputs from stakeholders and experts in research policy and management, ethics, legislation, and other areas. It has also issued technical documents and a checklist to assist countries in developing a national policy or agenda on health research. PASB actively monitors the development of national research priorities and policies through its technical support and reports received from countries and internal sources.
Given the continuous evolution of policies and priorities as governments and conditions change, sustained team efforts involving country and regional entities within PASB are required. Some countries experienced delays in issuing their policies (e.g., some were approved after December 31, 2023) or have policy documents approved but lacking funding for implementation.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 1 target country (GTM). This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Reporting financial flows for research is a cumbersome task that requires intersectoral collaboration and coordination, especially in countries where funding and priorities are set by different sectors and entities. PAHO has worked closely with WHO’s Global Observatory on Research for Health and Development and its Governing Bodies to reduce the burden of reporting financial flows for research, a meaningful SDG indicator that is measured with support from UNESCO, OECD, RICyT, and other partners.
PASB has coordinated with these counterparts and countries to incentivize reporting and updating of these indicators at least every 10 years, sending reminders to countries. PAHO and WHO are exploring dynamics and capacity building to improve intersectoral collaboration, aiming to implement training in the next biennium to facilitate reporting and intersectoral dialogue.
Thirteen countries have updated reports in WHO’s Global Observatory, according to PAHO and the Global Observatory’s SDG Indicator 9.5.1.
Two baseline countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
As per the IHR (2005), all 35 State Parties are mandated to report annually on the status of their core capacities through the State Party Self-Assessment Reporting Tool (SPAR). Compliance with this requirement demonstrates transparency and accountability among Member States and the Secretariat. PASB has supported multisectoral discussions to comply with the SPAR by developing guidance documents for the 15 core capacities, as well as country profiles using the SPAR indicators for the period 2010-2022.
Two baseline countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
In the 2022-2023 biennium, significant strides were made in health sector risk management, with 23 countries conducting national and/or subnational risk assessments to update their response plans. PASB supported this by implementing the "Emergency Risk Management in Health and Disasters" virtual course. This course trained 1,466 healthcare professionals, including 17 facilitators, on risk assessments, preparedness evaluation, and multi-threat response planning using methodologies like STAR, EDHPI, and the Multi-Threat Response Framework.
One baseline country (BRA) and one target country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
This indicator measures the degree of institutionalization and sustainability of essential public health functions that are relevant for application, implementation, and compliance with the IHR. Therefore, this result reflects the challenges most countries face in sustaining the level of financial investment needed to maintain surveillance and response capacities.
Two baseline countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Significant progress was made in the 2022-2023 biennium; 37 countries have full-time personnel dedicated to health emergencies. Training played a crucial role, with 5,682 health professionals certified in Health Facility Assessment, totaling 14 767 certified individuals. Additionally, the “Emergency Risk Management in Health and Disasters” virtual course trained 1,466 health professionals, including 17 facilitator trainers.
One baseline country (DOM) and one target country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
In the 2022-2023 biennium, progress was made in enhancing the resilience and safety of healthcare facilities across the Caribbean and South America through the Resilient Hospitals Initiative. This initiative focused on the strengthening of SMART Hospitals to fortify health facilities against health emergencies and disasters, which 24 countries have launched, promoting safety, sustainability, inclusivity, and adaptability within health facilities. Technical support was instrumental in helping Caribbean countries integrate SMART standards, with notable achievements such as the evaluation of 10 facilities for A70 standards in Barbados and the modernization of eight health centers in Belize. Continuous efforts in monitoring, resource allocation, and addressing data gaps remain essential if the 2025 targets for safe and resilient healthcare infrastructure are to be met.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 1 baseline country (BHS). In addition, 2 baseline countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 3 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Surveillance and early detection systems continue to be strengthened in the region. Training activities, lab quality assessments, and reviews of lessons learned have allowed improvement of this indicator’s performance in countries.
One baseline country (BRA) and one target country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
The Public Health Emergency of International Concern associated with COVID-19 demonstrated the solidarity expressed by Member States in responding to health emergencies. All national public health laboratories received training, technology transfer, and essential supplies in a timely manner. In parallel, laboratory guidelines were shared with countries, and re-certification of the laboratory personnel on the regulations for the transport of infectious substances and associated materials was reactivated in the Region.
The cholera epidemic in Hispaniola still poses a threat to the Region. Training of laboratory personnel in early detection, case confirmation, and molecular characterization of pandemic V. cholerae O:1 strains was provided.
The new strategy for genomic surveillance of epidemic- and pandemic-prone pathogens has started to be implemented at the regional level. This instrument represents added value for decision makers during outbreak investigations. Challenges remain to harmonize knowledge, technologies, and Standard Operating Procedures within public health laboratory networks.
Four baseline countries (BRA, DOM, GLP, MTQ) did not complete the assessment. These 4 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
The surveillance system for influenza and other respiratory viruses is highly robust. This system was strengthened during the COVID-19 pandemic and laid the foundation for the integration of COVID-19 surveillance in the region in 87% of countries. Within the countries that partially achieved the indicator, work continues to improve the frequency of epidemiological reporting.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 2 target countries (BHS, JAM). In addition, 2 target countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 4 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Progress has been made in most countries. However, target countries continue to show either no progress or partial achievement. PASB will redouble its efforts to examine the health equity approach in key strategic programs, policies, and plans, with particular emphasis on those countries which did not complete the assessment.
Two target countries (BRA, DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Progress has been made in many countries; however, some continue to show either no progress or partial achievement. PASB will continue to provide support to integration of gender approaches in key strategic programs, policies, and plans, with an emphasis on countries that did not complete the assessment.
One baseline country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. This country was not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
Major advances have been made in the region in line with the implementation of the Strategy and Plan of Action on Ethnicity and Health 2019-2025; however, challenges remain. PASB will intensify its efforts to ensure culturally adequate approaches are taken when addressing the health needs of the diverse ethnic groups in the region.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 2 target countries (BRB, VEN). In addition, 1 baseline country (DOM) did not complete the assessment. These 3 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.
PASB Comments
PASB has provided technical support and promoted the right to health and other health-related rights, supporting legislative processes at national levels, including capacity building with relevant stakeholders on a variety of issues, including healthy nutrition (front-of-package nutrition labeling, trans fats and sodium, breast milk substitutes), mental health, violence (police and armed forces), LGBT+, persons with disabilities (review of a course for NGOs prepared in PAN), and elimination of diseases among persons deprived of liberty, as well as inter-programmatic work, mapping and analysis of legislation, regulations, and policies across the 33 Member States of the Region, including systematization and analysis of relevant judicial decisions, national/international human rights standards, and intellectual property discussions. Regarding lessons learned and challenges, data collection is generally a challenge, especially when it requires coordination with other authorities and branches of government (legislative and judiciary). Even if the human rights approach is sometimes politically present, inclusion of human rights norms/principles/standards in national legislation, policies, plans, programs, and mechanisms is not always reflected in operational and preventive terms. Therefore, capacities on health-related human rights perspectives and approaches should be strengthened systematically and continuously at the national level.
There was no consensus on the assessment results for 1 baseline country (ECU). In addition, 1 target country (BRA) did not complete the assessment. These 2 countries were not counted towards the overall indicator assessment.